UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant
    Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

required

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials

Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

0-11


 

LOGO

Goldman Sachs

 (1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

LOGO
 (2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value Proxy Statement

2024

Annual Meeting

of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Shareholders

 

 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.

 (1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 (2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


LOGO

Goldman Sachs The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Annual Meeting of Shareholders Proxy Statement 2021


THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.—NOTICE OF 20212024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

 

 

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

200 West Street, New York, New York 10282

Notice of 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

ITEMS OF BUSINESSItems of Business

 

Item 1.Election to our Board of Directors of the 1211 director nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement as further described herein

 

Item 2.An advisory vote to approve executive compensation (Say on Pay)

 

Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)

Item 4. Ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 20212024

 

Items 5–8. 4-12.Consideration of certain shareholder proposals, if properly presented by each shareholder proponent

 

  Transaction of such other business as may properly come before our 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

  

 

  TIMETime

 

 

8:30 a.m., New YorkSalt Lake City time

Date

Wednesday, April 24, 2024

 

  

  DATE

Place

 

 

Thursday, April 29, 2021Goldman Sachs office

 

  ACCESS

 

Our Annual Meeting can be accessed virtuallylocated at:www.

virtualshareholdermeeting.com/

GS2021

 

 
222 South Main Street
14th Floor
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions

 

 

 

  RECORD DATE       March 1, 2021Record Date

The close of business on the record date February 26, 2024 is when it iswas determined which of our shareholders are entitled to vote at our 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or any adjournments or postponements thereof

Your vote is important to us. Please exercise your shareholder right to vote.

In light of ongoing considerations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the safety of all of our people, including our shareholders, and taking into account applicable federal, state and local guidance, we have determined that our 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. Shareholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions (both before, and for a designated portion of, the meeting) from any location via the Internet. For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Beverly L. O’TooleJamie Greenberg

Assistant Secretary

March 19, 202115, 2024

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for our Annual Meeting to be held on April 29, 2021. 24, 2024. Our Proxy Statement, 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders and other materials are available on our website at www.gs.com/proxymaterials. By March 19, 2021,15, 2024, we will have sent to certain of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice). The Notice includes instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders and how to vote online. Shareholders who do not receive the Notice will continue to receive either a paper or an electronic copy of our proxy materials, which will be sent on or about March 23, 2021.19, 2024. For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions.

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | GOLDMAN SACHSGoldman Sachs  


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Table of Contents

 

Letter from our Chairman and CEO

 ii

Letter from our Lead Director

 iii

Executive Summary

 1

20212024 Annual Meeting Information

  1 

Matters to be Voted on at our 20212024 Annual Meeting

  1 

Strategy and Performance Highlights

  2 

Compensation Highlights

  5 

2021 Stock Incentive PlanCorporate Governance Highlights

  6 

Corporate Governance

8

Corporate Governance HighlightsBest Practices

  7
Corporate Governance98 

Corporate Governance Snapshot

9

Item 1. Election of Directors

  109 

Our Directors

  109 

Independence of Directors

  1817 

Structure of our Board and Governance Practices

  1918 

Our Board Committees

  1918 

Board and Committee Evaluations

20

Board Leadership Structure

  21 

Board Leadership Structure

22

Year-Round Review of Board Composition &
Board Leadership Succession Planning

23

Director Education

  24 

Director EducationCommitment of our Board

  2524 

Commitment of our Board

25

Board Oversight of our Firm

  2726 

Key Areas of Board Oversight

  2726 

Stakeholder Engagement

 31

Spotlight on Sustainability

 32

Compensation Matters

 35

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

  35 

20202023 Annual NEO Compensation Determinations

  35 

How Ourour Compensation Committee Makes Decisions

  36 

Overview of Annual Compensation Elements
and
Key Pay Practices

  4142 

20202023 Annual Compensation

  43 

Equity-Based Annual Variable Compensation Elements—A More Detailed LookCompensation: PSUs

49

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

  50 

GS GivesEquity-Based Long-Term Incentive: Shareholder Value Creation Awards

  5351 

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

52

GS Gives

55

Executive Compensation

  5456 

20202023 Summary Compensation Table

54

2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

  56 

2020 Outstanding Equity2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards at Fiscal Year-End

56

2020 Stock Vested

57

2020 Pension Benefits

57

2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

  58 

2023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

58

Potential Payments Upon Termination
or Change in Control2023 Stock Vested

  59 

2023 Pension Benefits

60

2023 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

60

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

61

Compensation Committee Report

  6265 

Item 2. An Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)

  6365 

2023 Say on Pay Vote

66

Pay Ratio Disclosure

  6466 

Non-Employee Pay Versus Performance Disclosure

67

Director Compensation Program

  6570 

Audit Matters

73

Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated SIP (2021)

68
Audit Matters76

Item 4. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20212024

  7673 

Assessment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

73

Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

74

Report of our Audit Committee

  7875 

Items 5-8.4-12. Shareholder Proposals

 7976

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 9197

Beneficial Ownership

 95100

Additional Information

 98103

Frequently Asked Questions

 100105
Annex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures and Other Information A-1

Annex B: Additional Details on Director Independence

 B-1

Annex C: The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)Directions to our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 C-1
 

 

This Proxy Statement includes forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts, but instead represent only our beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Forward-looking statements include statements about our business and expense savings initiatives, and interest expense savings, the effectiveness of our management of our human capital, including our diversity goals, and may relate to, among other things, our future plans and results, including our target ROE, ROTE, efficiency ratio and CET1 ratio, and how they can be achieved, and various legal proceedings or governmental investigations. It is possible that the firm’s actual results, including the incremental revenues and savings, if any, from such initiatives, and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results, financial condition and incremental revenues and savings indicated in these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of some of the risks and important factors that could affect our future results and financial condition, see “Risk Factors” in Goldman Sachs’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. Statements about Goldman Sachs’ business and expense savings initiatives are subject to the risk that our businesses may be unable to generate additional incremental revenues or reduce expenses consistent with current expectations.

 

This Proxy Statement includes forward-looking statements. These statements are not historical facts, but instead represent only our beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our businesses, such as trends in or growth opportunities for such businesses, expense savings initiatives, interest expense savings, funding strategies and durability of earnings as well as the effectiveness of our management of our human capital, including our aspirational diversity goals, and may relate to, among other things, our future plans and results, including the narrowing of our consumer business and our target ROE, ROTE, efficiency ratio and CET1 ratio, and how they can be achieved, and goals relating to our sustainability initiatives, among other things. It is possible that the firm’s actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results, financial condition and incremental revenues and savings, funding strategies or increased durability in earnings, among other things, indicated in these forward-looking statements. Statements about Goldman Sachs’ businesses, savings and other initiatives are subject to the risk that our businesses may be unable to generate additional incremental revenues or reduce expenses consistent with current expectations. For a discussion of some of the risks and important factors that could affect our future results and financial condition, see “Risk Factors” in Goldman Sachs’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

 

References to our website or other links to our publications or other information are provided for the convenience of our shareholders. None of the information or data included on our websites or accessible at these links is incorporated into, and will not be deemed to be a part of, this Proxy Statement or any of our other filings with the SEC.

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | GOLDMAN SACHSGoldman Sachs  

i


LETTER FROM OUR CHAIRMAN AND CEO

 

 

Letter from our Chairman and CEO

Letter from our Chairman and CEO

March 15, 2024

LOGO

Goldman Sachs

March 19, 2021

Fellow Shareholders:Shareholders,

I am pleased to invite you to attend the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., which will be held virtually on Thursday,Wednesday, April 29, 202124, 2024 at 8:30 a.m., New Yorklocal time, as described herein.at our office in Salt Lake City, Utah. Enclosed you will find a notice setting forth the items we expect to address during the meeting, a letterletters from our retiring and incoming Lead Director,Directors, our Proxy Statement, a form of proxy and a copy of our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders. Your vote is important to us: evenus. Even if you do not plan to attend the meeting, we hope your votes will be represented.

Our Board has nominated Jessica Uhl, CFODespite a challenging environment, 2023 was a year of Royal Dutch Shell plc,execution for election byGoldman Sachs. In addition to narrowing our shareholders at this Annual Meeting, as describedstrategic focus, we strengthened our core businesses. As you can read about in more detail in this Proxy Statement. Ourthe 2023 letter to shareholders in our Annual Report, because of the decisions we made, I believe the firm is well positioned for 2024.

As the 2024 Annual Meeting approaches, I wanted to take a moment to express our sincerest gratitude and acknowledge the extraordinary service Adebayo Ogunlesi has provided to our Board is pleasedsince joining as a director in 2012. Over the course of a decade, Bayo has exemplified excellence in his role as our Lead Director. His commitment, integrity, intelligence and dedication to havehis fellow Board members has left an indelible mark on all of us, and above all, Bayo has shown unwavering commitment to stewarding the interests of our shareholders. Bayo’s insightful advice has guided our decision-making processes and fostered an environment of growth and progress. He has also challenged us, pushing us to strive for a candidatebetter level of Jessica’s caliberachievement collectively and to not lose sight of lessons learned.

I also want to take a moment to thank Jessica Uhl, who will further enhancebe retiring from the diversity of skillsBoard at the Annual Meeting. Jessica has had a great impact during her tenure, with an unwavering focus on financial and experience represented on our Board. We believe she is well-positioned to provide advicenonfinancial risk management and insightcontrols. She has also provided valued guidance and informed counsel across a broad spectrumwide breadth of topics, from strategic developmenttopics. I want to congratulate her in particular on her new role as President of GE Vernova.

On behalf of the management of climate risk. If elected byentire Board and our shareholders, we extend our gratitude to both Bayo and Jessica will joinfor the exceptional contributions they have each made to our Board and its Audit, Riskour firm. We wish them both every happiness, fulfillment and Governance Committeessuccess in July,the future.

Lastly, I want to congratulate David Viniar on his appointment by our independent directors as our new Lead Director and weI look forward to welcoming herour continued work together.

We look forward to the Boardengaging with our shareholders at that time.

In our 2020 letter to shareholders, which is included in the Annual Report, we discuss how our people overcame immense challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic to deliver strong results. We lay out the progress we made on our three-year financial targets, as well as our other growth initiatives. And we explain how we were able to grow our core businesses, diversify our products and services, and achieve significant operating expense savings by staying true to our Core Values and putting our clients first.

Meeting. I would like to personally thank you for your continued support of Goldman Sachs as we continue to invest together in the future of this firm. We look forward to engaging with our shareholders at our Annual Meeting.

 

LOGO

LOGODavid Solomon

David M. Solomon

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

OUR PURPOSE

To advance sustainable economic growth and financial opportunity

OUR CORE VALUES

 

Our Purpose

Partnership

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity and excellence.

  

Our Core Values

 

IntegrityOur purpose comes to life through our four Core Values:

Partnership

   

Client Service

 

Integrity

Excellence

Client Service

   Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs   

Excellence

Our Core Values have endured for over 150 years, driven by a spirit of partnership

LOGO

ii
PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS        ii


LETTER FROM OUR LEAD DIRECTOR

 

 

Letter from our Lead Director

Letter from our Lead Director

LOGO

Goldman Sachs

March 19, 2021

ToMarch 15, 2024

Our Shareholders,

With our 2024 Annual Meeting approaching, I write to you what will be my fellow shareholders,

It is my privilegelast letter as your Lead Director, to once again reflectreflecting upon the last year and to share directlysharing with you my observations on some of the most critical aspectshighlights of the work of our Board and Committees.

Our Board

As announced in January 2024, I will be retiring from the Board at the 2024 Annual Meeting. First and foremost, I want to say that it has been my distinct honor and privilege to have served alongside the distinguished group of directors on our Board since 2012 and to have served this venerable firm and its shareholders as your Lead Director for the past decade. I am particularly grateful for the many opportunities I have had to engage with you, our shareholders. My retirement is a bittersweet event for me personally. I have full confidence in our Board and in the firm’s forward strategy and am excited about the future of the firm. Please know that I will be cheering enthusiastically from the sidelines and expect to be a client of the firm.

I am pleased to pass the torch to David Viniar, who will assume the roles of Lead Director and Chair of the Governance Committee on April 24. David, who joined the Board in January 2013, has exhibited steadfast dedication to the Board and its oversight obligations — including, where necessary, the duty to challenge management — and has unparalleled knowledge about our business and industry that I know will serve him, our Board and our firm well as he takes on these new roles.

As you will see detailed in the Proxy Statement, there have been some other changes to the Board over the past year.

When I wroteyear, including the July 2023 appointment of Thomas Montag to our Board. Tom brings to the Board extensive financial services experience and deep risk acumen, and we have already benefited from his wise counsel across a wide range of topics. As previously announced, Tom will assume the role of Chair of our Risk Committee, succeeding David Viniar, and the Board looks forward to his informed perspective as he takes on this new leadership role. In addition, as previously reported to you, in March 2020, we had only begun to scratchApril 2023, Kimberley Harris became the surface of the multifaceted challenges and complexities that 2020 would bring, from the unprecedented public health crisis and the devastating economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, to the focus on racial equity and injustice in the U.S. and other countries around the world, among many others.

Goldman Sachs navigated this unprecedented operating environment very well, as David Solomon, joined by the senior leaders and all the people of Goldman Sachs, responded proactively, drawing upon the firm’s Core Values and culture to prioritize the health and safetyChair of our people and deliver unparalleled service to clients and customers. The firm also continued to emphasize its long-standing priority of making investments in our communities, from ongoing support of its 10,000 Small Businesses initiatives, including the commitment in response to the COVID-19 pandemic of up to $1.25 billion in emergency lending capital to Community Development Financial Institutions and other mission-driven lenders, and the establishment of a COVID-19 Relief Fund that contributed over $40 million to support relief efforts around the world, to the creation of a $10 million Fund for Racial Equity, which builds upon the firm’s practice of making grants in minority communities and to minority-owned businessesCompensation Committee. Kim has done an incredible job over the past two decades.year in this role, drawing upon her cross-disciplinary perspective and public policy and regulatory expertise garnered from her range of experiences acting as a trusted advisor to senior leaders in both the public and private sectors.

EachI also want to recognize Jessica Uhl, who will not be standing for re-election at the upcoming Annual Meeting. Jessica has been a dedicated director over the last several years, with an astute focus on risk management and controls and informed financial acumen. On behalf of these actions allowedour entire Board, I want to thank Jessica for her dedicated service and counsel, and wish her every continued success, including in her new role as President of GE Vernova.

These changes are reflective of our Board’s broad and diverse mix of skills and experiences and a result of our ongoing reviews of Board composition, which include regular reviews of director skill sets, individual director evaluations, robust re-nomination assessments and board leadership succession planning considerations. These processes help to ensure that we have the right membership, strong independent leadership and sound governance, so that we can effectively carry out our responsibilities as stewards of your interests as shareholders, and respond swiftly to changing circumstances.

Reflections on 2023

2023 was once again an active year for our Board and our firm, to deliver strong performance in 2020 and early success in executingcharacterized by swift execution on the firm’s long-term growth strategy.

In times of challengenarrowed strategic focus. As was discussed during the strategic update provided in January 2024, management’s decisive actions, led by David Solomon, John Waldron and change, our role as a Board in providing independent guidance and oversight to management andDenis Coleman, have provided the firm is more critical than ever as we seek to fulfill our fundamental role as stewards of shareholder interest, working to bring long-term value to our shareholderswith a stronger platform for 2024 and serve the interests of our other stakeholders. As you would expect, ourbeyond.

Our Board was highly engaged actively with senior management ason these strategic changes and we support the firm navigatedfirm’s clear and simplified forward strategy. Our obligation to advise and guide the COVID-19 environment,senior management team on such issues as how to best support our people and deliver the firm for our clients and other stakeholders while managing our risks and protecting the safety and soundness of our firm.

Providing oversight of management’s development, ongoing refinement and execution of itsthe firm’s strategy and growth initiatives will never be off our agenda, and we will continue to hold management accountable for providing you with ongoing transparency about our strategic plans is core to our Board’s duties,path.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

iii


LETTER FROM OUR LEAD DIRECTOR

To this end, during 2023, over the course of 78 Board and throughoutCommittee meetings, and significant engagement beyond the year we engagedboardroom (including over 200 engagements by the 2023 Committee Chairs and myself), directors met with David, John Waldron and Stephen ScherrDenis — as well as with the broader management and other key leaderscontrol teams and employees across the firm on our businessesthe key drivers and strategy. The importance of the strategy that senior management laid out at last year’s Investor Dayrisks relating to enhance and build the durability of the firm’s returns has been reinforced by the events of the past year, and the Board and management continue our focus on sound risk management in the execution of ourthe narrowed strategic plan.focus and other important priorities on firmwide, regional and business levels.

Management also continued itsOur strategic objectives underscore the firm’s relentless commitment to make the necessary investments,serving our clients with excellence and further strengthening our leading client franchise. I know our Board will not only inlose sight of our businessesobligation to — and technology, but in the firm’s people. During 2020 we engaged withwill hold management on the importance of the firm’s people strategy, including our continued progress on diversity and inclusion, as well as the firm’s larger goals around attracting talent, supporting our people, sustaining our culture and broadening our impact.

Sustainability is centralaccountable for — continuing to ourdrive long-term success — it is top of mindvalue for you, our shareholders, as well asshareholders. Doing so requires prudent management of capital, liquidity, and financial and nonfinancial risks, and ongoing investment in our risk and control capabilities, each of which have been and will continue to be areas of focus for our people, our clients and our communities. To this end, our Board continues to focus on firm’s sustainable finance commitments to advance climate transition and inclusive growth, which is integrated across the work of our Board and its Committees.

In carrying outContinued investment in our work,culture and Core Values and dedication to our people are also prerequisites to our continued success. We remain steadfast in our focus on core considerations, such as attracting and retaining the best talent, the development of the firm’s “next generation” of leaders, the strength, depth and diversity of our leadership bench, further progress toward achieving our sustainable finance targets, and reinvesting in and strengthening our culture, such as through our cultural stewardship and connection programs.

On behalf of the entire Board, met actively throughout 2020, with 74 BoardI am grateful for your investment and committee meetings, and for me, as Lead Director, over 100 additional meetings, calls and engagements withyour ongoing support. During 2023, I had the firm and its people, our shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders, including meetingsprivilege of engaging with shareholders representing over 25% of our shares outstanding.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS        iii


LETTER FROM OUR LEAD DIRECTOR

Asoutstanding; this engagement is a Board, we also continue to focus on enhancingcritical input which informs our own diversity of perspectives and backgrounds.work. Our Board is pleased to nominate for election Jessica Uhl, CFO of Royal Dutch Shell plc. If elected at our Annual Meeting, Jessica will join our Board and its Audit, Risk and Governance Committees in July 2021. As further detailed in this Proxy Statement, we nominated Jessica because we believe she will bring important experience to our Board, from financial management and complex risk management to leadership, operations and sustainability, and will further enhance the bench strength of our Audit and Risk Committees. We looklooks forward to Jessica’s contributions to our Board.

I also want to address the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) matter. Ascontinued engagement with you are aware, during 2020, the firm resolved government and regulatory matters relating to 1MDB, which allows us to put the uncertainty of these investigations behind us and concentrate on self-reflection and lessons learned. As a Board, we have been focused on these matters for many years, both with respect to oversight of the progress of these investigations as well as oversight of the myriad of compliance and control improvements that have been made at the firm since the time of the 1MDB transactions that enhance the firm’s focus on putting reputational risk at the center of its decision-making.

As we said in our October 2020 statement, we as a Board view the 1MDB matter as an institutional failure, inconsistent with the high expectations we have for the firm. We will continue to be focused on ensuring the proper controls and oversight are in place. We appreciate management’s commitment to be self-critical and we will continue to hold them accountable for doing so, including through our 1MDB Remediation Special Committee, which will provide added oversight to the remediation efforts arising out of the lessons of 1MDB, including an emphasis on business ethics.

Importantly, while none of the past or current members of senior management were involved in or aware of the firm’s participation in any illicit activity at the time the firm arranged the 1MDB bond transactions, our Board determined that it is appropriate in light of the findings of the government and regulatory investigations and the magnitude of the total 1MDB settlement that compensation for certain past and current members of senior management be impacted. To this end, as previously announced and as you will see described further in this Proxy Statement, we reduced the 2020 compensation that would otherwise have been paid to the Executive Leadership Team.

On behalf of our Board, I want to thank you for your ongoing support of both our Board and the firm. We know that this year has brought a multitude of challenges for our shareholders, clients and other stakeholders. We value your investment and our ongoing engagement, which is invaluable to me and informs the work of our entire Board. Stay safe and healthy, and I look forward to continuing our dialogue in the year to come.

 

LOGO

LOGOAdebayo Ogunlesi

Adebayo O. Ogunlesi

Retiring Independent Lead Director

Dear Shareholders,

It has been my great privilege to have prepared over the last few months to assume the role of your Lead Director. Bayo leaves big shoes to fill, having set the gold standard for what it means to be a Lead Director. His contributions are truly too numerous to detail, and I am grateful to have benefited from his wisdom during the transition period.

Our Board has enumerated a robust set of responsibilities that come with the title of Lead Director. It is my honor to step into this role and I am committed to upholding — and, as needed, enhancing — the various best practices of independent leadership, including an annual Lead Director letter, robust stakeholder engagement and holding management accountable for driving long-term value for you, our shareholders.

I am looking forward to working with my esteemed Board colleagues in this new capacity, and engaging with you over the coming year.

 

   LOGO

David Viniar

Incoming Independent Lead Director

iv

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—20212024 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION

 

 

Executive Summary

This summary highlights information from our Proxy Statement for the 20212024 Annual Meeting. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. Please refer to our glossary in Frequently Asked Questionson page 100105 for definitions of some of the terms and acronyms we use.

20212024 Annual Meeting Information

 

  

DATE AND TIMEDate, Time

and Place

 

8:30 a.m., New YorkSalt Lake City time
Thursday,

Wednesday, April 29, 202124, 2024

Goldman Sachs office located at:

222 South Main Street, 14th Floor

Salt Lake City, Utah 84101

  

ACCESS*Record Date

 

Our Annual Meeting can be accessed virtually at: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021 To participate (e.g., submit questions and/or vote), you will need the control number provided on your proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice. If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest, but you will not be able to participate.February 26, 2024

RECORD DATEAdmission

 

March 1, 2021Photo identification and proof of ownership as of the record date are required to attend our Annual Meeting.

*

Webcast

In light of ongoing considerations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the safety of all of our people, including our shareholders, and taking into account applicable federal, state and local guidance, we have determined that our 2021Our Annual Meeting will also be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-person meeting. At our virtual Annual Meeting, shareholdersavailable through an audio webcast, which will be ableaccessible to attend, vote and submit questions by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021. Shareholders may also submit questions in advance of the Annual Meetingpublic at www.proxyvote.comwww.gs.com/proxymaterials. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting by one of the methods described in these proxy materials. For more information, see Frequently Asked Questions.

For additional information about our Annual Meeting, see Frequently Asked Questions.

Matters to be Voted on at our 20212024 Annual Meeting

 

 
  BOARD
  RECOMMENDATION  
  PAGE   Board
 Recommendation 

Item 1. Election of Directors

 FOR each director10

Other Management Proposals

 

Item 2. An Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)

 FOR63

Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)

FOR68

Item 4. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20212024

 FOR76

Shareholder Proposals

 

Item 4. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Policy for an Independent Chair

Requests that the Board adopt a policy to require that the chair of the Board be an independent director

 AGAINST

Item 5. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consenta Transparency in Lobbying Report

Requests that the Board undertake stepsannual report disclosing various policies, procedures and expenditures relating to permit shareholder action without a meeting by written consentlobbying

 AGAINST79

Item 6. Shareholder Proposal Regarding aOutcome Report on the EffectsEfforts Regarding Protected Classes of the Use of Mandatory ArbitrationEmployees

Requests that the Board oversee the preparation of a publicannual report on the impacteffectiveness and outcomes of the use of mandatory arbitration on our employeesefforts to prevent harassment and workplace culturediscrimination

 AGAINST82

Item 7. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Conversion to a Public Benefit CorporationEnvironmental Justice Impact Assessment

Requests that the Board approve an amendment to the company’s Restated Certificateassessment and report on environmental justice impacts of Incorporation to become a Public Benefit Corporation pursuant to Delaware lawenergy and power sector financing and
underwriting

 AGAINST85

Item 8. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Racial Equity AuditDisclosure of Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio

Requests that the Board oversee a racial equity audit analyzing the firm’s impacts on nonwhite stakeholders and communitiesannual disclosure of color“Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio”

 AGAINST

Item 9. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a GSAM Proxy Voting Review

Requests a review of Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s 2023 voting record and policies regarding diversity and
climate change

 88 AGAINST

Item 10. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on Financial Statement Assumptions Regarding Climate Change

Requests an audited report assessing how the findings of the Energy Policy Research Foundation impact financial
statement assumptions on climate change matters

 AGAINST

Item 11. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Reporting

Requests annual report on unadjusted and adjusted pay gaps across race and gender

 AGAINST

Item 12. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Director Election Resignation Bylaw

Requests Board adoption of a director election resignation bylaw

 AGAINST

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

1


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—STRATEGY AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

 

Strategy and Performance Highlights

We encourage you to read the following Strategy and Performance Highlights as background to this Proxy Statement.

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity and excellence.

 

 

The firm delivered strong performance in 2020, successfully navigating an unexpectedGoldman Sachs is a preeminent global investment bank and volatile operating backdrop to meet the needs of clients — driving the firm’s highest full-year net revenues in more than a decade —leader across asset and delivering solid early progress in executing all three pillars of thewealth management; our firm’s strategic goals.

2020 Performance — Financial Highlightsobjectives underscore our relentless commitment to serve our clients with excellence and to further strengthen our client franchise. 2023 was a year of strategic execution for our firm. We swiftly executed on several important actions that narrowed our forward strategy. In addition, we further strengthened our core businesses. Our achievements in 2023, coupled with our clear and simplified strategy, give us a much stronger platform for 2024.

 

  NET REVENUES  
  $44.6 BILLION  

 

 

 

 Highest full-year net revenues since 2009 

 

 

 

      
ROE  ROTE(a)  EPS      Standardized     
11.1%  11.8%  $24.74  CET1 Ratio
(+390 basis points  (+410 basis points  (+$9.51 Ex. Litigation)  14.7%
Ex. Litigation) 

 

 Ex. Litigation) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      
Pre-Tax Earnings  Efficiency Ratio  1-Year TSR          BVPS Growth        
$12.5 billion  65.0%  17.5%  8.1%
  (-760 basis points    Year-Over-Year

 

 

 

 Ex. Litigation) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our Strategic Objectives

Solid Early Progress in Executing onOur Culture and Leading Client Franchise are the Foundation of our Focused Strategy — Committed to our Medium-

Harness One Goldman Sachs

to Serve our Clients

with Excellence

Run World-Class,

Differentiated, Durable

Businesses

Invest to Operate at Scale

Two World-Class and Long-Term TargetsInterconnected Franchises

  Global Banking & Markets

  Asset & Wealth Management

     LOGO

  #1 Global Investment Bank(a)

     LOGO

  Leading Global Active Asset Manager(b)

     LOGO

  #1 Equities franchise(a)

     LOGO

  Top 5 Alternative Asset Manager(b)

     LOGO

  #3 Fixed Income, Currency and Commodities (FICC)

  franchise(a)

     LOGO

     LOGO

  Premier Ultra High Net Worth franchise

  Scaled and integrated platform

     LOGO

  Trusted Advisor of Choice

(a)

Based on cumulative publicly disclosed Investment Banking, FICC and Equities revenues from 2020-2023. Applicable peers are MS, JPM, BAC, C, BARC, DB, UBS and CS (through FY22).

(b)

Rankings as of 4Q23. Peer data compiled from publicly available company filings, earnings releases and supplements, and websites, as well as eVestment databases and Morningstar Direct. GS total Alternatives investments of $485 billion as of 4Q23 includes $295 billion of Alternative assets under supervision (AUS) and $190 billion of non-fee-earning Alternatives assets.

2

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—STRATEGY AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

LOGO

STRATEGIC DIRECTION MEDIUM-TERM FINANCIAL TARGETS(b) 2020 PROGRESS Grow and Strengthen Existing Businesses PROFITABILITY >13% ROE >14% ROTE 11.1% ROE (+390 basis points Ex. Litigation) 11.8% ROTE(a) (+410 basis points Ex. Litigation) Higher Wallet Share across Broader Client Set FUNDING OPTIMIZATION $100 billion in deposit growth $1.0 billion in revenues $70 billion raised across channels Limited interest expense savings due to rate environment Diversify our Products and Services EFFICIENCY AND EXPENSES ~60% efficiency ratio $1.3 billion expense plan 65.0% efficiency ratio (-760 basis points Ex. Litigation) Achieved approximately half of $1.3 billion expense plan More Durable Earnings Operate More Efficiently CAPITAL 13-13.5% standardized CET1 ratio Well-positioned with CET1 ratio of 14.7% Sold or announced sale of $4 billion of gross equity investments Higher Margins and Returns

Solid Progress on Execution Priorities in 2023

 

(a)

 Global Banking & Markets

 Asset & Wealth Management

  Strengthened client franchise

  #1 M&A, #1 Equity Capital
 Markets, #2 High-Yield Debt
(a)

  Top 3 with 117 of the Top
 150 FICC & Equities clients in
 1H23 vs. 77 in 2019
(b)

Increased financing revenues in   FICC and Equities

  Record financing revenues
 of $7.8 billion in 2023

  Compound annual
 growth rate of 15%
 from 2019-2023

  Grew more durable revenues

  Record Management and
 other fees of $9.5 billion in
 2023, up 8% year-over-year
 (YoY); Alternatives
 management and other fees
 of $2.1 billion in 2023,
 up 15% YoY

  Record Private banking and
 lending revenues of $2.6
 billion in 2023, up 5% YoY

  Reduced historical principal

  investments(c) and

  surpassed fundraising target

  Historical principal
investment reduction of
$13 billion during the year to
$16 billion
(c)

  Surpassed Alternatives
fundraising target of
$225 billion

(a)

Dealogic – January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. Equity capital markets refers to Equity & Equity-related Offerings.

(b)

Top 150 client list and rankings compiled by GS through Client Ranking I Scorecard I Feedback and I or Coalition Greenwich 1H23 and FY19 Institutional Client Analytics ranking.

(c)

Historical principal investments include consolidated investment entities and other legacy investments the firm intends to exit over the medium term (medium term refers to a three to five year time horizon from year-end 2022).

  Strong Execution on Narrowed Strategic Focus

LOGO

  Sale of substantially
  all of the Marcus

  loan portfolio

LOGO

  Sale of Personal

  Financial

  Management

  business

LOGO

  Announced sale

  of GreenSky

LOGO

  Agreement with General

  Motors regarding a process
  to transition card program

2023 Financial Performance

Net Revenues

$46.3

billion

EPS

$22.87

(+$8.04 Ex. Selected Items and

FDIC Special Assessment Fee)(a)

ROE

7.5%

(+2.6 percentage points

Ex. Selected Items and FDIC

Special Assessment Fee)(a)

ROTE(b)

8.1%

Pre-Tax Earnings

$10.7

billion

(+$3.4 billion Ex. Selected

Items and FDIC Special

Assessment Fee)(a)

BVPS Growth

3.3%

YoY

Standardized CET1

Capital Ratio

14.4%

Efficiency Ratio

74.6%

1-Year TSR

15.9%

Dividend

$2.75

10% YoY increase in the

quarterly dividend

(a)

Represents the impact from selected items that the firm has sold or is selling related to the firm’s narrowing of its ambitions in consumer-related activities and related to Asset & Wealth Management, including its transition to a less capital-intensive business, as well as the firm’s recognition of the FDIC special assessment fee. For additional information about these items, please see Annex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures and Other Information.

(b)

For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the corresponding GAAP measure, please see Annex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures. Measures and Other Information.

 

(b)

Medium-term refers to three-year time horizon from December 31, 2019.  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

2 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

3


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—STRATEGY AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Key Business Highlights and Progress Towards Investor Day Goals in 2020

INVESTMENT BANKING

GLOBAL MARKETS

Net Revenues: $9.4 billion

Net Revenues: $21.2 billion

#1 in M&A and Equity Underwriting(a)

Highest Global Markets net revenues since 2010

  Ranked #1 in worldwide announced and completed mergers and acquisitions and #1 in worldwide equity and equity-related offerings for the year

  Expanded coverage by ~2,700 corporates since 2017, generated over $800 million in revenue from client footprint expansion(b)

  Formally launched Transaction Banking platform: generated ~$135 million in net revenues; ~225 clients, 3 partnerships and $29 billion in deposits as of 2020 year-end

  #2 in FICC and Equities globally(c)

  Top 3 position with 64 of the Top 100 clients(d)

  120 basis points of wallet share gain year-over-year(c)

  Achieved ~$400 million of expense efficiencies; ~$1.25 billion of capital reallocated to accretive opportunities

ASSET MANAGEMENT

CONSUMER & WEALTH MANAGEMENT

Net Revenues: $8.0 billion

Net Revenues: $6.0 billion

Record firmwide assets under supervision (AUS)

$2.1 trillion of firmwide AUS; $286 billion of firmwide AUS growth

  Significant growth in third-party alternatives: ~$40 billion of gross commitments across corporate equity, private credit, real estate and multi-asset

  Optimized capital: sold or announced sale of $4 billion of gross equity investments, with a related $2 billion expected reduction in required capital

  Hired over 100 client-facing professionals(e) for ultra-high-net-worth business globally; $17 billion of AUS net inflows with total client assets(f) exceeding $1 trillion

  Expanded high-net-worth platform: over 4,000 client referrals(g); 33 corporates added – serving ~55% of Fortune 100

  Continued to scale digital consumer banking: increased consumer deposits to $97 billion as of 2020 year-end; prudently increased loan balances in context of operating environment

(a)  Source: Dealogic — January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.

(b)  Americas and Europe, Middle East and Africa advisory, underwriting and derivatives net revenues from footprint expansion clients accrued in 2020.

(c)  Source: McKinsey institutional client analytics for 3Q20 YTD. Analysis excludes captive wallets.

(d)  Sources: Client Ranking / Scorecard / Feedback and/or McKinsey revenue ranking (data as of 1H20 or 3Q20, as applicable).

(e)  Includes advisors, content specialists and client service specialists.

(f)   Total client assets includes AUS, brokerage assets and consumer deposits.

(g)  Represents bi-lateral referrals between Private Wealth Management and Personal Financial Management (PFM) and eligible corporate employees referred to PFM.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS3


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—STRATEGY AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

 

PERFORMANCE IN CONTEXT – COVID-19 CRISIS AND 2020 OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
OUR BOARDOUR PEOPLE

  Met frequently in 2020, with full Board meetings increasing from 12 in 2019 to 23 in 2020 due to the 2020 operating environmentExecuting on a Focused Set of Strategic Priorities

In narrowing our strategic focus, our leadership team spent a significant amount of time in 2023 realigning the firm’s priorities with our strategic vision, our values and our strengths. Our execution focus areas for 2024 are aligned with our strategic objectives, and will help drive us towards our key desired outcomes.

 

Received regular postings both during and outside of meetings on the firm’s financial position and management of financial and non-financial risks generated by the COVID-19 pandemic, including relating to the safety of our people

  Reviewed how the COVID-19 pandemic and related market stress were impacting our strategic plan

PSU thresholds unchanged (for 2020 compensation and prior year awards)LOGO

  

  Adopted a “People First” approach to managing the firm through the pandemic, focused on supporting our people and their families through a variety of initiatives, including:

 

»  A quick transition in Spring 2020

Harness

One Goldman Sachs

to work-from-home, deploying new technologies and provisioning ~11,000 work kits toServe our employees to ensure a smooth transitionClients

with Excellence

 

»  A flexible, gradual “return to office” approach focused on safety and supported by employee testing

Run World-Class,

Differentiated, Durable

Businesses

 

»  Offerings to allow our people to meet family responsibilities, including a new 10-day COVID-19- specific leave of absence program and expanded access to back-up child care

 

  ContinuedInvest to engage in open dialogue on race and racial equity, leveraging our established initiatives and taking new actions to enhance our diversity and inclusion efforts

OUR CLIENTS

Significant client focus and engagement during the pandemic by our Executive Leadership Team. For example, our CEO David Solomon hosted 13 group client engagements and made 35 external conference appearances, as well as held over 145 one-on-one engagements across 125 clients between March and December 2020

  As in prior periods of market disruption, during 2020 we saw clients come to us seeking complex risk intermediation, financing, advice and thought leadership, and we are proud to have deployed client-centric advice and solutions for our clients across the breadth of our businesses

  Provided uninterrupted service to our Marcus customers throughout the pandemic with simple and transparent assistance programs to support them

OUR COMMUNITIES

  Continued our longstanding support of small businesses through our 10,000 Small Businesses initiative, from our small business resource center to 10,000 Small Businesses Voices. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we committed up to $1.25 billion in emergency lending capital to Community Development Financial Institutions and other mission-driven lenders, and through partnerships with organizations such as the National Urban League and the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce to ensure that both capital and information reach minority-owned businesses. We have also renewed our long-standing commitment to 10,000 Small Businesses with an additional $250 million to fund the next generation of our 10,000Small Businessesprogram

Established the COVID-19 relief fund and contributed over $40 million to support relief efforts around the world, with significant funds designated toward supporting communities of color

  Building upon more than $200 million of grants in minority communities and to minority-owned businesses over the past two decades, in 2020 we created the Fund for Racial Equity to support the vital work of leading nonprofits that are addressing racial injustice, structural inequity and economic disparity, which has committed $10 million from GS Gives in addition to matching employee contributions to recipient organizations

  Launched the firm’s first-ever virtual volunteering campaign, shifting our over 20-year Community TeamWorks program online to allow employees to directly support individuals and communities disproportionately impacted by the pandemic with over 8,000 volunteers participating in over 430 projects with over 200 nonprofit partners globallyOperate at Scale

 

4

LOGO

     GOLDMAN SACHS    |  

Enhance Client Experience

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Grow More Durable

Revenue Streams

 

Achieve Agility, Scale, Efficiency

and Engineering Excellence

Grow Wallet Share

 

Invest in People & Culture

 

Optimize Resource Allocation

Drive Investment Performance

 

Maintain and Strengthen Focus

on Risk Management

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

LOGO

Trusted Advisor

to our Clients

Employer

of Choice

Mid-teens Returns

Through-the-Cycle

Strong Total

Shareholder Return

Strategic objectives Harness One Goldman Sachs to Serve our Clients with Excellence Run World-Class, Differentiated, Durable Businesses Invest to Operate at Scale 2024 Execution Focus Areas Enhance Client Experience Grow More Durable Revenue Streams Achieve Agility, Scale, Efficiency and Engineering Excellence Grow Wallet Share Invest in People & Culture Optimize Resource Allocation Drive Investment Performance Maintain and Strengthen Focus on Risk Management Driving Towards Key Outcomes Trusted Advisor to our Clients Employerof Choice Mid-teens Returns Through-the-Cycle Strong Total Shareholder Return

4

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

 

Compensation Highlights (see Compensation Matters, beginning on page 35)

Highlights of our 2020Our Compensation Committee’s 2023 annual compensation program and Compensation Committee decisions for our NEOs are described below. It is important that you review our CD&A and compensation-related tables in this Proxy Statement for a complete understanding of our compensation program and 20202023 annual compensation decisions.

 

2020 COMPENSATION ($ IN MILLIONS)
     
OUR NEOS INITIAL
  DETERMINATION  
 BOARD 1MDB
REDUCTION*
  FINAL   

YEAR-END

EQUITY-BASED AWARDS**

     

David M. Solomon, Chairman and CEO

 27.5  (10.0)          17.5   10.85 (100% PSUs)
     

John E. Waldron, President and COO

 25.5  (7.0)          18.5     9.99 (100% PSUs)
     

Stephen M. Scherr, CFO

 22.5  (7.0)          15.5     8.19 (100% PSUs)
     

John F.W. Rogers, EVP

 12.5  N/A         12.5     6.60 (50% PSUs, 50% RSUs)
     

Karen P. Seymour, Former EVP & General Counsel***

 10.0  N/A         10.0     5.10 (50% PSUs, 50% RSUs)

*

Reflects the Board’s previously announced determination related to 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) to reduce 2020Our compensation by $10 million for Mr. Solomonprogram reflects our pay-for-performance culture and by $7 million for each of Messrs. Waldron and Scherr. For more information, see Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2020 Compensation.incentivizes long-term

shareholder alignment without undue emphasis on shorter-term results.

 

**

Equity amount at grant; PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics (absolute and relative ROE).

***

Ms. Seymour retired as EVP and General Counsel on March 15, 2021.

2020 COMPENSATION REFLECTS
Strong financial performance and steady progress towards
our Investor Day goals

2023 Annual Compensation*

  Strong individual performance
  

 Best full-year net revenues since 2009 amidst challenging operating environment

 Strong financial momentum and strength of our franchises

 Reaffirmation of our strategic direction as we execute our long-term growth strategy and build a foundation for more durable revenues over timeOur NEOs

  

 Exemplary leadership and tone at the top

 Led advances towards strategic goals within the context of a challenging environment

 Committed to advancing our culture, diversity and talent development

Compensation incentivizes continued long-term, sustainable growth and achievement of financial targets

without undue emphasis on shorter-term results

2020 ANNUAL MEETING FEEDBACK AND PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS

As we do each year, during 2020 we conducted extensive governance-related engagement with shareholders representing more than 35% of Common Stock outstanding and other key stakeholders. Engagement with shareholders representing over 25% of Common Stock outstanding included our Lead Director and/or our Compensation Committee Chair.

While our engagement and our ~71% 2020 Say on Pay vote reflect a number of positive aspects of our executive compensation program, including our high percentage of performance-based pay, our Compensation Committee also discussed and took into account certain focus areas from stakeholder feedback.

WHAT WE HEARD...    WHAT WE DID...
FOCUS ON    TOOK ACTION ON

 HIGH LEVELS OF COMPENSATION COMMITTEE DISCRETION

LOGO

  Enhanced Performance Assessment Framework

  Expanded proxy disclosure

 PROPORTION OF EUROPEAN PEERS IN PEER
GROUP

LOGO

  Undertook Peer Group Analysis and Expanded U.S. Peer group for PSUs

  Increased portion of deferral in PSUs for these NEOs

 PERCENTAGE OF DEFERRAL IN TIME-BASED
RSUS FOR NEOS (OTHER THAN THE EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM)

Total Annual
Compensation**
   

  

 

LOGOYear-End PSUs / %

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS5


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—2021 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN HIGHLIGHTS

2021 Stock Incentive Plan Highlights (see Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021), beginning on page 68)

Key Facts about the 2021 SIP    

3

Year extension of our equity

plan

Annual Variable
Compensation***
    

 

   

20 million

New shares being requested

   

 

 

LOGO

Fixed Equity
amount of         non-employee director        compensation added


at grant;
PSUs subject
to ongoing
performance 
metrics
(absolute &
relative ROE)

 

 

  Key changes to our 2021 SIP include:

»  Extending the term of the plan an additional three years beyond the current term of our existing SIP (the 2018 SIP).

»  Requesting an increase of 20 million in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan. In light of shareholder engagement regarding our equity grant practices, this is the first time we are requesting new shares for our SIP approval since 2015.

»  As previously announced, adding a fixed amount of annual compensation for each non-employee director.

Equity-based awards play a fundamental role in aligning our compensation with our shareholders’ interestsDavid Solomon, Chairman and regulatory requirements. Without a shareholder-approved equity plan, we would be reliant on cash-settled awards as our sole method of incentive-based compensation.

»  We believe that equity-based compensation provides employees, directors, officers and consultants or other service providers with long-term exposure to the firm’s performance, aligns recipients’ interests with those of our shareholders and discourages imprudent risk-taking; equity-based awards represent a larger portion of our compensation expense than for any of our U.S.-based Peers.

»  Our regulators across the globe, including the Federal Reserve Board in the U.S. and the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., expect that a substantial portion of variable compensation awarded to executives and certain other employees will be equity-based.

The 2021 SIP continues to include features designed to protect shareholder interests and to reflect our Compensation Principles.

No “evergreen” provision (i.e., no automatic increase in the number of shares available under the plan)

Double-trigger change in control provisions that do not accelerate vesting, delivery or transferability based on a change in control aloneCEO

  

No hedging or pledging

31.0

20.3 / 70%

LOGO

John Waldron, President and COO

30.0

16.9 / 60%

Denis Coleman, CFO

20.0

10.9 / 60%

Kathryn Ruemmler, CLO and General Counsel

16.0

 8.7 / 60%

Philip Berlinski, Global Treasurer

13.0

 6.9 / 60%

    *

Reflects dollar amounts, in millions, unless noted.

  **

Salary plus annual variable compensation consisting of cash and year-end equity-based awards (100% PSUs for all NEOs).

***

For more information on our PSUs, see Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Equity-Based Annual Variable Compensation: PSUs.

  2023 NEO Compensation Reflects:

  Decisive leadership in recognizing the need to clarify and simplify our forward strategy

 

No repricing or below-market grants   Swift execution on a series of stock optionsactions that narrowed our strategic focus and stock appreciation rights (SARs)strengthened our platform for 2024 and beyond

 

50%change  Continued progress on strategic priorities in our core franchises: Global Banking & Markets and Asset & Wealth Management

  Ongoing emphasis on delivering long-term value for shareholders

  Steadfast focus on client centricity and One Goldman Sachs as foundational to our firm

  Dedicated commitment to our culture, Core Values and advancing our people strategy

  Demonstrated investment to promote the strength of our risk management and control and merger consummation thresholdsenvironment

 

 

6
  2023 Annual Meeting Feedback

Stakeholder

Feedback and ~94%

Say on Pay Vote

  Reflects Continued  

Support for:

  LOGO GOLDMAN SACHSPay-for-performance philosophy
LOGO   |  100% of year-end equity-based pay in PSUs for all NEOs
LOGO PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSPSUs that tie compensation for senior leaders to ongoing performance conditions
LOGO Robust risk-balancing features in compensation program
LOGO Program alignment across senior leadership

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

5


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 

 

KEY FACTS ABOUT OUR BOARD

Corporate Governance Highlights (see Corporate Governance beginning on page 9)8)

 

 KEY FACTS ABOUT OUR BOARDKey Facts About our Board

We strive to maintain a well-rounded and diverse Board that balances financial industry expertise with independence, and the institutional knowledge of longer-tenured directors coupled with the fresh perspectives brought by newer directors. Our directors bring to our Board a varietydiversity of skills and experiences developed across a broad range of industries, both in established and growth markets and in each of the public, private and not-for-profit sectors.

   Key Board Statistics      
   Director Nominees       Independence of Nominees     2023 Meetings    

Board

 11 10 of 11 29(a)

Audit

  4     All 14

Compensation

  5     All 10

Governance

 10     All  7

Public Responsibilities

  4     All  5

Risk

  5     All 13

(a)

Includes meetings of the Board’s 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) Remediation Special Committee and other special Board committees formed from time to time.

  Frequent Engagement Throughout 2023

 

NOMINEE SKILLS AND EXPERIENCES

 

5  

 

  

 

12

 

  

 

12  

 

  

 

6  

 

  

 

5  

 

  

 

9  

 

  

 

4  

 

  

 

11  

 

 

      FINANCIAL      

SERVICES

INDUSTRY

 

  

 

   COMPLEX OR   

REGULATED

INDUSTRIES

  

 

RISK  

 MANAGEMENT   

  

 

TALENT

  DEVELOPMENT    

  

 

  TECHNOLOGY    

  

 

PUBLIC

COMPANY

  GOVERNANCE  

  

 

AUDIT/TAX/

  ACCOUNTING    

  

 

INTERNATIONAL  

 

KEY BOARD STATISTICS

 

    
    

 

DIRECTOR NOMINEES(a)

 

  

 

INDEPENDENCE OF NOMINEES     

 

  

 

2020 MEETINGS

 

    

Board

 

  

12

 

  

10 of 12     

 

  

23(b)

 

    

Audit

 

  

5

 

  

All     

 

  

17

 

    

Compensation

 

  

4

 

  

All     

 

  

8

 

    

Governance

 

  

10

 

  

All     

 

  

7

 

    

Public Responsibilities

 

  

3

 

  

All     

 

  

5

 

    

Risk

 

  

7

 

  

6 of 7     

 

  

14

 

(a)

If elected at our 2021 Annual Meeting, independent director nominee Jessica R. Uhl will join our Board and its Audit, Governance and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021.

(b)

Includes one meeting of the Board’s 1MDB Remediation Special Committee, which was formed in October 2020.

FREQUENT ENGAGEMENT THROUGHOUT 2020

74 Total Board and Committee
Meetings

26 Director Sessions without
Management Present

Over 215 Engagements by Lead
Director and Committee Chairs with
Others Outside of Formal Board Meetings

DIVERSITY OF NOMINEES ENHANCES BOARD PERFORMANCE

 

42%

 

  

 

6.3 YEARS

 

  

 

64

 

  

 

58%

 

  

 

25%

 

NEW NOMINEES

IN THE LAST

5 YEARS

  MEDIAN TENURE    MEDIAN AGE    

 NOMINEES WHO ARE   

DIVERSE BY RACE,  

GENDER OR SEXUAL  

ORIENTATION  

 

 

  

     NOMINEES WHO      

     ARE NON-U.S. OR      

      DUAL CITIZENS      

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS7


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

   

78

  NAME/AGE/INDEPENDENCE  

Total Board and

Committee Meetings

  

15

  DIRECTOR  
  SINCE  

Director Sessions without

Management Present

  

  OCCUPATION/CAREER  

  HIGHLIGHTS  

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

OTHER

CURRENT U.S.-

LISTED PUBLIC

BOARDS(a)Over 200

 

Engagements by 2023 Lead Director

and Committee Chairs with Others

Outside of Formal Board Meetings

  Diversity of Nominees Enhances Board Performance

 

  AUD  

  COMP  

  GOV  

  PRC    

  RISK

    

~27%

New Nominees

in the

Last 5 Years

 

~7 Years

Median Tenure

~64

Median Age

~45%

Nominees who are

Diverse by Race,

Gender or Sexual

Orientation

~9%

Nominees who

are Non-U.S. or

Dual Citizens

  Key Pillars of Lead Director Role

LOGO Sets and approves

 agenda for Board

 meetings and leads

 executive sessions

 

 

    

David Solomon,59 Focuses on Board

Chairman effectiveness and CEO

 composition and

 conducts evaluations

 Acts as primary Board

 contact for shareholder

 engagement and

 engages with regulators

 Serves as liaison

 between independent

 directors and Chair/

 management

For more information on our Board’s leadership structure, see page 21.

6

 

 

October

2018

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 

Chairman & CEO,

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY—CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

 

 Director Nominees

         

0

 

LOGO

Adebayo Ogunlesi,67

Independent Lead Director

October

2012

Chairman & Managing Partner, Global Infrastructure Partners

Ex-Officio

C

Ex-Officio

2

   
  Name/Age  Director Since  Qualifications/Key Experience  EEO-1
  Data
(a)
   LOGO

LOGODavid Solomon, 62

Chairman & CEO

 October 2018 

  Experienced leader across range of our businesses

Michele Burns,63  Deep business, operational and industry expertise

Independent  A primary face of our firm

White (M)

   LOGO

 

 

David Viniar, 68*

OctoberIndependent Lead Director**

2011Chair, Governance**

January 2013

  Strong financial industry leader

  Deep financial acumen and risk and regulatory expertise

  Leadership and governance experience

White (M)

   LOGO

 

 

Retired

(Chairman & CEO, Mercer LLC;

CFO of each of: Marsh & McLennan

Companies, Inc.Michele Burns, Mirant Corp. and

Delta Air Lines, Inc.)

66*

 October 2011 

C  Compensation, governance and risk experience

  Human capital management and strategic consulting
 experience

  Expertise in accounting and the review and preparation
 of financial statements

 White (F)
   LOGO

Mark Flaherty, 64*

 December 2014 

  Leadership experience in investment management industry

  Informed perspective on institutional investors’ approach
 to company performance and corporate governance

  Risk expertise

 White (M)
   LOGO 

3Kimberley Harris, 53*

LOGO

Chair, Compensation

 May 2021 

  Cross-disciplinary legal experience

  Government and regulatory affairs expertise

Drew Faust,73

Independent

  Informed perspective on public policy and reputational risk
 management

 Multiracial:
Black,
White (F)
   LOGO

July

2018

Kevin Johnson, 63*

 October 2022

Professor, Harvard University  Technology and consumer leader with multi-disciplinary
 background

(Retired, President, Harvard University)  International business and growth markets experience

  Leadership and governance expertise

 White (M)
   LOGO 

Ellen Kullman, 68*

Chair, Public Responsibilities

 December 2016

  Key leadership and strategic experience, with engineering
 background

  Corporate governance and compensation expertise

  Focus on reputational risk and sustainability/ESG matters

 White (F)
   LOGO

Lakshmi Mittal, 73*

 June 2008 

0  Leadership, business development and operations experience

LOGO  International business and growth markets expertise

  Corporate governance and international governance
 perspective

 Asian (M)
   LOGO 

Mark FlahertyThomas Montag,61 67*

Independent

Chair, Risk**

 July 2023

December  Financial services industry expertise

2014  Deep and informed risk management acumen

  Leadership and sustainability experience

 White (M)
   LOGO

RetiredPeter Oppenheimer, 61*

(Vice Chairman, Wellington

Management Company)

Chair, Audit

 March 2014

  Capital and risk management expertise

  Experienced in financial management and the review and
 preparation of financial statements

  Seasoned perspective on oversight of technology and
 technology risks

 White (M)
   LOGO 

Jan Tighe, 61*

 December 2018 

  Expert in technology risk, including cybersecurity

  Strategic planning and operations expertise

  Leadership and governance experience

 

0

LOGO

Ellen Kullman,65

Independent

December

2016

President & CEO, Carbon, Inc.

(Retired, Chairman & CEO, E.I. du Pont

de Nemours and Company)

C

2

LOGO

Lakshmi Mittal,70

Independent

June

2008

Executive Chairman

ArcelorMittal S.A.

1

LOGO

Peter Oppenheimer,58  

Independent

March

2014

Retired

(Senior Vice President and CFO, Apple, Inc.)

C

0

LOGO

Jan Tighe,58

Independent

December

2018

Retired

(Vice Admiral, United States Navy)

2

LOGO

Jessica R. Uhl, 53

Independent Nominee(b)

CFO, Royal Dutch Shell plc

1

LOGO

David Viniar,65

Non-Employee

January

2013

Retired

(CFO, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.)

1

LOGO

Mark Winkelman,74

Independent

December

2014

Private investor

C

0

White (F)

 

(a)  *

As per SEC rules.Independent

**

Effective April 24, 2024

(a)

Equal Employment Opportunity (EE0-1) categories, as self-identified.

 

(b)

If elected at our 2021  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting Ms. Uhl will join our Board and its Audit, Governance and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021.of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

C

Designates Committee Chairs.

8 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

7


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—CORPORATE GOVERNANCE SNAPSHOTBEST PRACTICES

 

 

 

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance SnapshotBest Practices

 

  Independent Lead Director with expansive duties, including setting Board agendas,

Regular executive sessions of and who is appointed by our independent and non-employee directors

 

  Regular executive sessions of independent directors

CEO evaluation process conducted by our Lead Director with our Governance Committee (enhanced in 2020)

 

  Independent director focus on executive succession planning

 

  Comprehensive process for Board refreshment, including a focus on diversity and on succession for Board leadership positions

 

  AnnualBoard and Committee evaluations, which incorporate feedback on individual director performance(enhanced in 2020)

 

  Candid, one-on-one discussionsbetween our Lead Director and eachnon-employee director supplementing formal evaluations

 

  Active, year-round shareholder engagement process, whereby we, including our Lead Director, meet and speak with our shareholders and other key stakeholders

 

  Board and Committee oversight of sustainability, including material environmental and social impacts, and other environmental, social and governanceESG-related matters

 

  Directors may contact any employeeof our firm directly, and our Board and its Committees mayengage independent advisorsat their sole discretion
  Formal “overboarding” limit on the number of public company board memberships for our directors (a maximum of four public company directorships, including Goldman Sachs)

Annual elections of all directors
(i.e. (i.e., no staggered board)

 

  ProxyProactively adopted proxy access right for shareholders; shareholders which right was adopted proactively after engagement with shareholders. In addition, shareholders are welcome to continue to may also recommend director candidates for consideration by our Governance Committee

 

  Majority voting with resignation policy bylaw for directors in uncontested elections

 

  Shareholders holding at least 25% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock can call a special meeting of shareholders

 

  No supermajority vote requirements in our charter or By-Laws

 

  Executive share retention and share ownership requirements (as applicable), which require significant long-term share holdings by our NEOs

 

  Director share ownership requirementof 5,000 shares or RSUs, with a transition period for new directors

 

  » All RSUs granted as director compensation must be held for a director’s entire tenure on our Board. Directors are not permitted to hedge or pledge these RSUs
 

 

LOGOLOGO

WORKING DYNAMICS Candid discussions Open access to management & information Focus on reputation BOARD COMPOSITION Broad range of skills & experiences Independence Diversity Regular refreshment BOARD STRUCTURE Strong Lead Director role 5 standing Committees All independent directors on Governance Committee GOVERNANCE PRACTICES Candid self-evaluation Oversight of CEO/ management performance with assessment framework Board/management succession planning BOARD EFFECTIVENESS YEAR-ROUND ENGAGEMENT Broad range of stakeholders Proactive outreach Responsiveness to areas of focus 2020 FIRM & BOARD ENGAGEMENT IR meetings with >35% Common Stock Lead Director and/or our compensation committee chair met with >25% Common Stock RANGE OF TOPICS Corporate governance Firm performance FEEDBACK PROVIDED Stakeholder feedback informs Board/Committee discussions ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT Strategic priorities/goals Risk management Culture & conduct

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS Board Effectiveness  9 Active Engagement

Working Dynamics

Board CompositionYear-Round Engagement2023 Firm & Board Engagement

  Candid discussions

  Open access to management &
 information

  Focus on long-term value,
 reputation and risk
 management

  Broad range of skills &
 experiences

  Independence

  Diversity

  Regular refreshment & succession planning

  Broad range of stakeholders

  Proactive outreach

  Responsive to areas of focus

  IR meetings with >35%
 Common Stock on ESG matters

  Lead Director meetings with
 >25% Common Stock

Board Structure

Governance Practices

Range of Topics

Feedback Provided

  Strong Lead Director role

  5 standing Committees

  All independent directors on
 Governance Committee

  Candid self-evaluation

  Oversight of CEO/
 management performance
 with Assessment Framework

  Executive succession planning

  Corporate governance

  Firm performance

  Strategic priorities/goals

  Risk management

  Culture & conduct

  Sustainability

  Stakeholder feedback informs
 Board/Committee discussions
 and decisions

8

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 

   Proposal Snapshot — Snapshot—Item 1. Election of Directors    
  
 

 

What is being voted on:Election of 11 director nominees to our Board of 12 director nominees.Board.

 

Board recommendation:After a review of the individual qualifications and experience of each of our director nominees and his or hertheir contributions to our Board (as applicable), our Board determined unanimously to recommend that shareholders vote FOR all of our director nominees.

 

 

Item 1. Election of Directors

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 Our Directors

Board Updates

New Independent Director Nominee

Our Board iswas pleased to nominate for election Jessica R. Uhl. Ms. Uhlwelcome Thomas Montag as an independent director on our Board as well as our Audit, Risk and Governance Committees on July 17, 2023. Mr. Montag, who brings significant experience in the financial services industry, was recommended to our Lead Director and to our Governance Committee by an executive employee and our independent director search firm,firm.

Director Retirements

As previously announced, our current independent Lead Director and Chair of our Governance Committee, Adebayo Ogunlesi, will not stand for re-election and will be retiring from our Board at the 2024 Annual Meeting. We are grateful to Mr. Ogunlesi for his esteemed counsel and distinguished service on our Board, including his commitment to robust shareholder engagement and other extraordinary contributions as our Lead Director for nearly 10 years. In addition, we believewant to recognize Jessica Uhl, who will also be retiring from our Board at the Annual Meeting. We are thankful for Ms. Uhl’s informed judgment and critical insights and the many contributions she will bring important insight and significant experiencemade to our Board and its Committees during her tenure.

Changes in Board Leadership

As part of our Board’s succession process, the independent directors appointed David Viniar (current Chair of our Risk Committee) as describedLead Director and recommended that our Board appoint him as Chair of our Governance Committee and Thomas Montag as Chair of our Risk Committee, in her biography below. If elected byeach case effective April 24, 2024. In doing so, our shareholders, Ms. Uhl will joinindependent directors took into account Mr. Viniar’s dedication to our firm and our Board and his knowledge about our firm and the industry, as well as Mr. Montag’s broad and deep risk acumen.

In addition, as previously announced, effective April 26, 2023, Kimberley Harris assumed the role of Chair of our Compensation Committee, bringing to bear her cross-disciplinary perspective and public policy and regulatory expertise to this key role.

Global Governance

During 2023, the Board also took a number of steps to further enhance the firm’s global governance structures, including to strengthen its Audit, Governanceoversight of and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021, and we look forwardconnectivity to her contributions.certain key entities globally:

Peter Oppenheimer assumed the role of chair of the board of Goldman Sachs Bank USA (GS Bank)

Michele Burns joined the board of Goldman Sachs International

Jan Tighe and Kevin Johnson joined the board of GS Bank

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

9


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

3 new director nominees

in last 5 years

  Thomas Montag

  Kevin Johnson

  Kimberley Harris

Refreshed Board Leadership

   David Viniar as Lead Director and
  Governance Chair

   Thomas Montag as Risk Chair

   Kimberley Harris as Compensation
  Chair

Director Tenure

   Average and median tenure:  ~7 years

   Tenure range: <1 year to 15+ years

   A balanced tenure provides for
  the institutional knowledge of our
  longer-tenured directors as well as
  the fresh perspectives brought by
  our newer directors

Board of Directors’ Qualifications and Experience

Our director nominees have a great diversity of experienceexperiences and bring to our Board a wide variety of skills, qualifications and viewpoints that strengthen their ability to carry out their oversight role on behalf of shareholders.

 

DIVERSITY OF SKILLS AND EXPERIENCESCore Qualifications and Experiences: All Directors

Financial services industryComplex / Regulated industriesInternational experience /
Established & growth markets

Human Capital Management /

Talent development

AcademiaTechnology / Cyber threatAudit, tax, accounting &
preparation of financial statements
Compliance

Operations / Large

organization oversight

Public policy & regulatory affairs /
Military
Risk & financial productsSustainability / ESG

Risk management

Public company / Corporate governance

CORE QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCES

Financial literacy

Demonstrated management / leadership ability

Strategic thinking

Leadership & expertise in their respective fields

Involvement in educational, charitable & community organizations

Extensive experience across public, private & not-for-profit sectors

Integrity & business judgment

 

Demonstrated management & leadership ability

Strategic thinking

Leadership & expertise in their respective fields

Risk management (financial & nonfinancial risks)

Extensive experience across public, private or not-for-profit sectors

Financial literacy

Reputational focus

Diversity of Skills and Experiences

Public company/ corporate governance

6 

directors 

Complex/regulated industries

All 

directors 

Financial services industry

4 

directors 

Human capital management, including diversity/talent development

6

directors

Technology/ cyber threat/

information

security

6 

directors 

Sustainability/ESG

7 

directors 

International experience/ established & growth markets

10 

directors 

Audit/tax/ accounting/ preparation of financial statements

3

directors

Further to those skills and experiences highlighted above, our director nominees possess a broad range of additional skills and experiences, including with respect to compliance, financial products, operations and large organization oversight, capital adequacy and deployment, design and evaluation of executive and firmwide compensation programs, succession planning, public policy, government and regulatory affairs, philanthropy (including involvement with educational, charitable and/or community organizations) and the military.

 

  How our Board considers diversity in its nomination process  
 

 

  Diversity is an important factor in our consideration       
  of potential and incumbent directors     

OUR NOMINEES(a)

Our Governance Committee considers a number of demographics and other factors, including race, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, culture, nationality and work experiences (including military service), seeking to develop a board that, as a whole, reflects diverse viewpoints, backgrounds, skills, experiences and expertise.

 

Among the factors our Governance Committee considers in identifying and evaluating a potential director candidate is the extent to which the candidate would add to the diversity of our Board. The Committee considers the same factors in determining whether to re-nominate an incumbent director.

Diversity is also considered as part of the annual Board evaluation.

 

 

 

5 WOMEN

10

 

 

  

1 BLACK

Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 

1 INDIAN DESCENT

       1 CAREER MILITARY       

SERVICE

3 NON-U.S. OR DUAL

CITIZENS

(a) Based on self-identified characteristics

10GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 

Director Tenure: A Balance of Experience

Our nominees have a median tenure of approximately 6.3 years. This experience balances the institutional knowledge of our longer-tenured directors with the fresh perspectives brought by our newer directors.Nominees(a)

 

4

Women

1

Black

1

Indian

Descent

1

Career

Military Service

1

Non-U.S. or

Dual Citizens

 

(a)

As self-identified and, where applicable, EEO-1 categories.

LOGO

No. of Nominees 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 <5 YEARS 5 NOMINEES 5-10 YEARS 6 NOMINEES 6.3 years median tenure 10+ YEARS 1 NOMINEE Years of ExperienceComprehensive Re-Nomination Process

 

  Comprehensive Re-Nomination Process     

Our Governance Committee appreciates the importance of critically evaluating individual directors and their contributions to our Board
in connection with annual re-nomination decisions.

In considering whether to recommend re-nomination of a director for election at our Annual Meeting, our Governance Committee conducts a detailed review, considering factors such as:

 

The extent to which the director’sjudgment, skills, qualifications and experience(including that gained due to tenure on our Board) continue to contribute to the success of our Board and our firm;

 

Feedback from the annual Board evaluation and related individual discussionsbetween each non- employee director and our Lead Director;

 

Attendanceandparticipationat, andpreparationfor, Board and Committee meetings;

 

Independence;

 

The extent to which the director continuescontributes to contribute to thediversityof our Board;

 

Shareholder feedback, including the support received at our 20202023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;Shareholders; and

 

Outside board and other affiliations, including overboarding considerations, time commitmentcommitments and any actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

Each of our director nominees has been recommended for election by our Governance Committee and approved and nominated for election by our Board.

If elected by our shareholders, our director nominees, who areeach of whom is currently membersa member of our Board, will serve for a one-year term expiring at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Ms. Uhl, who has been nominated by our Board for election by our shareholders at this Annual Meeting, will, if so elected, serve a term beginning on July 1, 2021 and expiring at our 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each director will hold office until his or hertheir successor has been elected and qualified, or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal.

All of our directors must be elected by a majority vote of our shareholders. Pursuant to our By-Laws:

 

  

A director who fails to receive a majority of FOR votes will be required to tender his or hertheir resignation to our Board.

 

  

Our Governance Committee will then assess whether there is a significant reason for the director to remain on our Board and will make a recommendation to our Board regarding the resignation.

For detailed information on the vote required for the election of directors and the choices available for casting your vote, please seeFrequently Asked Questions.Questions.

Biographical information about our director nominees follows. This information is current as of March 1, 20212024 and has been confirmed by each of our director nominees for inclusion in our Proxy Statement. There are no family relationships among any of our director nominees and executive officers.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

11


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

 

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

David M. Solomon, 59      62

 

Chairman and CEO

 

 

Director Since:Since: October 2018

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

 

   

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS     Key Experience and Qualifications  

  
   
 
  

 

Engaged and motivatingExperienced leader who embodiesacross range of our firm’s culture: businesses:With over 20nearly 25 years of leadership rolesexperience at our firm, he develops the firm’s strategy, embodies our Core Values and commitment to client service and leverages firm-specific and industry knowledge to lead the firm and its people, develop the firm’s strategy, embody the “tone at the top” and helpincluding helping to protect and enhance our firm’s culture includingand through his commitment to talent development and the diversity of our workforce

Strategic thinker with deepDeep business, operational and industry expertise:Utilizes Leverages deep familiarity with all aspects of the firm’s businesses, including from his experience as President and Chief Operating Officer,COO, to develop, articulate and lead the execution of the firm’s strategic vision, assess attendant risks and guide the firm’s growth, in each case providing his insights to our Board and keeping directors apprised of significant developments in our business and industry

Actively engaged with stakeholders as a primary face of our firm:Committed to engaging with our clients and other external stakeholders, he draws upon his extensive interaction with our clients, investors and other stakeholders to communicate feedback and offer insight and perspective to our Board

 

 
   
 
 


  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Goldman Sachs

»Chairman (January 2019 – Present) and Chief Executive Officer (October 2018 – Present)

»President and Chief or Co-Chief Operating Officer (January 2017 – September 2018)

»Co-Head of the Investment Banking Division (July 2006 – December 2016)

»Various positions of increasing seniority, including Global Head of the Financing Group (September 1999 – July 2006)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Trustee,Chair, Board of Trustees, Hamilton College

Member, Board of Directors, Robin Hood Foundation

Member, Executive Committee, Partnership for New York City

Member, Board of Trustees, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of Hamilton College

 

 

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Adebayo O. Ogunlesi, 67  David Viniar, 68     

 

Independent Lead DirectorDirector*

 

 

Director Since: October 2012Since: January 2013

 

GS CommitteesCommittees*

 

Governance (Chair)

Ex-officio member:

 

»Audit

 

»Compensation

 

»Public Responsibilities

 

»Risk

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company Directorships

 

Current: Callaway Golf Company; Kosmos
Energy Ltd.
None

Former (Past 5 Years): NoneSquare, Inc.

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

   
 
  

 

Strong leader with global experience in the financial services industry: Founder, Chairman and Managing Partner of Global Infrastructure Partners and a former executive of Credit Suisse withindustry leader: With over 2510 years of leadership experience inservice on our Board, including as Chair of the financial services industry, including investment bankingRisk Committee, as well as service as the former lead independent director and private equity

International business and global capital markets experience, including emerging markets: Advised and executed transactions and provided capital markets strategy advice globally

Broad board and governance expertise: Service on the boards of directors and board committees of other public companies and not-for-profit entities, and, in particular, as chair or former chair of the nominatingaudit and corporate governancerisk committee of Square, Inc. (a global technology company), he provides valuable perspective to our Board and is well positioned to lead our Board as Independent Lead Director

Deep financial acumen and risk and regulatory expertise: Able to provide insights about our firm’s risks to our Board and committees at eachand, where necessary, to challenge management with respect thereto

Leadership and governance: Well-respected industry leader with experience with stakeholder engagement as well as experience serving as lead director of Callaway Golf and Kosmos Energy, provides additional governance perspectiveSquare, Inc.

 
 
 
 
   
   
 

  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Chairman and Managing Partner, Global Infrastructure Partners, a private equity firm that invests worldwide in infrastructure assets in the energy, transport, water and waste industry sectors (July 2006 – Present)Goldman Sachs

Credit Suisse, a financial services company

»Executive Vice ChairmanPresident and Chief ClientFinancial Officer (2004(May 19992006)January 2013)

 

»MemberHead of Executive BoardOperations, Technology, Finance and Management Committee (2002Services Division (December 20022006)January 2013)

 

»Head of Global Investment Banking Department (2002the Finance Division and Co-Head of Credit Risk Management and Advisory and Firmwide Risk (December 20012004)

Law Clerk to the Honorable Thurgood Marshall, Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1980 – 1981)December 2002)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT»Co-Head of Operations, Finance and Resources (March 1999 – December 2001)

 

Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement

Member, NationalCo-Vice Chairman, Board of Directors, The NAACP Legal DefenseGarden of Dreams Foundation

Former Trustee, Union College

Education

Graduate of Union College and Educational Fund, Inc.

Member, Global Advisory Council, Harvard University

Member, Board of Dean’s Advisors, Harvard Business School

Member, Dean’s Advisory Board and Leadership Council of New York, Harvard Law School

 

EDUCATION

Graduate of Oxford University, Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School

 

 

 

*

Effective April 24, 2024

12

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

M. Michele Burns, 63         66  

 

Independent

 

 

Director Since:Since: October 2011

 

GS Committees

 

Compensation (Chair)

Governance

RiskPublic Responsibilities

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: Anheuser-Busch
InBev; Cisco Systems, Inc.; Etsy, Inc.

Former (Past 5 Years):
Alexion Pharmaceuticals,
Cisco Systems,
Inc.

Subsidiary Boards

Goldman Sachs International

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

    
   

 

Leadership, compensation,Compensation, governance and risk expertise: experience:Leverages current and former service on the boards of directors and board committees (including compensation committees) of other public companies and not-for-profit entities

Human capital management and strategic consulting:Background gained as former CEO of Mercer LLC

Accounting and the review and preparation of financial statements:Garnered expertise as former CFO of several global public companies

 

 
 
 




 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Chief Executive Officer, Retirement Policy Center, sponsored by Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MMC); Center focuses, a center focused on retirement public policy issues (October 2011 – February 2014)

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mercer LLC, a subsidiary of MMC and a global leader in human resource consulting, outsourcing and investment services (September 2006 – October 2011)

Chief Financial Officer, MMC, a global professional services and consulting firm (March 2006 – September 2006)

Chief Financial Officer, Chief Restructuring Officer and Executive Vice President, Mirant Corporation, an energy company (May 2004 – January 2006)

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Delta Air Lines, Inc., an air carrier (including various other positions, January 1999 – April 2004)

Senior Partner and Leader, Southern Regional Federal Tax Practice, Arthur Andersen LLP, an accounting firm (including various other positions, 1981 – 1999)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Advisory Council Member, former Center Fellow and Strategic Advisor, Stanford University Center on Longevity

Former Board Member and Treasurer, Elton John AIDS Foundation

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of University of Georgia (including for Masters)

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Drew G. Faust, 73               Mark Flaherty, 64     

 

Independent

 

 

Director Since: July 2018

GS Committees

Compensation

Governance

Public Responsibilities

Other U.S.-Listed Company Directorships

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years):
Staples, Inc.

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

Human capital and diversity: As former President of Harvard University, well-positioned to provide insight on the firm’s strategies relating to diversity, recruiting and retention

Leadership and governance: Current and prior service on the boards of directors of public and/or not-for-profit entities provides additional perspective on governance

Operations and sustainability: During her tenure at Harvard University she, among other things, broadened the university’s international reach, promoted collaboration across disciplines and administrative units and developed and implemented various sustainability initiatives, including Harvard’s Climate Action Plan


CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Harvard University

»President Emeritus (July 2018 – Present) and Arthur Kingsley Porter University Professor (January 2019 – Present)

»President (July 2007 – June 2018)

»Lincoln Professor of History (January 2003 – December 2018)

»Founding Dean, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study (January 2001 – July 2007)

University of Pennsylvania (1975 – 2000); various faculty positions including as the Annenberg Professor of History and the Director of the Women’s Studies Program

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Member, Educational Advisory Board, John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Member, American Academy of Arts & Sciences

Member, The MIT Corporation

Former Member, Board of Directors, The Broad Institute Inc.

Former Member, Board of Directors, Harvard Management Company Inc.

EDUCATION

Graduate of Bryn Mawr College and the University of Pennsylvania (Masters and Ph.D.)

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

LOGO

Mark A. Flaherty, 61          

Independent

Director Since:Since: December 2014

 

GS Committees

 

Audit

Governance

Risk

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

 
  
 

 

Investment management: Leadership in investment management industry:Leverages over 20 years of experience in the investment management industry, including at Wellington Management Company

Perspective on institutional investors’ approach to company performance and corporate governance:governance: Experience developed through his tenure at Wellington and Standish, Ayer and Wood

Risk expertise:Draws upon years of experience in the financial industry to provide informed perspective to our Board and committeesCommittees

 
 
 
  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Wellington Management Company, an investment management company

»Vice Chairman (2011 – 2012)

 

»Director of Global Investment Services (2002 – 2012)

 

»Partner, Senior Vice President (2001 – 2012)

Standish, Ayer and Wood, an investment management company

»Executive Committee Member (1997 – 1999)

 

»Partner (1994 – 1999)

 

»Director, Global Equity Trading (1991 – 1999)

Director, Global Equity Trading, Aetna, a diversified healthcare benefit company (1987 – 1991)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Member, Board of Directors, PGA TOUR

Member, Board of Directors, Patrick Cantlay Foundation

Former Member, Board of Trustees, Providence College

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of Providence College

 

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

13


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Ellen J. Kullman, 65           

Kimberley Harris, 53   

 

Independent

 

 

Director SinceSince: May 2021

GS Committees

Compensation (Chair)

Governance

Public Responsibilities

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

Key Experience and Qualifications  

Cross-disciplinary legal experience: A leader in the legal field with a differentiated perspective and judgment garnered from working at a global law firm, the U.S. Department of Justice, the White House and as Executive Vice President of Comcast Corporation and General Counsel at NBCUniversal, where she is responsible for providing legal advice to senior management and overseeing legal function across all NBCUniversal divisions

Government and regulatory affairs: Experience managing complex governmental and regulatory matters, including in the White House Counsel’s office, as well as overseeing global government affairs for NBCUniversal and international government and regulatory affairs for Comcast, supporting the company’s businesses worldwide

Public policy and reputational risk management: Experience both in the public and private sectors advising senior leaders on complex issues of public policy and reputational sensitivity


Career Highlights

Comcast Corporation, a global media and technology company

»Executive Vice President, Comcast Corporation (2019 – Present)

»Executive Vice President and General Counsel, NBCUniversal (2013 – Present)

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, a global law firm

»Partner (2012 – 2013, 2007 – 2009); Counsel (2006 – 2007); Associate (1997 – 2006)

United States Government

»White House Counsel’s Office, Principal Deputy Counsel and Deputy Assistant to the President (2011 – 2012); Associate Counsel and Special Assistant to the President (2010)

»U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General (2009 – 2010)

Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement

Member, Board of Directors, Advocates for Children of New York City

Co-Chair, Board of Directors, Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law

Member, Advisory Board, Yale Law School Center for the Study of Corporate Law

Member, Board of Trustees, Mount Sinai Health System

Education

Graduate of Harvard College and Yale Law School

LOGO

Kevin Johnson, 63    

Independent

Director Since: October 2022

GS Committees

Compensation

Governance

Risk

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years):
Starbucks Corporation

Subsidiary Boards

GS Bank

Key Experience and Qualifications  

Technology and consumer leader with multidisciplinary background: Experience as an independent director and then President, COO and CEO of Starbucks, where he led a global consumer brand and leveraged his deep technological expertise from over 32 years in the tech industry, including senior leadership roles at both Microsoft and Juniper Networks

International business and growth markets: Experience in driving growth across global markets, including in China

Leadership and governance expertise: Draws upon years of past service as a public company CEO and public company director to provide informed perspective to our Board and committees, including with respect to stakeholder governance and building, managing, transforming and sustaining a highly visible and global brand


Career Highlights

Starbucks Corporation, a global roaster, marketer and retailer of specialty coffee

»Partner and Special Consultant (April 2022 – September 2022)

»President and Chief Executive Officer (April 2017 – April 2022)

»President and Chief Operating Officer (March 2015 – April 2017)

»Independent Director (2009 – March 2015)

Chief Executive Officer, Juniper Networks, Inc., a global company that designs, develops and sells products and services for high-performance networks (September 2008 – January 2014)

Microsoft Corporation, a global technology company

»President, Platforms and Services (2005 – September 2008)

»Group Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Marketing and Services (2003 – 2005)

»Various positions of increasing seniority, including Senior Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Services (September 1992 – 2003)

Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement

Served Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama on the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee and chaired the Cybersecurity Taskforce

Education

Graduate of New Mexico State University

14

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

LOGO

Ellen Kullman, 68     

Independent

Director Since: December 2016

 

GS Committees

 

Compensation

Governance

Public Responsibilities (Chair)

Compensation

Governance

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: Amgen Inc.; Dell
Technologies Inc.

Former (Past 5 Years):

United Technologies

Corporation

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

   
 
  

 

LeadershipEngineering background, with key leadership and strategy: Duringstrategic experience: In her tenurerole as Chair and CEO of DuPont, a highly-regulatedhighly regulated science and technology-based company with global operations, she led the company through a period of strategic transformation and growth; in first year asgrowth. As CEO of Carbon, she led the company as it expanded globallythrough its global expansion and navigated the COVID-19 pandemic

Corporate governance and compensation: compensation expertise:Leverages service on the boards of directors and board committees (including in leadership roles) of other public companies and not-for-profit entities

Focus on reputational risk and sustainability/ESG matters:Draws upon experiences gained from DuPont and other board roles, including in connection with her role as Chair of our Public Responsibilities Committee

 
 
 
 
   
   
 

  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Carbon 3D, Inc., a digital manufacturing platform

»Chair (June 2022 – Present)

»President and CEO (November 2019 – Present)June 2022)

E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, a provider of basic materials and innovative products and services for diverse industries

»Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (2009 – 2015)

»President (October 2008 – December 2008)

»Executive Vice President, DuPont Coatings and Color Technologies, DuPont Electronic and Communication Technologies;Technologies, DuPont Performance Materials, DuPont Safety and Protection, Marketing and Sales, Pharmaceuticals, Risk Management and Safety and Sustainability (2006 – 2008)

»Various positions, including Group Vice President, DuPont Safety and Protection (1988 – 2006)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Member, Board of Advisors, Tufts University School of Engineering

Trustee, Northwestern University

Member, National Academy of Engineering

Member, The Business Council

Co-Chair, Paradigm for Parity

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of Tufts University and Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

 

 

14GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

OUR DIRECTORS

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Lakshmi N. Mittal, 70        73    

 

Independent

 

 

Director Since:Since: June 2008

 

GS Committees

 

Compensation

Governance

Public Responsibilities

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: ArcelorMittal S.A.

Former (Past 5 Years): None

 

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

   
 
  

 

Leadership, business development and operations:Founder of Mittal Steel Company and Executive Chairman and former Chief Executive OfficerCEO of ArcelorMittal, the world’s leading integrated steel and mining company and a leader in its focus on sustainability efforts

International business and growth markets:Leadership of a company with a presence in over 60 countries and an industrial footprint in 1815 countries provides global business expertise and perspective on public responsibilities

Corporate governance and international governance:Current and prior service on the boards of directors of other international public companies and not-for-profit entities assists with committee responsibilities

 
     
     
 


  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

ArcelorMittal S.A., a steel and mining company

»Executive Chairman (February 2021 – Present)

»Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (May 2008 – February 2021)

»President and Chief Executive Officer (November 2006 – May 2008)

Chief Executive Officer, Mittal Steel Company N.V. (1976 – November 2006)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Trustee, Cleveland Clinic

Member, Governing Board, Indian School of Business

Member, European Round Table for IndustryExecutive Committee, World Steel Association

Chairman, Governing Council, LNM Institute of Information Technology

Member, Global Advisory Council, Harvard University

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of St. Xavier’s College in India

 

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

 

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

Peter Oppenheimer, 58     Thomas Montag, 67    

 

Independent

 

 

Director SinceSince: July 2023

GS Committees

Audit

Governance

Risk (Chair)*

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

* Effective April 24, 2024

Key Experience and Qualifications  

Financial services industry expertise: Over 35 years of experience in the financial services industry, including most recently as COO and President of Global Banking and Markets at Bank of America, his previous tenure at the firm and his prior role on the board of BlackRock, Inc.

Risk management acumen: Deep and informed perspective regarding the complex financial and nonfinancial risks global financial institutions face, including market, credit and operational risks

Leadership and sustainability: Experience gained as an executive and director of both private and public companies. As CEO and director of Rubicon Carbon and as the former co-chair of the Sustainable Markets Committee at Bank of America, he provides additional perspective on sustainability risks


Career Highlights

Rubicon Carbon, LLC, a market-based products and solutions platform in the carbon market

»Chief Executive Officer (October 2022 – Present) and Director (December 2022 – Present)

Bank of America Corporation, a financial services company

»Chief Operating Officer (August 2014 – December 2021)

»Co-Chief Operating Officer (September 2011 – August 2014)

»President, Global Banking and Markets (September 2009 – December 2021)

»Head of Markets (January 2009 – September 2009)

»Executive Vice President, Head of Global Sales & Trading, Merrill Lynch (August 2008 – December 2008)

Goldman Sachs

»Global Securities Division leadership and member of the Management Committee, including as Co-COO of FICC and then Co-Head, Securities Division (April 2002 – December 2007)

»Head, Equities Asia (September 2002 – December 2006)

»Head, FICC Asia and Co-President, Goldman Sachs Japan (1999 – December 2006)

»Various positions of increasing seniority, including in London as head of Global Derivatives
(1985 – 1999)

Other Professional Experience and Community Involvement

Member, Board of Trustees, New York University Langone Medical Center

Member, Board of Trustees, Northwestern University

Member, Board of Directors, Hispanic Federation

Member, Board of Directors, The Japan Society

Member, Board of Directors, Deschutes Land Trust

Education

Graduate of Stanford University and the Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University

LOGO

Peter Oppenheimer, 61  

Independent

Director Since: March 2014

 

GS Committees

 

Audit (Chair)

Governance

Risk

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company
Directorships

 

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

 

Subsidiary Boards

GS Bank (Chair)

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

   
 
  

 

Capital and risk management:Garnered experience as CFO and Controller at Apple and Divisional CFO at Automatic Data Processing, Inc.

ReviewFinancial management and the review and preparation of financial statements:Over 20 years as a CFO or controllerController provides valuable experience and perspective as Audit Committee Chair

Oversight of technology and technology risks: Leverages prior experience in overseeing information systems at Apple

 
 


  

 

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

Apple, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of electronic devices and related software and services

»Senior Vice President (retired September 2014)

»Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2004(June 2004 – June 2014)

»Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (2002 – June 2004)

»Vice President and Corporate Controller (1998(2000 – 2002)

»Vice President, Finance and Controller, Worldwide Sales (1997 – 1998)2000)

»Senior Director, Finance and Controller, Americas (1996 – 1997)

Divisional Chief Financial Officer, Finance, MIS, Administration and Equipment Leasing Portfolio at Automatic Data Processing, Inc., a leading provider of human capital management and integrated computing solutions (1992 – 1996)

Consultant, Information Technology Practice at Coopers & Lybrand, LLP (1988 – 1992)

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of California Polytechnic State University and the Leavey School of Business, University of Santa Clara

 
    
 

 

16

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS15


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

OURINDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Jan E. Tighe, 58                   61         

 

Independent

 

 

Director Since:Since: December 2018

 

GS Committees

 

Audit

Governance

Risk

 

Other U.S.-Listed Company

Directorships

 

Current: General Motors
Company;
Huntsman Corporation; The Progressive Corporation

Former (Past 5 Years): None
The Progressive Corporation;
IronNet, Inc.

Subsidiary Boards

GS Bank

 

 Key Experience and Qualifications    

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

   
 
  

 

Technology and technology risk: Overrisk expertise: More than 20 years of senior executive experience in cybersecurity and information technology which experiencethat provides perspective to aid in oversight of the firm’s deployment of technology and the management of technology risk

Strategic planning and operations: Experience in strategic planning, risk assessment and execution of naval strategies across a variety of positions, including as a Fleet Commander and as a university president

Leadership and governance:Retired Vice Admiral who served in numerous leadership roles in the U.S. Navy and with the National Security Agency, who served on the U.S. Navy’s Corporate Board and nowwho serves on the boards of directors and board committees of other public companies and not-for-profit entities

 
 
 
 
   
 

  

CAREER HIGHLIGHTSCareer Highlights

 

United States Navy, Vice Admiral and various positions of increasing authority and responsibility (1980 – 2018), including:

»Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Information Warfare and Director, Naval Intelligence (2016
(2016
– 2018)

»Fleet Commander or Deputy Commander, U.S. Fleet Cyber Command/U.S. Tenth Fleet (2013 – 2016)

»University President, Naval Postgraduate School (2012 – 2013)

»Director, Decision Superiority Division, Chief of Naval Operations’ Staff (2011 – 2012)

»Deputy Director of Operations, U.S. Cyber Command (2010 – 2011)

 

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENTOther Professional Experience and Community Involvement

 

Member, Defense Science Board

Trustee, The MITRE Corporation

Member, Strategic Advisory Committee, Idaho National Labs – National and Homeland Security Directorate

Board Member, United States Naval Academy Foundation

Member and Global Security Expert, Strategic Advisory Group, Paladin Capital Group

Directorship Certified and Governance Fellow, National Association of Corporate Directors

 

EDUCATIONEducation

 

Graduate of U.S. Naval Academy and Naval Postgraduate School (including for Ph.D.)

 

 

 

LOGO

Jessica R. Uhl, 53               

Independent Nominee

Director Nominee*

GS Committees

Audit

Governance

Risk

Other U.S.-Listed Company Directorships

Current: Royal Dutch Shell plc

Former (Past 5 Years): None

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

Financial management and the review and preparationIndependence of financial statements: Leverages global finance experience, including in current role as CFO of Royal Dutch Shell plc, where she has driven measures to support the long-term health of the company, such as overseeing the delivery of industry-leading cash flow, supporting strategic plans related to Shell’s business and managing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Complex risk management: Valuable perspective on the management of complex financial and non-financial risks, including climate risk management

Leadership, operations and sustainability: Experience across finance leadership positions at Shell in the U.S. and Europe, including achievement of key business objectives ranging from cost- saving initiatives related to complex operations to M&A. She has also been a leading advocate for transparency in the energy industry, including with respect to climate change, and during her tenure Shell has continued to expand its disclosures and climate commitments


CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Royal Dutch Shell plc, an international energy company

»Chief Financial Officer (March 2017 – Present)

»Executive Vice President, Finance, Integrated Gas (2016 – March 2017)

»Executive Vice President, Finance, Upstream Americas (2014 – 2015)

»Vice President, Finance, Unconventionals (2013 – 2014)

»Vice President, Controller, Upstream and Projects and Technology (2010 – 2012)

»Vice President, Finance, Shell Lubricants (2009 – 2010)

»Head of External Reporting (2007 – 2009)

»Vice President, Business Development, Shell Renewables, Hydrogen & CO2 (2005 – 2006)

»Finance Manager, Shell Solar (2004 – 2005)

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Member, Finance and Tax Working Group (CFO Task Force), European Roundtable for Industry

Member, Main Committee, The 100 Group

Member, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), CFO Network

EDUCATION

Graduate of the University of California, Berkeley and INSEAD

*

If elected at our 2021 Annual Meeting, Ms. Uhl will join our Board and its Audit, Governance and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021.Directors

 

16GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

OUR DIRECTORS

 

LOGO

David A. Viniar, 65              

Non-Employee

Director Since: January 2013

GS Committees

Risk

Other U.S.-Listed Company Directorships

Current: Square, Inc.

Former (Past 5 Years): None

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

Financial industry, in particular risk management and regulatory affairs: Over 30 years10 of experience in various roles at Goldman Sachs, as well as service as the lead11 director nominees are independent director and chair of the audit and risk committee of Square, Inc., provides valuable perspective to our Board

Insight into our firm’s financial reporting, controls and risk management: As our former CFO, able to provide insights about our risks to our Board and committees

Capital management processes and assessments: Experience gained through serving as our CFO for over 10 years


CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Goldman Sachs

»Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (May 1999 – January 2013)

»Head of Operations, Technology, Finance and Services Division (December 2002 – January 2013)

»Head of the Finance Division and Co-Head of Credit Risk Management and Advisory and Firmwide Risk (December 2001 – December 2002)

»Co-Head of Operations, Finance and Resources (March 1999 – December 2001)

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Co-Vice Chairman, Board of Directors, Garden of Dreams Foundation

Former Trustee, Union College

EDUCATION

Graduate of Union College and Harvard Business School

 

 

 

LOGO

Mark O. Winkelman, 74    

Independent

Director Since: December 2014

GS Committees

Risk (Chair)

Audit

Governance

Other U.S.-Listed Company Directorships

Current: None

Former (Past 5 Years): None

KEY EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS    

Knowledge about our firm, including our fixed income business, and an understanding of the risks we face: Utilizes his previous tenure at Goldman Sachs, as well as his current service on the board of our subsidiary, Goldman Sachs International (GSI), including as the former chair of the GSI risk committee

Audit and financial expertise, corporate governance and leadership: Leverages prior service on the board of directors and the audit and finance committees of Anheuser-Busch InBev and service on the boards of directors and audit, finance and other committees of not-for-profit entities

Financial services industry: Experience gained through his role as operating partner at J.C. Flowers and through other industry experience


CAREER HIGHLIGHTS

Private investor (Present)

Operating Partner, J.C. Flowers & Co., a private investment firm focusing on the financial services industry (2006 – 2008)

Goldman Sachs

»Retired Limited Partner (1994 – 1999)

»Management Committee Member and Co-Head of Fixed Income Division (1987 – 1994)

»Various positions at the firm, including Head of J. Aron Division (1978 – 1987)

Senior Investment Officer, The World Bank (1974 – 1978)

OTHER PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Director, Goldman Sachs International

Trustee Emeritus, Penn Medicine

Trustee Emeritus, University of Pennsylvania

EDUCATION

Graduate of Erasmus University in the Netherlands and The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS17


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS

INDEPENDENCE OF DIRECTORS

  10 of 12 director nominees are independent    

 

Our Board determined, upon the recommendation of our Governance Committee, that Ms. Burns, Dr. Faust,each of our director nominees (other than Mr. Flaherty, Ms. Kullman, Mr. Mittal, Mr. Ogunlesi, Mr. Oppenheimer, Vice Admiral Tighe, Ms. Uhl and Mr. Winkelman areSolomon) is “independent” within the meaning of NYSE rules and our Policy Regarding Director Independence (Director Independence Policy). Mr. Ogunlesi and Ms. Uhl, each of whom is retiring from our Board at the 2024 Annual Meeting, were also determined to be independent. Furthermore, our Board has determined that all of our independent nomineesdirectors satisfy the heightened audit committee independence standards under SEC and NYSE rules and that our Compensation Committee members also satisfy the relevant heightened standards under NYSE rules.

 

Process for Independence Assessment

A director is considered independent under NYSE rules if our Board determines that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Goldman Sachs. Our Board has established a Director Independence Policy that provides standards to assist our Board in determining which relationships and transactions might constitute a material relationship that would cause a director not to be independent.

To assess independence, our Governance Committee and our Board review detailed information regarding our independent directors or nominees, including employment and public company and not-for-profit directorships, as well as information regarding immediate family members and affiliated entities.

Through the course of this review, our Governance Committee and our Board consider relationships between the independent directors or nominees (and their immediate family members and affiliated entities) on the one hand, and Goldman Sachs and its affiliates on the other, in accordance with our Director Independence Policy. This includes a review of revenues to the firm from, and payments or donations made by the firm to, relevant entities affiliated with our directors or nominees (or their immediate family members) as a result of ordinary course transactions or contributions to not-for-profit organizations.

For more information on the categories of transactions that our Governance Committee and our Board reviewed, considered and determined to be immaterial under our Director Independence Policy, see Annex B: Additional Details on Director Independence.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

17

 

Process for Independence Assessment

A director is considered independent under NYSE rules if our Board determines that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with Goldman Sachs. Our Board has established a Director Independence Policy that provides standards to assist our Board in determining which relationships and transactions might constitute a material relationship that would cause a director not to be independent.

To assess independence, our Governance Committee and our Board review detailed information regarding our independent directors or nominees, including employment and public company and not-for-profit directorships, as well as information regarding immediate family members and affiliated entities.

Through the course of this review, our Governance Committee and our Board consider relationships between the independent directors or nominees (and their immediate family members and affiliated entities) on the one hand, and Goldman Sachs and its affiliates on the other, in accordance with our Director Independence Policy. This includes a review of revenues to the firm from, and payments or donations made by us to, relevant entities affiliated with our directors or nominees (or their immediate family members) as a result of ordinary course transactions or contributions to not-for-profit organizations.

For more information on the categories of transactions that our Governance Committee and our Board reviewed, considered and determined to be immaterial under our Director Independence Policy, see Annex B: Additional Details on Director Independence.

18GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

OUR BOARD COMMITTEES

 

Structure of our Board and Governance Practices

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

CHAIRMAN AND CEO: DAVID SOLOMON; LEAD DIRECTOR: ADEBAYO OGUNLESI

AUDIT

COMMITTEE*

COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
GOVERNANCE
COMMITTEE*

PUBLIC
RESPONSIBILITIES
COMMITTEE

RISK

COMMITTEE*

5 Members:4 Members:10 Members:3 Members:7 Members:

All Independent

All Independent

All Independent

All Independent

6 Independent

OUR BOARD COMMITTEESOur Board Committees

Our Board has five standing Committees: Audit, Compensation, Governance, Public Responsibilities and Risk. The specific membership of each Committee allows us to take advantage of our directors’ diverse skill sets, which enablesenabling a deep focus on Committee matters.

Each of our standing Committees:

 

  

Operates pursuant to a written charter (available on our website atwww.gs.com/charters)

 

  

Evaluates its performance annually

 

  

Reviews its charter annually

 

 

 

The firm’s reputation is of critical importance. In fulfilling their duties and responsibilities, each of our standing Committees and our Board considers the potential effect of any matter on our reputation.

 

   Audit

   All Independent

Key Skills & Experiences  

Represented

Key Responsibilities

    LOGO

Peter Oppenheimer*

Mark Flaherty

Thomas Montag

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl**

Adebayo Ogunlesi**

David Viniar**

(ex-officio)

  Audit/tax/accounting

  Preparation or oversight of financial statements

  Compliance

  Technology

  Assist our Board in its oversight of our financial statements, legal and regulatory compliance, independent auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance, internal audit function performance and internal controls over financial reporting

  Decide whether to appoint, retain or terminate our independent auditors

  Pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services, if any, to be provided by the independent auditors

  Appoint and oversee the work of our Director of Internal Audit and annually assess her performance

  Prepare the Audit Committee Report

   Compensation

   All Independent

Key Skills & Experiences  

Represented

Key Responsibilities

    LOGO

Kimberley Harris

Michele Burns

Kevin Johnson

Ellen Kullman

Lakshmi Mittal

Adebayo Ogunlesi**

David Viniar**

(ex-officio)

  Setting of executive compensation

  Evaluation of executive and firmwide compensation programs

  Human capital management, including diversity practices

  Determine and approve the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers

  Approve, or make recommendations to our Board for it to approve, our incentive, equity-based and other compensation plans

  Assist our Board in its oversight of the development, implementation and effectiveness of our policies and strategies relating to our human capital management function, including:

»   recruiting, retention and career development and progression;

»   management succession (other than that within the purview of our Governance Committee); and

»   diversity and employment practices

  Prepare the Compensation Committee Report

  *

Multiple members of our Audit Committee, including the Chair, have been determined to be “audit committee financial experts.”

**

Mr. Ogunlesi and Ms. Uhl are retiring at our 2024 Annual Meeting. Effective April 24, 2024, David Viniar will be our Lead Director and Chair of our Governance Committee and an ex-officio member of our Audit, Compensation, Public Responsibilities and Risk Committees.

18

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

OUR BOARD COMMITTEES

   Governance

   All Independent

Key Skills & Experiences  

Represented

Key Responsibilities

    LOGO

Adebayo Ogunlesi*

David Viniar*

Michele Burns

Mark Flaherty

Kimberley Harris

Kevin Johnson

Ellen Kullman

Lakshmi Mittal

Thomas Montag

Peter Oppenheimer

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl*

  Corporate governance

  Talent development and succession planning

  Current and prior public company board service

  Recommend individuals to our Board for nomination, election or appointment as members of our Board and its Committees

  Oversee the evaluation of the performance of our Board and our CEO

  Review and concur with the succession plans for our CEO and other members of senior management

  Shape our corporate governance, including developing, recommending to our Board and reviewing on an ongoing basis the corporate governance principles and practices that apply to us

  Review periodically the form and amount of non-employee director compensation and make recommendations to our Board

   Public Responsibilities

   All Independent

Key Skills & Experiences  

Represented

Key Responsibilities

    LOGO

Ellen Kullman

Michele Burns

Kimberley Harris

Lakshmi Mittal

Adebayo Ogunlesi*

David Viniar*

(ex-officio)

  Reputational risk

  Sustainability/ESG

  Government and regulatory affairs

  Philanthropy

  Assist our Board in its oversight of our firm’s relationships with major external constituencies and our reputation

  Oversee the development, implementation and effectiveness of our policies and strategies relating to citizenship, corporate engagement and relevant significant public policy issues

  Review sustainability issues affecting our firm, including through the periodic review of the Sustainability Report

   Risk

   All Independent

Key Skills & Experiences  

Represented

Key Responsibilities

    LOGO

David Viniar*

Thomas Montag**

Mark Flaherty

Kevin Johnson

Peter Oppenheimer

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl*

Adebayo Ogunlesi*

(ex-officio)

  Risk taking, mitigation and control in complex industries

  Technology, cybersecurity and information security

  Understanding of financial products

  Expertise in capital adequacy and deployment

  Assist our Board in its oversight of our firm’s overall risk-taking tolerance and management of financial and operational risks, such as market, credit and liquidity risk, including reviewing and discussing with management:

»   our firm’s capital plan, regulatory capital ratios, capital management policy and internal capital adequacy assessment process, and the effectiveness of our financial and operational risk management policies and controls;

»   our liquidity risk metrics, management, funding strategies and controls, and the contingency funding plan; and

»   our market, credit, operational (including information security and cybersecurity), climate and model risk management strategies, policies and controls

  *

Mr. Ogunlesi and Ms. Uhl are retiring at our 2024 Annual Meeting. Effective April 24, 2024, David Viniar will be our Lead Director and Chair of our Governance Committee and an ex-officio member of our Audit, Compensation, Public Responsibilities and Risk Committees.

**

Mr. Montag will be the Chair of our Risk Committee effective April 24, 2024.

In October 2020, in connection with the announcement of the settlement of government and regulatory proceedings relating to 1MDB matters, our Board formed the 1MDB Remediation Special Committee to provide additional oversight and review of the remediation efforts arising out of the lessons of 1MDB. The 1MDB Remediation Special Committee iswas chaired by our Lead Director and the members are the Chairs ofwith each of the Audit, Compensation, Public Responsibilities and Risk Committees.our Committee Chairs as members. This Special Committee has met twice in 2023 and reported to datethe Board on its activities. Following the completion of our obligations pursuant to the settlements, our Board determined, as part of its annual Board and Committee evaluation, to dissolve the 1MDB Remediation Special Committee, with oversight to continue as part of the Board’s and each Committee’s respective mandate. The Board may from time to time utilize additional special purpose committees; any such committees will report periodically to the Board concerningon its activities.

 

  

     AUDIT

Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

     ALL INDEPENDENT

KEY SKILLS & EXPERIENCES
REPRESENTED

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

     LOGO19

 

Peter Oppenheimer**

Mark Flaherty

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl*

Mark Winkelman

Adebayo Ogunlesi (ex-officio)

   Audit/Tax/Accounting

   Preparation or oversight of financial statements

    Compliance

   Technology

   Assist our Board in its oversight of our financial statements, legal and regulatory compliance, independent auditors’ qualification, independence and performance, internal audit function performance and internal controls over financial reporting

   Decide whether to appoint, retain or terminate our independent auditors

Pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services, if any, to be provided by the independent auditors

    Appoint and oversee the work of our Director of Internal Audit and annually assess her performance

    Prepare the Audit Committee Report

*

If elected at our 2021 Annual Meeting, Ms. Uhl will join our Board and its Audit, Governance and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021.

**

Multiple members of our Audit Committee, including the Chair, have been determined to be “audit committee financial experts.”

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS19


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

OUR BOARD COMMITTEESAND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

 

     COMPENSATION

     ALL INDEPENDENT

KEY SKILLS & EXPERIENCES
REPRESENTED

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

    LOGO

Michele Burns

Drew Faust

Ellen Kullman

Lakshmi Mittal

Adebayo Ogunlesi    

(ex-officio)

   Setting of executive compensation

   Evaluation of executive and firmwide compensation programs

    Human capital management, including diversity

   Determine and approve the compensation of our CEO and other executive officers

    Approve, or make recommendations to our Board for it to approve, our incentive, equity-based and other compensation plans

    Assist our Board in its oversight of the development, implementation and effectiveness of our policies and strategies relating to our human capital management function, including:

»  recruiting, retention and career development and progression;

»  management succession (other than that within the purview of our Governance Committee); and

»  diversity and employment practices

    Prepare the Compensation Committee Report

     GOVERNANCE

     ALL INDEPENDENT

KEY SKILLS & EXPERIENCES
REPRESENTED

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

    LOGO

Adebayo Ogunlesi

Michele Burns

Drew Faust

Mark Flaherty

Ellen Kullman

Lakshmi Mittal

Peter Oppenheimer  

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl*

Mark Winkelman

   Corporate governance

   Talent development and succession planning

    Current and prior public company board service

   Recommend individuals to our Board for nomination, election or appointment as members of our Board and its Committees

    Oversee the evaluation of the performance of our Board and our CEO

   Review and concur with the succession plans for our CEO and other members of senior management

    Take a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance, including developing, recommending to our Board and reviewing on an ongoing basis the corporate governance principles and practices that apply to us

    Review periodically the form and amount of non-employee director compensation and make recommendations to our Board with respect thereto

     PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES

     ALL INDEPENDENT

KEY SKILLS & EXPERIENCES
REPRESENTED

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

    LOGO

Ellen Kullman

Drew Faust

Lakshmi Mittal

Adebayo Ogunlesi     (ex-officio)

   Reputational risk

   Sustainability / ESG

    Government and
regulatory affairs

   Philanthropy

   Assist our Board in its oversight of our firm’s relationships with major external constituencies and our reputation

    Oversee the development, implementation and effectiveness of our policies and strategies relating to citizenship, corporate engagement and relevant significant public policy issues

    Review sustainability issues affecting our firm, including through the periodic review of the Sustainability Report

     RISK

     MAJORITY INDEPENDENT

KEY SKILLS & EXPERIENCES

REPRESENTED

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

     LOGO

Mark Winkelman

Michele Burns

Mark Flaherty

Peter Oppenheimer    

Jan Tighe

Jessica Uhl*

Adebayo Ogunlesi (ex-officio)

Non-independent

David Viniar

   Understanding of how risk is undertaken, mitigated and controlled in complex industries

    Technology and cybersecurity

    Understanding of financial products

   Expertise in capital adequacy and deployment

   Assist our Board in its oversight of our firm’s overall risk-taking tolerance and management of financial and operational risks, such as market, credit and liquidity risk, including reviewing and discussing with management:

»   our firm’s capital plan, regulatory capital ratios, capital management policy and internal capital adequacy assessment process, and the effectiveness of our financial and operational risk management policies and controls;

»   our liquidity risk metrics, management, funding strategies and controls, and the contingency funding plan; and

»   our market, credit, operational (including information security and cybersecurity) and model risk management strategies, policies and controls

*

If elected at our 2021 Annual Meeting, Ms. Uhl will join our Board and its Audit, Governance and Risk Committees on July 1, 2021.

20GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

  BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

Committee Evaluations

Board and Committee evaluations play a critical role in ensuringhelping to ensure the effective functioning of our Board. It is important to take stock of Board, Committee and director performance and to solicit and act upon feedback received from each member of our Board. To this end, under the leadership of our Lead Director, our Governance Committee is responsible for evaluatingevaluates the performance of our Board annually, and each of our Board’s Committees also annually conducts a an annual self-evaluation.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

20202023 Evaluations: A Multi-Step Process REVIEW OF EVALUATION PROCESS Our Lead Director and Governance Committee periodically review the evaluation process to ensureso that actionable feedback is solicited on the operation of our Board and its Committees, as well as on director performance QUESTIONNAIRE Provides director feedback on an unattributed basis; feedback from questionnaire informs one-on-one and closed session discussions ONE-ON-ONE DISCUSSIONS One-on-one discussions betweenOn a biennial basis (including for 2023), the Secretary to the Board interviews each director to obtain feedback on director performance, the results of which are provided to our Lead Director. Our Lead Director andseparately has one-on-one discussions with each non-employee director, provide furthereach of which provides an opportunity for candid discussion regarding individual feedback and an additional forum to solicit additional feedback as well as to provide individualfurther feedback CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSION Joint closed session discussion of Board and Committee evaluations led by our Lead Director and independent Committee Chairs provides for a synergistic review of Board and Committee performance EVALUATION SUMMARY Summary of Board and Committee evaluationsevaluation results provided to the full Board FEEDBACK INCORPORATED Policies and practices updated as appropriate as a result of the annual and ongoing feedback Examples include changes to Committee structure, additional presentations on various topics, evolution of director skill sets, refinements to meeting materials and presentation format, additional Audit and Risk Committee meetings and additional opportunities for exposure to "next generation" leaders of the firm ONGOING FEEDBACK Directors provide ongoing, real-time feedback outside of the evaluation process Examples of feedback from evaluations and otherwise include: additional presentations on various topics (e.g., strategic initiatives, risk deep dives, talent strategy, investor feedback), evolution of director skill sets, refinements to meeting materials (e.g., enhanced executive summaries) and presentation format, refinement of board and committee meeting cadence, strengthened oversight of key global entities, and additional opportunities for exposure to next generation leaders of the firm Topics considered duringConsidered During the Board and Committee evaluations include:Evaluations Include: DIRECTOR PERFORMANCE Individual director performance (format enhanced in 2020 to help further elicit individual feedback) Lead Director (in that role) Chairman of the Board (in that role) Each Committee Chair (in that role) BOARD AND COMMITTEE OPERATIONS Board and Committee membership, including director skills, background, expertise and diversity Committee structure, including whether the Committee structure enhances Board and Committee performance and efficacy of the use of special committees Access to firm personnel Executive succession planning process Conduct of meetings, including frequency of, time allocated for and encouragement of candid dialogue, and effectiveness of closed sessions Materials and information, including quality, quantity and timeliness of information received from management, and suggestions for educational sessions Shareholder feedback BOARD PERFORMANCE Key areas of focus for the Board Oversight of reputation StrategyStrategic oversight, including risks related thereto Consideration of shareholder value Capital planning COMMITTEE PERFORMANCE Performance of Committee duties under Committee charter Oversight of reputation and considerationConsideration of shareholder value Effectiveness of outside advisors Identification ofSuggested topics that should receive more attention andfor further discussion

 

20

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS21


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

 

Board Leadership Structure

Strong Independent Lead Director—Combined Chair-CEO: Why our Structure is Effective

We review our Board leadership structure annually. Conducting regular assessments, rather than having a fixed policy, allows our Board to deliberate the merits of our Board’s leadership structure to ensure that the most efficient and appropriate leadership structure is in place for our firm’s needs, which may evolve over time. We are committed to independent leadership on our Board. If at any time the Chair is not an independent director, our independent directors will appoint an independent Lead Director.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTUREKey Components of Review

 

Strong IndependentChair-CEO

& Lead Director — Combined Chairman-CEO: Why our Structure is Effective

Director

We review our Board leadership structure annually. Conducting regular assessments allows our Board to deliberate the merits of our Board’s leadership structure to ensure that the most efficient and appropriate leadership structure is in place for our firm’s needs, which may evolve over time. We are committed to independent leadership on our Board. If at any time the Chairman is not an independent director, our independent directors will appoint an independent Lead Director.

KEY COMPONENTS OF REVIEW

CHAIRMAN-CEO

& LEAD

DIRECTOR

RESPONSIBILITIESResponsibilities

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

POLICIESPolicies & Practices

& PRACTICES TOto Ensure Strong

ENSURE STRONGIndependent Board

INDEPENDENT

BOARD OVERSIGHTOversight

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

 

SHAREHOLDERShareholder

FEEDBACKFeedback & Voting

VOTING RESULTSResults Regarding

REGARDING BOARD

LEADERSHIPBoard Leadership

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

FIRMFirm

PERFORMANCEPerformance

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

TRENDSTrends &

DEVELOPMENTS REGARDINGDevelopments

LEADERSHIPRegarding

STRUCTURELeadership

Structure

                      

In December 2020,2023, our Governance Committee conducted its annual review of our Board’s leadership structure. The review considered a variety of factors, including our governance practices and shareholder feedback on our Board and its leadership structure. In addition, our Governance Committee considered feedback on theour Chairman of the Board received in connection with the Board evaluation.

As a result of this review, our Governance Committee determined that continuing to have Mr. Solomon serve as both Chairman and CEO — CEO—working together with a strong independent Lead Director — Director—is the most effective leadership structure for our Board and our firm at this time.

Ultimately, we believe that our current leadership structure, together with strong governance practices, creates a productive relationship between our Board and management, including strong independent oversight that benefits our shareholders.

We will continue to conduct Board leadership assessments annually. If at any time our Governance Committee determines it would be appropriate to appoint an independent Chairman,Chair, it will not hesitate to do so.

BENEFITS OF A COMBINED ROLEBenefits of a Combined Role

 

 

  

A combined Chairman-CEOChair-CEO structure provides our firm with a senior leader who serves as a primary liaison between our Board and management and as a primary public face of our firm.firm. This structure demonstrates clear accountability to shareholders, clients and others.

 

  

Our CEO has extensive knowledge of all aspects of our current business, operations and risks, which he brings to Board discussions as Chairman.

 

 » 

A combined Chairman-CEO can serveChair-CEO serves as a knowledgeable resource for independent directors both at and between Board meetings.

 

 » 

Combining the roles at our firm has been effective in promulgating strong and effective leadership of the firm, particularly in times of economic challenge and regulatory change affecting our industry (including the market stress brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic);industry; the same will beis important during this timephase of continuedour strategic developmentjourney, including executing on our strategic transition and execution and investmentpositioning the firm for long-term growth.the future.

EMPOWERED LEAD DIRECTOR WITH EXPANSIVE LIST OF ENUMERATED DUTIES

Key Pillars of Lead Director Role

 

Sets and approves

SETS AND APPROVESagenda for Board

AGENDA FOR BOARDmeetings and leads

MEETINGS AND LEADS EXECUTIVE SESSIONSexecutive sessions    

Focuses on Board

effectiveness,

composition

and conducts

evaluations

Acts as primary

Board contact

for shareholder
engagement and

engages with
regulators

Serves as liaison

between

independent

directors and Chair/

management

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

21

FOCUSES ON BOARD EFFECTIVENESS,

COMPOSITION AND

CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS

ACTS AS PRIMARY

BOARD CONTACT

FOR SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND

ENGAGES WITH

REGULATORS

SERVES AS LIAISON

BETWEEN INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND CHAIRMAN/

MANAGEMENT

22GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

 

 

   Powers and Duties of our Independent Lead Director

 

  

  Provides independent leadership

 

Sets agenda for Board meetings, working with our ChairmanChair (including adding items to and approving the agenda) and approving the form and type of related materials, as well as reviewing and concurring in the agendas for each Committee meeting

 

  Approves the schedule for Board and committeeCommittee meetings

 

Presides at executive sessions of the independent directors

 

Calls meetings of the Board, including meetings of the independent directors

 

  Presides at each Board meeting at which the ChairmanChair is not present

 

  Engages with the independent directors and non-employeenon- employee directors at and between Board and Committee meetings, including:

 

» to identify matters for discussion, including for discussion at executive sessions of the independent directors

 

» to facilitate communication with the ChairmanChair (as set forth below)

 

» one-on-one engagement regarding the performance and functioning of the collective

Board, individual director performance and other matters as appropriate

 

Serves as an advisor to the Chairman,Chair, including by:

 

» engaging with the ChairmanChair between Board meetings

 

» facilitating communication between the independent directors and the Chairman,Chair, including by presenting the Chairman’sChair’s views, concerns and issues to the independent directors, as well as assisting with informing or engaging non-employee directors, as appropriate

 

» raising to the ChairmanChair views, concerns and issues of the independent directors, including decisions reached, and suggestions made, at executive sessions, in each case as appropriate

 

Oversees the Board’s governance processes, including Board evaluations, succession planning and other governance-related matters

 

Leads the annual CEO evaluation

 

  Meets directly with management and non- managementnon-management employees of the firm

 

  Consults and directly communicates with shareholders and other key constituents, as appropriate

 

 

 

Strong Governance Practices Support

 

STRONG GOVERNANCE PRACTICES SUPPORT

INDEPENDENT BOARD OVERSIGHTIndependent Board Oversight

 

 

 

 

STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACKStakeholder Feedback & ENGAGEMENTEngagement

  Experienced independent directors, and non-employee director, the majority of whichwhom have executive-level experience

 

  Independent and engaged Chairs of all standing Committees

 

  Regular executive sessions of independent directors chaired by Lead Director, supplemented by additional sessions of non-employeedirectors without management present

 

  All directors may suggest inclusion of additional subjects on agendas and any director may call an executive session

 

  Annual Board and Committee evaluations that include feedback on individual director performance

 

  Independent director participation in, and oversight of, key governance processes, such as CEO performance, executive compensation and succession planning

 

  All directors are free to contact any employee of theour firm directly

 

  Our Chairman and CEO and our Lead Director meet and speak with each other regularly about our Board and our firm

 

  We have generally received positive stakeholder feedback on the nature of our Lead Director role and our annual leadership structure review

 

» In considering the strength of our Board leadership structure, many investors cite our Lead Director’s expansive list of enumerated duties, extensive engagement with shareholders and the insight into the Board’s perspectives and focus areasour Board provided by theour Lead Director’s letter in our proxy statement that comes from our Lead Director

 

  Our retiring Lead Director, Adebayo Ogunlesi, has engaged actively during his tenure with the firm’s shareholders and other key stakeholders, including our regulators, to discuss a variety of topics, including our Board leadership structure and his responsibilities as Lead Director, Board effectiveness, compensation, the Board’s independent oversight of strategy and firm culture, and Board and management succession planningplanning. David Viniar, our incoming Lead Director, intends to continue this robust approach to shareholder engagement going forward

 

» In 2020,2023, Mr. Ogunlesi met with investors representing over 25% of our shares outstanding. He has regularly conducted engagement since becomingover his tenure as Lead Director, generally meeting with individuals representing key investors and proxy advisory firms

 

22

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS23


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

YEAR-ROUND REVIEW OF BOARD COMPOSITION & BOARD LEADERSHIP SUCCESSION PLANNING

 

YEAR-ROUND REVIEW OF BOARD COMPOSITIONYear-Round Review of Board Composition & Board Leadership Succession Planning

 

 

 

Our Governance Committee seeks to build and maintain an effective,

well-rounded, financially literate and diverse Board that operates

in an atmosphere of candor candidly and collaboration.collaboratively

 

 
 

 

In identifying and recommending director candidates, our Governance Committee places primary emphasis on the criteria set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, including:

 

  Judgment, character, expertise, skills and knowledge useful to the oversight of our business;

 

  Diversity of viewpoints, backgrounds, work and other experiences and other demographics;

 

  Business or other relevant experience; and

 

  The extent to which the interplay of the candidate’s expertise, skills, knowledge and experience with that of other members of our Board will build a strong and effective Board that is collegial and responsive to the needs of our firm.

 

Board Process for Identification and Review of Director Candidates to Join Our Board

    LOGO

INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHAREHOLDERS INDEPENDENT SEARCH FIRMS OUR PEOPLE CANDIDATE POOL IN-DEPTH REVIEW Screen Qualifications Consider Diversity Review Independence and Potential Conflicts Meet with Directors Consider Skills/Matrix RECOMMEND SELECTED CANDIDATES FOR APPOINTMENT TO OUR BOARD FIVE NEW DIRECTOR NOMINEES IN LAST FIVE YEARS MEDIAN NOMINEE TENURE OF ~6.3 YEARS

Identifying and recommending individuals for nomination, election or re-election to our Board is a principal responsibility of our Governance Committee. The Committee carries out this function through an ongoing, year-round process, which includes the Committee’s annual evaluation of our Board and individual director evaluations. Each director and director candidate is evaluated by our Governance Committee based on his or hertheir individual merits, taking into account our firm’s needs and the composition of our Board.

LOGO

Independent Directors Shareholders Independent Search Firms Our People Candidate Pool In-Depth Review Consider Skills/Matrix Screen Quali fications Review Independence and Potential Conflicts Meet with Directors Consider Diversity Recommend Selected Candidates for Appointment to our Board [4] New Director Nominees in Last Five Years Median Nominee Tenure of ~[6] YearsIndependent Directors Shareholders Independent Search Firms Our People Candidate Pool In-Depth Review Consider Skills/Matrix Screen Quali fications Review Independence and Potential Conflicts Meet with Directors Consider Diversity Recommend Selected Candidates for Appointment to our Board 3 of our Director Nominees New in Last Five Years Median Nominee Tenure of ~7 Years

The Committee continues to focus on what skills are beneficial for service in key Board positions, such as Lead Director and Committee Chairs, and regularly evaluates potential successors for those positions (both on an emergency and longer-term basis).

To assist in thisits evaluation of directors and director candidates, the Committee utilizesmay from time to time utilize as a discussion tool a matrix or focus list of certain skills and experiences that would be beneficial to have represented on our Board and on our Committees at any particular point in time. For example, the Committee is focused on what skills are beneficialtime and those that may be viewed as critical for service in keya leadership role.

These ongoing processes position the Board positions, suchto be able to act swiftly on succession-related matters, as the independent directors recently did in appointing Mr. Viniar as the Lead Director and Committee Chairs, and conducts a succession planning process for those positions.to succeed Mr. Ogunlesi.

Our Governance Committee welcomes candidates recommended by shareholders and will consider these candidates in the same manner as other candidates. Shareholders wishing to submit potential director candidates for consideration by our Governance Committee should follow the instructions inFrequently Asked Questions.Questions.

 

24

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

23


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

DIRECTOR EDUCATION

 

DIRECTOR EDUCATIONDirector Education

Director education about our firm and our industry is an ongoing process whichthat begins when a director joins our Board.

Upon joining our Board, new directors are provided with a comprehensive orientation about our firm, including our business, strategy and governance. For example, new directors (including Mr. Montag) typically meet with senior leaders covering each of our revenue-producing divisionssegments and regions, as well as with senior leaders from key control-sidecontrol, finance and operating functions.

New directors will also undergo in-depth training on the work of each of our Board’s Committees, such as Audit and Risk Committeeparticipate in orientation sessions with our CFO, Controller, Treasurercovering the responsibilities and CRO, as well as a session withkey areas of focus of the DirectorBoard and its Committees. Orientation programs typically include more than 25 hours of Internal Audit. programming and are tailored accordingly for each director, including based on Committee assignments.

Additional training is also provided when a director assumes a leadership role, such as becoming Lead Director or a Committee Chair.

Board and Committee presentations, roundtables, regular communications and firm and other industry events help to keep directors appropriately apprised of key developments in our businesses and in our industry, including material changes in regulation, so that they can carry out their oversight responsibilities.responsibilities effectively.

 

COMMITMENT OF OUR BOARDCommitment of our Board

Commitment of our Directors — 2020Directors—2023 Meetings

Our Board and its Committees met frequently in 2020, with Board meetings increasing from 12 in 2019 to 23 in 2020 due to the 2020 operating environment.2023.

 

  

 

2020    

   MEETINGS       2023 Meetings   

 

  

 

 

 

Board

 

 

 

 

 

2329(a)

 

 

 LOGO

 

 

 

74 TOTAL BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS IN 2020LOGO

 

 

 

 

 

 

Audit

 

 

 

 

1714  

 

78

Total Board and

Committee Meetings

in 2023

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

 

810  

 

 

 

 

 

Governance

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

Public Responsibilities

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

Risk

 

 

 

 

1413  

 

 

 

 

 

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors without Management(b)

 

 

 

 

9 7  

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Executive Sessions of Non-EmployeeIndependent Directors without Management(c)

 

 

 

 

17 8  

 

 

 (a)

(a)  Includes one meetingmeetings of the Board’s 1MDB Remediation Special Committee which wasand other special Board committees formed in October 2020.from time to time.

 

(b)

Chaired by our Lead Director.

 

(c)

Led by our Lead Director or other independent Committee Chairs.

Each of our current directors attended over 75% (the threshold for disclosure under SEC rules) of the meetings of our Board and the Committees on which he or shethey served as a regular member during 2020.2023. Overall attendance at Board and Committee meetings during 20202023 was over 99%approximately 96% for our directors as a group.

We encourage our directors to attend our annual meetings. All of our current directors then in office attended the 20202023 Annual Meeting, which was held virtually.Meeting.

 

24

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS25


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—STRUCTURE OF OUR BOARD AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

COMMITMENT OF OUR BOARD

 

Commitment of our Directors — Directors—Beyond the Boardroom

 

Engagement beyond the boardroom provides our directors with additional insights into our businesses, risk management and industry, as well as valuable perspectives on the performance of our firm, our CEO and other members of senior management.

The commitment of our directors extends well beyond preparation for, and attendance at, regular and special meetings.

 


 

ONGOING COLLABORATION

Ongoing Collaboration

Frequent interactions with each
other, senior management and
key employees around the globe
on topics including strategy,
performance, risk management,
culture and talent development

 

 

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

Stakeholder Engagement

Regular engagement with key
stakeholders, including regulators and
engagement with our
shareholders. Participation
in firm and industry conferences
and other events on behalf
of the Board

 

 

REGULARLY INFORMED

Regularly Informed

Receive and review postings on significant
developments and weekly
informational packages that include updates on recent developments, press coverage and current events that relate to our business, our people and our industry

 

 

Service on Subsidiary Boards

Provides connectivity and enhances oversight of our entities worldwide

Our Lead Director and Committee Chairs provide additional independent leadership outside the boardroom.

 

For example, each Chair sets the agenda for his or hertheir respective Committee meetings and reviews and provides feedback on the form and type of related materials, in each case taking into account whether their Committee is appropriately carrying out its core responsibilities and focusing on the key issues facing the firm, as may be applicable from time to time. To do so, each Chair engages with key members of management and subject matter experts in advance of each Committee meeting.

 

In addition, our Lead Director also sets the Board agenda (working with our Chairman) and approves the form and type of related materials. Our Lead Director also approves the schedule offor Board and Committee meetings, taking into account whether there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items at each Board and Committee meeting.

In carrying out their leadership roles during 2023:

 

In carrying out their leadership roles during 2020:

Lead Director / Governance Chair*

Adebayo Ogunlesi

LOGO

 

 

LEAD DIRECTOR

Adebayo Ogunlesi

    LOGO     

Includes meetings with, as applicable:

CEO, COO, CFO, Secretary to the Board, CLO and General Counsel, CRO, Director of Internal Audit and other keyOther Key Internal Audit employees,Employees, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Global Head of HCM, Director of Investor Relations, Global Head of Executive Compensation,IR and Chief Strategy Officer, Global Head of Reward and People Analytics, Chief Information Security Officer, Chief Information Officer, Global Head of Corporate Engagement, Chief Information Security Officer, Co-Chief Information Officer,Global Head of Corporate Communications, Shareholders, Regulators, Independent Compensation Consultants Director Search Firm,and/or Independent Auditors

 

Over 80 meetings

 

OVER100MEETINGS

 

Committee Chairs

COMMITTEE CHAIRS

Audit – Peter Oppenheimer

Compensation – Michele BurnsMark Winkelman or Kimberley Harris**

Public Responsibilities – Ellen Kullman

Risk – Mark WinkelmanDavid Viniar*

 

 

Over 175 meetings

 

OVER150MEETINGS

 

 *

Mr. Ogunlesi is retiring at our 2024 Annual Meeting. Effective April 24, 2024, Mr. Viniar will be our Lead Director and the Chair of our Governance Committee and Mr. Montag will be the Chair of our Risk Committee.

**

Changes to Compensation Committee Chair effective April 2023.

26

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

25


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

 

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

 

Board Oversight of our Firm

 

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHTKey Areas of Board Oversight

Our Board discusses and receives regular updates on a wide variety of matters affecting our firm. Our Board is responsible for, and committed to, the oversight of the business and affairs of our firm. In carrying out this responsibility, our Board, working with and through its Committees, as applicable, discusses and receives regular updates on a wide variety of matters affecting our firm. Our reputation is a core consideration, as is our culture, as our Board advises our senior management to help drive success for our clients and our communities in order to create long-term, sustainable value for our shareholders. Central to this is our Board’s oversight of management’s efforts to ensure that the firm’s cultural expectations are appropriately communicated and embraced throughout the firm.

LOGO

 

 

 

LOGO

STRATEGY RISK MANAGEMENTStrategy CEO PERFORMANCE EXECUTIVE SUCCESSION PLANNING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEperformance Financial performance & REPORTING CULTUREreporting Conduct People strategy Risk management Executive succession planning Culture & core values CONDUCT people STRATEGY CONSIDERATION OF OUR REPUTATION UNDERSCORES OUR BOARD AND COMMITTEE OVERSIGHTCore Values Sustainability Consideration of our Reputation Underscores our Board and Committee Oversight

LOGO

Strategy

 

LOGO

STRATEGY

Our Board oversees and provides advice and guidance to senior management on the formulation and implementation of the firm’s strategic plans, including the development of growth strategies by our senior management team.

»plans. This occurs year-round through presentations and discussions covering firmwide, divisionalbusiness and regional strategy, business planning and growth initiatives, both during and outside Board meetings.

 
» 

Strategic oversight takes various forms, including discussions regarding strategic direction and focus, review of existing and new business initiatives and progress on the key performance indicators (KPIs) that underpin our through-the-cycle targets and inform consideration of firm performance pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s Assessment Framework, as well as ongoing assessment of potential organic and inorganic growth opportunities.

»

A strong and effective risk and control environment is a strategic imperative, which necessitates commitment to ongoing enhancements to our enterprise risk management framework, overseen by the Board and carried out by management across all lines of defense. Our Board’s focus on overseeingoversight of risk management enhances our directors’ ability to provide insight and feedback to senior management and, if necessary, to challenge management on its development and implementation of the firm’s strategic direction.priorities.

 

»

Our Lead Director helps facilitate our Board’s oversight of strategy, by ensuring that directors receive adequate information about strategy and by discussing strategyincluding through discussions with independent directors atduring executive sessions.sessions, as needed.

 

Throughout 2020,2023, our Board engaged on an ongoing basis with our CEO, COO and CFO, as well as other key members of senior management and theleaders across our revenue businesses and control, side,finance and operating functions, on management’s execution of the firm’s decisions to narrow its strategic focus, which will drive our growth-focused long-term strategy and progress towards our financial targets as announced at our inaugural Investor Day in January 2020.strategy.

 
» 

»This took various forms, ranging from high-level discussions regarding strategic direction, reviewsincluded Board review and approvals relating to the sales of existingour Marcus loan portfolio, our Personal Financial Management business and new business initiatives,GreenSky, as well as organicdiscussions focused on driving growth across Asset & Wealth Management, unlocking synergies across Global Banking & Markets and inorganic growth opportunitiesdeveloping our forward strategy within Platform Solutions, including our agreement with General Motors regarding a process to transition their credit card program to another issuer.

»

The Board also engaged with management in discussions regarding new and a focus on the qualityemerging technologies, such as generative artificial intelligence, geopolitical considerations and diversity of our people,new regulation and regulatory expectations, each of which was aligned with our goal of long-term value creation for our shareholdersinform the development and grounded by considerations such as risk management, culture and reputation.

»  For example, our Board discussed how our strategic framework was being impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and related market stress, and reviewed progress on a number of key performance indicators (KPIs) that underpin our medium-term financial targets and inform considerationexecution of our performance pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s Performance Assessment Framework.long-term strategy.

 
 

Our Board will continue to receive regular updates from, and provide advice to, management as they execute on the firm’s strategy.

26

 

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

LOGO

Risk Management

 

 

LOGO

RISK MANAGEMENT

In the normal course, our firm commits capital and otherwise incurs risk as an inherent part of serving our clients’ needs. Our intention is to avoid, mitigate and manage, risks or, where possible, to mitigate them. In doing so, we endeavor not to undertake risks that could materially impair our firm, including our capital and liquidity position, ability to generate revenues, or reputation. Doing so necessitates ongoing investments in our enterprise risk management framework to maintain and reputation.enhance the strength of our risk management and control environment consistent with our business needs and regulatory expectations.

 
 

Management is responsible for the day-to-day identification, assessment and monitoring of, and decision- makingdecision-making regarding, the risks we face. Our Board is responsible for overseeing the management of the firm’s most significant risks on an enterprise-wide basis, which includes setting the types and levels of risk the firm is willing to take. This oversight is executed by our full Board, as well as each of its Committees, in particular our Risk Committee, and is carried out in conjunction with the Board’s oversight of firm strategy.

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS27


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

REPUTATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

 Board risk management oversight (in coordination with each of its Committees) includes:

 

 

 

BOARDREPUTATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:

LOGO

 

  Strategic and financial considerations

 

  Legal, regulatory, reputational and compliance risks

 

  People strategy

  Other financial and nonfinancial risks considered by Committees

 

  

 

 

 LOGO

 

 

 Risk Committee risk management oversight includes:

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

RISK COMMITTEE RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:

  Overall risk-taking tolerance and risk governance, including our Enterprise Risk Management Frameworkenterprise risk management framework

 

  Our Risk Appetite Statement (in coordination with our full Board)

 

  Liquidity, market, credit, capital, operational (including information security, cybersecurity, third party and business resilience), model and climate risks

 

  Our Capital Plan, capital ratios and capital adequacy

 

  Information and cybersecurity risk, third-party risk and business resilience risk, including oversight of management’s processes, monitoring and controls related thereto (such as at least annual presentations and additional updates as needed)

  

 

 

 

 

PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES COMMITTEE RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:

  Reputational Audit Committee risk and constituent impact, including client and business standards considerations, as well as the receipt of reports from the Firmwide Reputational Risk Committee regarding certain transactions that may present heightened reputational risk

  Sustainability / ESG strategymanagement
 oversight includes:

 

 

Compensation Committee risk management oversight includes:

 

 

 

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:  Financial considerations, including internal controls over financial reporting

 

  Firmwide compensation program  Legal and policies that are consistent with the safety and soundness of our firm and do not raise risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our firmcompliance (including financial crime compliance) risk

 

  Jointly with our Risk Committee, annual CRO compensation-related risk assessment

  Human capital strategy

AUDIT COMMITTEE RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES:

  Financial, legal and compliance risk, in coordination with our full Board

  Coordination with our Risk Committee, including with respect to technology-related risks, risk assessment and riskrisk/business standards management practices

 

 

  CRO compensation-related risk assessment, including that our firmwide compensation programs and policies should be consistent with the safety and soundness of our firm and not encourage imprudent risk taking

  How our performance management and incentive compensation programs promote a strong risk management and control environment

  Consideration of risk management and control factors in senior management compensation

 

 

 

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE RISK MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT INCLUDES: Public Responsibilities Committee risk

 management oversight includes:

Governance Committee risk management oversight includes:

 

  Board composition  Reputational risk and constituent impact, including through reports from the Firmwide Reputational Risk Committee

 

  Sustainability/ESG strategy

  Board composition and refreshment

  Board leadership succession and executive succession

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

Focus on COVID-19-Generated Risks:

»  During 2020, the Board and its Committees, including the Risk Committee, were focused on overseeing the financial and non-financial risks generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

»  For example, in Spring 2020, the Board and the Risk Committee met often and received additional postings amid the market stress precipitated by the pandemic to discuss and keep apprised of, among other things, the firm’s capital and liquidity positions, as well as its evolving operational risk and resilience profile in light of the pandemic, with an overarching focus on the safety of our people.

Continued Focus on Reputational Risk Management: Over the past several years, our firm has taken a number of steps that have enhanced our Board’s and our firm’s oversight of reputational risk, as described in detail on our website at www.gs.com/repriskenhancements, including:

»  Development and implementation of a Reputational Risk Framework and formation of a management-level Firmwide Reputational Risk Committee and control-side “regional vetting groups,” as well as implementation of a comprehensive Enterprise Risk Framework that addresses both financial and non-financial risks.

»Training programs to empower all employees to defend against transactional, operational and reputational risks, creation of a Compliance Forensics Program and establishment of an Insider Threat Program to prevent and detect potentially harmful action by employees.27

 

28GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

 

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

 

Spotlight on Cybersecurity Risk

Cybersecurity and information security risks are areas of focus for our stakeholders, including our shareholders and regulators. Our Board, directly, as well as through its Committees (in particular the Risk and Audit Committees), maintains a regular focus on these critical issues, including through oversight of management’s processes, monitoring and controls related to cyber- and information security-related risks. This includes regular presentations on our approach to cybersecurity threats and cyber- and information security risk management from our Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), broader discussions regarding existing and emerging operational and technology risks with leaders across all lines of defense and closed sessions with our CISO.

LOGO

CEO PERFORMANCEPerformance

 

LOGO

  Under the direction of our Lead Director, our Governance Committee annually evaluates CEO performance.

   The Committee reviews with our Global Head of HCM the results of our CEO’s self-assessment pursuant to the Performance Assessment Framework as well as the CEO’s evaluation under our 360° Review Process, as described further in Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How Our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions.

  While this formal process is conducted at year-end, our directors are regularly focused on the performance of our CEO and other senior leaders, including during executive sessions of independent directors, regular closed sessions with our CEO and additional discussions between our Lead Director and our CEO throughout the year.year, as well as through mid-year and year-end discussions with the Compensation Committee on progress pursuant to the KPIs set forth in the Committee’s Assessment Framework.

 

Under the direction of our Lead Director, each year-end our Governance Committee also formally evaluates CEO performance. This takes into account independent directors’ own assessments of CEO performance and is informed by the results of the CEO’s evaluation under our annual feedback processes, and as further described in Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions.

 

EXECUTIVE SUCCESSION PLANNINGLOGO

Executive Succession Planning

LOGO

Interaction with senior management in Succession planning is a variety of settings, including Board meetings and preparatory meetings, during visits to our offices around the world and at client-related events Plan reviewed bypriority for our Governance Committee, which worked with Mr. Solomon to put in place an appropriate emergency succession protocol and will continue to work with him on the development and ongoing refinement of our CEO at least annually Monitoring of senior management careers to ensure appropriate exposure to our Board and our business Review of senior management summaries (including 360o evaluations) and assessment of potential for executive positions DEVELOPING THE FIRM'S NEXT GENERATION OF LEADERS

longer-term succession plan.

 

 Our Governance Committee has long utilized a framework relating to executive succession planning under which the Committee has defined specific criteria for, and responsibilities of, each of the CEO, COO and CFO roles. The Committee then focuses on the particular skill set needed to succeed in these roles at our firm both on a long-term and an emergency basis.

 

   Our Lead Director also meets on this topic separately Executive succession planning takes many forms, including Governance Committee reviews of long-term and emergency succession plans with our CEO, regular closed sessions with the Board and facilitatesour CEO throughout the year, one-on-one discussions between our Lead Director and CEO and additional discussions withamong our independent directors, about executive succession planning throughout the year, including at executive sessions, as may be appropriate.

 

   Succession planning is a priority for our Governance Committee, which worked with Mr. Solomon to ensure an appropriate emergency succession protocol and will continue to work with him onDeveloping the development and ongoing refinementFirm’s Next Generation of our longer-term succession plan. Leaders

The Board also continues to engage with management on the firm's

firm’s broad leadership pipeline, more broadly, including with respect to leadership pipeline health and the development of the firm’s “next generation”next generation of leaders.leaders for executive and other senior roles across our firm.

Interaction with leaders
in a variety of settings, including formal meetings, prep sessions, lunches, during visits to our offices around the world and
at client-related events

 

 

 

        LOGO      Executive succession planning reviewed by our Governance Committee with our CEO; ongoing assessment of senior management for potential executive positions

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE & REPORTING

  

LOGO

Monitoring of careers
to ensure appropriate exposure to our Board and our business

 

Additional engagement
on broader leadership pipeline for key roles across the firm

 

28

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

LOGO

Financial Performance & Reporting

  

Our Board, including through its Committees, is continually kept apprised by management of the firm’s financial performance and key drivers thereof. For example, our Board generally receives an update on financial performance from our CFO at each regularly scheduled meeting (and additionally as needed), which update provides critical information to the Board and its Committees that assists them in carrying out their responsibilities. During Spring 2020, our Board also received regular postings between meetings on how the market stress precipitated by the COVID-19 crisis was impacting the firm’s financial health and performance.

 

Our Board, through its Audit Committee, is responsible for overseeing management’s preparation and presentation of our annual and quarterly financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

»

»Each quarter, our Audit Committee meets with members of our management, the Director of Internal Audit and our independent registered public accounting firm to review and discuss our financial statements, as well as our quarterly earnings release.

 

In addition, our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm. In this regard, our Audit Committee and Audit Committee Chair are directly involved with the periodic selection of the lead audit partner (see(see Audit Matters—Item 4.3. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20212024).

 

LOGO

Culture & Core Values

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS29


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

KEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

CULTURE & CORE VALUES

 

LOGO

Management’s role in shaping the firm’s culture is critical and our Board’s oversight of firm culture is an important element of its responsibilities.

 

Our culture has been a cornerstone of our business and performance throughout our history. Our Core Values ofpartnership, integrity, client service, integrityandexcellenceare derived from our longstandinglong-standing Business Principles and are regularly reinforced at every step of our peoples’ careers, from onboarding to training, and through our performance, development, compensation and promotion processes.

 

Our Board holds senior management accountable for embodying an appropriate “tonetone at the top”top and for maintaining and communicating a culture that emphasizesour Core Values, with an emphasis on integrity and the importancecriticality of compliance with both the letter and spirit of the laws, rules and regulations that govern us.

 

»

»Oversight of culture takes many forms, including strategy and risk tolerance, review of governance policies, and practices the receipt of governanceand metrics, regular discussions with the Executive Leadership Team, members of the firm’s Compliance, Legal, Risk, Human Capital and Internal Audit functions, as well as others across the firm, and assessment of CEO and senior management performance and compensation.

 

»

»These are also topics on which our firm regularly engages with our shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders.

Our culture is defined by a commitment to delivering the best service to our clients through collaboration, innovation and a relentless pursuit of excellence. It is a strategic imperative that we continually reinvest in our culture, including to bring our people together in person given the growth of the firm during the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, we conducted a Culture Stewardship Program for our PMDs and continue to conduct a firmwide Culture Connect Forum to reinforce our Core Values and promote cultural stewardship, awareness and connectivity.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

29


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE—BOARD OVERSIGHT OF OUR FIRM

 

CONDUcTKEY AREAS OF BOARD OVERSIGHT

LOGO

Conduct

 

LOGO

We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical conduct at all times, consistent with our Business Principles and our Core Values.

 For example:

 

»

»Our Board regularly receives governance metrics, including metrics focused on conduct, controls and business integrity matters, as well as attrition and complaints, and engages in regular discussions with the Compliance, Legal, Risk, Human Capital and Internal Audit functions.functions, among others.

 

»

»Our Board also expects management to examine and to report to it on “lessons learned” from events at our firm or in our industry, as appropriate.

 

»

»Our PerformanceCompensation Committee’s Assessment Framework not only assesses the firm’s financial performance, but also takes into account a wide array of non-financialnonfinancial factors, including conduct-relatedconduct and other risk management and control-related matters.

 

As part of our ongoing commitment to dialogue, education and formal training, the firm offers a range of programs focused on our business standards and conduct.

 

Our Board recently approved amendments to revise and relaunch the firm’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (available on our website at www.gs.com) to better reinforce our Core Values and emphasize what we expect from our people. To this end, the amended Code reflectsoutlines our ongoing commitmentscommitment to the highest standards of partnership, client service, integrity and excellence and clarifies existing obligations under the Code by providing clear direction and practical information to further empower our peopleshared responsibility to treat our clients and each other with honesty and integrity, avoid conflicts of interest, treat customers fairly, maintain accurate and complete records, comply with applicable laws and regulations and escalate concerns.

 

PEOPLE STRATEGYLOGO

Sustainability

 

LOGOGiven the interdisciplinary nature of the oversight of sustainability, including the priorities of climate transition and inclusive growth, and the financial and nonfinancial risks related to these activities, including material environmental and social risks and impacts, the Board carries out its oversight of these matters directly, at the full Board level, as well as through its Committees.

 

This may include periodic updates on the firm’s sustainability strategy, including the firm’s approach, objectives and progress, discussions regarding the climate models the firm utilizes to assess physical and transition risks and reviews of our sustainability- and climate-related reporting, as well as presentations on initiatives such as One Million Black Women.

 

For additional information regarding our commitment to sustainability, see Spotlight on Sustainability.

LOGO

People Strategy

  

We have long emphasized that our people are our greatest asset, and we seek to manage our people with the same rigor as we manage all other aspects of our firm including our risk and capital.asset. It is only with the determination and dedication of our people that we can serve our clients, generate long-term value for our shareholders and contribute to economic progress for all our stakeholders and deliver on our purpose.stakeholders.

 

Our Board and Committees are highly engagedengage with management in discussingon all aspects of our People Strategy,people strategy, which includes attracting and retaining talent, sustaining our culture and broadening our impact.

  One key elementimpact, and is informed by regular surveys of our People Strategy is diversity and inclusion. The eventspeople, the results of 2020 reemphasized that further progress on such matters remain imperative forwhich are shared with our firm. To this end, the Board provided oversight as management enhanced its commitments in these areas, such as the announcement of additional initiatives aimed at increasing the representation of diverse communities at all levels across the firm, including two new aspirational goals to enhance the diverse representation of our vice president population and significantly increase our hiring of Black analysts from historically Black colleges and universities, while sustaining our existing programs focused on other diverse populations.Board.

 

  More broadly, theThe Board and its Committees continue to work with managementoversee management’s efforts to enhance other aspectsour people strategy across all levels of our People Strategy,the organization, including ongoing enhancements to our performance management processprocesses and our leadership pipeline health through succession planning, next-generation skill development, diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and talent mobility.

As part of our ongoing commitment to transparency and accountability, we publish an annual People Strategy Report (available at www.gs.com). This report provides tangible indicators of progress on our people-related goals, including EEO-1 disclosures and progress on our aspirational diversity goals. Also available on our website is information on our gender and racial pay gaps, consistent with our commitment to provide additional disclosure on this topic.

30

 

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

30 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

 

 

Stakeholder Engagement

 

 

Commitment to Active Engagement with our Shareholders and Other Stakeholders

                    
 
 

 

Stakeholder views regarding matters affecting our firm are important to our Board. We employ a year-round approach to engagement that includes proactive outreach as well as responsiveness to targeted areas of focus. We also seek to engage with all proponents of shareholder proposals. If you would like to speak with us, please contact our Investor Relations team at gs-investor-relations@gs.com.

 

Our Approach

We engage on a year-round basis with a wide range of stakeholders, including shareholders, fixed income investors, credit rating agencies, ESG rating firms, proxy advisory firms, prospective shareholders and thought leaders, among others. We also conduct additional targeted outreach ahead of our annual meeting each year, and otherwise as needed.

Firm engagement is led by our Investor Relations team, including targeted outreach and open lines of communication for inbound inquiries. Board-level engagement is led by our Lead Director, who meets regularly with shareholders and other key stakeholders, and may include other directors as appropriate. Feedback from these interactions is provided to all directors from these interactions to inform Board and Committee work.

Depth of Engagement

Corporate governance represents only one component of our broader approach to stakeholder engagement. We take a holistic, comprehensive approach when communicating with shareholders. Discussions on corporate governance matters are often part of a broader dialogue covering corporate strategy, business performance, risk oversight and other key themes. We continued to conduct year-round, proactive engagement on corporate governance matters in 2020:

 

~150

 

Targeted outreach to top 200~15

Total Equity and Fixed Income Investors Engaged

Across both group and 1:1 engagements with senior management

Investor Conferences

Participated in by senior management during 2023

>25% 

Common Stock Outstanding Engaged

Lead Director engagement with shareholders ahead of 2020 Annual Meetingduring 2023

 

IR met with shareholders representing more than 35% of Common Stock outstanding during 2020

Our Lead Director and/or the Chair of our Compensation Committee met with investors representing over 25% of Common Stock outstanding during 2020

2020 engagement covered:

LOGO BUSINESS PERFORMANCE STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND GOALS RACIAL EQUITY COVID-19 RESPONSE CULTURE AND CONDUCT CORPORATE GOVERNANCE RISK MANAGEMENT REGULATORY OUTLOOK Approach to Sustainability People Strategy Executive Compensation Board Governance Succession Planning Tone at the Top

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS   

Top

100+

>35%

>65

Shareholder Outreach

Ahead of Annual Meeting

Common Stock

Outstanding Engaged

IR engagement with shareholders on ESG
matters during 2023

1:1 Investor Meetings

With C-Suite

During 2023, engagement with corporate governance stakeholders covered a variety of topics, including board governance, executive compensation and succession planning, strategic priorities and goals as well as business performance, firm culture and people strategy, financial resource management, regulatory environment and outlook, sustainable finance and climate risk, and risk management.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

31


SPOTLIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY—OUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY

 

 

OUR CLIMATE COMMITMENT

Spotlight on Sustainability

Our Approach to Sustainability

Goldman Sachs is dedicated to advancing sustainable economic growth and financial opportunity. This purpose guidesSustainability helps guide our everyday work with our clients, including our emphasis on supporting our people and our broader strategic direction, and has served us welldirection. Our priorities in navigating the challenging circumstances of the past year.

This purpose is also fundamental to our sustainable finance commitment. Our commitment cuts acrossthis area underscore two broad themes — themes—climate transition and inclusive growth — that—that represent our view of the imperativerisks and the opportunityopportunities that continuescontinue to develop across sectors. Since 2019 when we announced our $750 billion sustainable financing, investing and advisory activity target by 2030, we have achieved approximately $555 billion in sustainable finance activity, including $302 billion in climate transition, $74 billion in inclusive growth and the remainder in multiple themes.

 Climate

 Transition

LOGO

Clean

Energy 

LOGO

Sustainable 

Transport

LOGO

Sustainable 

Food &

Agriculture

LOGO

Waste &

Materials 

LOGO

Ecosystem

Services

 Inclusive     

 Growth

LOGO

Accessible &

Innovative

Healthcare

LOGO

Financial

Inclusion

LOGO

Accessible &

Affordable

Education

LOGO

Communities

Our sustainable finance efforts are grounded in a commercial, One Goldman Sachs focus that is integrated throughout our businesses. businesses and draws upon external partnerships and engagements that complement our work.

We are targeting $750 billionreport regularly on our sustainability strategy, including our approach and progress toward our climate-related goals and commitments. Available on www.gs.com, our most recent Task Force on Climate-related Disclosures (TCFD) Report was issued in sustainable financing, investingDecember 2023 and advisory activity by 2030, and after one year we are ahead of pace, with over $150 billion of sustainable-finance activity overplan to publish our annual Sustainability Report in the course of 2020, including over $90 billion towards climate transition.coming months.

 

OUR CLIMATE COMMITMENTClimate Transition

As a financial institution, our focus is on supporting our clients in achieving their respective sustainability goals. We have continued to advance our commercial capabilities and further supported our clients in their climate ambitions through our investing, financing, and advisory activities, and by operationalizing climate transition capabilities in our businesses. Our capabilities and solutions span our core franchises; for example, within Global Banking & Markets, we established the Sustainable Banking Group, a group focused on supporting our corporate clients in reducing their direct and indirect carbon emissions. Within Asset & Wealth Management, teams including Public Markets Investing, Private Markets Investing, External Investing, and Private Wealth Management all have sustainable investing capabilities, and the Sustainability & Impact Solutions team in Asset & Wealth Management also helps mobilize the full range of insights, advisory services and investment solutions across our asset management client segments.

We also seek to identify climate-related gaps in the marketplace and address them by leveraging our existing capabilities and working with clients and strategic partners to develop innovative solutions. Two examples of how we are helping to address market gaps include:

Climate Innovation and Development Fund: In 2021, we announced the launch of the Climate Innovation and Development Fund, a blended finance facility designed to catalyze and deploy private and public sector capital in first-of-their-kind or demonstrative climate-focused projects across South and Southeast Asia. Managed by the Asian Development Bank and seeded with $25 million of concessional capital from Goldman Sachs and Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Fund catalyzed $500 million of total capital that was invested across seven projects throughout 2022 and 2023.

 

  

Open-Source Data and Analytics:Goldman Sachs believessupports open-source tools and analytics that addressing climate change requiresour clients and others can use to advance solutions to data challenges through our participation in various industry groups. As OS-Climate’s founding U.S. bank member, we have supported the non-profit’s work to develop an open-source data platform and net-zero alignment tools that can be used across industries. Through our membership in the Fintech Open Source Foundation (FINOS) — a whole-of-society approach. To that end, we recently announced our commitment fellow project of the Linux Foundation — Goldman Sachs has contributed to align our financing activities with a net-zero pathway by 2050.the open-source design of sustainability reporting tools to help increase data transparency, accuracy and efficiency, and support higher levels of audit assurance.

32

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


SPOTLIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY

We provide our people with the tools, resources, and support they need to help our clients and enhance the value of our firm. We are committed to responsibly managing our operational and supply chain footprint while monitoring and managing climate risk within our workspace and business processes and our portfolio through scenario analysis, integration of climate into our Risk Appetite Statement, and integration of climate risk into our business processes.

In 2021, we announced our commitment to align our financing activities with a net-zero-by-2050 pathway and an expansion of our operational carbon commitment. In doing so, we set three 2030 sectoral targets: Energy, Power and Auto Manufacturing. These sectors reflect where we see the greatest opportunity to proactively engage with our clients, deploy capital required for the transition, and invest in new commercial solutions to support transition to the low-carbon economy.

In our December 2023 TCFD Report, we provided an update on our progress on these targets, and in 2024 we plan to provide another update on these targets.

We will continue to support our clients in critical sectors as they deliver on their climate transition strategies, including by providing financing and investing in climate transition-enabling technology and infrastructure. As relevant regulations are finalized, we anticipate providing additional disclosures in 2025 to comply with climate- and other sustainability-related reporting requirements, including those of the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive.

Inclusive Growth

To advance economic opportunity and growth, we combine the needs of our clients, partners and communities with our expertise to drive sustainable, inclusive solutions.

 

  

We are also focused on where we can have a tangible impact today. This includes (1) workingCore to developour inclusive growth strategy is our work in Community Development Finance through Goldman Sachs’ Urban Investment Group, which provides innovative and responsive capital solutions to help meet the needs of low-to moderate-income communities across the U.S. To date, the Urban Investment Group has deployed more comprehensive climate datathan $19 billion in real estate projects, social enterprises and promoting more thorough disclosure; (2) developing our own near-term goals; and (3) continuing to incorporate climate risk considerations into ourlending facilities for small businesses.

 

 

Climate Data: Building on our longstanding leadership in the area of data reporting, including having been the first bank to report under the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and publishing our first Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) report in 2020, we are now encouraging similar reporting from clients.

  »We are helping to facilitate this through initiatives such as our lead role on the board of OS-Climate, which is focused on building an open source approach to climate data.

Near-Term Goals: We recently joined the UN Principles for Responsible Banking, and as part of that commitment we will conduct a climate impact analysis and plan to enhance our disclosures and set interim business-related climate targets by the end of 2021.

  »We have also expanded our operational net-zero commitment and set a new goal to cut our supply chain’s emissions to net zero by 2030.

Climate Risk: We are working to enhance our TCFD reporting to further detail how we are taking climate risk considerations into account in business practices and business selection, and we expect to release that report later this year.

LOGO Climate Transition Clean Energy Sustainable Transport Sustainable Food & Agriculture Waste & Materials Ecosystem Services Inclusive Growth Accessible & Innovative Healthcare Financial Inclusion Accessible & Affordable Education Communities

32GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


SPOTLIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY—OUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY

OUR APPROACH: BUSINESS AND CLIENTS

Our sustainable finance commitment is applied across three core areas: our businesses and clients; our people and operations; and our partnerships and engagement.

OUR APPROACH: BUSINESSES AND CLIENTS

We view sustainability first and foremost through a commercial lens. Our Sustainable Finance Group was established in 2019 to partner with our global businesses to deliver leading sustainability expertise and drive innovative solutions for our clients.

Over the past year, we have launched divisional councils across our revenue divisions that are helping to facilitate achievement of our $750 billion commitment. These councils consist of senior business leaders who — in addition to delivering their day-to-day expertise to clients — are able to provide the added benefit of a sustainability-focused perspective.

We continue to drive sustainability-focused solutions for our clients across all four of our segments. These include:

  »In Investment Banking, we are playing a crucial role in helping clients integrate climate alignment into their broader corporate strategy, in addition to leveraging our long-standing green bond expertise.

  »In Global Markets, we are providing sustainability-focused risk management solutions to our clients, as well as thought leadership through our Global Investment Research channels.

  »In Asset Management, we have launched a dedicated effort to help companies effectively manage climate transition, including integration of a proprietary climate risk tilt into our core suite of equity products, and created a new Sustainable Investing Group focused on investment opportunities in key sustainable finance sectors.

  »In Consumer & Wealth Management, we are scaling our Marcus platform with more robust online tools and resources to improve consumers’ overall financial health and literacy.

OUR APPROACH: PEOPLE AND OPERATIONS

Our people and our operations are core components of our ability to deliver on our purpose — ensuring that we sustain our firm’s culture, advance critical diversity and inclusion priorities, and continue our focus on responsible management.

We view our People Strategy as integral to our success in maintaining our Core Values and executing on our strategic direction, and advancing diversity is an imperative for our firm. We are focused on not just bringing in diverse people, but cultivating diverse perspectives and abilities to best serve our clients and stakeholders.

 

In keeping with2009 we launched 10,000 Small Businesses, which provides business education, access to capital and support services to small businesses in the U.S., U.K. and France. To date, the program has committed over $750 million to serve over 17,000 entrepreneurs globally, representing over 330,000 employees and $33 billion in total revenue. In 2023, we launched our broader 10,000 Small Businesses Investment in Rural Communities, a $100 million commitment to enhanced accountabilityexpand our business education program and transparency, we are developing our reportingcapital access program to give our investors and other stakeholders greater insight into our HCM strategy, including through our inaugural People Strategy Report, which we expect to publish in conjunction with our Sustainability Report in the coming months. This report will also include tangible indicators of our progress on our people-related goals, including expanded Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO-1) disclosure.

Our focus on responsibly managing our firm also includes reducing our operational impact. We were the first of our Peers to reach carbon neutrality in 2015, and at that time we set a number of operational goals around renewable energy usage, elimination of disposable plastics, energy efficiency and green building standards.

By the end of 2019, we had reached nearly all of the initial targets — so we set new operational goals for ourselves for 2025. We are already making strong progress towards these goals, including 70% of our global building portfolio now certified green.

We are also proud to have been the first20 rural U.S. corporate signatory to all three of The Climate Group’s key initiatives driving progress towards net zero carbon emissions by 2050: the RE100, EV100 and EP100.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS33


SPOTLIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY—OUR APPROACH TO SUSTAINABILITY

OUR APPROACH: PARTNERSHIPS AND ENGAGEMENT

OUR APPROACH: PARTNERSHIPS AND ENGAGEMENT

While we seek to approach sustainable finance from a commercial perspective, we often complement our work through proactive external partnership and engagement. These include philanthropic efforts, such as our recently announced One Million Black Women initiative through which the firm will invest $10 billion and commit $100 million in philanthropic capital for capacity-building grantsstates over the next decade to narrow opportunity gaps for at least one million Black women in the U.S., as well as collaborationsfive years. The program will partner with local academic institutions non-profitsand public or private sector working groups focused on advancing climate transitioncommunity development financial institutions (CDFIs) across the region to support job creation and inclusiveeconomic growth.

 

  

For example,Launched in 2020 we were a founding member2021, One Million Black Women (OMBW) is our commitment to invest $10 billion in investment capital and $100 million in philanthropic support to Black women-led and Black women-serving organizations, with the goal of impacting the Climate Leadership Council, which put forth a bi-partisan plan for a revenue-neutral carbon tax. In 2020, we were also a founding partnerlives of the Rocky Mountain Institute’s Center for Climate-Aligned Finance, which serves as a platform to partner with corporate clients to identify decarbonization solutions in the global economy.at least one million Black women by 2030.

 

 » 

Earlier this year,To date, OMBW has committed over $2.3 billion in investment capital and $33 million in philanthropic capital to impact the lives of an estimated 200,000 Black women. In 2024, we also joined the OS-Climate initiative as its founding U.S. bank member. We believe this coalition will be a leadercontinue to graduate women from our One Million Black Women: Black in Business program, an entrepreneurship program for business owners who align with our mission of supporting Black women entrepreneurs with tools and education so they can create jobs, opportunity and economic growth in their communities.

»

To date, more than 600 Black women solopreneurs from 40 states have participated in the developmentOne Million Black Women: Black in Business program. 61% of comprehensive open source data solutionsparticipants report increases in revenues just six months after completing the program, compared to 29% of all Black or African American nonemployer firms that help shift global investment towards zero carbon emissions.increase revenues at 12 months (2023 Report on Nonemployer Firms by Federal Reserve Small Business: https://www.fedsmallbusiness.org/survey/2023/ report-on-nonemployer-firms).

More information can be found in our annual Sustainability Report, available at www.gs.com/sustainability-report. Our 2020 report will be available later this year.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

33


SPOTLIGHT ON SUSTAINABILITY

 

34 

In 2023, we marked the 15th anniversary of 10,000 Women, which has supported over 200,000 women from over 150 countries with business education, access to capital, mentoring and networking. Our global finance facility, created in partnership with the International Finance Corporation, has reached more than 164,000 women entrepreneurs and has provided over $2.9 billion in capital to women-owned businesses in partnership with local financial institutions across the globe. Our impact in India continues to grow, with the program reaching over 3,000 women entrepreneurs through business education, mentorship, and capital across the country. Further, the alumni community continues to drive innovation and growth in the country — within 18 months of graduating, alumni double their workforce and quadruple their revenue. Collectively, these women have created 12,000 new jobs and contributed INR 28 billion to the Indian economy.

Also available on our website is the March 2023 Goldman Sachs’ Efforts to Advance Equity and Opportunity for Underserved Communities from the law firm Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP (“WilmerHale”), which examines and reports on the effectiveness of three important initiatives: OMBW, the Fund for Racial Equity and 10,000 Small Businesses program. During 2023, our Office of Corporate Engagement reported to the Public Responsibilities Committee on its implementation of applicable enhancements to each of these three initiatives, as recommended by WilmerHale in its report.

None of the information or data included on our websites or accessible at these links is incorporated into, and will not be deemed to be a part of, this Proxy Statement or any of our other filings with the SEC.

34

 GOLDMAN SACHS

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

   |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

20202023 ANNUAL NEO COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONS

 

Compensation Matters

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This CD&A describes our executive compensation philosophy and the process by which our Compensation Committee makes executive compensation decisions, each of which is designed to motivate, reward and retain our senior leaders, support our strategic objectives, promote a strong risk management and control environment and advance the long-term interests of our shareholders. Our 20202023 NEOs are:

 

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

          LOGO

David M. Solomon

John WaldronDenis ColemanKathryn RuemmlerPhilip Berlinski
Chairman and CEO

  

     LOGO

      John E. Waldron

President and COO

  

LOGO

Stephen M. Scherr

CFO

  

LOGO       

John F.W. Rogers       

EVP       

CLO and General Counsel
  

LOGO               

Karen P. Seymour                

Former EVP and General Counsel*            

Global Treasurer

 

20202023 Annual NEO COMPENSATION DETERMINATIONSCompensation Determinations

The following table shows our Compensation Committee’s determinations regarding our NEOs’ 20202023 annual compensation, as well as their 20192022 annual compensation information (dollarinformation. The details of how our Compensation Committee made its compensation determinations for 2023 are set forth in this CD&A.

Dollar amounts in the following table are shown in millions).millions.

This

    
   Year   

 Total Annual

 Compensation* ($) 

   Salary ($)   

 Annual Variable 

 Compensation ($) 

 

    Equity-Based Awards 
  

 

 Cash  

  

 

 PSUs** 

   

 

 

 

 % of Annual

 Variable Comp  

 

 

 % of

 Total 

 

Executive Leadership Team

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        

David Solomon

Chairman and CEO

  2023   31.00   2.00    8.70   20.30  

 

 70  65 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 6.90

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

 

64

 

 

        

John Waldron

President and COO

  2023   30.00   1.85   11.26   16.89  

 

 60  56 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

23.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 8.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.99

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

55

 

 

        

Denis Coleman

CFO

  2023   20.00   1.85    7.26   10.89  

 

 60  54 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

 

 

 

 

 6.06

 

 

 

 

 

 

 9.09

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

Other NEOs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        

Kathryn Ruemmler

CLO and General Counsel

  2023   16.00   1.50    5.80    8.70  

 

 60  54 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

12.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 4.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 6.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

53

 

 

        

Philip Berlinski

Global Treasurer

  2023   13.00   1.50    4.60    6.90  

 

 60  53 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 3.40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 5.10

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

51

 

 

  *

Salary plus annual variable compensation consisting of cash and year-end equity-based awards (100% PSUs for all NEOs).

**

Equity amount at grant; PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics (absolute & relative ROE).

Note this table is different from the SEC-required 2020 2023 Summary Compensation Table on page 54.in —Executive Compensation.

         
   YEAR   

INITIAL
 DETERMI- 

NATION
($)

 

BOARD

1MDB

REDUCTION(a)  
($)

  FINAL 
($)
    SALARY  
($)
  ANNUAL VARIABLE
COMPENSATION ($)
    

EQUITY-BASED

AWARDS

 
   

 

  CASH  

  

 

  PSUS(b)  

  

 

  RSUS(b)  

  

 

% OF
ANNUAL
VARIABLE
COMP

  

 

% OF
TOTAL

 
   

 EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP TEAM

 

          
            

David M. Solomon

Chairman and CEO

 2020 27.50 (10)  17.50   2.00   4.65   10.85        70   62 
 

2019

 

27.50

 

N/A

 

 

27.50

 

 

 

2.00

 

 

 

7.65

 

 

 

17.85

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

65

 

John E. Waldron

President and COO

 

2020

 

25.50

 

(7)

 

 

18.50

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

 

6.66

 

 

 

9.99

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

54

 

 

2019

 

24.50

 

N/A

 

 

24.50

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

 

9.06

 

 

 

13.59

 

 

 

 

   

 

60

 

 

 

55

 

            

Stephen M. Scherr

CFO

 2020 22.50 (7)  15.50   1.85   5.46   8.19        60   53 
 

2019

 

22.50

 

N/A

 

 

22.50

 

 

 

1.85

 

 

 

8.26

 

 

 

12.39

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

55

 

            

 OTHER NEOS

 

             
            

John F.W. Rogers

EVP

 2020 12.50 N/A  12.50   1.50   4.40   3.30   3.30     60   53 
 

2019

 

11.50

 

N/A

 

 

11.50

 

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

4.00

 

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

4.50

 

   

 

60

 

 

 

52

 

            

Karen P. Seymour*

Former EVP and General Counsel

 2020 10.00 N/A  10.00   1.50   3.40   2.55   2.55     60   51 
 

2019

 

9.00

 

N/A

 

 

9.00

 

 

 

1.50

 

 

 

3.00

 

 

 

1.12

 

 

 

3.38

 

  

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

50

 

(a)

Reflects the Board’s previously announced determination related to 1MDB to reduce 2020 compensation by $10 million for Mr. Solomon and by $7 million for each of Messrs. Waldron and Scherr. For more information, see —2020 Compensation.

(b)

The number of PSUs or RSUs awarded as part of our NEOs’ 2020 annual compensation was determined by reference to the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date ($290.47 on January 20, 2021). This resulted in grants as follows: Mr. Solomon — 37,354 PSUs; Mr. Waldron — 34,393 PSUs; Mr. Scherr — 28,196 PSUs; Mr. Rogers — 11,361 PSUs and 11,361 RSUs; and Ms. Seymour — 8,779 PSUs and 8,779 RSUs.

*

Ms. Seymour retired as EVP and General Counsel on March 15, 2021.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

35


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

 

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONSHow our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions

 

Our

OUR Compensation 

COMPENSATION

PRINCIPLES

Principles

 

FIRMWIDE

PERFORMANCE Firmwide 

 Performance 

 

INDIVIDUAL

PERFORMANCE Individual  

 Performance  

 

STAKEHOLDER

FEEDBACKMarket for 

Talent 

 

MARKET FOR

TALENTStakeholder 

Feedback 

 

CRO INPUTRisk 

AND RISKManagement 

MANAGEMENT& Controls 

 

REGULATORY

CONSIDERATIONSRegulatory 

Considerations 

 

INDEPENDENTIndependent 

  COMPENSATION    Compensation 

CONSULTANTConsultant 

 

Importance of Informed Judgment

To help ensure that our compensation program is appropriately aligned with our long-term strategy, stakeholder expectations and the safety and soundness of our firm, our Compensation Committee, within the structure of our Performance Assessment Framework and in the context of the inputs and factors described below, utilizes

Importance of Informed Judgment

To help ensure that our compensation program is appropriately aligned with our long-term strategy, stakeholder expectations and the safety and soundness of our firm, our Compensation Committee, within the structure of its Assessment Framework and in the context of the inputs and factors described below, uses its informed judgment to evaluate, and structured discretion to set, executive compensation.

We believe this balanced approach which is consistent with industry practice, is appropriate for our firm, and that a more formulaic compensation program would not be in the long-term best interests of our firm, our shareholders and other stakeholders.

 

Avoids Unintended Consequences and Mitigates Compensation-Related Risk. Our business is dynamic and requires us to respond rapidly to changes in our operating environment. As such, our annual compensation program is designed to encourage appropriate prudence by our senior leaders, on behalf of our shareholders and our clients, regardless of prevailing market conditions.

 

»

We utilize a Performance  Our Compensation Committee utilizes an Assessment Framework to provide greater definition to, and transparency regarding, the pre-established financial and non-financialnonfinancial factors considered by the Compensation Committee to assessit considers in its assessment of the firm’s performance in connection with compensation decisions for our NEOs and other senior leaders. However, a strictly formulaic compensation program would not permit adjustments based on less quantifiable factors, such as unexpected external events or individual performance.

 

»

The recent market stress during Spring 2020 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic is a key example of the benefits of our approach; the Board was not forced to restructure a strictly formulaic incentive plan midway through the year, and ultimately utilized its judgment to hold initial compensation levels for our CEO flat year-over-year despite the firm’s strong performance, and before applying the 1MDB-related reduction.

Equity and Performance-Based Pay Provides Alignment. Alignment.While grant amountsannual compensation decisions are based on our Compensation Committee’s informed judgment and use of structured discretion, the amounts ultimately realized by our NEOs (who received 100% of year-end equity-based pay in PSUs) are subject to ongoing performance metrics (through the use of PSUs) and tied to the firm’s longer-term stock price (settlement of PSUs RSUs and Shares at Risk delivered in respect of PSUs and RSUs)PSUs).

 

 LOGO

OUR COMPENSATION PRINCIPLES

Our Compensation Principles guide our Compensation Committee in its review of compensation at our firm, including the Committee’s determination of NEO compensation. The full text of our Compensation Principles is available at www.gs.com/corpgov. Key elements of our Compensation Principles include:

 

   PAYING FOR PERFORMANCE

LOGO

Our Compensation Principles

Our Compensation Principles (available at www.gs.com/corpgov) underpin all of our compensation decisions, including the Compensation Committee’s determination of NEO compensation. Key elements of our Compensation Principles (which were reviewed and updated in 2023) include:

 

  

Paying for Performance

 

ENCOURAGING FIRMWIDE
ORIENTATIONEncouraging Firmwide

Orientation & CULTURE

Culture

 

DISCOURAGING IMPRUDENT
RISK-TAKING
Discouraging Imprudent

Risk-Taking

 

ATTRACTINGAttracting &

RETAINING TALENT

Retaining Talent

Firmwide compensation should directly relate to firmwide performance over the cycle.

 

Employees should think and act like long-term shareholders, and compensation should reflect the performance of the firm as a whole.

 

Compensation should

be carefully designed to be consistent with the safety and soundness of our firm. Risk profiles must be taken into account in annual performance reviews, and factors like liquidity risk and cost of capital should also be considered.

 

 

Compensation should reward an employee’s ability to identify and create value, and the recognition of individual performance should also

be considered in the context of the competitive market for talent.

Promoting a Strong Risk Management and Control Environment

 

36

 

In addition to our Compensation Principles, our Compensation Committee is guided by our variable compensation frameworks, which more broadly govern  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the variable compensation process for employees who could expose the firm to material amounts2024 Annual Meeting of risk (such as our NEOs).Shareholders  

36 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

 

LOGO

    LOGOFirmwide Performance

FIRMWIDE PERFORMANCETaking into account our pay-for-performance philosophy, our Compensation Committee places substantial importance on the assessment of firmwide performance when determining NEO compensation. This includes not only financial performance, but how these results are achieved, including how our most senior leaders are investing in the future of our firm and demonstrating an appropriate commitment to a strong control environment and effective financial and nonfinancial risk management practices.

 

 

Taking into account our pay-for-performance philosophy, our Compensation Committee places substantial importance on the assessment of firmwide performance when determining NEO compensation.

 

During 2019, we developed a Performanceour initial Assessment Framework to provide greater definition to and transparency regarding the key factors considered by the Compensation Committee to assess the firm’s performance in connection with compensation decisions for our NEOs and other senior leaders (ourour Management Committee).Committee.

 

 » 

The Assessment Framework includes an assessment of pre-established financial metrics and non-financialnonfinancial factors on a firmwide basis. It also includes divisionalinformation and metrics on business performance in the context of our strategic priorities that underpin firmwide performance and serve to inform compensation decisions for the firm’s divisionalbusiness leaders.

 

 » 

The Assessment Framework aligns performance metrics and goals across our most senior leaders and provides a structure to help to ensure that our compensation program for our NEOs and Management Committee continues to be appropriately aligned with our long-term strategy, our financial targets and stakeholder expectations as well as promotes the strength of our risk management and control environment and the safety and soundness of our firm.

The Assessment Framework may continueis reviewed annually, with metrics and factors updated as needed. For example, in 2023, the Compensation Committee, taking into account Board and stakeholder feedback, adopted changes to evolve, as appropriate,enhance the types of metrics and the nature of information provided to ensure this purpose is served.the Committee in connection with the risk management and control pillar of the Assessment Framework.

For 2023, the assessment of firmwide performance to inform compensation decisions for our NEOs and other Management Committee members included:

2023 financial performance, both on an absolute basis and relative to our Peers.

 

  

For 2020,Additional information regarding the Committee adopted financial metrics, which align with the goals announced at our January 2020 Investor Day, as well as non-financial factors, each as described below, that informed the 2020 compensation decisions for our NEOs.

 The assessment of firmwide performance takes into account a number of factors:

»  2020 financial performance, focused on the key metrics set forth in the Framework, both on an absolute basis as well as relative to our Peers

»NEW. Progress towards achieving the firm’s strategic objectives announced at Investor Day

»  Non-financialnonfinancial factors that underpin how our financial results are achieved and ensure thatsupport appropriate investment is made in the firm’s future,

LOGO

NEW. Enhanced Alignment including with Investor Day KPIs. In additionrespect to assessing annual financial performance, the Committee also assessed progress on the firm’s key strategic objectives – growing and strengthening existing businesses, diversifying our products and services and operating more efficiently as announced at Investor Day. To this end, and to further enhance transparency based on stakeholder feedback, the Performance Assessment Framework included an enhanced dashboard with key performance indicators to help the Committee better assess the firm’s progress towards its Investor Day goals.our strategic priorities, One Goldman Sachs and client-centricity, risk management and control considerations, and execution of our people strategy.

 

  Overview of Assessment Framework
OVERVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEHOW THE RESULTS ARE ACHIEVED / INVESTMENT IN THE FUTURE
CLIENTSRISK MANAGEMENTLEADERSHIP, CULTURE
& VALUES
   

LOGO

LOGO

How the Results are Achieved/Investment in the Future

Financial Performance

Strategic Priorities & ClientsRisk Management & ControlsPeople

 ROE

 ROTE

 Efficiency ratio

 TSR

 CET1 ratio

 BVPS growth

 Pre-tax earnings

 Net revenues / revenue net of provisions

 EPS

 Progress towards our strategic objectives

 Cross-business strategy / collaboration in support of One Goldman Sachs

 Strength of client feedback

 Broadening share of addressable market

 Progress towards sustainable finance commitments

 

 

   ROE Managing reputational risk

   ROTE

    Efficiency ratio Standing with regulators

    TSR

    BVPS growth Risk – including:

Pre-tax earnings

   Net revenue»  Management across categories (market, credit, liquidity & funding, operational, model)

    EPS

»  Strategic priorities to assess progress towards Investor Day goals:& business environment risk

»   Grow  Residual risks identified

 Internal Audit findings

 Compliance, conduct and strengthen existing businessesdisciplinary matters

»   Diversify our products and services

»   Operate more efficiently

 

   Cross-divisional strategy/ collaboration in support Core Values

 Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (e.g., hiring and representation)

 Attrition

 Leadership pipeline health

 Strategic location headcount and hiring

We will continue to evolve the Assessment Framework, as appropriate, to help ensure its purposes are served. To this end, in February 2024, the Compensation Committee adopted amendments to the Assessment Framework to further align it with our announced strategic priorities and 2024 execution focus areas.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of OneShareholders | Goldman Sachs

    Strength of client feedback

   Broaden share of addressable market

 

   Reputation

    Compliance

    Standing with regulators

   Governance and controls

   Operation risk loss events

    Risk violations/exceptions

   360° feedback on risk management and firm reputation and compliance

    Teamwork and collaboration

   Retention of key talent, including diverse populations and top performers

    Attract high performing external talent

   Progress towards announced diversity goals

   Identification and development of next generation leaders

    360° feedback on culture

   Disciplinary matters

FIRMWIDE37

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS37


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

 

LOGO

LOGOIndividual Performance

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCEAn assessment of each NEO’s individual performance and achievements is critical to our Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, including how each of our NEOs helped to contribute to firmwide performance based on the metrics and other criteria set forth in the Assessment Framework and other factors, in each case as applicable depending on the NEO’s role.

Individual performance is also evaluated through our annual feedback processes, which are designed to solicit and provide individual performance feedback, including on strengths and development opportunities. These processes include confidential input from employees, including those who are senior to, peers of and junior to the employee being reviewed, as applicable. Individual performance is assessed across a variety of factors, including client focus and driving growth, risk management, firm reputation, culture contributions and manager effectiveness.

  An assessment of each NEO’s individual performance and achievements is critical to our Compensation Committee’s decision-making process, including how each of our NEOs helped to contribute to firmwide performance based on the criteria set forth in the Performance Assessment Framework, as applicable dependent on each NEO’s role.

»NEW. To enhance consideration of individual performance under the Framework, for 2020 the Framework was updated to include a self- assessment by each of the CEO, COO and CFO. Assessments were facilitated by the Global Head of HCM.

  Each of our NEOs is also evaluated under our 360° Review Process, which includes confidential input from employees, including those who are senior

LOGO 360o REVIEW PROCESS

     to (other than for our CEO), peers of and junior to the employee being reviewed. Our 360° Review Process assesses performance across a variety of factors, including risk management and firm reputation, control-side empowerment, judgment, compliance with firm policies, commercial contributions, culture contributions, diversity and inclusion, communication, leadership and people development, and client focus.

 

  

Our CEO:Under the direction of our Lead Director, our Governance Committee evaluated the performance of Mr. Solomon including consideration of the results of Mr. Solomon’s self-assessment under the Performance Assessment Framework as well as a summary of his evaluation under the 360° Review Process (see (see Corporate Governance—Board Oversight of our Firm—Key Areas of Board Oversight—CEO Performance)Performance). Our Compensation Committee considered this evaluation and discussed Mr. Solomon’s performance, including pursuant to the Assessment Framework, as part of its discussions to determine his compensation.

 

  

Other NEOs:Mr. Solomon discussed with the Governance Committee the performance of our COO, CFO and CFO, including the results of the COO’sCLO and CFO’s respective self-assessments under the Performance Assessment Framework as well as a summary of their evaluations under the 360° Review Process. The Compensation Committee similarly considered these evaluationsGeneral Counsel, and discussed the performance of Messrs. WaldronSolomon and Scherr as part of its discussions to determine their compensation. Mr. Solomon alsoWaldron discussed with the Compensation Committee the performance of our other NEOs, includingGlobal Treasurer, in respect of the metrics included in the Frameworkeach case taking into account results from our annual feedback processes. The Compensation Committee considered these individual performance evaluations, as well as a summary ofmetrics and other criteria set forth in the Assessment Framework, in connection with their evaluations under the 360° Review Process.discussions to determine NEO compensation. In this context, Mr.Messrs. Solomon and Waldron submitted variable compensation recommendations to the Compensation Committee for our NEOs, but did not make recommendations about histheir own compensation.

 

LOGO

LOGOMarket for Talent

STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK

2020 Say on Pay Results. Our 2020 Say on Pay vote received the support of approximately 71% of our shareholders, reflecting that while shareholders view many aspects of our compensation program positively, such as our high percentage of performance-based pay, there are also opportunities for enhancement of our compensation program.

Stakeholder Engagement. Engagement has been and continues to be a priority for our Board and management. To this end, we engage extensively with our stakeholders each year and the feedback received continues to inform our Board and Compensation Committee actions. For example, in 2020 we (including, in certain cases, our Lead Director and/or our Compensation Committee Chair) met with shareholders representing more than 35% of Common Stock outstanding to discuss compensation-related matters and other areas of focus.

Board Responsiveness. Stakeholder feedback received in connection with the 2020 Say on Pay vote and over the last several years continues to inform our Board and Compensation Committee actions. To this end, the Committee discussed and evaluated feedback received in setting the form, structure and amount of 2020Our Compensation Committee broadly considers the competitive market for talent as part of its review of our compensation program’s effectiveness in attracting and retaining talent, including to help determine NEO compensation.

38GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

IN RESPONSE TO STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK

For 2018 and 2019 compensation, we made a number of enhancements, including:

  Enhanced the rigor of our PSU design

  Granted PSUs beyond our Executive Leadership Team to our other NEOs and Management Committee beginning with 2019 compensation

  Implemented the Performance Assessment Framework enhancing transparency and alignment with
forward strategy

For 2020, we made a number of other enhancements, and restated our commitments to certain best practices:

STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE ACTION

LOGO

LOGO

Undertook Peer group analysis and expanded Peer group for PSUs and compensation benchmarking (see below)

LOGO

LOGO

Increased portion of deferral in PSUs to 50% (from 25%) for NEOs other than our Executive Leadership Team, which continues to receive 100% of deferral in PSUs

LOGO

LOGO

100% of equity for our Executive Leadership Team and 50% for our other NEOs subject to ongoing performance conditions

LOGO

LOGOContinued use of risk-adjusted metrics, transfer restrictions, retention requirements and recapture provisions
LOGO

LOGO

Enhanced Performance Assessment Framework to provide a dashboard for the Compensation Committee to assess progress against key Investor Day goals
LOGOExpanded proxy disclosure regarding Committee’s use of informed judgment and structured discretion on pay decisions

LOGO

LOGO

Continued commitment to engagement by Lead Director and Compensation Committee Chair

HIGH PROPORTION OF EUROPEAN PEERS IN PEER GROUP DECREASE PERCENTAGE OF DEFERRAL IN TIME-BASED RSUS GRANTED TO CERTAIN NEOS SUPPORT FOR HIGH PERCENTAGE OF PERFORMANCE-BASED PAY SUPPORT FOR ROBUST RISK BALANCING FEATURES TRANSPARENCY REGARDING COMPENSATION COMMITTEE'S USE OF DISCRETION SUPPORT FOR ROBUST STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

SPOTLIGHT ON PEER GROUP ANALYSIS

  In 2020, in response to stakeholder feedback, our Compensation Committee directed a detailed analysis of the Peers utilized for PSUs.

»  This analysis was conducted by the firm together with the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, and involved an assessment of criteria including business mix and overlap, the firm’s own strategic initiatives, comparability of capital requirements, U.S. Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIB) status, global footprint, competition for talent and peer group benchmarking.

  This analysis confirmed that our existing Core U.S. Peers and our European Peers continued to be appropriate in light of the factors considered.

»  In particular, the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to retain the existing European firms in our Peers given their strong correlation with the firm across the criteria listed above, including business mix and overlap.

  Further, as a result of this analysis the Compensation Committee determined to expand the Peers utilized in connection with our PSUs by adding The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Wells Fargo & Company, which represent the G-SIBs with the most significant business overlap beyond those already included in our Peer group. This change also reduced the proportion of European firms in our Peers.

  Peer group changes apply beginning with PSUs granted in January 2021. No Peer group changes have been made to PSUs previously granted.

  We also determined to similarly expand our Peers for compensation benchmarking purposes more broadly.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS39


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

LOGO

MARKET FOR TALENT

  LOGO

OUR PEERS CORE U.S. PEERS ADDITIONAL U.S. PEERS (NEW FOR 2020) EUROPEAN PEERS BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION CITIGROUP, INC. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. MORGAN STANLEY THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORATION WELLS FARGO & COMPANY BARCLAYS PLC CREDIT SUISSE GROUP AG DEUTSCHE BANK AG UBS GROUP AG

 

 

Our Compensation Committee reviews the competitive market for talent as part of its review of our compensation program’s effectiveness in attracting and retaining talent, and to help determine NEO compensation.

» 

Wherever possible, our goal is to be in a position to appoint people from within the firm to our most senior leadership positions and ourroles. Our executive compensation program is intended to incentivize our people to stay at Goldman Sachs and to aspire to these senior roles.

To this end, the Committee regularly evaluates our NEO compensation program against benchmarking to ensure that our senior roles are properly valued, taking into account compensation program design and structure, as well as multi-year financial performance and quantum of NEO pay at our Peers. The Committee may also receive additional benchmarking information with respect to other companies with which the firm competes for talent (e.g., asset managers, FortuneTo this end, the Committee regularly evaluates our NEO compensation program using benchmarking to help ensure that our senior roles are properly valued, taking into account compensation program design and structure, as well as multi-year financial performance and quantum of NEO pay at our Peers. The Committee may also receive additional benchmarking information with respect to other companies with which the firm competes for talent (e.g., alternative and other asset managers, S&P 100 companies).

 

 » 

The Committee performs this evaluation with information and assistance from our HCM division and itsthe Committee’s independent compensation consultant, FW Cook.Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (FW Cook).

 

 » 

Benchmarking information provided by HCM is obtained from an analysis of public filings, by our Finance and HCM divisions, as well as surveys regarding incentive compensation practices conducted by Willis Towers Watson.Watson regarding incentive compensation practices.

 

38

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

LOGO

CRO INPUT & RISK MANAGEMENTHOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

 

 Our

 Peers      

 

Effective risk management underpins everything that we do, and our compensation program is carefully designed to be consistent with the safety and soundness

 U.S. Peers

 Bank of our firm.America Corporation

 Citigroup Inc.

 JPMorgan Chase & Co.

 Morgan Stanley

 The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

 Wells Fargo & Company

 European Peers*

 Barclays PLC

 Deutsche Bank AG       

 UBS Group AG

 

 *

Credit Suisse was removed from the Peer group following the merger with UBS Group AG.

In addition, the Compensation Committee (and other Committees as may be applicable in the context of their respective oversight) also receives and considers information on non-executive employee compensation, including information on aggregate compensation, benchmarking (for certain populations), attrition and retention. Annually, the Compensation Committee reviews and approves the equity award terms, including deferral levels, for equity-based awards granted to employees at all levels across the firm. Consistent with our Compensation Principles, employees at certain compensation thresholds receive a portion of their compensation in the form of equity-based awards, which increases as compensation increases, in order to help support employee share ownership and align employee interests with those of long-term shareholders.

LOGO

Stakeholder Feedback

Engagement has been and continues to be a priority for our Board and management. To this end, we engage extensively with our stakeholders each year (see Stakeholder Engagement). This feedback, together with feedback received over the last several years and the results of our annual Say on Pay Vote, informs our Board and Compensation Committee actions.

Feedback from the Say on Pay Vote at our 2023 Annual Meeting (approximately 94% support), as well as stakeholder engagement in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting, reflected continued support for our:

LOGO

Pay-for-performance philosophy

LOGO

100% of year-end equity-based pay in PSUs for all NEOs

LOGO

PSUs that tie compensation for senior leaders to ongoing performance conditions

LOGO

Robust risk-balancing features in the compensation program

LOGO

Program alignment across senior leadership

Taking into account the strong feedback received, the Compensation Committee determined to keep the form and structure of our executive compensation program consistent year-over-year. More information on 2023 year-end compensation decisions and our commitment to various best practices is described below.

Over the last several years, we have made a number of enhancements to our compensation program and affirmed our commitments to various best practices, including paying for performance and using performance-based equity awards to closely link pay to longer-term results.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

39


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

  Stakeholder Feedback

Compensation Committee Action

Pay-for-Performance

Philosophy

LOGO   Compensation reflects both firm and individual performance

LOGO   All pay other than salary is variable and at least 60% of NEO variable compensation is subject to performance conditions

Limit Use of

Time-Based RSUs in

Executive Compensation

LOGO   For 2023, all NEOs and other senior leaders continued to receive 100% of year-end equity in the form of PSUs

Support for High Percentage

of Performance-Based Pay

and Rigor of Design

LOGO   100% of year-end equity for NEOs subject to ongoing performance conditions

LOGO   Rigorous five-year SVC Awards previously granted to our senior leaders, who have the greatest ability to influence long-term shareholder returns

Composition of Peer Group

LOGO   Conducted Peer group analysis in 2020 and expanded Peer group with two additional U.S. Peers for PSUs and compensation benchmarking; Peer group continues to be regularly reassessed (most recently in 2023)

Support for Robust

Risk-Balancing Features

LOGO   Continued use of risk-adjusted metrics, transfer restrictions, retention requirements and recapture provisions

Transparency Regarding

Compensation Committee’s

Use of Discretion

LOGO   Regular enhancements to Assessment Framework, which is reviewed annually. In 2023, pillar covering risk management and control-related reporting was enhanced

LOGO   Robust proxy disclosure regarding the Committee’s use of informed judgment and structured discretion on pay decisions and the factors considered by the Committee in making its decisions

LOGO   No discretionary adjustments to ROE in year-end PSUs; ROE based on as reported metrics

Support for Robust

Stakeholder Engagement

LOGO   Continued commitment to engagement by Lead Director and Compensation Committee Chair

40

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

HOW OUR COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MAKES DECISIONS

LOGO

Risk Management & Controls

Our compensation program is designed to be consistent with the safety and soundness of our firm and to help promote the strength of our risk management and control environment.

 

Our CRO presented histhe annual risk assessment jointly to our Compensation Committee and our Risk CommitteeCommittees in order to assist with the evaluation of our program’s design.

 

»

»This assessment, which is also reviewed by our independent compensation consultant, is focused on whether our program is consistent with regulatory guidance providing that financial services firms should ensure that variable compensation does not encourage imprudent risk-taking.risk taking.

 

»

Our Compensation Committee and our CRO each believesbelieve that the various components of our compensation program, including compensation plans, policies and practices, as well as our Committee’s use of informed judgment, work together to balance risk and reward in a manner that does not encourage imprudent risk-taking.risk taking. For example:

Compensation considered based on Risk-AdjustedMetrics, such as net revenues and ROE (which are reflected in our Performance Assessment Framework)

Significant portion of pay in Equity-Based Awards aligns with long-term shareholder interests

Transfer Restrictions, Retention Requirements and Stock Ownership Guidelines work together to align compensation with long-term performance and discourage imprudent risk-taking

Recapture provisions mitigate imprudent risk-taking; misconduct or improper risk analysis could result in clawback or forfeiture of compensation

 

40

Compensation is
considered based on
risk-adjusted metrics,
such as net revenues and
ROE (which are reflected
in our Assessment
Framework)

 

Significant portion of pay
in 
equity-based awards
aligns with long-term
shareholder interests

 GOLDMAN SACHS

Transfer restrictions,
retention requirements
and stock ownership
guidelines
work together
to align compensation with
long-term performance
and discourage imprudent
risk-taking

   |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW OF COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND KEY PAY PRACTICES

LOGO

REGULATORY CONSIDERATIONS

 

Our Compensation Committee also considers regulatory matters and the views

Recapture provisions
mitigate imprudent
risk-taking; misconduct
or improper risk
analysis could result
in clawback or forfeiture
of our regulators when determining NEO compensation. To this end, the Committee receives briefings on relevant regulatory developments. See also —CRO Input & Risk Management.

LOGO

INDEPENDENT COMPENSATION CONSULTANT INPUT

Our Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of using an independent compensation consulting firm that is appropriately qualified and that provides services solely to our Board and its Committees and not to our firm.

 

 

In addition, as described under —Firmwide Performance, in 2023 the Assessment Framework was updated to include enhanced risk management and control-related reporting and enhanced engagement with senior leaders across Legal, Compliance, Risk and Internal Audit to inform compensation decisions for our NEOs and other senior leaders.

LOGO

Regulatory Considerations

Our Compensation Committee also considers regulatory matters and the views of our regulators when determining NEO compensation. To this end, the Committee receives briefings on relevant regulatory developments, feedback and expectations. See also —Risk Management & Controls.

LOGO

Independent Compensation Consultant

Our Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of using an independent compensation consulting firm that is appropriately qualified and that provides services solely to our Board and its Committees and not to our firm.

 

For 2020,2023, our Compensation Committee received the advice of FW Cook. FW Cook whoreviewed our Assessment Framework and provided input on our incentive compensation program structure and terms and other compensation matters generally. In addition, FW Cook reviewed our CRO’s compensation-related risk assessment provided input and advice on our Performance Assessment Framework and on the structure and amount of our 20202023 NEO annual compensation program, advised on other compensation matters and, providedas needed, may provide additional benchmarking information to the Committee, such as with respect to market context and expectations for Peer compensation.Committee.

 

  

Our Compensation Committee determined that FW Cook had no conflicts of interest in providing services to the Committee and was independent under the factors set forth in the NYSE rules for compensation committee advisors.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

41


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW OF ANNUAL COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND KEY PAY PRACTICES

OVERVIEW OF COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND KEY PAY PRACTICESOverview of Annual Compensation Elements and Key Pay Practices

Our Compensation Committee believes the design of our executive compensation program is integral to further our Compensation Principles, including paying-for-performancepaying for performance and effective risk management.management and controls. In addition, our variable compensation frameworks more broadly govern the variable compensation process for employees who could expose the firm to material amounts of risk (such as our NEOs).

 

 PAY ELEMENT CHARACTERISTICS
Pay Element PURPOSECharacteristics 2020 COMPENSATIONPurpose2023 Annual Compensation
   BASE SALARY

Base Salary

 Annual fixed cash compensation Provides our executives with a predictable level of income that is competitive to salary at our Peers We made no changes to NEOFor 2023, NEOs received the following annual base salary levels ($2.0salaries: $2.0 million for our CEO, $1.85 million for our COO and CFO and $1.5 million for our other NEOs),NEOs

Annual Variable Compensation(a)

Equity-Based: PSUsAligns our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and motivates executives to achieve longer-term performance, and strategic and operational objectivesEach of our Compensation Committee believes that these salary levels are competitiveNEOs received at least 60% of their annual variable compensation in the market for talentform of PSUs

 ANNUAL

   VARIABLE    COMPENSATION(a) 

 Cash Motivates and rewards achievement of company performance and strategic and operational objectives In 2020,2023, each of our NEOs received a portion of their annual variable compensation (no more than 40%) in the form of a cash bonus

Equity-Based

PSUs

RSUs

Aligns our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders and motivates executives to achieve longer-term performance, strategic and operational objectives

Each of our NEOs received at least 60% of his or her annual variable compensation in the form of equity-based compensation

   Executive Leadership Team: 100% PSUs

   Other NEOs: 50% PSUs (increased from 25% in 2019); 50% RSUs

 

(a)

Our NEOs participate in the Goldman Sachs Partner Compensation Plan (PCP), the plan under which we determine variable compensation for all of our other PMDs.

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS41


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW OF COMPENSATION ELEMENTS AND KEY PAY PRACTICES

Life Cycle of Equity Awards

    
  

      2021      

       2022                2023                 2024        2025

       PSUs        

 

 

3-Year Performance Period

PSU goals set and granted in January 2021. Payout is calculated based on average ROE over the 3-year performance period (using both absolute and relative metrics)

 

 

Awards Settle in 2024

Transfer Restrictions Apply

to Shares at Risk

  
 

LOGO

 

   

    RSUs    

 

RSUs Granted

in January 2021

 

3-Year Pro-Rata Delivery

  

Transfer

Restrictions Apply to

Shares at Risk

Equity-based awards and underlying Shares at Risk are also subject to retention requirements, Stock Ownership Guidelines and

robust recapture provisions (each as described herein)

Five-Year Transfer Restrictions on Equity-Based Awards and Underlying Shares at Risk Applied from Grant Date through January 2026

LOGO

LOGO
What We Do What We Don't Do Engage proactively with shareholders and other stakeholders Review and carefully consider stakeholder feedback in structuring and determining executive compensation Grant equity-based awards subject to ongoing performance metrics as a significant portion of our NEOs' annual variable compensation (for 2020 at least 60%)for NEOs Align pay with firmwide performance, including through use of PSUs and RSUs Utilize PerformanceUse Assessment Framework to assess performance through financial and non-financialnonfinancial metrics, (includingincluding with respect to leadership, culturerisk management and values) Tie 100% of equity-based compensation granted to our Executive Leadership Team and 50% for our other NEOs to ongoing performance metricscontrol-related information Exercise informed judgment responsive to the dynamic nature of our business, including consideration of appropriate risk-based and other metrics within the context ofin our Performance Assessment Framework Apply significant shareholding requirements through: Stock Ownership Guidelinesownership guidelines for our Executive Leadership Team Retention Requirementsrequirements for all Management Committee members (including NEOs) Shares at Risk broadly applicablefor PMDs and managing directors (including NEOs) Maintain robust recapture provisions in our variable compensation award agreements Provide for annual assessment by our CRO of our compensation program to ensure it does not encourage imprudent risk-taking Utilizerisk taking and engagement with senior control side leaders on risk and control matters Use independent compensation consultant What We Dont Do No employment agreements providing for severance pay with our executive officers (including our NEOs) No golden parachutes No guaranteed bonus arrangements with our executive officers No tax gross-ups for our executive officers, except in connection with international assignments and relocations No repricing of underwater stock options and no changing of thresholds for legacy performance-based awards No excessive perquisites No ongoing service-based pension benefit accruals for executive officers No hedging transactions or short sales of our common stockCommon Stock permitted for any executive officer; no executive officer has shares subject to a pledge

 

42

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

20202023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

 

2020 COMPENSATION2023 Annual Compensation

Our Compensation Committee made its annual compensation determinations for our NEOs in the context of our Compensation Principles, which encompass a pay-for-performance philosophy, and after consideration of the factors set forth inHow —How our Compensation Committee Makes its Decisions.

 

2020 COMPENSATION REFLECTS

Strong financial performanceOur compensation program reflects our pay-for-performance culture and steady progress towards

our Investor Day goals

Strong individual performance

  Best full-year net revenues since 2009 amidst challenging operating environment

  Strong financial momentum and strength of our franchises

  Reaffirmation of our strategic direction as we execute ourincentivizes long-term growth strategy and build a foundation for more durable revenues over time

  Exemplary leadership and tone at the top

  Led advances towards strategic goals within the context of a challenging environment

  Committed to advancing our culture, diversity and talent development

Compensation incentivizes continued long-term, sustainable growth and achievement of financial targets

shareholder alignment without undue emphasis on shorter-term results

results.

2020 Compensation and 1MDB

2023 NEO Compensation Reflects:

 Decisive leadership in recognizing the need to clarify and simplify our forward strategy

 Swift execution on a series of actions that narrowed our strategic focus and strengthened our platform for 2024 and beyond

 Continued progress on strategic priorities in our core franchises: Global Banking & Markets and Asset & Wealth Management

 Ongoing emphasis on delivering long-term value for shareholders

 Steadfast focus on client centricity and One Goldman Sachs as foundational to our firm

 Dedicated commitment to our culture, Core Values and advancing our people strategy

 Demonstrated investment to promote the strength of our risk management and control environment

Compensation amounts also reflect the previously announced decision by the Board to reduce 2020 compensation of Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and Scherr by $10 million, $7 million and $7 million, respectively, as part of the Board’s broader determination regarding the compensation of certain past and current members of senior management in light of the findings of the government and regulatory investigations and the magnitude of the firm’s settlement of government and regulatory matters relating to 1MDB. While none of Messrs. Solomon, Waldron or Scherr was involved in or aware of the firm’s participation in any illicit activity at the time the firm arranged the 1MDB bond transactions, the Board views the 1MDB matter as an institutional failure, inconsistent with the high expectations it has for the firm.

The Compensation Committee determined 2020 compensation amounts taking into account each of the factors described below and in —How our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions, and then applied the previously determined compensation reduction.

20202023 Firmwide Performance: Strong Financial PerformanceExecution on our Narrowed Strategic Focus and Steady Progress Towards Our Investor Day Goalson Other Strategic Priorities

Our Compensation Committee places key importance on the assessment of annual firmwide performance when determining NEO compensation.compensation, which is core to our pay-for-performance philosophy.

 

  

Performance is assessed in a holistic manner and was guided by our Performance Assessment Framework (using metrics determined by our Compensation Committee in early 2023), without ascribing specific weight to any single factor or metric, as we continue to believe that a formulaic compensation program would not be in the best interests of our firm.firm or our shareholders.

 

  

In consideringThe Committee considered the firm’s 2023 financial performance, for 2020, the Committee receivedboth on an absolute basis and relative financial metrics that both included and excluded the impact of the firm’s 2020 litigation expense. The Committee also consideredto peer results, as well as in the context of the broader2023 operating environment and longer-term results. The Compensation Committee recognized that these results were affected by a number of factors, including our strong client franchise performance (as described below) but also the impactexecution of the COVID-19 pandemic acrossfirm’s own initiatives to narrow its strategic focus. While these strategic actions negatively impacted short-term performance, the globeCompensation Committee believes that the actions of senior management were critical to reorienting the firm with a much stronger platform for 2024 and in particular the immense financial toll it has taken on individuals and small businesses.beyond.

 

  

TheIn addition, the Committee also considered how 20202023 results were achieved, including how the firm continued to invest in its future, and how each NEO and each divisionbusiness contributed to the various client, risk management and leadership, culturecontrol, and values-relatedpeople-related strategies and goals set forth in the Assessment Framework, including as described in 20202023 Individual Performance.

ExecutionThe execution of the firm’s long-term growth strategy as articulated at our January 2020 Investor Daynarrowed strategic focus and progress on our broader strategic priorities was also central to our Compensation Committee decisions for 20202023 compensation. These actions reinforced the firm’s commitment to serve our clients with excellence and further strengthen our client franchise, which is reflected in the firm’s achievements over the past year.

 

  

Our NEOs, and in particular our Executive Leadership Team, drove execution ofrecognized the need to clarify and simplify our forward strategy and swiftly executed on actions to narrow our strategic plan throughout 2020, reaffirmed our strategic direction and made steady progress towards our Investor Day goals. Pursuant to

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS43


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2020 COMPENSATION

the Performance Assessment Framework, the Committee considered progress towards achieving our Investor Day goals in 2020 by reviewing a dashboard of progress across various KPIs.focus, including:

 

 »

These actions help to set the firm on a path to more durable revenues over time, drive financial momentumThe exit of our Marcus lending business and demonstratesale of substantially all of our commitment to making the necessary investments to drive long-term, sustainable growth for our shareholders.Marcus loan portfolio;

 

 »

The sale of our Personal Financial Management business;

»

The announcement of the sale of GreenSky, and the sale of the majority of our GreenSky loan portfolio;

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

43


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

»

An agreement with General Motors regarding a process to transition their credit card program to another issuer; and

»

Continued progress on strategic priorities in Global Banking & Markets and Asset & Wealth Management.

 

Each of our NEOs also focused on the continued implementation of a newcommitment to an operating approach that deliversOne Goldman Sachs to our clients, is underscored by a multi-year financial planningfinancial-planning process, invests in new and existing businessescapabilities and enhances accountability and transparency.

The Committee continues to focus on ensuring that the structure and amount of our NEO compensation appropriately incentivizes our NEOs to continue to build long-term, sustainable growth and to achieve our financial targets, without undue emphasis on shorter-term results.

 

For example, each of our NEOs receives at least 60% of his or her variable compensation in the form of equity-based awards that promotes alignment with long-term shareholder interests.

Further, all of our Executive Leadership Team’s and 50% of our other NEOs’ equity-based awards are in the form of PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. PSUs were also granted to our Management Committee members (25% of their equity-based awards), resulting in a meaningful portion of compensation for our most senior leaders being subject to ongoing performance metrics.

ASSESSMENT OF 2020 FIRMWIDE PERFORMANCEAssessment of 2023 Firmwide Performance

 

    

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEFinancial performance

 

ROE

 

11.1%7.5%

(+390 basis points2.6 percentage

points Ex. Litigation)Selected Items and FDIC Special Assessment Fee)(a)

 

ROTE(a)(b)

 

11.8%

(+410 basis points

Ex. Litigation)8.1%

 

Net RevenueRevenues

 

$44.646.3 billion

 

EPSRevenues Net of Provisions

 

$24.7445.2 billion

EPS

$22.87

(+$9.518.04 Ex. Litigation)Selected Items and FDIC Special Assessment Fee)(a)

 

 

Pre-Tax Earnings

 

$12.510.7 billion

(+$3.4 billion Ex. Selected Items and FDIC Special Assessment Fee)(a)

 

Efficiency Ratio

 

65.0%

(-760 basis points

Ex. Litigation)74.6%

 

1-Year TSR

 

17.5%15.9%

 

BVPS GrowthStandardized CET1 Capital Ratio

 

8.1% Year-Over-Year14.4%

BVPS Growth

3.3% YoY

Progress Across our 2023 Strategic Priorities

 

 

  Highest full-year net revenues since 2009

  Record firmwide AUS

  #1 in announced and completed M&A; #1 in equity and equity-related offerings (Dealogic)

  Highest Global Markets net revenues since 2010; record net revenues in Investment Banking and Consumer & Wealth Management

PROGRESS TOWARDS INVESTOR DAY GOALS

  
  
GROW AND STRENGTHEN EXISTING BUSINESSES

  Grew wallet share in Global Banking & Markets(b); expanded client footprint in Investment Banking

  Grew traditional AUS; firmwide AUS increased $286 billion in 2020, including $42 billion of long-term fee based net inflows

DIVERSIFY OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES

 

  Formally launched Transaction Banking capabilities, with the launch of our client platform Ranked #1 in June 2020worldwide announced and $29 billion of deposit balances at 2020 year-endcompleted mergers and acquisitions, equity and equity-related offerings, and common stock offerings for 2023(c)

 

  Grew third-party alternatives, including ~$40 billion of gross commitments Record total financing revenues across asset classesFICC and Equities businesses in 2023

 

  Continued to scale Consumer Top 3 with 117 of the Top 150 FICC & Equities clients in 1H23 vs. 77 in 2019(d)

Asset & Wealth Management offerings, including growth in consumer deposits, integration of GS Personal Financial Management and the launch of new products and partnerships

OPERATE MORE EFFICIENTLY 

  On track to generate $1.3 Record Management and other fees of $9.5 billion in run-rate expense efficiencies over the medium term; achieved approximately half2023, up 8% YoY, and AUS of our medium-term plan in 2020$2.8 trillion

 

  Diversified funding mix; $70 billion 24 consecutive quarters of deposits raised across channelslong-term fee-based net inflows

 

  Expanded presence in strategic locations and ongoing investment in automation and infrastructure Surpassed our five-year $225 billion alternatives fundraising target, one year ahead of schedule

 Reduced historical principal investments by $13 billion during the year(e)

 

(a)

(a)  Represents the impact from selected items that the firm has sold or is selling related to the firm’s narrowing of its ambitions in consumer-related activities and related to Asset & Wealth Management, including its transition to a less capital-intensive business, as well as the firm’s recognition of the FDIC special assessment fee. For additional information about these items, please see Annex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures and Other Information.

(b)  For a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the corresponding GAAP measure, please seeAnnex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures. Measures and Other Information.

(c)  Source: Dealogic.

(d)  Top 150 client list and rankings compiled by GS through Client Ranking / Scorecard / Feedback and / or Coalition Greenwich 1H23 and FY19 Institutional Client Analytics ranking.

(e)  Historical principal investments include consolidated investment entities and other legacy investments the firm intends to exit over the medium term (medium term refers to a three to five year time horizon from year-end 2022).

(b)

Source: McKinsey institutional client analytics for 3Q20 YTD. Analysis excludes captive wallets.

44GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2020 COMPENSATION2023 Individual Performance

 

2020 Individual Performance

The Committee assesses how each NEO’s individual performance (highlights of which are set forth below) contributed to the firm’s overall performance, including execution of our long-term strategy, and driving our financial momentum, as well as how each NEO exhibited exemplaryeffective leadership and set the tone at the toptone-at-the-top in the stewardship of our culture.culture and Core Values.

 

The Committee also considers the metrics and factors described in our Performance Assessment Framework, including an assessment of each NEO against the self-assessments bycriteria in the Assessment Framework and other factors, in each of the CEO, COO and CFO, across the areas of clients, risk management and leadership, culture and values,case as applicable dependent on each NEO’s role.

 

44

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

LOGO

 

 

David M. Solomon

 

Chairman and CEO

KEY RESPONSIBILITIESKey Responsibilities

 

As Chairman and CEO, Mr. Solomon is responsible for leading our business operations and overseeing our firm, leading development and implementation of corporate policy and strategy and serving as primary liaison between our Board and our firm and as a primary public face of our firm.

 

2020  2023 Annual Compensation

                                                         LOGO 27% variable cash compensation 11%28% variabl 6% base salary 62%65% PSUs $17.5M$31M Equity-based compensation represented 70% of 20202023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. LOGO

*

Percentages do not sum to 100% due to rounding.

 

KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTSKey Performance Highlights

 

In 2020, Mr. Solomon displayed outstandingdecisive and effective leadership in guidingof our firm during 2023, demonstrating an unwavering focus on its long-term strategy, including recognizing the firm throughneed for, and swiftly executing on, the pandemic, delivering strong results while also driving significant early progress towards the firm’sactions to narrow our strategic goals.focus, and an authentic commitment to our people and culture, clients, shareholders and broader stakeholders.

 

Mr. Solomon’s 20202023 dashboard:

 

 

CLIENTSStrategic Priorities & Clients

 

 

  Continued Led the firm through the initial phases of its strategic evolution, including by:

»  Championing transparency with external stakeholders about our strategy, including by hosting the firm’s 2023 Investor Day

»  Swiftly executing on the decisions made to emphasizenarrow our strategic focus

»  Continuing to capitalize on opportunities to expand addressable markets and provide differentiated client service

 Displayed ongoing commitment to client centricity including ongoing execution of the firm’s andOne Goldman Sachs approach.

  Accelerated strategic initiatives, including by promoting collaboration across our businesses and provided differentiated client service within the context of 2020 operating environment.

  Delivered consistent, personalthrough extensive engagement with hundredsour clients around the world

 Continued sponsorship of client CEOs across multiple formats.our sustainability strategy, in particular to further accelerate and operationalize commercial capabilities to serve our clients

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENTRisk Management

 

 

  Oversaw implementation Demonstrated the strategic imperative of Business Continuity Planregular reinvestment in responseour enterprise risk management framework to the pandemic.

  Instilledmaintain a strong focus onand effective risk management and accountabilitycontrol environment

»  Continued focus on the management of financial and nonfinancial risks

»  Engaged actively throughout the organization,year with leaders of our control, finance
and operating functions,
including with respectLegal, Risk and Compliance, as well as Internal Audit

 Acted promptly to reputational risk.direct and manage oversight of the firm’s exposures to, and further bolster the firm’s liquidity positions in light of, the Spring 2023 regional banking crisis in the U.S. and Europe

  Continued strong  Maintained ongoing engagement with our key regulators and top government officials, including on matters such as the state of the economy and the pandemic.
leaders worldwide

 

 

LEADERSHIP, CULTURE & VALUESPeople

 

 

  Championed a “People First” Demonstrated commitment to our culture and Core Values and continued to advance our people strategy, including by:

»  Prioritizing engagement with the firm’s people across all levels in our offices across the globe, through meetings, small group roundtables and townhalls as well as hosting and participating in nearly all Cultural Stewardship events during the pandemic, focused on employee welfare, and frequent, transparent communication.year

  Highly visible internal and external presence, including extensive engagement across the firm’s stakeholders.

  Continues to set appropriate tone at the top, including by:

»  Instilling  Serving as a client-centric culturesenior sponsor of innovation.

»  Reinforcing the firm’s culture and values and each employee’s responsibility to protect and foster integrity, encourage escalation and hold themselves and others to the highest standards of conduct.

»  Advancingour people and talent initiatives, acrossincluding developing next generation talent, promoting internal mobility efforts, focusing on aspirational diversity goals, and continuing investments in our benefits offerings and performance management processes

»  Investing in the firm.leadership of our businesses and control, finance and operating functions

»  Championing diversity  Providing thought leadership on important social topics and racial equity both internallypersonally demonstrating the firm’s commitment to maintaining a safe and externally, including through aspirational goals to enhance the diverse representationsupportive environment in which all of our people as well as our commitments relatinghave an equal opportunity to the board diversity of the IPOs we underwrite.

»  Spearheading operationalization of $750 billion sustainable finance target across the firm.succeed, grow and build a fulfilling career

 

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

45


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

20202023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

 

LOGO

 

 

 

John E. Waldron

 

President and COO

Key Responsibilities

 

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

As President and COO, Mr. Waldron’s responsibilities include managing our day-to-day business, executing on our firmwide strategy and other priorities and closely collaborating with our senior management team across the breadth of the firm’s operations, as well as engaging with, and serving as a liaison to, our clients.

2020 Annual Compensationclients and other stakeholders.

 

                                                         LOGO 36% variable cash compensation 10%  2023 Annual Compensationcash compensation38% variable6% base salary 54% PSUs $18.5M Equity-basedsalary$30M56% PSUsEquity-based compensation represented 60% of 20202023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. 2023 Annual Compensation cash compensation 38% variable 6% base salary $30M 56% PSUs Equity-based compensation represented 60% of 2023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. LOGO

KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Key Performance Highlights

 

In 2020,During 2023, Mr. Waldron provided robustdisplayed a strong and resilient day-to-day oversight ofactive focus on the successful execution of our Business Continuity Plan in lightfirm’s forward strategy, driving progress towards our narrowed focus and other strategic priorities with continued attention to further enhancing our expense discipline. In doing so, he provided dedicated leadership of the COVID-19 pandemic, while simultaneously leading the firm’s revenue divisionsbusinesses and operations functions and delivering extensivewhile maintaining significant client coverage.engagement.

 

Mr. Waldron’s 20202023 dashboard:

 

 

CLIENTSStrategic Priorities & Clients

 

 

  Drove Led execution of our strategic priorities, including by:

»  Driving execution priorities, growth initiatives and achievement of KPIs in close partnership with business and functional leaders across the firm

»  Overseeing operating efficiency initiatives, including continued optimization of organizational structure and progressing automation efforts

»  Driving significant focus on the reduction of our historical principal investments

»  Engaging with internal and external stakeholders on our strategic priorities

 Continued focus on ourOne Goldman Sachs strategy, including expanded client coverageby promoting collaboration across our businesses and enhanced cross-divisional collaboration.

  Demonstrated significant and consistent global client focus and engagement, including active CEO dialogue around significant transactions.

  Executed on strategic priorities and actively engaged in key initiatives with client focus and impact, including:

» Led dialogue relating to key strategic partnerships.

» Worked with key institutional clients to drive client-share initiatives in Global Markets.

» Helped drive Asset Management third-party fundraising objectives.

» Engaged with clients in support of the launch and growth of our Transaction Banking platform.

  Comprehensively reviewedassessing key client franchises across the firm, including as Chair of theestablishing working groups under our Firmwide Client Franchise Committee to drive progress for key cross-business client channels, and Business Standards Committee.maintaining high levels of client engagement

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENTRisk Management

 

 

  Spearheaded execution Maintained focus on the management of financial and nonfinancial risks as well as efficient management of resources firmwide. In doing so, closely collaborated with control, finance and operating functions and demonstrated a commitment to a strong risk management and control environment

 Served as Co-Chair (alongside CRO) of the firm’s Business Continuity Plan.

  Leveraged extensive capital markets experience to drive the firm’s disciplined balance sheet deployment to support client needs through the pandemic.

  Oversaw reputational risk managementEnterprise Risk Committee and as chairChair of the Firmwide Reputational Risk Committee.Committee

  Continued high level Significant engagement around regional strategies in the context of engagementan evolving market and geopolitical landscape

 Maintained ongoing dialogue with ourkey regulators and government officials.leaders globally

 

 

LEADERSHIP, CULTURE & VALUESPeople

 

 

  Active leadership role in managing the firm’s businesses, including through frequent dialogue Engaged regularly with divisional leadership and ongoing focus on execution of the firm’s strategic priorities.

  Highly visible internal presence across the firm as well as extensive engagement across the firm’s stakeholders.

  Partnered with CEO to implement “People First” strategy aimed at supporting the firm’sour people and their families.fostered collaboration through individual meetings, small group roundtables and townhalls throughout our offices globally

  Led Sponsored major people and talent initiatives, including sponsorship of the firm’s People Strategy in collaboration with the Global Head of HCM, enhancementsincluding:

»  Continuing to performance management and goal setting, and the 2020 partner selection process.

  Ledenhance the firm’s leadership pipeline review process with a particular focus onand initiatives to increase transparency, governance and rigor around
succession planning

»  Sponsoring Pine Street and Partnership Committee efforts to invest in culture, connectivity and talent development

»  Sponsoring diversity, equity and development ofinclusion networks and initiatives
across the firm

»  Leading managing director promotion process

 Drove efforts related to the firm’s “next generation” talent.

  Collaborated with CEO to lead process for key strategic hires across the firm.

location and real estate strategy

 

 

46

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

20202023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

 

Stephen M. ScherrDenis Coleman

 

CFO

KEY RESPONSIBILITIESKey Responsibilities

 

As CFO, Mr. Scherr managesColeman is responsible for managing the firm’s overall financial condition, as well as financial analysis and reporting. In addition, he also oversees various control functions, operations and technology and closely collaborates across our senior management team, including on issues relating to risk management and firmwide operations.

2020 Annual Compensation

 

                                                         LOGO 35%  2023 Annual Compensation 36% variable cash compensation 12%9% base salary 53%54% PSUs $15.5M$20M Equity-based compensation represented 60% of 20202023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. LOGO

*

Percentages do not sum to 100% due to rounding.

KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Key Performance Highlights

 

In 2020,2023, Mr. ScherrColeman provided exceptionalstrong oversight of the firm’s capital, liquidity and balance sheet to support its successful navigationthe execution of a challenging macro environment, deftly working to ensurethe firm’s strategic and operational goals with an enduring focus on ensuring the safety and soundness of the firm while furtheringand the executionstrength of its strategicour risk management and operational goals.control environment.

 

Mr. Scherr’s 2020Coleman’s 2023 dashboard:

 

 

CLIENTSStrategic Priorities & Clients

 

 

  Oversaw Successfully navigated market volatility to ensure the firm’s deployment of itsfirm had appropriate capital, liquidity and balance sheet to support client needs throughoutprudently deploy towards franchise activity as well as future growth

 Closely collaborated with our CEO and COO on the volatile 2020 operating environment.execution of our strategic priorities, with regular stakeholder engagement related thereto and concerted focus on deepening relationships with investors aimed at raising greater awareness around our firm’s strategy and performance

  Provided oversight of ongoing investments to digitize and automate firm processes that enhance client experience. Engaged with clients in partnership with business leaders

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENTRisk Management

 

 

  Actively managed Demonstrated a strong commitment to investing in and promoting the strength of our risk management and control environment and maintained focus on the management of both financial and nonfinancial risks

 Managed the firm’s financial resources, during 2020, managing firmincluding to:

»  Manage capital and liquidity through market surges facingvolatility, including the industry, while ensuringregional banking crisis and U.S. debt ceiling negotiations, maintaining sufficient capacity to meet internal and regulatory requirements (in particular, the firm’s Stress Capital Buffer and CET1 requirements), driving

»  Focus on enhancing expense discipline, and deploying resources to high returning client opportunities.management across our businesses

  Ensured disciplined risk management approach as the firm provided clients Engaged in ongoing dialogue with complex risk intermediation and financing solutions.

  Managed the firm’s three-year business planning process and the development of a comprehensive upgrade of business and scenario planning by linking business performance, risk, liquidity and capital in a comprehensive model for the firm.

  Oversaw development of a more dynamic Treasury function, including review of credit extensions.

  Led discussions and strategic advocacy with the Federal Reserve and other globalkey regulators and policy-makers regarding the COVID-19 crisis, Brexit and other supervisory matters.government leaders

 Served as Co-ChairVice Chair of the Enterprise Risk Committee and as Co-Chair of the Firmwide Asset-LiabilityAsset Liability Committee and the Firmwide Risk Committee.

 

 

LEADERSHIP, CULTURE & VALUESPeople

 

 

  Advanced Engaged with our people across the firm and continued his focus on convening leaders across control, finance and operating functions to foster greater alignment and collaboration

 Championed the firm’s people and talent initiatives, including as a significant participantthrough participation in the 2020 partnermanaging director selection process.process, leadership pipeline reviews and various other key programs

  Served as a senior sponsor and culture carrier on important issues, including diversity, inclusion and racial equity. For example, served as Executive Office sponsor to the Firmwide Hispanic and Latinx Network and worked with the COO in furthering the Black Leadership Initiative.

  Collaborated with senior management in identifying various key strategic hires.

  Strong engagement across Advanced the firm’s stakeholders.

culture through participation in the firm’s Cultural Stewardship Program and Culture Connect Forums

 

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

47


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

20202023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

 

John F.W. RogersKathryn Ruemmler

 

EVP

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

As EVP, Mr. Rogers is responsible for overseeing and/ or advising on the firm’s executive functions, including corporate affairs, stakeholder relations (including clients, investors, the public, media and the government) and our corporate engagement efforts. He also serves as Chief of Staff of our firm and Secretary to the Board.

2020 Annual Compensation*

35% variable cash compensation 12% base salary 26% PSUs 26% RSUs $12.5M Equity-based compensation represented 60% of 2020 annual variable compensation, paid 50% in PSUs (subject to ongoing performance metrics) and 50% in RSUs.

LOGO

KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

In 2020, Mr. Rogers served as a key advisor to our Executive Leadership Team, providing significant advice and leadership across a broad spectrum of topics, including strategy, corporate affairs, culture, government affairs, public policy and reputational risk management.

Mr. Rogers’ 2020 dashboard:

RISK MANAGEMENT

  Led the firm’s engagement with government and other officials on the economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

LEADERSHIP, CULTURE & VALUES

  As Secretary to the Board of Directors, devoted significant energy and effort to ensure the firm’s transparent and constructive engagement with the Board, successfully managing complex matters relating to governance and driving stakeholder engagement on governance matters. In particular, played a lead role in engaging with the Board relating to 1MDB matters.

  Continued to drive the firm’s culture and values, including by working closely with senior management to execute the firm’s sustainability strategy and helping to create a coordinated, firmwide sustainability function.

  Led the firm’s efforts to redesign its marketing function.

  Continued to lead and champion the firm’s corporate engagement efforts, such as the newly created 10,000 Small Business Voices initiative, which is designed to help small business owners in the United States advocate for policy changes that will help their businesses, their employees and their communities. In 2020, he activated the members of this community to engage in COVID-19 impact and relief efforts, among other things.

LOGO

Karen P. Seymour

Former EVPCLO and General Counsel

KEY RESPONSIBILITIESKey Responsibilities

 

As EVPCLO and General Counsel, Ms. Seymour ledRuemmler leads the firm’s Legal Division and was responsibledivision, providing oversight for overseeing the firm’s legal affairs worldwide. Ms. Seymour retired fromworldwide, and oversees the Compliance division and Conflicts Resolution Group, which oversight serves to enhance collaboration across these roles on March 15, 2021.

disciplines and ensure a consistent approach to addressing the legal, compliance and reputational risk issues facing the firm.

 

2020  2023 Annual Compensation

LOGO

34% variableCompensation*9% base salary cash compensation 15%36% variable$16M54% PSUsEquity-based compensation represented 60% of 2023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics.2023 Annual Compensation* 9% base salary 25.5%cash compensation 36% variable $16M 54% PSUs 25.5% RSUs $10.0M Equity-based compensation represented 60% of 20202023 annual variable compensation, paid 50%100% in PSUs (subjectsubject to ongoing performance metrics) and 50% in RSUs.metrics. LOGO

 

*

Percentages do not sum to 100% due to rounding.

KEY PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

Key Performance Highlights

 

In 2020,2023, Ms. Seymour effectively oversaw the firm’s strategy regarding class action and other litigation and enforcement issues and servedRuemmler continued to serve as a keyan invaluable advisor to the firm leadership across a varietybroad range of legal, reputational and other matters.regulatory matters with a strong track record of exceptional judgment and informed and sound counsel. She successfully resolved a number of importantalso brought certain long-standing litigation matters on behalf ofto successful resolution while continuing to enhance collaboration and synergies across the firmLegal, Compliance and was key in negotiating the firm’s most critical legal matters, including 1MDB.Conflicts Resolution functions.

 

Ms. Seymour’s 2020Ruemmler’s 2023 dashboard:

 

 

RISK MANAGEMENTStrategic Priorities & Clients

 

 

 Key advisor across a variety Regularly provided counsel to senior management on the development and execution of legal, reputational and other matters. For example, in Spring 2020 she spearheaded a working group from the Legal Division to address COVID-19 contractual, employment and related issues to provide real-time advice and resources to the division and its clients across the firm.

 Played an integral role in the resolution of 1MDB matters across many different regulators globally and otherwise oversaw the firm’s litigation and enforcement strategy.

 Continued to invest significant time and oversight with respect to the restructuring of the firm’s Legal Division, including to reduce expenses, increase efficiencies and global integration, and enhance technology offerings, while still ensuring the Legal Division is well-positioned to advise on and assist with the firm’s growth plans and forward strategy.our strategic priorities

 

 

LEADERSHIP, CULTURE & VALUESRisk Management

 

 

 Played Championed the ongoing investment in our risk management and control environment, serving as a sponsor and leader of our efforts to strategically enhance our enterprise risk management framework

 Provided informed and sound counsel to leaders across the firm on a broad range of legal, reputational and regulatory matters

 Significant focus and leadership on the firm’s litigation strategy, bringing several key leadership rolematters to a successful resolution in many2023

 Enhanced the firm’s engagement model with key regulators by pursuing a more centralized and robust approach to engagement, exam management, responses and, where applicable, remediation

 Significant focus on the management of reputational risk, including as Co-Vice Chair of the firm’s cultureFirmwide Reputational Risk Committee

People

 Invested substantial time and diversity initiatives, includingthought leadership as a memberChair of the Firmwide Conduct Committee, including emphasizing the importance of integrity as an expectation of our people and leaders

 Focused on supporting and implementing the firm’s Global Diversity Committeepeople strategy goals across Compliance, Legal and a memberConflicts Resolution functions, including furthering issues of equity, diversity and inclusion across all areas of the Board of Advisors of Launchfirm

 Led continued efforts to refine and improve our organizational structure, including with GS, the firm’s $500 million commitment to invest in companiesongoing focus on enhancing collaboration and investment managers with diverse leadership.

 Formed the Global Inclusion and Diversity Committee insynergies across the Legal, Division to drive progress with respect to the diversity of the divisionCompliance and its environment for inclusion, with a specific focus on representation, hiring, retention and pipeline development.

Conflicts Resolution functions

 

 

48

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

2023 ANNUAL COMPENSATION

LOGO

Philip Berlinski

Global Treasurer

Key Responsibilities

As Global Treasurer, Mr. Berlinski is responsible for overseeing the firm’s Corporate Treasury function, which manages the firm’s liquidity, payments, funding, balance sheet and capital to maximize net interest income and return on equity through liability planning and execution, financial resource allocation, asset liability management and liquidity portfolio management. Mr. Berlinski also serves as CEO of GS Bank and as interim Co-Head or Head of Platform Solutions.

  2023 Annual Compensation 35% variable cash compensation 12% base salary $13M 53% PSUs Equity-based compensation represented 60% of 2023 annual variable compensation, paid 100% in PSUs subject to ongoing performance metrics. LOGO

Key Performance Highlights

During 2023, Mr. Berlinski effectively managed the firm’s liquidity position through continued market volatility, appropriately balancing his technical responsibilities while supporting business growth in our core franchises. He also successfully assumed the role of interim Co-Head or Head of Platform Solutions, with significant engagement and oversight of the Enterprise Platforms and Transaction Banking businesses.

Mr. Berlinski’s 2023 dashboard:

Strategic Priorities & Clients

 Focused on maintaining appropriate liquidity to support franchise activity and future growth

 Engaged with a range of Platform Solutions clients and strategic partners as well as fixed income investors

Risk Management

 Maintained strong tone-at-the-top with demonstrated commitment to the strength of our risk management and control environment across his various responsibilities

 Successfully managed the firm’s liquidity position and navigated continued market volatility throughout the year, including during the regional banking crisis and U.S. debt ceiling negotiations, and ensured sufficient liquidity to meet internal and regulatory needs

 Partnered with Risk to strengthen the firm’s liquidity and funding management processes, including to enhance the firm’s liquidity stress testing and intraday liquidity risk model and capabilities

 Continued to progress liquidity optimization management initiatives, including to:

»  Deliver enhanced liquidity projections

»  Add new funding channels to enable the firm to bolster funding in times of stress

 Continued to lead efforts to facilitate growth and migration of businesses to Bank entities with a focus on enhancing GS Bank governance and oversight and on GS Bank risk management and controls

 Represented the firm by leading G-SIB Treasurer discussions on markets, liquidity and regulations with key regulators and policy makers

 Served as Chair of the GS Bank Management Committee and Co-Chair of the Firmwide Asset Liability Committee

People

 Focused on supporting and implementing the firm’s people strategy goals in Corporate Treasury and Platform Solutions. In doing so, partnered with HCM to invest in our people and culture and advance diversity, equity and inclusion

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

49


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EQUITY-BASED ANNUAL VARIABLE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS—A MORE DETAILED LOOKCOMPENSATION: PSUS

 

   EQUITY-BASED VARIABLE COMPENSATION ELEMENTS—A MORE DETAILED LOOKEquity-Based Annual Variable Compensation: PSUs

We believe it is important to pay a significant portion of our annual variable compensation in equity-based awards.

For 2020 To this end, for 2023 annual compensation, our Compensation Committee assessed the overall levels of equity-based and performance-based compensation for our NEOs. As a result, the Committee determined it was appropriate to pay 70% of Mr. Solomon’s and 60% of all other NEOs’ variable compensation in equity-based awards.

Our Executive Leadership Team continued to receive their 2020 equity-based annual compensation entirelywas paid in PSUs. For 2019, in order to further tie compensation to ongoing performance metrics and further align goals across our most senior leaders, our Compensation Committee introduced PSUs to our other NEOs as well as the other members of our Management Committee. The Committee continued this practice for 2020, with our other two NEOs receiving 50% of their 2020 equity-based annual awards in PSUs (increased from 25%) and other members of our Management Committee continuing to receive 25% of their 2020 equity-based annual awards in PSUs, and in each case receiving the remainder in RSUs.

Our equity-based variable compensation is subject to various robust risk-balancing features, as described more fully inOther —Other Compensation Policies and Practices. Treatment upon a termination of employment or change in control is described more fully inExecutive —Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control.

PSUs

 

 PSUs — Year-End PSUs—Overview of Material Terms  
   
 
  
   

 

  PSUs provide recipients with annual variable compensation that has a metrics-based outcome; theoutcome. The ultimate value paid to the NEO is subject to firm performance both through stock price and a metrics-based structure. ROE is used givenbecause it is a risk-based metric that is an important indicator of the firm’s operating performance and is viewed by many stakeholders as a key performance metric.

 

  PSUs will be paid at 0-150% of the initial award based on our average ROE over 2021-2023,2024-2026, using absolute and relative metrics as described in the below table.

 

    

         

 

3-YEAR AVERAGE

ABSOLUTE ROE

 % EARNED 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3-YEAR AVERAGE

RELATIVE ROE

 % EARNED(a)       
 

<5%

 

0%

   

<25th percentile

 

25%

 
 5% to <16% Based on relative ROE;
see scale at right
  

LOGO  

 25th percentile 50% 
 ³16% 150%  60th percentile 100% 

(a)   % earned is scaled if performance is between specified thresholds

  ³ 75th percentile 150%  
                 

  

 

 

  3-Year Average

  Absolute ROE

 

 

 

  % Earned

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  3-Year Average

  Relative ROE

 

 

 

  % Earned(a)

   
 

  <5%

 

    0%

  

LOGO

 

  <25th percentile

 

   25%

 
 

  5% to <16%

 

 

  Based on relative ROE;

  see scale at right

  

  25th percentile

 

   50%

 
  

  60th percentile

 

  100%

 
 

  16%

 

  150%

  

  75th percentile

 

  150%

 

 

 

    
       

(a)  Percentage earned is scaled if performance is between specified thresholds; payout is automatically capped at 100% if 3-year average GS ROE is between 5% and 6%.

  PSU performance thresholds for PSUs granted in January 2024 (for 2023 year-end compensation) were unchanged year-over-year. Our Compensation Committee continues to believe these thresholds are appropriate to incentivize senior management to achieve our strategic goals and enhance long-term shareholder value. PSU design, including performance thresholds, will continue to be reviewed annually in connection with annual compensation decisions.

 

»  Absolute performance thresholds are more aspirational than the 13% medium-term ROE target set at our Investor Day.

»PSU thresholds unchanged (for 2020 compensation and prior year awards).

 PSUs granted in January 20212024 will be settledsettle in 2024.2027. For our Executive Leadership Team who receive 100% of their equity in PSUs,the CEO, COO and CFO, PSUs will be settledsettle 50% in cash based on the average closing price of our Common Stock over a ten-trading-day period and 50% in Shares at Risk. For our other NEOs, who receive 50% of their equity in PSUs and 50% in RSUs, their PSUs will settle 100% in shares of Common Stock, substantially in the form of Shares at Risk, similar to RSUs.Risk.

 

 

  

For purposes of the relative ROE metric, beginning withfor PSUs granted in January 2021,2024, our Peers consist of Bank of America Corporation,Corporation; Citigroup, Inc.,; JPMorgan Chase & Co.,; Morgan Stanley,Stanley; The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation,Corporation; Wells Fargo & Company,Company; Barclays PLC, Credit Suisse Group AG,PLC; Deutsche Bank AG and UBS Group AG. Our Compensation Committee believes that this Peer groupthese Peers appropriately and comprehensively reflectsreflect those firms that have a major presence across our collection of scaled businesses (including market making, investment banking and asset and wealth management) and whothat have regulatory requirements (such as with respect to capital) similar to ours.

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS49


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

  

Average ROE is the average of the annual ROE for each year during the performance period.

 

 » 

Annual ROE for the firm is calculated as annualized net earnings applicable to common shareholders divided by average common shareholders’ equity, as publicly reported by Goldman Sachs in its annual report.report, and rounded to one decimal place.

 

 » 

For purposes of determining ROE of our Peers with respect to the PSUs’ relative metrics, annual ROE is as reported in the Peer company’s publicly disclosed annual report, rounded to one decimal place.

 

50

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EQUITY-BASED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE: SHAREHOLDER VALUE CREATION AWARDS

  

In certain circumstances (e.g., a merger, change in corporate structure or other similar corporate transaction) that result in a substantial change in a Peer company’s business or revenue mix, the Committee mayshall adjust the Peer group and/or make such other equitable adjustments as the Committee deems appropriate, with any such changes having effect for purposes of all calculations as the Committee determines necessary or appropriate to maintain the intended economics of the award.

If the Committee determines it is necessary or appropriate to maintain the intended economics of PSUs granted to our Executive Leadership Team, it may also make adjustments, including to the firm’s or a Peer company’s ROE as it deems equitable in light of changed circumstances (e.g., unusual or non-recurring events), resulting from changes in accounting methods, practices or policies, changes in capital structure by reason of legal or regulatory requirements, a material change in the firm’s or a Peer company’s revenue mix or business activities or such other changed circumstances as the Committee may deem appropriate.

 

 »

Following the Credit Suisse merger with UBS Group AG in 2023, the Compensation Committee amended the peers for outstanding PSUs (those granted in respect of 2020-2022 year-end compensation) to reflect this transaction.

»

For purposes of relative ROE calculations, Credit Suisse ROE will be included only when there is a full year of reported ROE available (2021 and 2022 ROE only, as applicable). Accordingly, Credit Suisse has been removed from the Peer group for the 2022 Year-End PSUs (2023-2025 performance period) and for PSUs going forward.

 

Certain adjustments (e.g., to a Peer company’s ROE for purposes of the relative ROE calculation) will be based on publicly disclosed financial information.

 

  

Each PSU granted to our NEOs includes a cumulative dividend equivalent right payable only if and when that PSU is earned and settles.earned.

 

  

PSUs granted to our NEOs who meet certain age and service requirements on the grant date have no additional service-based vesting requirement; however, theyall PSUs are subject to various robust risk-balancing features, as described in —Other Compensation Policies and Practicesbelow.

RSUs

RSUs provide recipients with annual equity-based incentives, with value tied to firm performance through stock price.

 

  

Vested at grant for Mr. RogersFor information on the vesting and Ms. Seymour; underlying shares are substantially delivered in the formsettlement of Shares at Risk (after applicable withholding) in three approximately equal installments on first, secondMessrs. Solomon and third anniversaries of grant.Waldron’s 2019 year-end PSUs during 2023, see —Executive Compensation—2023 Stock Vested.

 

Equity-Based Long-Term Incentive: Shareholder Value Creation Awards

As previously disclosed, the non-employee members of our Board, upon the recommendation of our independent Compensation Committee, granted SVC Awards to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron in October 2021 and, in response to shareholder feedback regarding the importance of broadening the scope of these awards’ key objectives across our senior leadership team, more broadly to members of our Management Committee, including Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler, in January 2022.

SVC Awards were designed to address three key objectives and align the incentive structure across our most senior leaders.

  1  

 

 

Align compensation with

rigorous performance thresholds

that drive long-term shareholder

value creation

 

 2 

 

  

Ensure leadership continuity over

the next phase of our growth

strategy

 

 3 

 

  

Enhance retention in response to the

increasing competition for talent

in the current environment

  
  
  
  

The previously granted SVC Awards were not part of annual compensation and will not be awarded on a regularly recurring basis. 2023 annual compensation was determined based on the factors described in —How our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions and —2023 Annual Compensation above.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

Each RSU granted51


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Key Terms of our NEOs’ SVC Awards(a)

 

       

TSR Thresholds (Absolute & Relative)

   Cumulative
Absolute TSR Goals
  % of Target
Earned
 

 

 

   LOGO     

  Relative
TSR Goals
  % of Target
Earned
  75%  75%  80th percentile  75%
  60%  50%  65th percentile  50%
  47%  25%  40th percentile  25%
  <47%   0%  <40th percentile   0%

 

 

 

Performance-based vesting for the SVC Awards is based 50% on absolute TSR goals and 50% on relative TSR goals, all of which have been pre-established by the Board. As of the time of grant, with respect to absolute TSR goals, the resulting stock price plus dividends would have been approximately, in each case, $602 at 47%, $655 at 60% and $717 at 75%. For reference, as of the initial grant in October 2021, our highest closing stock price was $419.69.

 

Peer Group for Relative Thresholds

U.S. Peers: BAC, C, JPM, MS, BK, WFC

Achievement of Thresholds

  Absolute TSR: Highest average closing price of GS stock for any 30 consecutive trading days during performance period

  Relative TSR: 30-day average closing price prior to Mr. Rogersbeginning and Ms. Seymour includesend of performance period

Performance Period and Vesting

Vesting will occur over a dividend equivalent right.five-year performance period beginning for all SVC Awards on October 21, 2021, subject to continuous service until the end of the five-year performance period, with limited exceptions provided in the applicable award agreement and the SIP, such as death and disability.

Form of Settlement and Transfer Restrictions

Any amounts earned under the SVC Awards are settled 100% in shares of Common Stock that will deliver at the end of the five-year performance period. Any shares earned will be Shares at Risk subject to transfer restrictions for one year after delivery, and will also be subject to forfeiture and clawback provisions (see —Other Compensation Policies and Practices).

 

(a)

See — Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Equity-Based Variable Compensation Elements of Annual Compensation —Shareholder Value Creation Awards —A Detailed Look in our Proxy Statement for our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for more details.

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Robust Risk-Balancing Features

Compensation granted to our NEOs is subject to various longstandinglong-standing risk-balancing features, including the use of Shares at Risk, retention requirements and, for our Executive Leadership Team, additional stock ownership guidelines.

 

  

Shares at Risk:Shares delivered pursuant to our equity-based awards generally deliver in the form of “Shares at Risk.” Shares at Risk are shares (after applicable tax withholding) that are subject to five-year transfer restrictions as follows:

»

For PSUs granted as part of annual compensation, calculated based on the grant date (for 2020 2023 Year-End Equity-Based PSU awards granted in January 2021,2024, Shares at Risk will be subject to transfer restrictions through January 2026). Transfer restrictions generally prohibit the sale, transfer, hedging or pledging of underlying Shares at Risk, even if the NEO leaves our firm (subject to limited exceptions; see —Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for more detail)2028).

 

 » 

For SVC Awards, Shares at Risk will be subject to transfer restrictions for one year after delivery (through October 2027) of any shares of Common Stock that are earned.

Transfer restrictions generally prohibit the sale, transfer, hedging or pledging of underlying Shares at Risk, even if the NEO leaves our firm (subject to limited exceptions). See —Executive Compensation—Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control for more detail.

Retention Requirements: Pursuant to our Policy on Retention Requirements and Stock Ownership Guidelinesinternal policy applicable to members of our Management Committee, each of our NEOs is subject to retention requirements with respect to shares of Common Stock received in respect of equity awards:

 

 » 

Our CEO is required, for so long as he holds thatsuch position, to retain (including, in certain cases, ownership(directly or indirectly through estate planning entities established by him)entities) at least 75% of the shares of Common Stock granted (net of payment of any withholding taxes) as compensation (After-Tax(After-Tax Shares) since becoming CEO.

 

50GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

» 

Similarly, each of our COO and CFO is required, for so long as he holds such position, to retain (directly or indirectly through estate planning entities) at least 50% of After-Tax Shares granted as compensation since being appointed to such position.

 

52

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

 » 

Our other NEOs are required, for so long as they serve on the firm’s Management Committee, to retain (directly or indirectly through estate planning entities) at least 25% of After-Tax Shares granted as compensation since being appointed to the Management Committee.

 

  

Stock Ownership Guidelines:In addition, our Executive Leadership Team is subject to additional stock ownership guidelines that supplement the retention requirements. These guidelines provide that:

 

 » 

Our CEO must retain beneficial ownership of a number of shares of Common Stock equal in value to 10x his base salary for so long as he remains our CEO.

 

 » 

Each of our COO and CFO must retain beneficial ownership of a number of shares of Common Stock equal in value to 6x his base salary for so long as he remains in such a position at the firm.

 

 » 

Transition rules apply in the event that an individual becomes newly appointed to a positionone of the positions subject to these guidelines.

 

 » 

Each member of our Executive Leadership Team met these stock ownership guidelines in 2020.2023.

 

  

Recapture Provisions:We have a longstandinglong-standing practice of including robust forfeiture and recapture provisions (collectively, Recapture) in our variable compensation award agreements. To this end,Pursuant to these Recapture provisions, if, after delivery, payment or release of transfer restrictions, we maintain several conduct-related recapture rights, as set forth below, whichdetermine that a forfeiture event had previously occurred, we can require repayment to the firm of the award (including amounts withheld to pay withholding taxes) and any other amounts paid or delivered in many cases include both forfeiture and clawback rights (collectively, “Recapture”):respect thereof.

 

» 

Our conduct-related Recapture rights include:

CAUSE

 

 Cause  Failure to Consider Risk

 

FAILURE TO CONSIDER RISKWho   LOGO

 
LOGO

Each employee who receives equity-based awards as part of his or her their year-end compensation (since IPO)

  

Each employee who receives equity-based awards as part of his or her their year-end compensation (since 2009 year-end)

LOGO

Application    LOGO

 

If such employee engages in conduct constituting “cause,” including:

 Is convicted  Conviction in a criminal proceeding on certain misdemeanor charges, on a felony charge or an equivalent charge;

 Engages  Engaging in employment disqualification conduct under applicable law;

 Willfully fails  Willful failure to perform his or hertheir duties to the firm;

  Violates  Violation of any securities or commodities laws, rules or regulations of any relevant exchange or association of which the firm is a member;

 Violates  Violation of any of our policies concerning hedging, pledging or confidential or proprietary information, or materially violates any other of our policies;

 Impairs, impugns, denigrates, disparages  Impairing, impugning, denigrating, disparaging or reflecting negatively reflects upon our name, reputation or business interests; or

 Engages  Engaging in conduct detrimental to the firm

  

If, during the time period specified in the award agreement, such employee participated (or otherwise oversaw or was responsible for, depending on the circumstances, another individual’s participation) in the structuring or marketing of any product or service, or participated on behalf of the firm or any of its clients in the purchase or sale of any security or other property, in any case without appropriate consideration of the risk to the firm or the broader financial system as a whole (for example,(e.g., where such employee has improperly analyzed such risk or where they failed sufficiently to raise concerns about such risk), and, as a result of such action or omission, the Compensation Committee determines there has been, or reasonably could be expected to be, a material adverse impact on the firm, the employee’s business unit or the broader financial system.

system

What   LOGO

 
LOGO

All outstanding PSUs, RSUs, shares of restricted stock (Restricted Stock)SVC Awards and Shares at Risk at the time “cause” occurs

  

All equity-based awards (e.g., PSUs, and RSUs, (andSVC Awards and underlying Shares at Risk) and Restricted Stock) covered by the specified time period (e.g., the year for which the award was granted)

WHO APPLICATION WHAT

Pursuant to these Recapture provisions, if after delivery, paymentgranted or, release of transfer restrictions we determine that a forfeiture event had previously occurred, we can require repayment to us offor SVC Awards, the award (including amounts withheld to pay withholding taxes) and any other amounts paid or delivered in respect thereof.

entire performance period)

 

  

OurIn addition, our Compensation Committee has adopted a comprehensive, standalonetwo clawback policy in January 2015policies (together, Accounting-Related Recapture) that applies to each member of our Executive Leadership Team and generally permits recoverypermit Recapture of awards (including equity-based awards and underlying Shares at Risk).:

 

 » 

AmongIn January 2015, our Compensation Committee adopted a comprehensive, standalone clawback policy that, among other things, the Clawback Policy expands our Recapture rights if the events covered by Thethe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) occur, applying such provision to all variable compensation

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS51


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

(whether (whether cash- or equity-based) paid to any member of our Executive Leadership Team, even though the Sarbanes-Oxley provision on which the Policy is based requires that such a clawback apply only to our CEO and CFO.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

53


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OTHER COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

 »

Our Compensation Committee also adopted a new clawback policy in October 2023, as required by Section 10D of the Exchange Act and the listing standards adopted by the NYSE (the Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy). In the event of certain accounting restatements, this policy requires us to pursue recovery from current and certain former executive officers of any amount of incentive-based awards that exceeds the amount that would have otherwise been received if calculated based on the restated financial reporting measure, calculated on a pre-tax basis.

 

In addition, our 2020 year-end PSUsequity-based awards and as applicable, RSUs (and, in certain cases, underlying Shares at Risk)Risk (in each case as applicable) granted to our NEOs also provide for Recapture if:

 

 » 

Our firm is determined by bank regulators to be “in default” or “in danger of default” as defined under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or it fails to maintain for 90 consecutive business days the required “minimum Tier 1 capital ratio” (as defined under Federal Reserve Board regulations) (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs, as defined below);

 

 » 

The NEO associates with any business that constitutes a Covered Enterprise (as defined in —Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Control) (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

 

 » 

The NEO solicits our clients or prospective clients to transact business with a Covered Enterprise or to refrain from doing business with us or interferes with any of our client relationships;relationships (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

 

 » 

The NEO or an entity with which he or she is associated solicits or hires certain employees of the firm;firm (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs); or

 

 » 

The NEO fails to perform obligations under any agreement with us.

Hedging Policy; Pledging of Common Stock

Our executive officers (including our NEOs) and non-employee directors are prohibited from hedging any shares of our Common Stock, even shares they can freely sell, for so long as they remain executive officers or non-employee directors, as applicable. In addition, our NEOs, non-employee directors and all other employees are prohibited from hedging or pledging their equity-based awards. Our employees, other than our executive officers, may hedge only shares of our Common Stock that they can otherwise sell. However, they may not enter into uncovered hedging transactions and may notor “short” sharessales of our Common Stock. Employees alsoAdditionally, employees and directors may not act on investment decisions with respect to our Common Stock, except during applicable “window periods.” The restrictions described above also generally apply to such individual’s immediate family, household members and dependents. In addition, none of our executive officers or non-employee directors has any shares of Common Stock subject to a pledge.

Qualified Retirement Benefits

During 2020,2023, each NEO other than Mr. Berlinski participated in The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan (401(k) Plan), which is our U.S. broad-based tax-qualified retirement plan. In 20202023, these individuals were eligible to make pre-tax and/or “Roth” after-tax contributions to our 401(k) Plan and receive a dollar-for-dollar matching contribution from us on the amount they contributed, up to a maximum of $11,400.$12,500. For 2020,2023, these individuals each received a matching contribution of $11,400.$12,500. Mr. Berlinski has not participated in the U.K. defined contribution arrangement, known as LifeSight (the U.K. Defined Contribution Arrangement), since July 2019, when he relocated on assignment to the U.S. The firm provides overseas employees who can no longer participate in the U.K. Defined Contribution Arrangement with an annual payment in lieu of their participation. The amount of this payment for 2023 for Mr. Berlinski was $20,535, which is approximately equal to the firm’s annual cost in respect of participation in the U.K. Defined Contribution Arrangement.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

Our NEOs received in 20202023 certain benefits that are considered “perquisites” for purposes of the SEC rules regarding compensation disclosure. While our Compensation Committee was provided with the estimated value of these items, it determined, as in prior years, not to give these amounts significant consideration in determining our NEOs’ 20202023 variable compensation.

54

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

GS GIVES

During 2020,2023, we made available to each of our Executive Leadership Team a car and driver and, in some cases, other services, including for security and/or business purposes.security. We also offered our NEOs benefits and tax counseling services, generally provided or arranged by our subsidiary, The Ayco Company, L.P. (Ayco), to assist them with tax and regulatory compliance and to provide them with more time to focus on the needs of our business.

Our NEOs participate in our executive medical and dental program and receive executive life insurance while they remain PMDs. Our NEOs also receive long-term disability insurance coverage. Our NEOs (and their covered dependents) are also eligible for a retiree healthcare program and receive certain other perquisites, some of which have no incremental cost to us. At our request, Mr. Coleman relocated from London to our New York office in 2021, and Mr. Berlinski did so in 2019. To this end, during 2023, consistent with our standard Global Mobility Services programs, Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski received international assignment relocation benefits and tax protection and/or equalization payments, as applicable, in connection with their respective arrangements. See “All Other Compensation” and footnote (c)(e) inExecutive —Executive Compensation—20202023 Summary Compensation Table.Table.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility of executive compensation paid to each of our “covered employees” to $1 million. In setting 20202023 executive compensation, our Compensation Committee considersconsidered the factors identified in more detail inHow Our —How our Compensation Committee Makes Its Decisions and doesdid not take this limit on deductibility into account.

 

52
GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 GS Gives


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

GS GIVES

GS GIVES

As a key element of the firm’s overall impact investing platform, we established our GS Gives program to coordinate, facilitate and encourage global philanthropy by our PMDs. TheAccordingly, firm contributedcontributions supported an approximately $140$160 million for the 20202023 GS Gives program.

GS Gives underscores our commitment to philanthropy through diversified and impactful giving, harnessing the collaborative spirit of the firm’s partnership while also inspiring our firm’s next generation of philanthropists. We ask our PMDs to make recommendations of not-for-profit organizations to receive grants from the firm’s contributions to GS Gives. GS Gives has made approximately $2.5 billion in grants and partnered with over 9,400 not-for-profit organizations supporting 140+ countries around the world since its inception.

Grant recommendations from our PMDs help to ensure that GS Gives invests in a diverse group of charities that improves the lives of people in communities around the world. We encourage our PMDs to make recommendations of grants to organizations consistent with GS Gives’ mission of fostering innovative ideas, solving economic and social issues and enabling progress in underserved communities globally. GS Gives undertakes diligence procedures for donations and has no obligation to follow recommendations made to us by our PMDs.

In 2020,2023, GS Gives accepted the recommendations of over 530500 current and retired PMDs and granted over $190 million to over 2,500 2,700 not-for-profit organizations around the world. GS Gives made grants in support ofacross a broadwide range of large-scale initiatives,areas, including access to high quality education, support for veterans, and innovative medical research, in addition to our continued support for the firm’s COVID ReliefAnalyst Impact Fund, and its Fundwhich allows analysts to compete for Racial Equity.a grant from GS Gives for the nonprofit of their choice. Amounts recommended by our NEOs in 20202023 for donation by GS Gives were: Mr. Solomon—$2.2Solomon - $4 million; Mr. Waldron—$5.9Waldron - $3.5 million; Mr. Scherr—$4.8Coleman - $2.5 million; Mr. Rogers—$1.0Ms. Ruemmler - $1 million; and Ms. Seymour—$1.2Mr. Berlinski - $1 million.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS53

55


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

2023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Executive Compensation

The 20202023 Summary Compensation Table below sets forth compensation information relating to 2020, 20192023, 2022 and 2018. In2021. However, in accordance with SEC rules, compensation information for each NEOcertain NEOs is only reported beginning with the year that such executive became an NEO. For a discussion of 20202023 annual NEO compensation, please read Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.

Pursuant to SEC rules, the 20202023 Summary Compensation Table is required to include for a particular year only those equity-based awards granted during that year, rather than awards granted after year-end, even if awarded for services in that year. SEC rules require disclosure of cash compensation to be included in the year earned, even if payment is made after year-end.

Generally, we grant equity-based awards and pay any cash variable compensation for a particular year shortly after that year’s end. As a result, annual equity-based awards and cash variable compensation are disclosed in each row of the table as follows:

2020

 

2023  

“Bonus” “Bonus” is cash variable compensation for 2023

 “Stock Awards” are PSUs awarded for 2022 (referred to as 2022 Year-End PSUs)

2022

 “Bonus” is cash variable compensation for 2022

 “Stock Awards” are:

»   PSUs awarded for 2021 (referred to as 2021 Year-End PSUs), including PSUs awarded to Mr. Coleman for 2021 that satisfy U.K. regulatory requirements in respect of Mr. Coleman’s prior role (referred to as 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs)

»   RSUs awarded to Mr. Coleman for 2021 that satisfy U.K. regulatory requirements in respect of Mr. Coleman’s prior role (referred to as 2021 U.K. RSUs)

»   SVC Awards granted to our CFO and other NEOs in 2022

2021

 “Bonus” is cash variable compensation for 2021

 “Stock Awards” are:

»   PSUs awarded for 2020 (referred to as 2020 Year-End PSUs)

»   RSUs awarded for 2020 (referred to as 2020 Year-End RSUs)

»   SVC Awards granted to our CEO and COO in 2021

 

2023 Summary Compensation Table

       
  Name and Principal
  Position
  Year   Salary ($)   Bonus ($)  Stock Awards ($)  

 Change in

 Pension

 Value ($)(d)

  

 All Other

 Compen-

 sation ($)(e)

   Total ($) 
 

 

 

 Year-End

 Awards(b)

  

 

 

 SVC

 Award(c)

  

 

 

 Total

 

David Solomon

Chairman and CEO

  2023   2,000,000   8,700,000   15,649,863      15,649,863   99     320,855   26,670,817 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,900,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,404,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

22,404,343

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

305,077

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,609,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,900,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,334,614

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,045,566

 

 

 

 

 

 

27,380,180

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

264,892

 

 

 

 

 

 

39,545,072

 

 

John Waldron

President and COO

  2023   1,850,000   11,260,000   12,626,934      12,626,934   492     355,563   26,092,989 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,660,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,127,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,127,364

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

343,897

 

 

 

 

 

 

28,981,261

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,515,417

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,363,788

 

 

 

 

 

 

20,879,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

319,593

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,508,798

 

 

Denis Coleman

CFO

  2023   1,850,000   7,260,000   8,835,914      8,835,914   2,360     619,147   18,567,421 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,060,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,158,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,341,555

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,500,517

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,158,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,568,553

 

 

Kathryn Ruemmler
CLO and General Counsel

  2023   1,500,000   5,800,000   5,947,730      5,947,730   —     68,289   13,316,019 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,021,951

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,339,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,360,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

68,577

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,129,562

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,731,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,731,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

63,358

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,695,321

 

 

Philip Berlinski

Global Treasurer

  2023   1,500,000   4,600,000   4,815,002      4,815,002   30,245     3,309,859   14,255,106 
 

 

 

 

2022

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,242,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,339,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,581,956

 

 

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,648,229

 

 

 

 

 

 

21,130,185

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,108,046

 

(a) 

 

 

 

 

6,556,898

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,341,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,341,994

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,518  

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,908,899

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,967,355

 

 

56

 

“Stock Awards” are PSUs and RSUs awarded  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for 2019 (referred to as 2019 Year-End PSUs and 2019 Year-End RSUs) the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

2019


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2023 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

(a)

“Bonus” is cash variable compensationReflects Mr. Berlinski’s effective salary for 20192021, which amount takes into account his annualized salary increase to $1.5 million, effective as of September 20, 2021, in connection with his appointment to the Management Committee.

 

(b)

“Stock Awards” are PSUs and RSUs awarded for 2018 (referred to as 2018 Year-End PSUs and 2018 Year-End RSUs)

2018

“Bonus” is cash variable compensation for 2018

“Stock Awards” are PSUs and Restricted Stock awarded for 2017 (referred to as 2017 Year-End PSUs and 2017 Year-End Restricted Stock)

2020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

       

 

NAME AND

PRINCIPAL POSITION

 

 

 

YEAR

 

  

 

SALARY ($)

 

  

 

BONUS ($)

 

  

 

STOCK
AWARDS(a)
($)

 

  

 

CHANGE IN
PENSION
VALUE(b) ($)

 

  

 

ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(c)
($)

 

   

 

TOTAL ($)

 

 
        

 

David M. Solomon

Chairman and CEO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,036,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

254,190

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

23,940,657

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,650,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,724,012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

296

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

283,429

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

24,657,737

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,887,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,700,375

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,775,034

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

299,926

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

20,662,835

 

 

 

 

        

 

John E. Waldron

President and COO

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,660,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,970,318

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,259

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

278,153

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

21,759,730

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,060,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,082,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,840

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

265,912

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

22,259,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,587,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,812,625

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,236,810

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

195,172

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

16,832,107

 

 

 

 

        

 

Stephen M. Scherr

CFO

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,460,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,825,118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

221,096

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

19,366,032

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,850,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,260,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,896,719

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,857

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

216,519

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

20,238,095

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,556,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,083,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,488,028

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

170,784

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

15,299,613

 

 

 

 

        

 

John F.W. Rogers

EVP

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,345,715

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

589

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

183,065

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

11,429,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,290,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

938

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

179,303

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

10,970,395

 

 

 

 

        

 

Karen P. Seymour

Former EVP and General Counsel*

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,009,460

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

115,536

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

9,024,996

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,500,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,744,784

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

121,005

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

8,365,789

 

 

 

 

*

Ms. Seymour retired as EVP and General Counsel on March 15, 2021.

54GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

(a)

Amounts included for 20202023 represent the grant date fair value of 2019 2022 Year-End RSUs and 2019 Year-End PSUs granted in January 20202023 for services in 2019, as applicable.2022. Grant date fair value for 2019 2022 Year-End RSUs PSUs for Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and 2019 Year-End PSUsColeman is determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs or target number of PSUs as applicable, by $249.72,$354.97, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 16, 2020,26, 2023, the grant date. Grant date fair value for 2022 Year-End PSUs for Ms. Ruemmler and Mr. Berlinski is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUs by $349.09, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 18, 2023, the grant date. For the portion (as applicable) of the 2019 2022 Year-End PSUs granted to each of our NEOs that are stock-settled,stock settled, the value includes an approximately 9%6% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs. Assuming achievement of maximum performance targets, the grant date fair value of 2019 2022 Year-End PSUs for each of Messrs. Solomon, Waldron, ScherrColeman and RogersBerlinski and Ms. SeymourRuemmler would be $25,554,412, $19,455,477, $17,737,677, $2,044,552$23,474,795, $18,940,568, $13,253,870, $7,222,502 and $1,533,584,$8,921,760, respectively. Amounts included for 2022 represent the grant date fair value of 2021 Year-End PSUs, and for Mr. Coleman, 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs and 2021 U.K. RSUs, in each case granted in January 2022 for services in 2021. Grant date fair value for 2021 Year-End PSUs for Messrs. Solomon and Waldron is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUs by $347.01, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 28, 2022, the grant date. Grant date fair value for 2021 Year-End PSUs for Messrs. Coleman (including his 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs) and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUs by $347.32, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 19, 2022, the grant date. For the 2019 portion of the 2021 Year-End RSUs PSUs granted to Mr. Rogers and Ms. Seymour,each of our NEOs that are stock settled, the value includes an approximately 11.5%6% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs.PSUs. For Mr. Coleman’s 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs, the value includes an approximately 14% liquidity discount to reflect both the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs and the lack of dividend equivalent rights. Assuming achievement of maximum performance targets, the grant date fair value of 2021 Year-End PSUs for each of Messrs. Solomon, Waldron, Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler would be $33,606,688, $27,191,219, $3,894,900, $13,864,382 and $13,533,089, respectively. Assuming achievement of maximum performance targets, the grant date fair value of 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs for Mr. Coleman would be $12,241,470. Grant date fair value for 2021 U.K. RSUs granted to Mr. Coleman is determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $347.01, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 28, 2022, the grant date. Amounts included for 20192021 represent the grant date fair value of 2018 2020 Year-End RSUs and 2018 2020 Year-End PSUs, as applicable, in each case granted in January 20192021 for services in 2018, as applicable.2020. Grant date fair value for 2018 2020 Year-End RSUs and 2018 2020 Year-End PSUs is determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs or target number of PSUs, as applicable, by $199.09,$290.47, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 17, 2019,20, 2021, the grant date. For the portion of the 2018 2020 Year-End PSUs granted to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron and ScherrMs. Ruemmler that are stock-settled,stock settled, the value includes an approximately 9%10% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs. Assuming achievement of maximum performance targets, the grant date fair value of 2018 2020 Year-End PSUs for each of Messrs. Solomon and Waldron and ScherrMs. Ruemmler would be $22,086,018, $16,623,075$15,501,920, $14,273,125 and $14,845,079,$1,816,125, respectively. For the 2018 2020 Year-End RSUs granted to Ms. Ruemmler and Mr. Rogers and Ms. Seymour,Berlinski, the value includes an approximately 12% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs.

(c)

Amounts included for 2018 for Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and Scherr represent the grant date fair value of 2017 Year-End PSUs for Mr.SVC Awards granted to Messrs. Solomon and 2017 Year-End Restricted Stock forWaldron in October 2021 and to Messrs. WaldronColeman and Scherr, in each case grantedBerlinski and Ms. Ruemmler in January 2018 for services in 2017.2022. Grant date fair value for 2017 Year-End PSUsSVC Awards granted to Messrs. Solomon and 2017 Year-End Restricted StockWaldron is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUsSVC Awards by $407.59, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on October 21, 2021, the grant date, and including an approximately 43% discount related to the aggregateprobability of achieving the award’s goals and transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these awards. Grant date fair value for SVC Awards granted to Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler is determined by multiplying the target number of restricted shares, as applicable,SVC Awards by $250.97,$347.01, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 18, 2018,28, 2022, the grant date. For the portion of the 2017 Year-End PSUs granted to Mr. Solomon that are stock-settled, the value includesdate, and including an approximately 9% liquidity61% discount related to reflect the probability of achieving the award’s goals and transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs.awards. Assuming achievement of maximum performance targets and vesting requirements, the grant date fair value of 2017 Year-End PSUsthe SVC Awards for Mr.each of Messrs. Solomon, Waldron, Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler would be $19,162,551. For 2017 Year-End Restricted Stock granted to Messrs. Waldron$25,568,349, $17,045,682, $5,012,332, $3,508,619 and Scherr, the value includes an approximately 17% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on these shares.$3,508,619, respectively.

 

(b)(d)

Ms. SeymourRuemmler is not a participant in any applicable plan.

 

(c)(e)

The following chart, together with the narrative below, describes the benefits and perquisites for 20202023 contained in the “All Other Compensation” column above.

 

 

NAME

 

 

 

401(K)
MATCHING
CONTRIBUTION
($)

 

  

 

TERM LIFE
INSURANCE
PREMIUM
($)

 

  

 

EXECUTIVE
MEDICAL
AND DENTAL
PLAN
PREMIUM ($)

 

  

 

LONG-TERM
DISABILITY
INSURANCE
PREMIUM ($)

 

  

 

EXECUTIVE
LIFE
PREMIUM

($)

 

  

 

BENEFITS
AND TAX
COUNSELING
SERVICES(*) ($)

 

  

 

CAR(**) ($)

 

 
        

 

David M. Solomon

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,162

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

106,820

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,274

 

 

 

 

        

 

John E. Waldron

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,728

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

109,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,401

 

 

 

 

        

 

Stephen M. Scherr

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,464

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,881

 

 

 

 

        

 

John F.W. Rogers

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32,368

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

55,884

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

        

 

Karen P. Seymour

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,181

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

423

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,616

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,701

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

       
 Name Defined
Contribution
Plan Employer
Contribution ($)   
 Term Life
Insurance
Premium ($)  
 Executive
Medical and
Dental Plan
Premium ($)   
 Long-Term
Disability
Insurance
Premium ($) 
  Executive  
Life
Premium 
($)
 Benefits and
Tax Counseling  
Services ($)*
 Car
($)**
 

 David Solomon

 

12,500

 

118

 

22,090

 

 

397       

 

 

28,028

 

149,815

 

 

77,231

 

 John Waldron

 

12,500

 

118

 

89,336

 

 

397       

 

 

10,877

 

153,825

 

 

87,933

 

 Denis Coleman

 

12,500

 

118

 

89,336

 

 

397       

 

 

 6,736

 

 73,595

 

 

83,786

 

 Kathryn Ruemmler

 

12,500

 

118

 

22,090

 

 

397       

 

 

11,608

 

 21,381

 

 

 

 Philip Berlinski***

 

20,535

 

428

 

66,201

 

 

1,428       

 

 

 9,300

 

 78,087

 

 

 

*

Amounts reflect the incremental cost to us of benefits and tax counseling services provided by Ayco or by another third-party provider.provider, as applicable. For services provided by Ayco, cost is determined based on the number of hours of service provided by, and compensation paid to, individual service providers. For services provided by others, amounts are payments made by us to those providers.

 

**

Amounts reflect the incremental cost to us attributable to commuting and other non-business use. We made available to each member of our Executive Leadership Team in 20202023 a car and driver for security and business purposes. The cost of providing a car is determined on an annual basis and includes, as applicable, driver compensation, annual car lease, car service fees, and insurance cost and driver compensation, as well as miscellaneous expenses (for example,(e.g., fuel, and car maintenance).

***

Certain of the amounts for Mr. Berlinski have been converted from British Pounds Sterling into U.S. Dollars at a rate of 1.2430 Dollars per Pound, which was the average daily rate in 2023.

Also included in the “All Other Compensation” column are amounts reflecting the incremental cost to us of providing our identity theft safeguards program for U.S. PMDs, assistance with certain travel arrangements, in-office meals and security services. We provide personal security (the incremental cost of which was $1,702$29,990 for Mr. Solomon) for the benefit of our firm and our shareholders. We do not consider these security measures to be personal benefits but rather business-related necessities due to the high-profile standing of our NEOs.CEO. Mr. Coleman previously relocated to

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

57


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2023 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

our New York office at our request and, for 2023, Mr. Coleman received relocation benefits of approximately $169,000 and tax protection payments of approximately $181,000. In addition, Mr. Berlinski previously relocated to our New York office at our request and, for 2023, Mr. Berlinski received international assignment benefits of approximately $153,000 and tax equalization and protection payments of approximately $3 million. In each case, these benefits and payments were part of our standard Global Mobility Services programs applicable to relocating employees, and the tax equalization and protection payments were intended to cover certain taxes that are over and above those that Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski would have incurred if they had not relocated to New York.

We provide our NEOs, on the same terms as areconsistent with those provided to our other executive officers and PMDs and at no upfront incremental out-of-pocket cost to our firm, waived or reduced fees, andas well as interests in overrides (the level of which may vary based on certain eligibility criteria) in connection with investments in certain funds and other accounts managed or sponsored by Goldman Sachs, unused tickets to certain events and certain negotiated discounts with third-party vendors.

We make availableThe primary purpose of our corporate aircraft is to facilitate business. Our CEO is expected to use our corporate aircraft, including for personal travel, for security reasons, as well as to maximize the efficiency of his travel time and his availability for firm business. In addition, our other NEOs private aircraft.who have time sharing agreements with us may use our corporate aircraft for personal use in limited circumstances. Our policy is to limit personal use of such aircraft by our NEOs and to require reimbursement of the aggregate incremental costs to usthe firm associated with suchany personal use as permitted by Federal Aviation regulations. In situations where an NEO brings a personal guest as a passenger on a business-related flight, the NEO pays us an amount equal to the greater of: (a) the aggregate incremental cost to us of the usage by the guest and (b) the price of a first-class commercial airline ticket for the same trip.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS55


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDSour CEO or other NEOs.

 

2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS2023 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The awards included in this table are 2019 Year-End PSUs and 2019 Year-End RSUs, each of which were granted in January 2020 and were previously described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of our Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (dated March 20, 2020).

The following table sets forth plan-based awards2022 Year-End PSUs granted in early 2020.2023. In accordance with SEC rules, the table does not include awards that were granted in 2021.2024. See —Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for a discussion of those awards.

 

 

NAME

 

 

 

     GRANT     

     DATE         

 

  

 

     ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS UNDER     
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS(a)

 

  

 

ALL OTHER
     STOCK AWARDS:     

NUMBER

OF SHARES

OF STOCK OR
UNITS (#)(b)

 

  

 

     GRANT DATE     
FAIR

VALUE

OF

STOCK
AWARDS ($)(c)

 

 
      

 

THRESHOLD
(#)

 

  

 

TARGET
(#)

 

  

 

MAXIMUM
(#)

 

 

 

David M. Solomon

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

71,481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

107,222

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,036,275

 

 

 

 

 

John E. Waldron

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54,421

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

81,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,970,318

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen M. Scherr

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

49,616

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

74,424

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,825,118

 

 

 

 

 

John F.W. Rogers

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,363,035

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,982,681

 

 

 

 

 

Karen P. Seymour

 

 

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,758

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,022,389

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

1/16/2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13,516

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,987,071

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Name

 

  

 

 

Grant Date  

 

 

 

 

   Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(a)

 

 

 

 

Grant Date Fair

Value of Stock    

Awards ($)(b)

 

 

 

Threshold (#)

 

 

 

Target (#)

 

 

 

Maximum (#)

 

 David Solomon

  

1/26/2023

 

0

 

45,356

 

68,034

 

15,649,863

 John Waldron

  

1/26/2023

 

0

 

36,595

 

54,893

 

12,626,934

 Denis Coleman

  

1/26/2023

 

0

 

25,608

 

38,412

 

 8,835,914

 Kathryn Ruemmler

  

1/18/2023

 

0

 

18,047

 

27,071

 

 5,947,730

 Philip Berlinski

  

1/18/2023

 

0

 

14,610

 

21,915

 

 4,815,002

 

(a)

Consists of 2019 2022 Year-End PSUs. PSUs granted in January 2023. See — 20202023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End and —Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Controlbelow for additional information on the 2019 Year-End PSUs.information.

(b)

Consists of 2019 Year-End RSUs. See — 2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation and — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control below for additional information on the 2019 Year-End RSUs.

(c)

Amounts included represent the grant date fair value. Grant date fair value wasfor 2022 Year-End PSUs for Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and Coleman is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUs or aggregate number of RSUs, as applicable, by $249.72,$354.97, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 26, 2023, the grant date. Grant date fair value for 2022 Year-End PSUs for Ms. Ruemmler and Mr. Berlinski is determined by multiplying the target number of PSUs by $349.09, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on January 18, 2023, the grant date. For the portion (as applicable) of the 2019 2022 Year-End PSUs granted to each of our NEOs that are stock-settled,stock settled, the value includes an approximately 9%6% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs. For the 2019 Year-End RSUs granted to Mr. Rogers and Ms. Seymour, the value includes an approximately 11.5% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs.

 

2020 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END2023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth the 2019 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2020 to each of our NEOs, the 2018 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2019 to Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and Scherr and the 2017 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2018 to Mr. Solomon. As of December 31, 2020, no NEOs hold any option awards.forth:

  
NAME 

STOCK AWARDS

 

 
   
   

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: NUMBER

OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED (#)
(a)

 

  

EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS: MARKET OR PAYOUT

VALUE OF UNEARNED SHARES, UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT HAVE NOT VESTED ($)
(b)

 

 
   
David M. Solomon  267,721   70,600,705 
   
John E. Waldron  141,819   37,399,088 
   
Stephen M. Scherr  127,666   33,666,801 
   
John F.W. Rogers  6,006   1,583,842 
   
Karen P. Seymour  4,505   1,188,014 

 

(a)

2022 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2023 to each of our NEOs;

2021 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2022 to each of our NEOs (including 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs granted in January 2022 to Mr. Coleman);

2020 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2021 to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron and Ms. Ruemmler;

SVC Awards granted to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron in October 2021 and to Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler in January 2022; and

RSUs granted to Ms. Ruemmler in April 2020 when she joined our firm.

58

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2023 STOCK VESTED

 
 Name  Stock Awards
  

 

Number of Shares

or Units that Have Not  
Vested (#)
(a)

   

 

Market Value

of Shares or Units  
that Have Not
Vested ($)
(b)

   

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number

of Unearned Shares, Units  
or Other Rights that Have
Not Vested (#)
(c)

  

 

Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market or Payout
Value of Unearned Shares,  
Units or Other Rights that
Have Not Vested ($)
(b)

  David Solomon   —               —         241,221  93,055,825
  John Waldron   —               —         190,889  73,639,250
  Denis Coleman   —               —          85,215  32,873,391
  Kathryn Ruemmler   15,937               6,148,016          69,692  26,885,083
  Philip Berlinski   —               —          60,023  23,155,073

(a)

The awards reflected in this column are the 2019 unvested portion of the RSUs granted to Ms. Ruemmler in April 2020, which vest in December 2024.

(b)

Pursuant to SEC rules, the dollar value in this column represents the number of shares shown in the immediately prior column multiplied by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023 (the last trading day of the year).

(c)

The awards reflected in this column are the 2022 Year-End PSUs granted in January 20202023 to each of our NEOs, the 2018 2021 Year-End PSUs granted in January 20192022 to Messrs. Solomon, Waldron and Scherr and the 2017 each of our NEOs, 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs granted in January 20182022 to Mr. Solomon.Coleman and 2020 Year-End PSUs granted in January 2021 to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron and Ms. Ruemmler. It also reflects the SVC Awards granted to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron in October 2021 and to Messrs. Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler in January 2022. Pursuant to SEC rules, the 2017 2020 Year-End PSUs and 2018 Year-End PSUs are represented at the maximum amountnumber of shares that may be earned, and each of the 2019 2021 Year-End PSUs, the 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs, the 2022 Year-End PSUs and the SVC Awards are represented at the target amountnumber of shares that may be earned. The ultimate amountnumber of shares earned under the 2017, 20182020, 2021 (including the 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs) and 2019 2022 Year-End PSUs (if any) will be determined based on the firm’s average ROE, both on an absolute basis and relative to a Peer group, over 2018–2020, 2019–20212021-2023, 2022-2024 and 2020-2022,2023-2025, respectively. The ultimate number of shares earned under the SVC Awards (if any) will be determined based on the achievement of TSR goals on an absolute basis and relative to a Peer group over a five-year performance period beginning in October 2021. In each case, the amount shown does not represent the actual achievement to date under the award, and final information, including regarding applicable Peer group performance to date, was not available as of the time of filing of this Proxy Statement.

(b)

Pursuant to SEC rules, the dollar value in this column represents the amount of shares shown in the immediately prior column multiplied by $263.71, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2020 (the last trading day of the year).

 

56GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2020 STOCK VESTED

2020 STOCK VESTED2023 Stock Vested

The following table sets forth information regarding the value of the 2019 Year-End RSUs PSUs granted to Mr. RogersMessrs. Solomon and Waldron, which settled on May 3, 2023, and certain of Ms. Seymour in January 2020. There are no options outstanding; as such, no NEOs exercised any options inRuemmler’s April 2020 and no2020 Year-End RSUs. No information is reportable with respect to Messrs. Solomon, Waldron or ScherrColeman and Berlinski for 20202023 in this table. 2017 2020 Year-End PSUs granted to Mr.Messrs. Solomon and Waldron and Ms. Ruemmler, which are expected to settle in Spring 20212024 when final information regarding Core U.S. and Europeanapplicable Peer performance is available, will be reflected in the 20212024 Stock Vested table in our Proxy Statementproxy statement for our 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

  
NAME  STOCK AWARDS 
   
    NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON VESTING  (#)
(a)  
   

VALUE REALIZED

ON VESTING ($)(b)

 
   
John F.W. Rogers                                                            18,021                                                       4,500,204 
   
Karen P. Seymour   13,516    3,375,216 

 Name

Stock Awards

Number of Shares Acquired on  
Vesting (#)

Value Realized on Vesting ($)(c)  

 David Solomon

107,222(a)

36,079,673

 John Waldron

 81,632(a)

27,468,766

 Kathryn Ruemmler

 20,074(b)

 7,743,947

 

(a)

Includes the number of shares of Common Stock underlying 2019 Year-End PSUs that were settled 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Common Stock on May 3, 2023 following the end of the applicable performance period on December 31, 2022. The final amounts payable under these PSUs were calculated based on the firm’s average annual ROE over the applicable performance period (see —Compensation Discussion and Analysis —Equity-Based Variable Compensation Elements—A More Detailed Look—PSUs in our proxy statement for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders for more details). The initial number of PSUs granted to each of Messrs. Solomon and Waldron was 71,481 and 54,421, respectively, and the average ROE over the performance period was 14.8% (at the 100th percentile versus Peers), resulting in a 150% multiplier. The final number of PSUs earned by Messrs. Solomon and Waldron was 107,222 and 81,632, respectively.

(b)

Includes the number of shares of Common Stock underlying one-third of Ms. Ruemmler’s 2020 Year-End RSUs, which were vested upon grant. One-third of these sharesduring 2023 and were delivered in January 2021, and one-third are deliverable on or about each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date.2024. Substantially all of the shares of Common Stock underlying the 2019 2020 Year-End RSUs that arewere delivered to these NEOsMs. Ruemmler are subject to transfer restrictions until January 2026. Also includes the number of shares of Common Stock underlying one-third of Ms. Ruemmler’s April 2020 RSUs, which vested during 2023 and were delivered in January 2024. The remaining one-third of these April 2020 RSUs are subject to vesting in December 2024 and delivery in January 2025.

 

(b)(c)

ValuesWith respect to Messrs. Solomon and Waldron’s 2019 Year-End PSUs, values were determined by multiplying 50% of the aggregate number of PSUs earned, representing the cash-settled portion of the award, by $339.62, the ten-day average closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on April 19, 2023 – May 2, 2023, and multiplying 50% of the aggregate number of PSUs earned, representing the stock-settled portion of the award, by $333.37, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on May 2, 2023. Messrs. Solomon and Waldron also received $2,466,106 and $1,877,536, respectively, in respect of the accrued dividend equivalents underlying these earned PSUs. With respect to Ms. Ruemmler’s RSUs, values were determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $249.72,$385.77, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE on January 16, 2020,December 29, 2023, the grantlast trading day prior to December 31, 2023, the vesting date. In accordance with SEC rules the — 2020 Summary Compensation Table and — 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards sections above include the grant date fair value of the 2019 Year-End RSUs.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

59


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2023 PENSION BENEFITS

 

2020 PENSION BENEFITS2023 Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth pension benefit information as of December 31, 2020.2023. The Goldman Sachs Employees’ Pension Plan (GS Pension Plan) was frozen as of November 27, 2004, and none of our NEOs has accrued additional benefits thereunder since November 30, 2001 (at the latest). Mr. Berlinski is a participant in The Goldman Sachs U.K. Retirement Plan (GS U.K. Retirement Plan), which was frozen as of March 31, 2016. Mr. Berlinski has not accrued benefits under the GS U.K. Retirement Plan since that time. Ms. SeymourRuemmler is not a participant in any plan reportable in this table.

 

     
    NAME       PLAN NAME NUMBER OF YEARS
     CREDITED SERVICES     
(#)
(a)
       PRESENT VALUE OF     
ACCUMULATED
BENEFIT ($)
(b)
  

     PAYMENTS DURING     
LAST FISCAL YEAR

($)

 
     
    David M. Solomon       GS Pension Plan             1   1,674    
     
    John E. Waldron       GS Pension Plan  1   8,356    
     
    Stephen M. Scherr       GS Pension Plan  8   77,484    
     
    John F.W. Rogers       GS Pension Plan  1   6,904    
    
   Name  Plan Name

  Number of Years  

  Credited

  Services (#)(a)

  Present Value of   

  Accumulated

  Benefit ($)(b)

  Payments During

  Last Fiscal Year ($)  

David Solomon

  GS Pension Plan   1    1,378  —

John Waldron

  GS Pension Plan   1    5,892  —

Denis Coleman

  GS Pension Plan   6   25,839  —

Philip Berlinski

  GS U.K. Retirement Plan   15  358,073  —

 

(a)

Our employees, including Messrs. Solomon, Waldron, ScherrColeman and Rogers,Berlinski, were credited for service for each year employed by us while eligible to participate in our GS Pension Plan.Plan or GS U.K. Retirement Plan, as applicable.

 

(b)

Represents the present value of the entire accumulated benefit and not the annual payment an NEO would receive once his benefits commence. Prior to being frozen, our GS Pension Plan provided an annual benefit equal to between 1% and 2% of the first $75,000 of the participant’s compensation for each year of credited service. The normal form of payment is a single life annuity for single participants and an actuarially equivalent 50% joint and survivor annuity for married participants. The present values shown in this column were determined using the following assumptions: payment of a single life annuity following retirement at either the normal retirement age (age 65) or immediately (if an NEO is over 65); a 2.87%5.08% discount rate; and mortality estimates based on the Pri-2012 white collar fully generational mortality table, with adjustments to reflect continued improvements in mortality based on Scale MP-2020.MP-2021. Our GS Pension Plan provides for early retirement benefits, and all of our participating NEOs became or will become eligible to elect early retirement benefits upon reaching age 55. Prior to being frozen, our GS U.K. Retirement Plan provided for an annual benefit equal to 1.25% of the first £81,000 of the participant’s compensation for each year of credited service. The normal form of payment is a single life annuity plus a contingent spouse’s annuity equal to two-thirds of the member’s pension. Mr. Berlinski has two records in the plan: the normal retirement age for the first period of service is age 50, and the normal retirement age for the second period of service is age 65. The present value shown in this column reflects Mr. Berlinski’s accrued benefits with an annual cost of living adjustment that is applied pursuant to the terms of the GS U.K. Retirement Plan and was determined using the following assumptions: payment of a joint life annuity following retirement at normal retirement age; a 4.70% discount rate; mortality estimates based on the “S3 series all pensioner very light” mortality table, with adjustments to reflect continued improvements in mortality; and the GS U.K. Retirement Plan’s provision of early retirement benefits in respect of his second period of service and Mr. Berlinski’s eligibility to elect early retirement benefits upon reaching age 55.

For a description of our 401(k) Plan and our U.K. Defined Contribution Arrangement, which isare our tax-qualified defined contribution plan,plans in the U.S. and U.K., respectively, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Policies and Practices.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS57


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2020 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

 

2020 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION2023 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 

 

The following table sets forth information for each NEO, as applicable, with respect to vested RSUs granted for service in prior years and for which the underlying shares of Common Stock had not yet been delivered as of the beginning of 2020during 2023 (Vested and Undelivered RSUs).

The Vested and Undelivered RSUs generally were awarded for services provided in 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 2016.2017. RSUs generally are not transferable. No NEO received RSUsinformation is reportable in this table for services in 2017.Messrs. Solomon and Waldron.

 

  

Amounts shown as “Registrant Contributions” represent certain of the 2019 April 2020 and 2020 Year-End RSUs, which were vested at grant.in December 2023.

 

  

Amounts shown as “Aggregate Earnings” reflect the change in market value of the shares of Common Stock underlying Vested and Undelivered RSUs, as well as dividend equivalents earned and paid on those shares, during 2020.2023.

 

  

Amounts shown as “Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions” reflect the value of shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs that were delivered, as well as dividend equivalents paid, during 2020.2023.

 

       
NAME PLAN OR AWARD EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FISCAL
YEAR ($)
  

REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST

FISCAL YEAR

($)(a)

  AGGREGATE
EARNINGS
IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR
($)
(b)
  AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST
FISCAL YEAR ($)
  

AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
FISCAL
YEAR-END

($)(c)

 
       
  David M. Solomon   Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs      

        219,804   3,449,171    
       
  John E. Waldron   Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs      

        196,126   3,077,609    
       
  Stephen M. Scherr   Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs      

        182,604   2,865,427    
       
  John F.W. Rogers   Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs      

     4,500,204   1,393,587   4,461,938   10,050,779 
       
  Karen P. Seymour   Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs      

     3,375,216   919,524   1,885,014   7,315,052 

60

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

      
   Name

  Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs  

  Executive

  Contributions  

  in Last Fiscal

  Year ($)

  Registrant

  Contributions 

  in Last Fiscal

  Year ($)(a)

  Aggregate 

  Earnings

  in Last

  Fiscal

  Year ($)(b)

  Aggregate

  Withdrawals/

  Distributions

  in Last Fiscal  

  Year ($)

  Aggregate

  Balance at

  Fiscal

  Year-End($)(c)

 

Denis Coleman

  Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs

  —         —  1,258,253  6,132,350  10,657,668

 

Kathryn Ruemmler

  Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs

  —  7,743,947     99,366  6,992,376   7,743,947

 

Philip Berlinski

  Vested and

  Undelivered RSUs

  —         —    976,538  7,418,768   7,146,003

 

(a)

ValueFor Ms. Ruemmler, value was determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $249.72,$385.77, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE on January 16, 2020,December 29, 2023, the grantlast trading day prior to December 31, 2023, the vesting date. In accordance with SEC rules, the — 2020 Summary Compensation Table and — 2020 Grants of Plan-Based Awards sections include the grant date fair value of the 2019 Year-End RSUs.

 

(b)

Aggregate earnings include changes in the market value of the shares of Common Stock underlying Vested and Undelivered RSUs during 2020.2023. In addition, each RSU includescertain RSUs include a dividend equivalent right, pursuant to which the holder is entitled to receive an amount equal to any ordinary cash dividends paid to the holder of a share of Common Stock approximately when those dividends are paid to shareholders. Amounts earned and paid on vested RSUs during 20202023 pursuant to dividend equivalent rights are also are included. The vested RSUs included in these amounts and their delivery dates are as follows (to the extent received by each NEO):.

 

 
   Vested RSUs      Delivery

VESTED RSUS

April 2020 RSUs

  DELIVERY
2019 Year-End RSUsWith respect to Mr. Rogers and

For Ms. Seymour, one-thirdRuemmler: One-third delivered in January 20212024 and one-third deliverable on or about January 2025 following vesting in December 2024.

2020 Year-End RSUs

For Ms. Ruemmler and Mr. Berlinski: One-third delivered in January 2024. For Mr. Coleman: one-fifth delivered in January 2024 and one-fifth deliverable on or about each of the secondfourth and thirdfifth anniversaries of grant.

2018

2019 Year-End RSUs

  With respect to

For Mr. Rogers and Ms. Seymour, one-thirdBerlinski: Approximately 11% delivered in each of January 20202024 and January 2021 and one-thirdthe remaining approximately 11% deliverable on or about the thirdfifth anniversary of grant. For Mr. Coleman: one-fifth delivered in January 2024 and one-fifth deliverable on or about the fifth anniversary of grant.

2016

2018 Year-End RSUs (RSUs granted in
January 2017 for services in 2016)

  

For all NEOs other than Ms. Seymour (who did not receive this award), one-thirdMr. Berlinski and Mr. Coleman: One-fifth delivered in each of December 2017, January 2019 and January 2020.2024.

 

Delivery of shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs may be accelerated in certain limited circumstances (for example,(e.g., in the event that the holder of the RSU dies or leaves the firm to accept a governmental position where retention of the RSU would create a conflict of interest). See Potential —Potential Payments Uponupon Termination or Change in Controlfor treatment of the RSUs upon termination of employment.

 

(c)

The Vested and Undelivered RSUs included in these amounts are 2020, 2019Year-End RSUs and 2018 Year-End and April 2020 RSUs. These stock awards were previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table (to the extent that the NEO was a named executive officer in the applicable year of grant). Values for RSUs were determined by multiplying the number of RSUs by $263.71,$385.77, the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE on December 31, 202029, 2023 (the last trading day of the year).

 

58GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROLPotential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

 

Our NEOs do not have employment, “golden parachute” or other agreements providing for severance pay.

Our NEOs do not have employment, “golden parachute” or other agreements providing for severance pay.

Our PCP, The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2018)(2021) (SIP) and its predecessor plans and our retiree healthcare program may provide for potential payments to our NEOs in conjunctionconnection with a termination of employment. The amounts potentially payable to our NEOs under our pension plan and vested RSUs, as applicable, are set forth under the — 2020 Pension Benefits and — 2020 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation sections above. The terms of the outstanding PSUs are not affected by a future termination of employment or change in control (absent a termination for circumstances constituting “cause” — e.g., any material violation of any firm policy or other conduct detrimental to our firm).

Each of our NEOs participated in our PCP in 2020.2023. Under our PCP, if a participant’s employment at Goldman Sachs terminates for any reason before the end of a “contract period” (generally a two-year period as defined in the PCP), our Compensation Committee has the discretion to determine what, if any, variable compensation will be provided to the participant for services provided in that year, subject to the formula set forth in the PCP. There is no severance provided under our PCP.

Set forth below is a calculation of the potential benefits to each of our NEOs assuming a termination of employment occurred on December 31, 2020,2023, in accordance with SEC rules. Ms. Seymour retired as EVPThe table and General Counsel on March 15, 2021, and will not receive any payments or other benefits in connection with her retirement from the firm on March 31, 2021. The narrative disclosure that follows the table providesprovide important information and definitions regarding specific payment terms and conditions.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

61


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

     
TERMINATION REASON

NAME

VALUE OF UNVESTED
RSUS, RESTRICTED

STOCK AND PSUS

THAT VEST UPON
TERMINATION ($)

PRESENT VALUE

OF PREMIUMS

FOR RETIREE
HEALTHCARE
PROGRAM
(d) ($)

TOTAL ($)
     
Cause or Termination with Violation(a)

David M. Solomon

 

                                                 0 

 

                                     0 

 

                       0 

John E. Waldron

 

 

 

Stephen M. Scherr

 

 

 

John F.W. Rogers

 

 

 

Karen P. Seymour

 

 

 

     

Termination without Violation(a), Death(b),

Change in Control, Disability or Conflicted

Employment(c)

David M. Solomon

 

 

372,660 

 

 

372,660 

 

John E. Waldron

 

 

531,001 

 

 

531,001 

 

Stephen M. Scherr

 

 

442,204 

 

 

442,204 

 

John F.W. Rogers

 

 

274,614 

 

 

274,614 

 

Karen P. Seymour

 

 

 

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Equity Awards

    
  Termination Reason   Name Value of Unvested RSUs
and PSUs that Vest upon  
Termination ($)
(a)
 

Value of Unvested SVC 

Awards that Vest upon 

Termination ($)(b)

 Total ($)(c)   

 

  Cause or Termination with Violation(d)

 

 

All NEOs

 

          0

 

          0

 

          0

 

  Termination without Violation(e)

 

 

David Solomon

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 5,077,464

 

 

 

 5,077,464

 

 

 

John Waldron

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 3,385,036

 

 

 

 3,385,036

 

 

 

Denis Coleman

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 1,684,295

 

 

 

 1,684,295

 

 

 

Kathryn Ruemmler

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 1,178,953

 

 

 

 1,178,953

 

 

 

Philip Berlinski

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 1,178,953

 

 

 

 1,178,953

 

  Death or Disability(f)

 

 

David Solomon

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

11,568,504

 

 

 

11,568,504

 

 

 

John Waldron

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 7,712,472

 

 

 

 7,712,472

 

 

 

Denis Coleman

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 3,837,502

 

 

 

 3,837,502

 

 

 

Kathryn Ruemmler   

 

 

 

15,124,221

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

 

 

17,810,351

 

 

 

Philip Berlinski

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

 

  Conflicted Employment(g)

 

 

All NEOs

 

          0

 

          0

 

          0

 

  Termination in Connection with

  a Change in Control(h)

 

 

 

David Solomon

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

11,568,504

 

 

 

11,568,504

 

 

 

John Waldron

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 7,712,472

 

 

 

 7,712,472

 

 

 

Denis Coleman

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 3,837,502

 

 

 

 3,837,502

 

 

 

Kathryn Ruemmler

 

 

 

15,124,221

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

 

 

17,810,351

 

 

 

Philip Berlinski

 

 

 

         0

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

 

 

 2,686,130

 

The amounts potentially payable to our NEOs under our pension plan and vested RSUs, as applicable, are set forth under the —2023 Pension Benefits and —2023 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation sections above. The delivery and performance conditions of the outstanding PSUs are not affected by a future termination of employment or change in control (absent a termination for circumstances constituting “Cause”—e.g., any material violation of any firm policy, other conduct detrimental to our firm or certain other circumstances).

 

(a)

Amounts reflect the unvested portion of Ms. Ruemmler’s (i) April 2020 RSUs, (ii) 2021 Year-End PSUs and (iii) 2022 Year-End PSUs, in each case as of December 31, 2023. The PSUs reflect target number of shares.

(b)

In the event of Death or Disability and Termination in Connection with a Change in Control, amounts included for SVC Awards reflect level of achievement against absolute and relative thresholds, based on actual performance as of December 31, 2023. For Termination without Violation, such amounts are prorated for length of performance period that has lapsed.

(c)

Our NEOs’ PSUs and SVC Awards are subject to our Dodd-Frank Clawback Policy (see —Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Policies and Practices).

(d)

RSUs, PSUs and SVC Awards, as well as any Shares at Risk delivered in respect of such awards, are subject to Conduct-Related Recapture; 2020, 2021 and 2022 Year-End PSUs and SVC Awards, as applicable, granted to our Executive Leadership Team are subject to Accounting-Related Recapture. The occurrence of any Violation (except for Solicitation with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSU Award) prior to delivery or settlement of RSUs, PSUs or SVC Awards or other specified time period, as applicable, will result in forfeiture of such equity awards, and in some cases may result in the NEO having to repay amounts previously received.

(e)

Except as discussed below, upon an NEO’s termination without Violation, (as defined below),any unvested RSUs and PSUs will be forfeited, but SVC Awards will vest pro rata for a portion of the award if the firm terminates employment and no applicable Recapture event occurs; shares of Common Stock underlying any vested RSUs as applicable, will continue to be delivered on schedule (and transfer restrictions will continue to apply until the applicable transferability date to any Shares at Risk delivered thereunder), transfer restrictions will continue to apply to Restricted Stock, as applicable, until the applicable transferability date,deliver, and PSUsPSU or SVC Awards will continue to be eligible to be earned, pursuant to their existing terms (and, in each case, transfer restrictions will continue to apply until the applicable transferability date to any Shares at Risk delivered thereunder), provided thatin respect of RSUs, PSUs and SVC Awards). For 2020, 2021 and 2022 Year-End PSUs and the NEO does not become associated with a Covered Enterprise (as defined below). Additionally, ifSVC Awards, the NEO becomes associated with a Covered Enterprise, for 2019 Year-End RSUs, the NEO generally would have forfeited all of these awards if the association occurred in 2020; will forfeit two-thirds of these awards if the association occurs in 2021; and will forfeit one-third of these awards if the association occurs in 2022. For 2018 Year-End RSUs, the NEO generally would have forfeited all of these awards if the association occurred in 2019; would have forfeited two-thirds of these awards if the association occurred in 2020; and will forfeit one-third of these awards if the association occurs in 2021. For 2019 Year-End PSUs, the NEO generally would forfeit all of these awards if the association occurred or occurs in 2020,NEO associates with a Covered Enterprise during the applicable performance period (which is 2021 or 2022. For 2018 through 2023, 2022 through 2024 and 2023 through 2025 for Year-End PSUs, the NEO generally would forfeit all of these awards if the association occurred or occurs in 2019, 2020 or 2021. For 2017 Year-End PSUs, the NEO generally would forfeit all of these awards if the association occurred in 2018, 2019 or 2020. For 2017 Year-End Restricted Stock, the NEO generally would have forfeited all of these awards if the association occurred in 2018; would have forfeited two-thirds of these awards if the association occurred in 2019;respectively; and would have forfeited one-third of these awards if the association occurred in 2020.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THEOctober 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS59


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The occurrence of a Violation, including any event constituting Cause (as defined below) or the Solicitation (as defined below) of employees or clients of our firm, by an NEO prior to delivery or settlement of RSUs and PSUs or a release of transfer restrictions on Restricted Stock or other specified time period will result in forfeiture of RSUs, PSUs and Restricted Stock, and in some cases may result in the NEO having to repay amounts previously received. In the event of certain Violations (for example, NEO engaging in Cause) following delivery of Shares at Risk underlying RSUs or PSUs but prior to the lapse of transfer restrictions, these shares also may be required to be returned to the firm.through October 2026 for SVC Awards).

 

(f)

RSU, Restricted Stock and PSU awards also are subject to risk-related clawback provisions included in the definition of Violations below. As a result of these provisions, for example, an NEO will forfeit certain of their outstanding equity-based awards and any shares of Common Stock or other amounts delivered under these awards may be Recaptured, if our Compensation Committee determines that their failure to properly consider risk (including overseeing or being responsible for, depending on the circumstances, another individual’s failure to properly consider risk) in 2019 (with respect to 2019 Year-End RSUs and PSUs), 2018 (with respect to 2018 Year-End RSUs and PSUs), or 2017 (with respect to 2017 Year-End Restricted Stock and PSUs) has, or reasonably could be expected to have, a material adverse impact on their business unit, our firm or the broader financial system.

For 2017 Year-End PSUs (granted to Mr. Solomon) and 2018 and 2019 Year-End PSUs granted to our Executive Leadership Team, if the firm is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to its material noncompliance, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws as described in Section 304(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley, their rights to the award will terminate and be subject to repayment to the same extent that would be required under Section 304 of Sarbanes-Oxley had such NEO been a “chief executive officer” or “chief financial officer” of the firm (regardless of whether they actually held such position at the relevant time).

(b)

In the event of an NEO’s death, any unvested RSUs, PSUs or SVC Awards will vest and, for RSUs, delivery of shares of Common Stock, underlying RSUs, as applicable, iswill be accelerated. Any transfer restrictions on the shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs, Shares at Risk delivered under PSUs, and Restricted Stock areor SVC Awards will be removed. The termsdelivery and performance conditions of the PSUs and SVC Awards are not affected by the NEO’s death. For information on the number of PSUs and vested RSUs held by the NEOs at year-end, see2020 —2023 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End and — 2020 —2023 Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation above. These amounts do not reflect, in the case of death, the payment of a death benefit under our executive life insurance plan, which provides each NEO with term life insurance coverage through age 75 (a $4.5 million benefit for each NEO other than Mr. Waldron, who elected coverage at the minimum level under such plan)benefit).

(c)

If a Change in Control (as defined below) occurs, and within 18 months thereafter we terminate an NEO’s employment without Cause or if the NEO terminates his employment for Good Reason (as defined below), delivery of shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs, as applicable, is accelerated and any transfer restrictions on the shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs, Shares at Risk delivered under RSUs and PSUs and/ or Restricted Stock are removed. The terms of the PSUs are not affected. For RSUs and Shares at Risk delivered in respect of PSUs and RSUs and/or Restricted Stock, certain forfeiture provisions no longer apply.

In the case of aan NEO’s disability, provided that the NEO does not become associated with a Covered Enterprise (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs), unvested RSUs, PSUs or SVC Awards will vest, shares of Common Stock underlying RSUs will continue to deliver on schedule and PSUs and SVC Awards will continue to be eligible to be earned pursuant to their existing terms. If the NEO does become associated with a Covered Enterprise, the awards would be treated as set forth in footnote (a)(e) above for that situation. Amounts included for SVC Awards reflect level of achievement against absolute and relative thresholds, based on actual performance as of December 31, 2023.

 

(g)

In the case of a termination in which an NEO resigns and accepts a position that is deemed Conflicted Employment (as defined below), the NEO will receive, at our sole discretion, (i) with respect to Year-End RSUs, either a cash payment or an accelerated vesting (if applicable), delivery of, and removal of transfer restrictions on, the shares of Common Stock underlying those RSUs and Shares at Risk; and (ii) with respect to Restricted Stock, removal of transfer restrictions on such Restricted Stock.Risk. Additionally, in the event of such a termination, our Compensation Committee may determine to amend the terms of any then-outstanding PSUs or SVC Awards held by the NEO.

 

(d)

62

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

(h)

In 2020, PMDs with eightthe event of an NEO’s termination for Good Reason (as defined below) or more yearswithout Cause within 18 months of PMD servicea Change in Control: (i) for RSUs, vesting and delivery of underlying shares of Common Stock, each as applicable, is accelerated and any applicable transfer restrictions are eligibleremoved; and (ii) for PSUs and SVC Awards, vesting is accelerated and any applicable transfer restrictions are also removed, but delivery and performance conditions do not change. For RSUs, and Shares at Risk delivered in respect of SVC Awards, PSUs and RSUs, certain forfeiture provisions no longer apply. For SVC Awards, in the case of a change of control that results in a delisting, the change in control would be deemed to receive medical and dental coverage under our retiree healthcare program for themselves and eligible dependents. The 2020 healthcare program provided a 75% firm subsidy to eligible retirees and their covered dependents. The firm amendedbe the retiree healthcare program effective January 1, 2022 to provide a subsidy equal to 100%last day of the individual premiumperformance period. Amounts included for current retirees with 8 yearsSVC Awards reflect level of PMD serviceachievement against absolute and active PMDs who retire with 8 yearsrelative thresholds, based on actual performance as of PMD service. Any elected coverage for spouses/partners or dependents will no longer be subsidized by the firm. In addition, any new PMDs promoted or hired on or after January 1, 2021, will no longer receive a firm subsidy toward retiree healthcare and will be required to pay 100% of the retiree medical premium. Each of our NEOs (other than Ms. Seymour) is eligible for this revised subsidy; Ms. Seymour is eligible to receive access to the retiree healthcare program at full cost with no firm subsidy. The values shown in this column reflect the present value of the cost to us of the 100% individual subsidy starting in 2022 (current plan still in effect for 2021) and were determined using a December 31, 2020 retirement date and the following assumptions: a 2.87% discount rate; mortality estimates based on the PRI-2012 white collar fully generational mortality table, with adjustments to reflect continued improvements in mortality based on Scale MP-2020; estimates of future increases in healthcare subsidy costs of 6.25% pre-65, 6.75% post-65, and grading down 0.25% per year until ultimate rate of 4.50% for medical and pharmacy and 5.25% for dental; and assumptions for subsequent eligibility for alternative coverage, which would eliminate subsidies under our program (60% firm subsidized and 40% not firm subsidized). If an NEO becomes associated with certain entities, including certain Covered Enterprises, the NEO may forfeit some or all of his/her benefits and/or coverage under our retiree healthcare program.2023.

Retiree Healthcare

The 2023 healthcare program allowed retiring PMDs who were not terminated for Cause to receive medical and dental coverage under our retiree healthcare program for themselves and eligible dependents. PMDs who were promoted or hired as a PMD before January 1, 2021, and retired with at least eight years of PMD service, are provided a subsidy equal to 100% of the individual premium; any elected coverage for spouses/partners or dependents is not subsidized by the firm. PMDs who were promoted or hired on or after January 1, 2021, or retire with less than eight years of PMD service, do not receive a subsidy toward retiree healthcare and are required to pay 100% of the retiree medical premium for themselves, their spouses/partners and dependents.

In the case of a termination for Cause, the present value of premiums for our retiree healthcare program would be $0 for each of our NEOs. In the case of a termination of employment for any other reason, Ms. Ruemmler is eligible to receive access to the retiree healthcare program at full cost to her with no subsidy; the present value of her firm-subsidized premium is thus $0. Each of our other NEOs is eligible for subsidized coverage of his individual premium, the present value of which is: Mr. Solomon – $309,462, Mr. Waldron – $426,334, Mr. Coleman – $489,153 and Mr. Berlinski – $522,289.

The values provided above reflect the present value of the cost to us of the 100% individual subsidy starting in 2024 and were determined using a December 31, 2023 retirement date and the following assumptions: a 5.08% discount rate; mortality estimates based on the PRI-2012 white collar fully generational mortality table, with adjustments to reflect continued improvements in mortality based on Scale MP-2021; estimates of future increases in healthcare subsidy costs of 7.50% pre-65, 8.75% post-65 and then grading down gradually each year until ultimate rate of 4.50% for medical and pharmacy in 2032 and 4.00% each year for dental; and assumptions for subsequent eligibility for alternative coverage, which would eliminate subsidies under our program (60% firm subsidized and 40% not firm subsidized). If an NEO becomes associated with certain entities, including certain Covered Enterprises, the NEO will forfeit some or all of their benefits and/or coverage under our retiree healthcare program.

Other Terms

As PMDs and members of the Management Committee, our NEOs are generally subject to a policy of 90 days’six months’ notice of termination of employment. We may require that an NEO be inactive (i.e., on “garden leave”) during the notice period (or we may waive the requirement).

For purposes of describing our PSUs, RSUs Restricted Stock and PSUs,SVC Awards, the above-referenced terms generally have the following meanings:

Cause” means the NEO (a) is convicted in a criminal proceeding on certain misdemeanor charges, on a felony charge or an equivalent charge,charge; (b) engages in employment disqualification conduct under applicable law,law; (c) willfully fails to perform his or hertheir duties to Goldman Sachs,Sachs; (d) violates any securities or commodities laws,

60GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

rules or regulations or the rules and regulations of any relevant exchange or association of which we are a member,member; (e) violates any of our policies concerning hedging or pledging or confidential or proprietary information, or materially violates any other of our policies,policies; (f) impairs, impugns, denigrates, disparages or negatively reflects upon our name, reputation or business interestsinterests; or (g) engages in conduct detrimental to us.

Change in Control” means the consummation of a business combination involving Goldman Sachs, unless immediately following the business combination either:

 

 

At least 50% of the total voting power of the surviving entity or its parent entity, if applicable, is represented by securities of Goldman Sachs that were outstanding immediately prior to the transaction (or by shares into which the securities of Goldman Sachs are converted in the transaction); or

 

 

At least 50% of the members of the board of directors of the surviving entity, or its parent entity, if applicable, following the transaction were, at the time of our Board’s approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for the transaction, directors of Goldman Sachs on the date of grant of the award (including directors whose election or nomination was approved by two-thirds of the incumbent directors).

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

63


COMPENSATION MATTERS—EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

Conflicted Employment” occurs where (a) a participant (a) resigns solely to accept employment at any U.S. federal, state or local government, any non-U.S. government, any supranational or international organization, any self-regulatory organization, or any agency or instrumentality of any such government or organization, or any other employer (other than an “Accounting Firm” within the meaning of SEC Rule 2-01(f)(2) of Regulation S-X) determined by our Compensation Committee and, as a result of such employment, the participant’s continued holding of our equity-based awards would result in an actual or perceived conflict of interest or (b) a participant terminates employment and then notifies us that he/she has accepted or intends to accept employment of the nature described in clause (a).

Covered Enterprise” includes any existing or planned business enterprise that (a) offers, holds itself out as offering or reasonably may be expected to offer products or services that are the same as or similar to those offered by us or that we reasonably expect to offer or (b) engages in, holds itself out as engaging in or reasonably may be expected to engage in any other activity that is the same as or similar to any financial activity engaged in by us or in which we reasonably expect to engage.

Good Reason” means (a) as determined by our Compensation Committee, a materially adverse change in the NEO’s position or nature or status of the NEO’s responsibilities from those in effect immediately before the Change in Control or (b) Goldman Sachs requiring the NEO’s principal place of employment to be located more than 75 miles from the location where the NEO is principally employed at the time of the Change in Control (except for required travel consistent with the NEO’s business travel obligations in the ordinary course prior to the Change in Control).

Solicitation” means any direct or indirect communication of any kind whatsoever (regardless of who initiated), inviting, advising, encouraging, suggesting or requesting any person or entity, in any manner, to take or refrain from taking any action.

Violation” includes any of the following:

 

 

Participating in (or otherwise overseeing or being responsible for, depending on the circumstances, another individual’s participation) materially improper risk analysis or failing sufficiently to raise concerns about risks during the year for whichperiod specified in the award was granted;agreement;

 

 

Soliciting our clients or prospective clients to transact business with a Covered Enterprise, or to refrain from doing business with us or interfering with any of our client relationships;relationships (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

 

 

Failing to perform obligations under any agreement with us;

 

 

Bringing an action that results in a determination that the terms or conditions of RSUs, Restricted Stock or PSUsapplicable equity-based awards are invalid;

 

 

Attempting to have a dispute under our equity compensation plan or the applicable award agreement resolved in a manner other than as provided for in our equity compensation plan or the applicable award agreement;

 

 

Any event constituting Cause;

 

 

Failing to certify compliance to us or otherwise failing to comply with the terms of our equity compensation plan or the applicable award agreement;

 

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS61


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Upon the termination of employment for any reason, receiving grants of cash, equity or other property (whether vested or unvested) from an entity to which the NEO provides services, to replace, substitute for or otherwise in respect of the NEO’s RSUs, Restricted Stock, PSUsapplicable equity-based awards or Shares at Risk;

 

 

Soliciting any of our employees to resign from us or soliciting certain employees to apply for or accept employment (or other association) with any person or entity other than us;us (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

 

 

Hiring or participatingParticipating in the hiring of certain employees by any person or entity other than us, whether as an employee or consultant or otherwise;otherwise (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

 

 

If certain employees are solicited, hired or accepted into partnership, membership or similar status by (a) any entity that the NEO forms, that bears the NEO’s name, or in which the NEO possesses or controls greater than a de minimis equity ownership, voting or profit participation or (b) any entity where the NEO has, or will have, direct or indirect managerial responsibility for such employee;employee, unless the Committee determines that the NEO was not involved in such solicitation, hiring or acceptance (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs); or

 

64

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Our firm failing to maintain our “minimum tier 1 capital ratio” (as defined in the Federal Reserve Board regulations) for 90 consecutive business days or the Federal Reserve Board or Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) making a written recommendation for the appointment of the FDIC as a receiver based on a determination that we are “in default” or “in danger of default.”default” (except with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 U.K. RSUs);

In addition, with respect to Mr. Coleman’s 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs, and 2021 U.K. RSUs (as applicable), “Violation” also includes any of the following, in each case as determined by our Compensation Committee:

»

Our firm or the relevant business unit (i.e., investment banking in respect of Mr. Coleman’s prior role) suffering from a material downturn in financial performance (for 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs);

»

On or prior to January 1, 2029, our firm or the relevant business unit suffering from a material failure of risk management;

»

During the period beginning on the applicable transferability date and ending on December 31, 2028, engaging in misconduct sufficient to justify summary termination of employment under English law; or

»

Exercising supervisory authority over an individual who engages in misconduct sufficient to justify summary termination under English law (for 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs).

Compensation Committee Report

Our Compensation Committee reviewed the CD&A, as prepared by management of Goldman Sachs, and discussed the CD&A with management of Goldman Sachs. FW Cook and theThe CRO also reviewed the CD&A. Based on the Committee’s review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee

Kimberley Harris, Chair

Michele Burns Chair

Drew FaustKevin Johnson

Ellen Kullman

Lakshmi Mittal

Adebayo Ogunlesi (ex-officio)

62GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 2. AN ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY ON PAY)

2020 SAY ON PAY VOTE

Item 2. An Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)

 

 

 

 Proposal Snapshot — Snapshot—Item 2. Say on Pay   

 

  
  

 

 

What is being voted on:An advisory vote to approve the compensation of all of our NEOs.

 

Board recommendation:Our Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the resolution approving the executive compensation of our NEOs.

 

 

Our Say on Pay voteVote gives our shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of all of our NEOs. We currently include this advisory vote on an annual basis.

We encourage you to review the following sections of this Proxy Statement for further information on our key compensation practices and the effect of shareholder feedback on NEO compensation:

 

 

“Compensation Highlights” in our Executive Summary, (see page 5);

 

 

20202023 Annual NEO Compensation Determinations” in our CD&A, (see page 35);

 

 

“How Ourour Compensation Committee Makes Decisions“Decisions” in our CD&A, (see page 36);

 

 

“Overview of Annual Compensation Elements and Key Pay Practices“Practices” in our CD&A, (see page 41);

“2023 Annual Compensation” in our CD&A,

“Equity-Based Annual Variable Compensation: PSUs” in our CD&A,

“Equity-Based Long-Term Incentive: Shareholder Value Creation Awards” in our CD&A and

 

 

2020 Compensation”Other Compensation Policies and Practices” in our CD&A (see page 43).&A.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

65


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 2. AN ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (SAY ON PAY)

2023 SAY ON PAY VOTE

Please note that these sections should be read in conjunction with our entire CD&A (beginning on page 35), as well as the executive compensation tables and related disclosure that follow (beginning on page 54).follow.

 

    2020 SAY ON PAY VOTE  2023 Say on Pay Vote

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the below resolution gives shareholders the opportunity to cast an advisory vote on the compensation of our NEOs, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the CD&A, the executive compensation tables and related disclosure.disclosures.

Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to vote on the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the holders of Common Stock approve the compensation of our named executive officersNEOs as disclosed in this Proxy Statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis,CD&A, the executive compensation tables and related disclosures.

As this is an advisory vote, the result will not be binding, although our Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the vote when evaluating the effectiveness of our compensation principles and practices and in connection with its compensation determinations.

For detailed information on the vote required for this matter and the choices available for casting your vote, please see Frequently Asked Questions.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS63


COMPENSATION MATTERS—PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

Pay Ratio Disclosure

In accordance with SEC rules, we have calculated the ratio between the 2023 compensation of our CEO and the median of the 2023 compensation of all of our employees (other than the CEO) (Median Compensation Amount).

 

In accordance with SEC rules, we have calculated the ratio between the 2020 compensation of our CEO and the median of the 2020 compensation of all of our employees (other than the CEO) (Median Compensation Amount).

 

Using reasonable estimates and assumptions where necessary, and in accordance with SEC rules, we have determined that the Median Compensation Amount (calculated in accordance with SEC rules) for 20202023 is $139,430.$153,492.

 

 » 

We identified the employee who received the Median Compensation Amount as of December 31, 20202022 using the firm’s standard internal compensation methodology known as “per annum total compensation,” which measures each employee’s fixed compensation and incentive compensation for a particular year, with appropriate prorations made to reflect actual compensation paid to part-time employees and currency conversions, as applicable.

»

SEC rules permit identification of this median employee once every three years. As such, the Median Compensation Amount for 2023 reflects the 2023 “per annum total compensation” of the employee we identified as of December 31, 2022, given that there has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact pay ratio disclosure.

 

 

Mr. Solomon’s compensation for 2020,2023, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, is $23,940,657,$26,670,817, and the ratio between this amount and the Median Compensation Amount is approximately 172:174:1.

Our Compensation Principles, described in more detail in —Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions, apply to all of our people, regardless of their compensation level, and reflect the importance of (1) paying for performance, (2) encouraging firmwide orientation and culture, (3) discouraging imprudent risk-taking, (4) attracting and retaining talent and (5) promoting a strong risk management and control environment.

66

 

Our  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE
Pay Versus Performance Disclosure
As required by SEC rules, we have calculated “compensation actually paid” and set forth the requisite company- selected financial measures below.
Paying for performance is a key element of our Compensation Principles and our approach to executive compensation. As detailed in our —
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
above, the Compensation Committee places substantial importance on the assessment of firmwide performance when determining NEO compensation. To this end, the Committee utilizes the Assessment Framework to assess a variety of financial and nonfinancial measures in applying its informed judgment to evaluate and set annual pay amounts. See —
Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2023 Annual Compensation
.
We believe that the structure of our equity-based awards provides an intrinsic link to the firm’s longer-term performance. Through the use of PSUs, the amounts ultimately realized by our NEOs with respect to annual compensation are subject to ongoing performance metrics (absolute and relative ROE) and are further tied to the firm’s longer-term performance through stock price (settlement of PSUs and Shares at Risk delivered in respect thereof). Given the use of ROE in our annual PSUs, ROE has been included as our “company-selected measure” in the table below.
While the Committee takes into account each of the measures in our Assessment Framework in a holistic manner to evaluate executive compensation in consideration of firm performance (without ascribing any specific weight to any single factor or metric), the below measures from the Assessment Framework have been selected as they represent those firmwide performance measures for which the firm currently has set forward financial targets.
  ROE
  ROTE
  Efficiency Ratio
In addition, our one-time SVC Awards provide additional, longer-term incentives for our NEOs that are directly tied to the firm’s longer-term performance (as measured by absolute and relative TSR).
The amounts set forth below in the required table are calculated pursuant to SEC rules but do not represent amounts that have been actually earned or realized by our NEOs, including in respect of PSUs and SVC Awards. Performance conditions for many of these awards have either not yet been satisfied or applicable performance information is not yet available.
As a result, this information does not reflect compensation that is actually paid or realized
.
For more information, please refer to our Stock Vested table each year in —
Executive Compensation
for the value realized by NEOs on the vesting of these awards, if any.
       
   Year 
 
Summary
Compensation 
Table Total
for PEO
(a)
 
“Compensation 
Actually Paid”
to PEO ($)
(a)(b)
 
Average
Summary
Compensation 
Table Total
for Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers ($)
(c)
 
 
Average
“Compensation 
Actually Paid”
to Non-PEO
Named
Executive
Officers ($)
(b)(c)
 
Value of Initial Fixed $100  
Investment Based on:
(d)
  
 
Net
Income
($000s)
(e)
 
ROE 
(%)
 
 
Total Shareholder  Return ($)
 
 
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder 
Return ($)
 
 
2023
 26,670,817 12,347,235
(f)
 18,057,884  9,391,899
(g)
 185 133  8,516,000  7.5
 
2022
(h)
 31,609,420 26,749,650 22,702,390 23,602,465 160 118 11,261,000 10.2
 
2021
(h)
 39,545,072 96,228,443 21,385,543 43,553,528 173 132 21,635,000 23.0
 
2020
(h)
 23,940,657 29,092,114 15,395,032 15,395,189 117  98  9,459,000 11.1
(a)
As Chairman and CEO in each of 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Mr. Solomon was our principal executive officer (PEO) under SEC rules.
(b)
The dollar amounts reported in the “Compensation Actually Paid to PEO” column and the “Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO Named Executive Officers” column represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to our PEO and the “average compensation actually paid” to our non-PEO NEOs, respectively, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. While the SEC rules require us to disclose these amounts, they do not correlate to actual amounts that will or may be paid to our NEOs. The actual amounts that will or may be paid to each NEO will be determined following the completion of the applicable performance period based upon the actual achievement over such performance period.
  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  
67

COMPENSATION MATTERS—PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE
The SEC rules require fair values to be calculated. Fair values were calculated as follows:
With respect to outstanding PSUs for which the performance period has not been completed, fair value was calculated by estimating probable performance which considers actual performance for the firm and Peers. With respect to outstanding SVC Awards for which the performance period has not been completed, fair value was calculated to reflect estimated level of achievement against absolute and relative thresholds, based upon the probability of achieving the award’s goals.
Fair Values as of December 31, 2023
. Fair Value of the 2022 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2023 was determined by multiplying 25% of the target number of PSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and including an approximately 5% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the 2021 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2023 was determined by multiplying approximately 65% of the target number of PSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and including an approximately 5% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs as of December 31, 2023 was determined by multiplying approximately 65% of the target number of PSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and including an approximately 9% liquidity discount to reflect both the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs and the lack of dividend equivalent rights. Fair value of the 2020 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2023 was determined by multiplying 150% of the target number of PSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and including an approximately 7% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the SVC Awards as of December 31, 2023 is determined by multiplying the target number of SVC awards by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and applying an approximately 42% discount related to the probability of achieving the award’s goals and an approximately 5% discount to reflect the impact of transfer restrictions on the shares underlying these awards. Fair value of the 2020 Year-End RSUs as of December 31, 2023, the vesting date, was determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023, and including an approximately 8% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs. Fair value of Ms. Ruemmler’s April 2020 RSUs as of December 31, 2023 was determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $385.77, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 29, 2023.
Fair Values as of December 31, 2022
. Fair value of the 2021 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying approximately 117% of the target number of PSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and including an approximately 6% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying approximately 117% of the target number of PSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and including an approximately 13% liquidity discount to reflect both the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these PSUs and the lack of dividend equivalent rights. Fair value of the 2020 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying approximately 133% of the target number of PSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and including an approximately 8% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the 2019 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying 150% of the target number of PSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and including an approximately 8% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of these PSUs. Fair value of the SVC Awards as of December 31, 2022 is determined by multiplying the target number of SVC Awards by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and applying an approximately 36% discount related to the probability of achieving the award’s goals, and an approximately 7% discount to reflect the impact of transfer restrictions on the shares underlying these awards. Fair value of the 2020 Year-End RSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022, and including an approximately 12% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs that vested on December 31, 2022 and an approximately 9% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying these RSUs that remained outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Fair value of Ms. Ruemmler’s April 2020 RSUs as of December 31, 2022 was determined by multiplying the aggregate number of RSUs by $343.38, the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on December 30, 2022.
(c)
In 2023, our non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Waldron, Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler (the 2023 Other NEOs). In 2022, our non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Waldron, Coleman and Berlinski and Ms. Ruemmler (the 2022 Other NEOs). In 2021, our non-PEO NEOs were Mr. Waldron, Stephen Scherr (our former CFO), Ms. Ruemmler and Mr. Berlinski (the 2021 Other NEOs). In 2020, our non-PEO NEOs were Messrs. Waldron and Scherr, John F.W. Rogers (Executive Vice President) and Karen Seymour (our former General Counsel) (the 2020 Other NEOs).
(d)
Reflects value of fixed $100 investment made on December 31, 2019. With respect to each of 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020, Peer Group Total Shareholder Return reflects total shareholder return of S&P 500 Financials Index.
(e)
Information in this column reflects “Net Earnings” as reported in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K as we do not use the term “Net Income.”
(f)
With respect to our PEO, using as a starting point $26,670,817, our PEO’s total compensation for 2023, as reported in our Summary Compensation Table, we: (i) deducted $15,649,863, the grant date fair value of his 2022 Year-End PSUs; (ii) added $4,275,415, the fair value of his 2022 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2023; (iii) deducted $9,661,673, the change in the fair value of his 2021 Year-End PSUs between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (iv) added $4,443,176, the change in the fair value of his 2020 Year-End PSUs between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (v) deducted $693,526, the change between (A) the fair value of his 2019 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2022 and (B) the fair value of his 2019 Year-End PSUs as of May 3, 2023, the settlement date, determined as described in more detailfootnote (c) to the 2023 Stock Vested table and, with respect to the stock-settled portion of the award, including an approximately 8% liquidity discount to reflect the transfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of such PSUs; (vi) added $496,882, the change in the fair value of his SVC Award between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (vii) added $2,466,106, the value of the dividends paid in respect of his 2019 Year-End PSUs prior to the vesting of such PSUs and (viii) deducted $99, the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of his accumulated benefit under the GS Pension Plan. There are no applicable service costs or prior service costs under the GS Pension Plan.
(g)
With respect to the 2023 Other NEOs, using as a starting point $18,057,884, the average total compensation for 2023 for our 2023 Other NEOs, as collectively reported in our Summary Compensation Discussion and Analysis—How Our Compensation Committee Makes Decisions, apply to allTable, we: (i) deducted $8,056,395, the average of the aggregate grant date fair values of our people, regardless2023 Other NEOs’ 2022 Year-End PSUs; (ii) added $2,217,591, the average of their compensation level,the fair values of our 2023 Other NEOs’ 2022 Year-End PSUs as of December 31, 2023; (iii) deducted $3,430,514, the average of the change in the fair value of (A) the 2023 Other NEOs’ 2021 Year-End PSUs between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (B) Mr. Coleman’s 2021 Year-End U.K. PSUs between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (C) Mr. Waldron and Ms. Ruemmler’s 2020 Year-End PSUs between December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023; (D) Mr. Waldron’s 2019 Year-End PSUs between December 31, 2022 and May 3, 2023, the settlement date, determined as described in footnote (c) to the 2023 Stock Vested table and, with respect to the stock-settled portion of the award, including an approximately 8% liquidity discount to reflect the importancetransfer restrictions on the Common Stock underlying the stock-settled portion of (1) paying for performance; (2) encouraging firmwide orientationsuch PSUs; (E) our 2023 Other NEOs’ SVC Awards between December 31, 2022 and culture; (3) discouraging imprudent risk-taking;December 31, 2023; (F) one-third of Ms. Ruemmler’s 2020 Year-End RSUs between December 31, 2022 and (4) attractingDecember 31, 2023, the vesting date; (G) one-third of Ms. Ruemmler’s April 2020 RSUs between December 31, 2022 and retaining talent.

December 31, 2023; and (H) one-third of Ms. Ruemmler’s April 2020 RSUs between December 31,

64
68
   Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders   GOLDMAN SACHS

COMPENSATION MATTERS—PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURE
2022 and December 31, 2023, the vesting date; (iv) added $614,365, the average value of the dividends paid to the 2023 Other NEOs, including: (A) Mr. Waldron in respect of his 2019 Year-End PSUs prior to the vesting of such PSUs; and (B) Ms. Ruemmler in respect of one-third of her 2020 Year-End RSUs and one-third of her April 2020 RSUs, in each case, prior to the vesting of such RSUs; and (v) deducted $11,032 the average aggregate change in the actuarial present value of our 2023 Other NEOs’ accumulated benefits under the GS Pension Plan and GS U.K. Retirement Plan. There are no applicable service costs or prior service costs under the GS Pension Plan or the GS U.K. Retirement Plan.
(h)
Pursuant to SEC rules, no footnote disclosure has been provided with respect to fiscal years 2020-2022, except where it is material to understanding the Pay Versus Performance for fiscal year 2023.
“Compensation Actually Paid” (CAP) Versus Performance Measures
In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following graphic description of the relationships between information presented in the Pay Versus Performance table, reflecting changes from 2020-2021, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 unless otherwise noted.
LOGO
231% 183% 129% 107% 85% 73% 60% 32% 33% 18% 26% 24% 48% 46% 56% 60% 54 72% Peer GS ROE Net Non-PEO PEO Peer GS ROE Net Non-PEO PEO Peer GS ROE Net Non-PEO PEO Group TSR % (YoY%) Income Avg. CAP CAP Group TSR % (YoY%) Income Avg. CAP CAP Group TSR % (YoY%) Income Avg. CAP CAP TSR % (2020 - (YoY%) (YoY%) (YoY%) TSR % (2020 - (YoY%) (YoY%) (YoY%) TSR % (2020 - (YoY%) (YoY%) (YoY (2020 - 2021) (2020 - 2022) (2020 - 2023) 2021)* 2022)* 2023)* FYE 2021 FYE 2022 FYE 2023 * Peer Group TSR reflects total shareholder return of S&P 500 Financials Index.
  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs     |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
69


COMPENSATION MATTERS—NON-EMPLOYEEDIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

 

2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation Program

 

2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 2023 Director Compensation Program

As we disclosed inIn 2021, our proxy statement last year, we made a change to significantly lowershareholders approved an amended and restated SIP, which fixed the total amount of compensation for our non-employee directors, starting with our 2020 Director Compensation Program. As we previously committed to do, we also included a fixed amount of annual director compensation infor service on our Board. Consistent with our SIP, for which we are seeking shareholder approval at our 2021 Annual Meeting (see —Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)).

Our 20202023 Director Compensation Program consisted of:

 

  

COMPONENTS OF DIRECTOR

COMPENSATION PROGRAM
FOR 2020 SERVICE
Components of Director Compensation Program 
for 2023 Service
(a)

 ANNUAL VALUE OF AWARD

 Annual Value of  

 Award 

 FORM OF PAYMENT

Form and Timing of Payment

Annual RSU Grant

$350,000

 

1,205 RSUs

Annual Retainer $350,000

 

$100,000

RSUs, granted annually in arrears(b)

Annual Retainer

 

345

 $100,000

RSUs or $100,000,cash, as per director election, paid quarterly in arrears(c)

Total Annual Base Compensation

 

$450,000 (reduced from $575,000)

 $450,000

 

Committee Chair Fee (if applicable)

$25,000

 

87

  $25,000

RSUs or $25,000,cash, as per director election, paid quarterly in arrears(c)

 

(a)

Compensation is prorated, as applicable, according to the number of months served. In connection with Board service, our directors do not receive any incremental fees for attending Board or Committee meetings or serving on special committees formed from time to time, andtime. Mr. Solomon does not participate in our Director Compensation Program and did not receive any incremental compensation for service on our Board.

While our Director Compensation Program has always been designed to attract and retain highly qualified and diverse directors and align director interests with long-term shareholder interests (as further described in —Key Features of Director Compensation), the decision to make this significant reduction in compensation levels, beginning with the 2020 Director Compensation Program, was the result of a targeted review of the quantum and design of our Director Compensation Program, initiated at the direction of our Lead Director.

The table below indicates the elements and total amount of compensation determined by our Board to be awarded to each non-employee director for services performed in 2020.

NAME

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

TOTAL COMPENSATION ($)

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Drew Faust

Mark Flaherty

Lakshmi Mittal

Jan Tighe

David Viniar

Annual Grant in RSUs(a)

Annual Retainer(b)

450,000

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS – COMMITTEE CHAIRS

Michele Burns

Ellen Kullman

Adebayo Ogunlesi

Peter Oppenheimer

Mark Winkelman

Annual Grant in RSUs(a)

Annual Retainer(b)

Committee Chair Fee(b)

475,000 Directors who also serve on the board of one of our subsidiaries also receive (as applicable) $50,000 for service as a subsidiary board member or $100,000 for service as a subsidiary board chair.

 

(a)(b)

GrantedRSUs granted on January 20, 2021.17, 2024 for service in 2023.

 

(b)(c)

Paid inRSU grants and cash payments were made quarterly (with RSU grants made on each of April 19, 2023, July 20, 2023, October 18, 2023 and January 17, 2024) over the formcourse of cash and/or RSUs per director election as described above. RSUs were granted on January 20, 2021. Cash was paid quarterly, in arrears, during 2020.the year.

In December 2020,2023, our Governance Committee reviewed the form and amount of the Director Compensation Program and recommended that the Board set the 20212024 Director Compensation Program in an amountunchanged from 20202023 levels. In connection with this review, the Governance Committee took into account:

 

  

Advice from its independent consultant, including with respect to benchmarking on the form, structure and amount of peer director compensationcompensation;

 

  

The amount and structure of the compensation programprogram;

 

  

Feedback from stakeholdersstakeholders; and

 

  

Commitments made in connection with the priorAugust 2020 settlement of the director compensation litigation, including the commitment to include a fixed amount ofthat annual director compensation for service on our Board not exceed the current levels fixed in the SIP not in excess of current levels

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS65


COMPENSATION MATTERS—NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

KEY FEATURES OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

KEY FEATURES OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONSIP.

 

 

Key Features of Director Compensation

  Is designed to attract and retain highlyqualified qualified and diverse directors

  Appropriately values the significant time commitment required of our directors

 

  Appropriately values the significanttime commitment required of our non-employee directors

  Effectively and meaningfully aligns interests of directors with long-termshareholder interests

 

  Recognizes thehighly regulatedand complex nature of our global business and the requisite skills and experience represented among our Board members

 

  Takes into account thefocuson Board governance and oversight atof financial firms

 

  Reflects the shared responsibility of all directors

 

  

 

 

 Significant Time commitment ByCommitment by Directors 

 

  
 LOGO

LOGO

    
   

 

In addition to preparation for and attendance at Board and Committee meetings, our directors are engaged in a variety of other ways, including:

 

  Receiving and reviewing postings on significant developments and  weekly informational packages

 

  Communicating and meeting with each other, senior management  and key employees around the globe

 

  Meeting with our regulators

 

  Participating in firm and industry conferences and other external  engagements on behalf of the Board

 

  Engaging with investors (our Lead Director and Compensation Committee Chair)other directors as  may be appropriate from time to time)

 

For additional information, see Corporate Governance  Serving on subsidiary boards, as applicable

Structure of our Board and Governance Practices

70

Commitment of our Board.

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


COMPENSATION MATTERS—DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

 

   Highlights of Our Director  Compensation Program  

Program features emphasize long-term alignment between director and shareholder interests.

 

What We Do

LOGO   Emphasis on Equity Compensation:

   The majority of director compensation is in the form
 of vested equity-based awards (RSUs). Directors
 may elect to receive 100% of their director
 compensation in the form of RSUs

 

LOGO   Hold-through Retirement Requirement:

  Non-employee directors

»   Directors must hold all RSUs granted to them
during their entire tenure

 

»   Shares of Common Stock underlying the
RSUs do not deliver until after a director’s
retirement

 

LOGO    Equity Ownership Requirements:

    All non-employee directorsDirectors are required to own at least 5,000
  shares
of Common Stock or vested RSUs, with a
  
five-year
transition period for new directors

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Maximum of 30% in cash, if elected by director Minimum of 70% equity compensation

 

What We Don’t Do

 

×LOGO

No fees for attending meetings — meetings—attendance is expected and compensation is not dependent on Board meeting schedule

 

×LOGO

No fees for membership on special committees formed from time to time

 

×LOGO

No undue focus on short-term stock performance — director pay aligns with compensation philosophy, not short-term fluctuations in stock price

 

×LOGO

No hedging or pledging of RSUs permitted

 

×LOGO

No hedging of shares of Common Stock permitted

 

×LOGO

No director has shares of Common Stock subject to a pledge

 

Maximum of no more than 30% in cash, if elected by Director Minimum of at least 70% Equity Compensation

 

66GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

RETENTION OF INDEPENDENT NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION CONSULTANTRetention of Independent Director Compensation Consultant

In 2020,2023, our Governance Committee reappointed FW Cook, a compensation consultant, to conduct an independent review of ournon-employee Director Compensation Program. FW Cook assessed the structure of our Director Compensation Program and its value compared to competitive market practices, taking into account the emphasis on equity compensation, the hold-thoughhold-through retirement requirement and other restrictions on the RSUs, as well as the August 2020 resolution of the director compensation litigation and the inclusion of a fixed amount of annual director compensation specified in the SIP.SIP, which was approved by our shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting.

FW Cook determined that the Director Compensation Program remained competitive with the market and continued to align the interests of our non-employeedirectors with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

Our Governance Committee determined that FW Cook is independent and does not havehas no conflicts of interest in providing services to our Governance Committee.

 

DIRECTOR SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE2023 Director Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the 2020 compensation for ournon-employee directors as determined by SEC rules, which require us to include equity awards grantedduring 2020 2023 and cash compensationearned for 2020. Historically, we have 2023. As noted above, the Annual Retainer and/or Committee Chair Fee is paid or granted equity-based awards to our non-employee directors for a particular yearquarterly, in arrears, and the Annual Grant is made shortly after that year’s end.year-end. Accordingly, this table includes RSUs granted in January 2020 for services performed in 2019 pursuant to our 2019 Director Compensation Program and levels and cash paid during 2020 (quarterly, in arrears) for services performed in 2020 for those directors who elected to receive cash payments.includes:

                                                                                                                                        
    
  FEES EARNED OR
  PAID IN CASH ($)
(a)  
  STOCK AWARDS  ($)(b)  

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION ($)(c)

  TOTAL ($) 
     

Michele Burns

 

 

                                 125,000  

 

 

 

                                 500,189  

 

 

 

                                 19,727  

 

 

 

                                 644,916

 

     

Drew Faust

 

 

100,000  

 

 

 

500,189  

 

 

 

16,000  

 

 

 

616,189

 

     

Mark Flaherty

 

 

100,000  

 

 

 

500,189  

 

 

 

20,000  

 

 

 

620,189

 

     

Ellen Kullman

 

 

—  

 

 

 

592,086  

 

 

 

20,000  

 

 

 

612,086

 

     

Lakshmi Mittal

 

 

—  

 

 

 

575,355  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

575,355

 

     

Adebayo Ogunlesi

 

 

—  

 

 

 

600,577  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

600,577

 

     

Peter Oppenheimer

 

 

—  

 

 

 

600,577  

 

 

 

20,000  

 

 

 

620,577

 

     

Jan Tighe

 

 

—  

 

 

 

500,189  

 

 

 

10,000  

 

 

 

510,189

 

     

David Viniar

 

 

100,000  

 

 

 

500,189  

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

600,189

 

     

Mark Winkelman

 

 

—  

 

 

 

600,577  

 

 

 

45,000  

 

 

 

645,577

 

 

(a)

RSUs granted in January 2023 (2022 Annual Grant, and the fourth quarter grant of the 2022 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, Committee Chair Fee) for services performed in 2022 for directors who elected RSUs;

RSUs granted during 2023 (the first three quarters of the 2023 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, Committee Chair Fee) for services performed in 2023 for directors who elected RSUs; and

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

71


COMPENSATION MATTERS—DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

Cash earned for services performed in 2023 (2023 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, Committee Chair Fee) for directors who elected cash.

This table also includes information in “All Other Compensation” on compensation received by certain directors who also serve on the board of one of our subsidiaries, in recognition of the additional time and workload associated with these roles.

    
  

 

 2023 Fees
 Earned or Paid   
 in Cash ($)(a)  

 

 Stock Awards ($) 

 All Other
 Compensation ($)(d)(e)

 

 

 

 

 Total ($) 

 

   2022 Program(b)  2023 Program(c)  Total   

Michele Burns

 

 100,000

 

 349,788

 

    —

 

 349,788

 

 61,667

 

 511,445

Drew Faust*

 

  33,333

 

 349,788

 

    —

 

 349,788

 

 20,000

 

 403,121

Mark Flaherty

 

 100,000

 

 349,788

 

    —

 

 349,788

 

 20,000

 

 469,788

Kimberley Harris

 

 118,750

 

 349,788

 

    —

 

 349,788

 

 20,000

 

 488,538

Kevin Johnson

 

     —

 

 112,058

 

 75,591

 

 187,649

 

 24,227

 

 211,876

Ellen Kullman

 

 125,000

 

 380,159

 

    —

 

 380,159

 

 20,000

 

 525,159

Lakshmi Mittal

 

     —

 

 374,224

 

 75,591

 

 449,815

 

    —

 

 449,815

Thomas Montag

 

  50,000

 

     —

 

    —

 

     —

 

  5,000

 

  55,000

Adebayo Ogunlesi

 

     —

 

 380,159

 

 94,312

 

 474,471

 

    —

 

 474,471

Peter Oppenheimer

 

     —

 

 380,159

 

 94,312

 

 474,471

 

 91,212

 

 565,683

Jan Tighe

 

 100,000

 

 374,224

 

    —

 

 374,224

 

 49,524

 

 523,748

Jessica Uhl

 

 100,000

 

 374,224

 

    —

 

 374,224

 

 20,000

 

 494,224

David Viniar

 

 125,000

 

 349,788

 

    —

 

 349,788

 

 20,000

 

 494,788

Mark Winkelman*

 

  10,417

 

 380,159

 

 31,331

 

 411,490

 

 24,167

 

 446,073

*

Drew Faust and Mark Winkelman retired from our Board at the 2023 Annual Meeting.

(a)

Includes 2023 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, 2023 Committee Chair Fee. For 2020,2023, Ms. BurnsKullman and Mr. Viniar elected to receive their Annual Retainers and Committee Chair Fees in cash; Ms. Harris elected to receive her annual retainerAnnual Retainer and prorated Committee Chair feeFee in cash; Ms. Burns, Mr. Flaherty, Vice Admiral Tighe and Ms. Uhl elected to receive their Annual Retainers in cash and Dr. Faust and Messrs. Flaherty and ViniarMr. Montag elected to receive their annual retainersprorated Annual Retainers in cash. Mr. Winkelman received a portion of his 2023 Annual Retainer and Chair Fee in RSUs per his election and a portion in cash pursuant to the terms of the award agreement in light of his retirement.

 

(b)

TheIncludes 2022 Annual Grant and, as applicable, the fourth quarter grant of the 2022 Annual Retainer and/or Committee Chair Fee. These values reflect the grant date fair value of RSUs granted on January 16, 202018, 2023 for service in 2019 was2022 based on the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on the date of grant ($249.72)349.09). These RSUs were vested upon grant and provide for delivery of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the first eligible trading day in the third quarter of the yearthat is at least 90 days following the year of the director’s retirement from our Board. For 2022, Messrs. Ogunlesi, Oppenheimer and Winkelman and Ms. Kullman elected to receive their Annual Retainers and Committee Chair Fees in RSUs; Mr. Mittal, Vice Admiral Tighe and Ms. Uhl elected to receive their Annual Retainers in RSUs; and Mr. Johnson elected to receive his prorated annual retainer in RSUs.

 

(c)

Includes 2023 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, 2023 Committee Chair Fee. These values reflect the grant date fair value of RSUs granted for the first through third quarters during 2023 for service in 2023. The grant date fair value of these RSUs was based on the closing price per share of Common Stock on the NYSE on each applicable grant date: April 19, 2023 ($336.89), July 20, 2023 ($350.86) and October 18, 2023 ($301.96). These RSUs were vested upon grant and provide for delivery of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the first eligible trading day that is at least 90 days following the director’s retirement from our Board. RSUs in respect of the fourth quarter grant of the 2023 Annual Retainer and 2023 Annual Committee Chair Fee, as well as the 2023 Annual Grant, were granted on January 17, 2024 and are not required to be disclosed in this table but will be reflected in the 2024 Director Summary Compensation table in our proxy statement for our 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, per SEC rules.

(d)

These values reflect the amounts that were donated to charities by our firm to match personal donations made by non-employee directors in connection with requests by these directors made prior to March 1, 2021February 26, 2024 under the Goldman Sachs employee matching gift program for 2020.2023. We allow our directors to participate in our employee matching gift program on the same terms as our non-PMD employees, matching gifts of up to $20,000 per participating individual.

(e)

In addition to the amounts donated to charities as described in footnote (d) above, our directors who serve on a board of one of our subsidiaries receive a cash retainer of $50,000 for service as a subsidiary member (Ms. Burns, Vice Admiral Tighe and Mr. Johnson and, formerly, Mr. Winkelman) or $100,000 for service as a subsidiary board chair (Mr. Oppenheimer). The subsidiary board retainer may be paid at the director’s election in RSUs (with any such RSUs granted consistent with the RSUs described in footnote (c) above, and providing for delivery of the underlying shares of Common Stock on the first eligible trading day that is at least 90 days following the director’s retirement from the applicable subsidiary board). The subsidiary board retainer is prorated, as applicable, according to the number of months served. For Ms. Burns and Mr. Winkelman, the amount also represents an annualamounts included represent their respective cash fee of $25,000retainers for his service as a member of the board of directors of our subsidiary, Goldman Sachs International board service during 2020.2023, and for Messrs. Johnson and Oppenheimer and Vice Admiral Tighe, the amounts represent the value of RSUs granted during 2023 (for the first through third quarters) in respect of their 2023 GS Bank board service.

Please refer toBeneficial Ownership for information pertaining to the outstanding equity awards (all of which are vested) held by each non-employeedirector as of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024, including RSUs granted in January 20212024 (for the 2023 Annual Grant, the fourth quarter grant for the 2023 Annual Retainer and, as applicable, Committee Chair Fee and the fourth quarter grant for the 2023 subsidiary retainer, as applicable) for services performed in 2020.2023.

For more information on the work of our Board and its Committees, see Corporate Governance.

 

72

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS67


COMPENSATIONAUDIT MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVALRATIFICATION OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2024

 

KEY FACTS ABOUT OUR 2021 SIPASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Audit Matters

Item 3. ApprovalRatification of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated SIP (2021)PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024

 

 

 

Proposal Snapshot –Snapshot— Item 3. ApprovalRatification of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

What is being voted on: The approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021).

Board recommendation: Our Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR the approval of the 2021 SIP.

KEY FACTS ABOUT OUR 2021 SIP

On February 26, 2021, upon the recommendation of our Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors unanimously approved the 2021 SIP, subject to approval by our shareholders at this Annual Meeting.

  Key Facts about our 2021 SIP 

3

Year extension of our equity plan

20 million

New shares being requested

LOGO


Fixed amount of non-employee director compensation added

  Key changes to our 2021 SIP include:

»  Extending the term of the plan an additional three years beyond the current term of our 2018 SIP.

»  Requesting an increase of 20 million in the number of shares authorized for issuance under the plan. In light of shareholder engagement regarding our equity grant practices, this is the first time we are requesting new shares for our SIP approval since 2015.

»  As previously announced, adding a fixed amount of annual compensation for each non-employee director.

Equity-based awards play a fundamental role in aligning our compensation with our shareholders’ interests and regulatory requirements. Without a shareholder-approved equity plan, we would be reliant on cash-settled awards as our sole method of incentive-based compensation.

»  We believe that equity-based compensation provides employees, directors, officers and consultants or other service providers with long-term exposure to the firm’s performance, aligns recipients’ interests with those of our shareholders and discourages imprudent risk-taking; equity-based awards represent a larger portion of our compensation expense than for any of our U.S.-based Peers.

»  Our regulators across the globe, including the Federal Reserve Board in the U.S. and the Prudential Regulation Authority and the Financial Conduct Authority in the U.K., expect that a substantial portion of variable compensation awarded to executives and certain other employees will be equity-based.

  The 2021 SIP continues to include features designed to protect shareholder interests and to reflect our Compensation Principles.

No “evergreen” provision (i.e., no automatic increase in the number of shares available under the plan)

Double-trigger change in control provisions that do not accelerate vesting, delivery or transferability based on a change in control alone

No hedging or pledging of equity-based awards

No repricing or below-market grants of stock options and SARs

50%  change in control and merger consummation thresholds

For detailed information on the vote required for this matter and the choices available for casting your vote, please see Frequently Asked Questions.

68GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

STRONG TRACK RECORD OF MITIGATING DILUTION

STRONG TRACK RECORD OF MITIGATING DILUTION

In light of the importance of equity-based compensation to our firm, shareholders and regulators, we have developed an active capital management program to offset potential dilution.

Since the end of 2009, our Common Stock outstanding has declined 33% to a year-end record low as a result of our strong track record of returning capital to shareholders.

This practice allows us to effectively manage dilution, but results in a higher burn rate.

Historical Burn Rate. Our equity-based compensation program results in a relatively high burn rate because of the broad-based participation of our employees and the higher percentage of our compensation and benefits expense that is equity-based compared to our U.S.-based Peers. Our burn rate is further inflated because of our strong history of buying back shares, which lowers our shares outstanding and consequently increases the burn rate. However, our share repurchases help us to return capital to shareholders and historically have been accretive to EPS and ROE. Since the end of 2009, our Common Stock outstanding has declined 33% to a year-end record low of 344.1 million shares. The graph below demonstrates our leading management of shares outstanding post-crisis and our efforts to mitigate dilution through buybacks.

Change in Common Stock Outstanding (2009YE–2020YE)

LOGO

MS BAC WFC JPM BK C GS -33% -27% -27% -23% -20% -13%(a) 33%

(a)

BAC 2009 common shares outstanding includes 1,286 million shares relating to common equivalent securities, which were converted to common stock in February 2010. Excluding these shares, BAC’s common shares outstanding were flat from 2009 to 2020.

The following table further illustrates how share repurchases have offset increases in our Common Stock outstanding:

     
 201820192020TOTAL/AVERAGE
     
(a) Equity-based awards granted(1)9,230,782  12,077,810  8,923,713  30,232,305  
     
(b) Shares repurchased(2)(13,946,896)  (25,828,620)  (8,157,152)  (47,932,668)  
     
(c) Common Stock outstanding367,741,973  347,343,184  344,088,725  —  
     
(d) Common Stock outstanding (adjusted for cumulative repurchases since 2000)(3)

 

889,062,439  

 

894,492,270  

 

899,394,963  

 

—  

     
(e) Unadjusted burn rate (a/c)(4)2.5%  3.5%  2.6%  2.9%(5)   
     
(f) Burn rate adjusted for share repurchases (a/d)(4)1.0%  1.4%  1.0%  1.1%(5)   

(1)

Reflects the gross number of shares underlying equity-based awards granted during the applicable year. In relation to 2020 year-end, during the first quarter of 2021, the firm granted to its employees 9.0 million RSUs. These awards are not included in the 2020 equity-based awards granted in the table above. For more information on our share repurchase program and our 2020 equity-based awards, see Notes 19 and 29, respectively, to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of our 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2)

Repurchases are subject to the approval of the Federal Reserve Board in the U.S. and past levels of repurchases do not guarantee any particular rate of repurchase in the future.

(3)

We repurchased approximately 555.3 million shares of Common Stock from the beginning of 2000 through December 31, 2020.

(4)

Not adjusted for any future forfeitures or cancellation of awards to satisfy tax withholding requirements, which would further reduce the burn rate if taken into account. During 2018-2020, approximately 40% of share-based awards were canceled or remitted at delivery to satisfy tax withholding requirements.

(5)

Average of underlying figures.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS69


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

2018–2020 Average Burn Rate*

2020 Burn Rate*

LOGO

LOGO

Unadjusted Adjusted for Repurchases Unadjusted Adjusted for Repurchases 2.9% 1.1% 2.6% 1.0%

*

Not adjusted for any future forfeitures or cancellation of awards to satisfy tax withholding requirements, which would further reduce the burn rate if taken into account. During 2018-2020, approximately 40% of share-based awards were canceled or remitted at delivery to satisfy tax withholding requirements.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2020 and as of March 1, 2021 regarding securities to be issued on exercise of outstanding stock options or pursuant to outstanding RSUs and securities remaining available for issuance under our 2018 SIP and its predecessor plans (referred to herein as the 2003 SIP, the 2013 SIP and the 2015 SIP), the only equity plans that remained in effect between January 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021.

     
      

NUMBER OF SECURITIES

TO BE ISSUED

UPON EXERCISE OF

OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,

WARRANTS AND RIGHTS

(#)(a)

   

WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE

OF OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS ($)
(b)

   NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE
FOR FUTURE ISSUANCE
UNDER EQUITY
COMPENSATION PLANS
(EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN THE
SECOND COLUMN) (#)
 
        
    

PLAN

 

CATEGORY     

 

AS OF

 

12/31/20

  

AS OF

 

3/1/21

   

AS OF

 

12/31/20

   

AS OF

 

3/1/21

   

AS OF

 

12/31/20

   

AS OF

 

3/1/21

 
        

Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders

  

2003 SIP

 

 

17,398

 

 

 

17,398

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

2013 SIP

 

 

34,185

 

 

 

34,185

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

2015 SIP

 

 

2,584,082

 

 

 

850,534

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

2018 SIP

 

 

16,751,334

 

 

 

19,673,828

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

55,515,851(c)

 

  

 

49,690,782(c)

 

        
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders  

None

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

        
Total    

 

19,386,999

 

 

 

20,575,945

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

55,515,851

 

  

 

49,690,782

 

(a)

Represents shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to outstanding RSUs and PSUs, as applicable. These awards are subject to vesting and other conditions to the extent set forth in the respective award agreements, and the underlying shares, in each case, will be delivered net of any required tax withholding.

(b)

No options are outstanding. Shares underlying RSUs and PSUs are deliverable without the payment of any consideration, and thus no information is reportable.

(c)

Represents shares remaining to be issued under the 2018 SIP as of the applicable date, excluding shares reflected in the corresponding entry under the second column. The total number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to awards granted under the 2018 SIP cannot exceed 73 million shares.

70GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE 2021 SIP

 SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE 2021 SIP

In assessing the appropriate terms of the 2021 SIP, our Compensation Committee considered, among other items, the existing terms of the 2018 SIP, our compensation philosophy and practices, feedback from our shareholders, feedback from our regulators on our philosophy and practices, as well as input from FW Cook, the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant and settlement of the non-employee director litigation.

The following summary of the material terms of the 2021 SIP is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2021 SIP, which is attached hereto as Annex C.

Purpose. The purposes of the 2021 SIP are to:

Attract, retain and motivate officers, directors, employees (including prospective employees), consultants and others who may perform services for Goldman Sachs, to compensate them for their contributions to the long-term growth and profits of Goldman Sachs and to encourage them to acquire a proprietary interest in our success;

Align the interests of officers, directors, employees, consultants and other service providers with those of our shareholders;

Assist us in ensuring that our compensation program does not provide incentives to take imprudent risks; and

Comply with regulatory requirements.

Types of Awards. The 2021 SIP provides for grants of the following specific types of awards, and also permits other equity-based or equity-related awards (each, an Award and, collectively, Awards). Each Award will be evidenced by an award agreement (together with any award statement or supplemental documents, an Award Agreement), which will govern that Award’s terms and conditions.

RSUs. An RSU is an unfunded, unsecured promise to deliver a share of Common Stock (or cash or other securities or property) at a future date in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the Award Agreement (including, with respect to our PSUs, satisfaction of performance-based conditions).

Restricted Shares. A Restricted Share, including a Share at Risk, is a share of Common Stock that is registered in the recipient’s name, but that is subject to transfer restrictions, forfeiture provisions and/or other terms and conditions as specified in the Award Agreement. The recipient of a Restricted Share has the rights of a shareholder, including voting and dividend rights, subject to any restrictions and conditions specified in the Award Agreement.

Dividend Equivalent Rights. A Dividend Equivalent Right represents an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay to the recipient an amount equal to all or any portion of the regular cash dividends that would be paid on shares of Common Stock if those shares were owned by the recipient. A Dividend Equivalent Right may be granted alone or in connection with another Award. Under the 2021 SIP, no payments will be made in respect of Dividend Equivalent Rights at a time when any applicable performance goals relating to the Dividend Equivalent Right or the related Award have not been satisfied.

Options and SARs. An option entitles the recipient to purchase a share of Common Stock at an exercise price specified in the Award Agreement (including through a cashless exercise). The 2021 SIP permits grants of options that qualify as “incentive stock options” under Section 422 of the Code (ISOs) and nonqualified stock options. A SAR may entitle the recipient to receive shares of Common Stock, cash or other property on the exercise date having a value equal to the excess of market value of the underlying Common Stock over the exercise price specified in the Award Agreement. Options and SARs will become exercisable as and when specified in the Award Agreement but not later than 10 years after the date of grant. The 2021 SIP provides that we may not reset the exercise price for options and SARs and that we may not issue any options or SARs with an exercise price less than the lesser of the closing price and the average of the high and low sale prices of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE, each on the date of grant. Grants of options and SARs are subject to the individual limits described below.

Eligibility. The 2021 SIP permits grants of Awards to individuals in the following classes of persons: (1) any current or prospective director of Goldman Sachs, (2) any current or prospective officer or employee of Goldman Sachs, (3) any current or prospective consultant or other service provider to Goldman Sachs, and (4) any former director, officer or employee of, or consultant or other service provider to, Goldman Sachs solely with respect to

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS71


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE 2021 SIP

their final year of service to the firm. As of December 31, 2020, Goldman Sachs had 11 directors, 9 executive officers, approximately 40,500 employees and approximately 5,300 consultants or other service providers to Goldman Sachs who are, in each case, eligible to participate in the 2021 SIP.

Term. The 2021 SIP will terminate at, and no more Awards will be permitted to be granted thereunder without further shareholder approval on or after, the date of our annual meeting of shareholders that occurs in 2025. The termination of the 2021 SIP will not affect previously granted Awards.

Administration. The 2021 SIP generally will be administered by our Compensation Committee (and those to whom it delegates authority), unless our Board determines otherwise. For purposes of this summary, we refer to the committee that administers the 2021 SIP, and to any person or group to whom this committee delegates authority, as the “Committee.” The Committee is granted broad discretion to make awards under the 2021 SIP and to interpret and implement the 2021 SIP. In exercising this authority, the Committee (and to the extent exercised by the Board, the Board) will have no liability for any action taken or omitted to be taken in good faith. This means that no person, including grantees or Goldman Sachs shareholders, may hold the members of the Committee (or the Board) personally liable for their good faith actions or omissions taken under the 2021 SIP. Our Board, in its sole discretion, also may grant Awards or administer the 2021 SIP.

Shares Subject to the Plan; Other Limitations of Awards. Up to approximately 70 million shares of Common Stock may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the 2021 SIP (i.e., 20 million shares plus the additional approximately 50 million that remain available for issuance under the 2018 SIP). These shares may be newly issued shares or treasury shares. Each Award or share of Common Stock underlying an Award will count as one share of Common Stock for these purposes. If any Award granted under the 2021 SIP, 2018 SIP, 2015 SIP or 2013 SIP is forfeited, otherwise terminated or canceled without the delivery of shares of Common Stock, shares of Common Stock are surrendered or withheld from any Award (including to satisfy federal, state, local or foreign taxes) or shares of Common Stock are tendered to pay the exercise price of any Award granted under the 2021 SIP, 2018 SIP, 2015 SIP or 2013 SIP, then the shares covered by such forfeited, terminated or canceled Award or equal to the number of shares surrendered, withheld or tendered will again become available to be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the 2021 SIP. In the case of an acquisition, any shares of Common Stock that we deliver with respect to an Award that we become obligated to make through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired entity will not count against the shares of Common Stock available to be delivered pursuant to Awards under the 2021 SIP.

No more than 24 million shares of Common Stock may be delivered under the 2021 SIP pursuant to the exercise of ISOs.

In the event of any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock (or issuance of shares of stock other than shares of Common Stock) resulting from certain corporate transactions that affect the capitalization of Goldman Sachs, the Committee will adjust the number of shares of Common Stock issuable under the 2021 SIP and the terms of any outstanding Awards in such manner as it deems appropriate to prevent the enlargement or dilution of rights.

As of March 1, 2021, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the NYSE was $329.92.

Fixed Amount of Non-Employee Director Compensation. The 2021 SIP fixes annual compensation for each non-employee director at an amount equal to $450,000, in the case of a non-employee director who does not serve as a chair of a committee, and $475,000, in the case of a non-employee director who serves as a committee chair. For additional detail on our non-employee director compensation program, see —Non-Employee Director Compensation Program.

Amendment. The Board may, at any time, suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the 2021 SIP in any respect whatsoever, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights, duties or obligations of any recipients of Awards. In general, we will seek shareholder approval: (1) for any suspension, discontinuance, revision or amendment only to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation, or (2) for any amendment to increase the fixed amount of annual non-employee director compensation.

72GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL TERMS OF THE 2021 SIP

Double-Trigger Change in Control. The Committee may include provisions in any Award Agreement relating to a Change in Control, including the acceleration of the vesting, delivery or exercisability of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of goals with respect to, any outstanding Awards. No such acceleration, lapse or deemed satisfaction may occur with respect to a Change in Control unless (in addition to any other conditions set forth in the Award Agreement):

The Change in Control occurs; and

The recipient’s employment is terminated by us without Cause or by the recipient for Good Reason within 18 months following the Change in Control.

“Change in Control,” “Cause” and “Good Reason” are defined in the 2021 SIP and, unless the Award Agreement indicates otherwise, have the same meanings set forth above under —Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

No Hedging, Pledging or Transferring Awards. Except as provided in the Award Agreement, no Award (or any rights and obligations thereunder) granted to any person under the 2021 SIP may be sold, transferred, pledged, hedged, exchanged, assigned, hypothecated, fractionalized or otherwise disposed of (including through the use of any cash-settled instrument) other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and all Awards (and any rights thereunder) shall be exercisable during the life of the recipient only by the recipient or by the recipient’s legal representative. The Committee may adopt procedures pursuant to which some or all recipients of RSUs or Restricted Shares may transfer some or all of these Awards through a gift for no consideration to any immediate family member or a trust in which the recipient and/ or the recipient’s immediate family members in the aggregate have 100% (or such lesser amount as determined by the Committee from time to time) of the beneficial interest (as determined pursuant to such procedures), provided that the Award will continue to remain subject to the same terms and conditions. In addition, the Committee may adopt procedures pursuant to which a recipient may be permitted to bequeath some or all of the recipient’s outstanding RSUs under the recipient’s will to a charitable organization.

Repayment. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the 2021 SIP and the Award Agreement in respect of an Award were not satisfied, then the recipient will be obligated immediately upon our demand, as determined by us in our sole discretion, (i) either to (A) return to us the number of shares of Common Stock received under the Award or (B) pay us an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares determined at the time of delivery for RSUs or at vesting or transferability for Restricted Shares, in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock or amount applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such shares (other than the payment of an exercise price), and (ii) to repay to us property or cash received under any Dividend Equivalent Rights.

Right of Offset. We have the right to offset against our obligation to (i) deliver shares of Common Stock (or other property or cash), (ii) release restrictions and/or other terms and conditions in respect of Restricted Shares or (iii) pay dividends or make payments under Dividend Equivalent Rights (granted alone or in connection with any Award), in each case, under the 2021 SIP or any Award Agreement, any outstanding amounts the recipient then owes to us and any amounts the Committee otherwise deems appropriate pursuant to any tax equalization policy or agreement. Our right to offset is subject to the constraints of Section 409A of the Code.

Other Terms of Awards. No recipient of any Award under the 2021 SIP will have any of the rights of a shareholder of Goldman Sachs with respect to shares subject to an Award until the delivery of the shares. Awards under the 2021 SIP may be granted in lieu of, or determined by reference to, cash bonus and/or other compensation.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS73


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

NEW PLAN BENEFITS

NEW PLAN BENEFITS

The amount of each participant’s Awards, if any, for 2021 will be determined in the discretion of the Committee and therefore cannot be calculated. As a result, we cannot determine the number or type of Awards that will be granted under the 2021 SIP to any participant for 2021. The RSUs and/or PSUs granted for 2020 compensation, which would not have changed if the 2021 SIP had been in place instead of the 2018 SIP, were as follows:

NAME AND POSITION      DOLLAR VALUE    
($)
(a)
      NUMBER OF UNITS  
(#)

David M. Solomon, Chairman and CEO

10.9 million

37,354

John E. Waldron, President and COO

10.0 million

34,393

Stephen M. Scherr, CFO

8.2 million

28,196

John F.W. Rogers, EVP

6.6 million

22,722

Karen P. Seymour, Former EVP and General Counsel

5.1 million

17,558

Current executive officers as a group

59.7 million

205,395

Current non-employee directors as a group

4.2 million

14,468

Employees other than executive officers as a group

2.6 billion

8.8 million

(a)

Dollar value reflects the gross number of RSUs and/or PSUs granted by our Board and/or Compensation Committee multiplied by the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the applicable grant date.

U.S. FEDERAL TAX IMPLICATIONS OF RSUS, RESTRICTED SHARES, OPTIONS AND SARS

The following is a brief description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences generally arising with respect to the grant of RSUs, Restricted Shares, stock options and SARs. This description is not intended to, and does not, provide or supplement tax advice to recipients of Awards. Recipients are advised to consult with their own independent tax advisors with respect to the specific tax consequences that, in light of their particular circumstances, might arise in connection with their receipt of Awards under the 2021 SIP, including any state, local or foreign tax consequences and the effect, if any, of gift, estate and inheritance taxes.

RSUs. A recipient of an RSU (whether time-vested or subject to achievement of performance goals) will not be subject to income taxation at grant. Instead, the recipient will be subject to income tax at ordinary rates on the fair market value of the Common Stock (or the amount of cash) received on the date of delivery. The recipient will be subject to FICA (Social Security and Medicare) tax at the time any portion of such Award is deemed vested for tax purposes. The fair market value of the Common Stock (if any) received on the delivery date will be the recipient’s tax basis for purposes of determining any subsequent gain or loss from the sale of the Common Stock, and the recipient’s holding period with respect to such Common Stock will begin at the delivery date. Gain or loss resulting from any sale of Common Stock delivered to a recipient will be treated as long- or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period.

Restricted Shares. A recipient of a Restricted Share will be subject to income tax at ordinary rates, as well as FICA (Social Security and Medicare) tax, on the fair market value of the Common Stock (or the amount of cash) on the date that the Award is deemed vested for tax purposes (which may be the same as the grant date). The fair market value of the Common Stock (if any) on this date will be the recipient’s tax basis for purposes of determining any subsequent gain or loss from the sale of the Common Stock, and the recipient’s holding period with respect to such Common Stock will begin on such date. Gain or loss resulting from any sale of Common Stock underlying an award of Restricted Shares will be treated as long- or short-term capital gain or loss depending on the holding period.

If permitted by the applicable award agreement, pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Code and the regulations thereunder and solely to the extent the Restricted Shares are not considered vested for tax purposes on the grant date, a recipient may elect, within thirty days after the date of the grant of the Restricted Shares, to recognize as of the grant date ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock awarded (less any amount the recipient may have paid for the shares), determined on the date of grant (without regard to the forfeiture conditions and transfer restrictions). Such income will be subject to income tax withholding, as well as FICA (Security and Medicare) tax at the time of making such election. If a recipient makes this election, the recipient’s holding period will begin the day after the date of grant and no additional income will

74GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


COMPENSATION MATTERS—ITEM 3. APPROVAL OF THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED SIP (2021)

U.S. FEDERAL TAX IMPLICATIONS OF RSUS, RESTRICTED SHARES, OPTIONS AND SARS

be recognized by the recipient on the date the Award is considered vested for tax purposes. However, if the recipient forfeits the Restricted Shares before such date the Award is considered vested for tax purposes, no deduction or capital loss will be available except to the extent of any amounts the recipient may have paid for the shares (even though the recipient previously recognized income with respect to such forfeited Restricted Shares).

Nonqualified Options and SARs. The grant of a nonqualified option (i.e., other than an ISO) or SAR will create no tax consequences at the grant date for the recipient or Goldman Sachs. Upon exercising such an option or SAR, the recipient will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock (and/or cash or other property) acquired on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and will be subject to FICA tax in respect of such amounts. A recipient’s disposition of Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of a nonqualified option or SAR generally will result in long- or short-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the recipient’s tax basis in such shares (the tax basis in the acquired shares of Common Stock generally being the exercise price plus any amount recognized as ordinary income in connection with the exercise of the option).

Special Tax Treatment of ISOs. A recipient will not recognize taxable income upon exercising an ISO except that the alternative minimum tax may apply. Upon a disposition of Common Stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO before the end of the applicable ISO holding periods, the recipient generally will recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the Common Stock at the date of exercise of the ISO over the exercise price or (ii) the amount realized upon the disposition of the ISO Common Stock over the exercise price. Otherwise, a recipient’s disposition of Common Stock acquired upon the exercise of an ISO for which the ISO holding periods are met generally will result in long-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the recipient’s tax basis in such shares (the tax basis in the acquired shares of Common Stock for which the ISO holding periods are met generally being the exercise price of the ISO).

Deduction. Goldman Sachs generally will be entitled to a tax deduction equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by the recipient in connection with the delivery of Common Stock pursuant to an RSU, the vesting of a Restricted Share or the exercise of an option or SAR. Goldman Sachs will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an ISO if the recipient holds the shares for the ISO holding periods prior to disposition of Common Stock, and is generally not entitled to a tax deduction for an ISO (or any other award) with respect to any amount that represents compensation in excess of $1 million paid to “covered employees” under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Section 409A. Some Awards under the 2021 SIP may be considered to be deferred compensation subject to special U.S federal income tax rules (Section 409A of the Code). Failure to satisfy the applicable requirements under these provisions for Awards considered deferred compensation would result in the acceleration of income and additional income tax liability to the recipient, including certain penalties. The 2021 SIP and Awards under the 2021 SIP are intended to be designed and administered so that any Awards under the 2021 SIP that are considered to be deferred compensation will not give rise to any negative tax consequences to the recipient under these provisions.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS75


AUDIT MATTERS—ITEM 4. RATIFICATION OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2021

ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Audit Matters

Item 4. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021


Proposal Snapshot — Item 4. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm for 2021

What is being voted on: Ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.2024.

 

Board recommendation:Our Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.

2024.

 

Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements. Our Audit Committee has appointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2021.2024. We are submitting the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for shareholder ratification at our Annual Meeting, as we do each year.

 

ASSESSMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMAssessment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The members of our Audit Committee believe that the continued retention of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of our firm and our shareholders. In making this determination, our Audit Committee considered a variety of factors, including:

 

  Independence

 

  Candor and insight provided
to Audit Committee

 

  Proactivity

 

  Ability to meet deadlines
and respond quickly

 

  Feasibility /   Feasibility/benefits of audit firm /
lead partner rotation

 

  Content, timeliness and practicality of PwC communications with managementAudit Committee

 

  Adequacy of information provided on accounting issues, auditing issues and legislative and regulatory developments affecting financial institutions

  Feasibility/benefits of lead partner rotation

  

  Timeliness and accuracy of all
services presented to Audit
Committee for pre-approval
and review

 

  Management feedback

 

  Lead partner performance

 

  Comprehensiveness of
evaluations of internal
control structure

 

In particular, our Audit Committee took into account:

Key Considerations of PwC

Audit Quality and Efficiency

 

  

PwC’s knowledge of the firm’s business allows it to design and enhance its audit plan by focusing on core and emerging risks, investing in technology to increase efficiency and capturing cost efficiencies through iteration.

 

  

PwC has a global footprint and the expertise and capability necessary to handle the breadth and complexity of the audit of the firm’s global business, accounting practices and internal control over financial reporting.

Candid and Timely Feedback

 

  

PwC generally attends each meeting of our Audit and Risk Committees and meets regularly in closed sessions with our Audit Committee so that it can provide candid feedback to the Committees regarding management’s control frameworks to address existing and new risks.

 

  

PwC’s familiarityexperience with the firm’s control infrastructure and accounting practices allow it to analyze the impact of business or regulatory changes in a timely manner and provide our Audit Committee with an effective, independent evaluation of management’s strategies, implementation plans and/or remediation efforts.

 

76

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

73


AUDIT MATTERS—ITEM 4.3. RATIFICATION OF PWC AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20212024

 

FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Independence

 

  

PwC is an independent public accounting firm and is subject to oversight and inspection by the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (the results of which are communicated to our Audit Committee), Big 4 peer reviews and SEC regulations.

 

  

Both the firm and PwC have controls to ensure the continued independence of PwC, including policies and procedures to maintain independence and firm policies limiting the hiring of audit team members and PwC policies and procedures to maintain independence.members.

 

  

Mandatory lead audit partner rotation ensures a regular influx of fresh perspectiveperspectives balanced by the benefits of having a tenured auditor with institutional knowledge.

Audit Committee’s Controls

 

  

Frequent closed sessions with PwC as well as a comprehensive annual evaluation.

 

  

Direct involvement by our Audit Committee and our Audit Committee Chair in the periodic selection of PwC’s new lead audit partner.

 

  

Responsibility for the audit fee negotiations associated with the retention of PwC, including considering the appropriateness of fees relative to both efficiency and audit quality.

 

  

Advance approval (by Audit Committee or Audit Committee Chair) of all services rendered by PwC to us and our consolidated subsidiaries. These services include audit, audit-related services (including, as may be applicable, attestation reports, employee benefit plan audits, accounting and technical assistance, risk and control services and due diligence-related services) and tax services, subject to quarterly fee limits applicable to each project and to each category of services.

 

  

Review of information regarding PwC’s periodic internal quality reviews of its audit work, external data on audit quality and performance such as feedback provided by the PCAOB and PwC’s conformance with its independence policies and procedures.

We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm as a matter of good corporate practice, although we are not legally required to do so. If our shareholders do not ratify the appointment, our Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain PwC, but still may retain them. Even if the appointment is ratified, our Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of our firm and our shareholders.

A representative of PwC is expected to be present at our Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desiresthey desire to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.

 

     FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM   Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table provides information about fees paid by us to PwC.PwC:

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                            
    
 

2020

  ($ IN MILLIONS)  

  PERCENT OF 2020
SERVICES APPROVED
BY AUDIT COMMITTEE
  

2019

  ($ IN MILLIONS)  

  PERCENT OF 2019
SERVICES APPROVED
BY AUDIT COMMITTEE
  

2023

($ in millions)     

 

Percent of 2023

Services Approved

by Audit Committee   

 

2022

($ in millions)     

 

Percent of 2022

Services Approved

by Audit Committee   

 

Audit Fees

 

 

69.5

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

69.7

 

 

 

100%

 

Audit Fees

  77.5  100%  78.1  100%
 

Audit-Related Fees(a)

Audit-Related Fees(a)

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

10.8

 

 

 

100%

 

  16.8  100%  15.0  100%
 

Tax Fees(b)

 

 

1.5

 

 

 

100%

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

100%

 

Tax Fees(b)

   1.2  100%   2.1  100%
 

All Other Fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

    —     —     —     —

 

(a)

Audit-related fees include attest services not required by statute or regulation and employee benefit plan audits.

 

(b)

The nature of the tax services is as follows: tax return preparation and compliance, tax advice relating to transactions, consultation on tax matters and other tax planning and advice. Of the $1.5$1.2 million for 2020,2023, approximately $1.0$0.2 million was for tax return preparation and compliance services.

PwC also provides audit and tax services to certain asset management funds managed by our subsidiaries. Fees paid to PwC by these funds for these services were $49.0$76.4 million in 20202023 and $89.7$71.2 million in 2019.2022.

For detailed information on the vote required for this matter and the choices available for casting your vote, please see Frequently Asked Questions.Questions.

 

74

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS77


AUDIT MATTERS—REPORT OF OUR AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

 

 

Report of our Audit Committee

Management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of Goldman Sachs’ financial statements, for its accounting and financial reporting principles and for the establishment and effectiveness of internal controls and procedures designed to ensure compliance with generally accepted accounting principles and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of Goldman Sachs’ financial statements and of its internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and expressing an opinion as to the conformity of Goldman Sachs’ financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, including critical audit matters, if any, addressed during the audit, and the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm has free access to the Committee to discuss any matters they deemmatter it deems appropriate.

In performing its oversight role, the Committee has considered and discussed the audited financial statements with each of management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee has also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the auditor’s communications with the Committee concerning independence and has discussed with the registered public accounting firm its independence. The Committee, or the Committee Chair if designated by the Committee, approves in advance all audit and any non-audit services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm to us and our consolidated subsidiaries. SeeItem 4. —Item 3. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021.2024.

Based on the reports and discussions described in this Report, the Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements of Goldman Sachs for 20202023 be included in the 20202023 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Audit Committee

Peter Oppenheimer, Chair

Mark Flaherty

Thomas Montag

Adebayo Ogunlesi (ex-officio)

Jan Tighe

Mark WinkelmanJessica Uhl

 

78

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

75


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

Items 5-8.4-12. Shareholder Proposals

How We are committed to active engagementEngage with our shareholders. If you would like to speak with us, please contact our Investor Relations team at gs-investor-relations@gs.com.Shareholder Proponents

 

  Across the firm, we spend significant time reviewing and evaluating the shareholder proposals we  receive each year.

  First and foremost, our Investor Relations team seeks in all cases to speak directly with any  shareholder who submits a proposal for our Annual Meeting. Our goal is to understand their  perspective, which may not be apparent from the face of the proposal, and to address their  questions. We hope that this engagement will be ongoing throughout the year.

  We respect that our shareholders have broad and diverse viewpoints, which viewpoints may differ  from other shareholders as well as from management and the Board.

 

 

Robust shareholder
engagement

is a long-standing
priority for our firm.

  Even where issues raised in a proposal or through engagement do not reflect any concern specific to Goldman Sachs, our goal is to  maintain constructive engagement and to find areas of common ground.

»  Many shareholder proposals suggest prescriptive and/or one-size-fits-all solutions, with limited consideration of risks or costs of a proposed approach.

»  We seek to meet the broad goals of our proponents where feasible and appropriate in a manner that we believe will further the long-term interests of our diverse shareholder base, and we regularly propose alternatives to a proponent that we believe address their concerns in a more practicable way.

Shareholder Proposals

Proposal Snapshot — Snapshot—Items 5-8.4-12. Shareholder Proposals

  
  
 

What is being voted on: In accordance with SEC rules, we have set forth below certain shareholder proposals, along with the supporting statements of the respective shareholder proponents, for which we and our Board accept no responsibility. These shareholder proposals are required to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting only if properly presented at our Annual Meeting.

 

Board recommendation: As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST each shareholder proposal.

 

 

For detailed information on the vote required with respect to these shareholder proposals and the choices available for casting your vote, please seeFrequently Asked Questions.Questions.

Item 5.4. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consenta Policy for an Independent Chair

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California, 90278,National Legal and Policy Center, 107 Park Washington Court, Falls Church, Virginia 22046, beneficial owner of 20 sharesat least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal. The proponent has advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 

PROPONENT’S STATEMENT

 Proponent’s Statement

 

Proposal 5 - Shareholder RightRequest for Board of Directors to Act by Written ConsentAdopt Policy for an Independent Chair

RESOLVED:

Shareholders request that our boardthe Board of directors take such stepsDirectors adopt as may bepolicy, and amend the governing documents as necessary, to permit written consent by shareholders entitled to castrequire hereafter that that two separate people hold the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize the action at a meeting at which all shareholders entitled to vote thereon were present and voting. This includes shareholder ability to initiate any appropriate topic for written consent.

This proposal topic won 88%-support at an AT&T annual meeting. And this was before the shareholder right to call a special in-person shareholder meeting was eliminated by the 2020 pandemic. Goldman Sachs management put up a smoke screen of outlandish theoretical objections to this proposal topic in 2020 but failed to give a single example of its theoretical objections ever taking place at any company whatsoever.

The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK) said it adopted written consent in 2019 after 45%-support for a written consent shareholder proposal. And this BK action was a year before the pandemic put an end to in-person shareholder meetings - perhaps forever. It is so much easier for management to conduct an online shareholder meeting that management is now spoiled and will never want to return to an in-person shareholder meeting.

Also it currently it takes the formal backing 25% of all shares in existence to call for the newly downgraded special meeting, which can be an online meeting. This means that it takes the backing of almost 33%office of the shares that normally cast ballots atChairman and the annual meeting to call for a special shareholder meeting.

Shareholders need to be able to accomplish more outsideoffice of a shareholder meeting due to the onslaught of online shareholder meetings replacing in-person shareholder meetings.

With the near universal use of online annual shareholder meetings, which can last only 10-minutes, shareholders no longer have the right to engage with management and directors at a shareholder meeting. Special shareholder meetings can now be online meetings which has an inferior format to even a Zoom meeting.

Shareholders are also severely restricted in making their views known at online shareholder meetings because all challenging questions and comments can be screened out.

For instance the Goodyear shareholder meeting was spoiled by a trigger-happy management mute button for shareholders. And AT&T would not allow shareholders to speak.CEO as follows:

 

76

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS79


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

Selection of the Chairman of the Board: The Board requires the separation of the offices of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer.

Please see:Whenever possible, the Chairman of the Board shall be an Independent Director.

Goodyear’s virtual meeting creates issuesThe Board may select a Temporary Chairman of the Board who is not an Independent Director to serve while the Board seeks an Independent Chairman of the Board.

The Chairman should not be a former CEO of the company.

Selection of the Chairman of the Board shall be consistent with shareholderapplicable law and existing contracts.

https://www.crainscleveland.com/manufacturing/goodyears-virtual-meeting-creates-issues-shareholderSUPPORTING STATEMENT:

Please see:

AT&T investors denied a dial-in as annual meeting goes online

https://whbl.com/2020/04/17/att-investors-denied-a-dial-in-as-annual-meeting-goes-online/1007928/

Now more than ever shareholders needThe Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs is also Board Chairman. These roles – each with separate, different responsibilities that are critical to have the option to take action outsidehealth of a shareholder meeting and sendsuccessful corporation – are greatly diminished when held by a wake-up call to management, if need be, since tightly controlled online shareholder meetings are a shareholder engagement wasteland.singular company official, weakening its governance structure.

Please vote yes:LOGO  LOGO

Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent – Proposal 5

Expert perspectives substantiate our position:

 

According to the CFA Institute Research and Policy Center, “Combining [Chairman and CEO] positions may give undue influence to executive board members and impair the ability and willingness of board members to exercise their independent judgment . Many jurisdictions consider the separation of the chair and CEO positions a best practice because it ensures that the board agenda is set by an independent voice uninfluenced by the CEO.”1

A pair of business law professors wrote for Harvard Business Review that “letting the CEO chair the board can compromise board discussion quality, weakening the corporation’s risk management ability . Splitting the CEO and board chair jobs between two people can help strengthen the quality of questions the corporation asks itself. When those questions remain weak, the organization is less likely to develop strategies that mitigate risk.”2

Proxy adviser Glass Lewis wrote in 2021, “the presence of an independent chair fosters the creation of a thoughtful and dynamic board not dominated by the views of senior management ... the separation of these two key roles eliminates the conflict of interest that inevitably occurs when a CEO is responsible for self-oversight.”3

Of former CEOs serving as Chairs, CFA Institute says, “this arrangement could impair the board’s ability to act independently of undue management influence... Such a situation also increases the risk that the chair may hamper efforts to undo the mistakes made as chief executive.”

According to the 2022 Spencer Stuart Board Index survey, 51 percent of S&P 500 companies had separate CEOs and Board Chairs in 2017 versus 57 percent in 2022.4 The growing separation of the CEO and Chair positions signifies the changing sentiment towards Chair independence.

1

https://rpc.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/article/position-paper/corporate-governance-of-listed-companies-3rd-edition.pdf

2

https://hbr.org/2020/03/why-the-ceo-shouldnt-also-be-the-board-chair

3

https://www.glasslewis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ln-Depth-Independent-Chair.pdf

4

https://www.spencerstuart.com/-/media/2022/october/ssbi2022/2022_us_spencerstuart_board_index_final.pdf

 DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION

 Directors’ Recommendation

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Our Board regularly seeks input from shareholdersdirectors take very seriously their fiduciary obligation to ensureact in the best interests of our firm and our shareholders. In exercising their fiduciary duties, our independent directors believe it is important to retain the flexibility to determine the leadership structure that will best serve our Board’s and our shareholders’ interests at any given time.

We are committed to independent leadership on our Board. In fact, our policies reflect best practicesrequire that if at any time our Chair is not independent, we must have an independent Lead Director.

Furthermore, as we have repeatedly disclosed, our Board will not hesitate to appoint an independent Chair if at any time our Governance Committee concludes it would be appropriate to do so.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

77


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Through our engagement and are appropriately aligned with shareholder interests. We appreciate that certain ofclear voting results, shareholders have shown support for our shareholders may view action by written consent as an important right (so long as proper protections are included), and we acknowledge that views vary acrossexisting leadership structure. At our diverse shareholder base.

We appreciate the concerns raised by the proponent in his proposal regarding the conduct of certain virtuallast two annual meetings, in 2020. In evaluating this proposal,similar proposals from the same proponent have been strongly rejected by over 80% of votes cast at those meetings. Accordingly, we took stock of the procedures at our 2020 virtual annual meeting, including that all shareholder proponents were permitted to present their proposals live, shareholders were able to submit questions both before and during a clearly designated portion of the annual meeting and the text of shareholder questions were generally not modified and were read out by our Chairman and CEO as submitted. Over the course of our extensive shareholder engagement since our 2020 virtual annual meeting — including with the proponent — we are not aware of any shareholders who had concerns or complaints regarding the way in which we conducted our 2020 Annual Meeting.

Our Board continues to believe that, as proposed, permitting shareholder action by written consent does not promote transparency and does not contain necessary shareholder protections.

Given our ongoing commitment to corporate governance best practices, including Board-level engagement with stakeholders and commitment to shareholder meeting best practices, we continue to believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

 

 

  

We are committed to active engagement with our shareholders and other stakeholders. Core to this is the ability for shareholders to raise important mattersPursuant to our attention, includingCorporate Governance Guidelines, our independent Governance Committee assesses and deliberates the merits of our leadership structure to help ensure that the most efficient and appropriate structure is in the context of a shareholders’ meeting where all shareholders have proper notice and the ability to participate.place; it has done so annually since 2011.

 

 

 »

In addition to governance practices that enhance the rights of all shareholders (examples of which are described below), our firm andThis annual review process provides our Board maintain open lineswith the necessary flexibility to make the appropriate determination about how our Board’s leadership should be structured to most effectively serve our firm’s needs, which may evolve over time. This annual review process also exists within the broader context of communication with our shareholders (see Stakeholder Engagement).Board’s ongoing, year-round review of its composition and effectiveness.

 

 

 »

For example, during 2020As a result of its most recent review, in December 2023 our Governance Committee determined that continuing to combine the roles of Chair and CEO, together with maintaining a strong independent Lead Director, met with shareholders representing over 25% ofis the most effective leadership structure for our shares outstanding on topics such as Board effectiveness, compensation, the Board’s independent oversight of strategy, culture and reputational risk and Board and executive succession planning.firm at this time.

 

 

  

Matters to be acted on by shareholders should be communicated to and voted on by all shareholders in the context of an annual or special meeting, with adequate time to consider the matters proposed.This robust process includes a review of:

 

 

 »

Our governing documents provide protections, such as advance notice and thorough public disclosure to all shareholders, for the conduct of business at annual and special meetings to ensure a transparent, well- informed, fair and equitable process.

80 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ITEMS 5-8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 »

In contrast, if shareholders are permitted to act by written consent as proposed, nearly half of our shareholders could be deprived of these important rightsChair-CEO and of the opportunity to participate in decisions that could have significant ramifications for our firm and shareholders.Lead Director responsibilities (described below);

 

 

 »

AnnualOur policies and special meetings also allow opportunity for discussionpractices, which ensure strong, independent Board oversight, as well as feedback received in connection with our Board, Committee and interaction amongst shareholders and management so that all points of view may be considered prior to a vote.individual director evaluation process;

 

 

 » 

In addition to our shareholder right to call a special meetingShareholder feedback and demonstrated commitment to shareholder engagement, we maintain strong governance practices that protect the rights of all shareholders. For example:voting results regarding board leadership;

 

 

  »

IndependentFor example, in connection with our year-round shareholder engagement, we have generally received positive feedback regarding our Board leadership structure, with certain shareholders viewing Goldman Sachs as a leader among companies with a combined Chair-CEO, given the strength of our Lead Director with expansive duties.role and our Board’s annual leadership structure review; and

 

 

 »

Experienced and diverse Board, which held 74 Board and Committee meetings during 2020.

 

 »

Proxy access provisions, proactively adopted in 2015. Any shareholder may also suggest a director candidate to our Governance Committee at any time for consideration.

 »

Single class shareholderPerformance and global trends regarding board leadership structure.

 

 

  »

No supermajority vote requirements.For example, there is no clear, empirical evidence that a combined Chair-CEO negatively affects company performance or impairs the efficacy of independent directors. Independent chairs also remain a minority practice among S&P 500 companies.

 

 

  »

Annual electionsOur Board leadership structure is enhanced by the independent leadership provided by our active Lead Director. The robust nature of directors; majority voting with resignation policy forthe role, which has been enhanced over time as a result of shareholder engagement, helps ensure that the perspectives of our independent directors in uncontested elections.are strongly represented on our Board. Key elements of our Lead Director role (each of which will continue under David Viniar as our new Lead Director) include:

 

 

 »

No “poison pill.”Setting and approving the agenda for Board meetings and leading executive sessions;

 

 

 » 

Action by written consent as proposed does not promote transparency, which may cause confusion, as well as promote short-termism or special interests. For example:Focusing on Board effectiveness, composition and evaluations (including of our CEO and our Board, committees and individual directors);

 

 

 »

OurServing as liaison between independent directors, on the one hand, and our Chair-CEO and management, on the other; and

»

Serving as primary Board may be deniedcontact for corporate governance engagement with shareholders and other stakeholders and engaging regularly with regulators.

For example, during 2023, our Lead Director had over 80 additional meetings, calls and engagements with the opportunity to consider the meritsfirm and its people, our shareholders, regulators and other stakeholders, including meetings with shareholders representing over 25% of Common Stock outstanding.

A combined Chair-CEO structure provides our firm with a proposed actionsenior leader who serves as a primary liaison between our Board and to suggest alternative proposals for shareholder evaluation that may be in the best interestsmanagement and as a primary public face of our shareholdersfirm.

78

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Furthermore, combining the roles of CEO and Chair at our firm has been effective in promulgating strong and effective leadership
of
the long-term interestsfirm, particularly in times of economic challenge and regulatory change affecting our industry; the same is important during this phase of our strategic journey, including executing on our strategic transition and positioning the firm for the future.

Independent Board oversight is further enhanced by our independent committee chairs, the independence of our Board as a whole and the governance policies and practices in place at our firm.

 

 

 »

In addition, nearly halfEach of our independent directors is committed to actively and effectively overseeing the management of our firm and protecting shareholder interests.

»

Our independent directors meet often in executive session, during which they discuss topics such as Chair-CEO performance and compensation, succession planning, the Board’s evaluation and the firm’s strategy.

»

Our governance structure establishes strong protections of shareholder rights.

For example, we have majority voting (with resignation bylaw) for uncontested director elections, annual election of all directors, no poison pill, a shareholder right to call special meetings, a shareholder right of proxy access and no supermajority vote requirements in our by-laws or charter.

For more information, see Corporate Governance, including the section Structure of our Board and Governance Practices— Board Leadership Structure.

Item 5. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Transparency in Lobbying Report

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, California 90278, together with a co-filer, Oblate International Pastoral Investment Trust, each a beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, are the proponents of the following shareholder proposal. The proponents have advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 Proponents’ Statement

LOGO

FOR SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS

Proposal 5 – Transparency in Lobbying

Resolved, Shareholders request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1.

Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.

2.

Payments by Goldman used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.

3.

Goldman’s membership in and payments to any tax-exempt organization that writes and endorses model legislation.

4.

Description of management’s and the Board’s decision-making process and oversight for making payments described in sections 2 and 3 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Goldman is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Public Responsibilities Committee and posted on Goldman’s website.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

79


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Supporting Statement

Full disclosure of Goldman’s lobbying activities and expenditures is needed to assess whether Goldman’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and shareholders’ interests. Goldman spent $44 million from 2010 – 2022 on federal lobbying. This does not include state lobbying, where Goldman also lobbies. Goldman also lobbies abroad, spending between 800,000 – 899,999 on lobbying in Europe for 2022 and drawing scrutiny for hiring JPMorgan’s chief lobbyist in Europe.1

Companies can give unlimited amounts to third party groups that spend millions on lobbying and undisclosed grassroots activity.2 Goldman fails to disclose its memberships in or payments to trade associations and social welfare groups, or the amounts used for lobbying, to shareholders. Goldman belongs to the American Bankers Association (ABA), Bank Policy Institute (BPI), Business Roundtable, Financial Service Forum (FSF), Managed Funds Association and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which together spent $46 million on federal lobbying for 2022.

Goldman’s lack of disclosure presents reputational risks when its lobbying contradicts company public positions. For example, Goldman publicly supports addressing climate change, yet the Business Roundtable opposed the Inflation Reduction Act and its historic investments in climate action,3 and BPI and FSF both lobbied the Securities and Exchange Commission to weaken proposed climate disclosure rules.4 A recent analysis looking at inconsistencies between banks’ public climate commitments and their direct and indirect climate lobbying practices noted Goldman failed to publicly support the Inflation Reduction Act.5 And while Goldman does not belong to or support the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is attacking “woke” investing,6 one of its trade associations does, as ABA supported its 2022 annual meeting.7

Reputational damage stemming from these misalignments could harm shareholder value. Thus it is a best practice for Goldman to expand its lobbying disclosure.

1 https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/2022/12/goldman-government-relations.

2 https://theintercept.com/2019/08/06/business-group-spending-on-lobbying-in-washington-is-at-least-double-whats-pubIiclyreported/.

3 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/aug/19/top-us-business-lobby-group-climate-action-business-roundtable.

4 https://www.eenews.net/articles/banks-to-sec-climate-rule-poses-real-world-problems/.

5 https://www.ceres.org/news-center/press-releases/new-benchmark-analysis-us-banks-reveals-inconsistencies-between-climate.

6 https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2023/03/22/esg-investing-fossil-fuels.

7 https://documented.net/investigations/heres-who-bankrolling-alec-2022-annual-meeting.

Directors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Our Statement on Policy Engagement and Political Participation (our Policy Statement, available on our website through www.gs.com/corpgov) and our existing public disclosures already address the most material requests in the proposal.

Preparing the report requested by the proposal would impose an additional administrative burden on our firm without providing material new information to our shareholders. Furthermore, additional disclosure may also raise potential competitive and business-related concerns. As a result, taking into account the immateriality of our lobbying expenditures, the lack of heightened focus from our shareholders on our lobbying activities and expenditures outside the context of this shareholder proposal and our existing public disclosures, we believe that the adoption of the proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

We already provide significant and meaningful disclosure about our policy engagement efforts, which addresses the most material items requested in the proposal.

We have transparent policies and procedures governing our policy engagement and political participation.

»

A key source of information for our shareholders is our Policy Statement, which is publicly available on our website.

80

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

»

Our Policy Statement already contains information about:

Our principal public policy priorities, which are developed by our Office of Government and Regulatory Affairs (OGRA) in coordination with our Legal and Compliance functions with senior management oversight. These priorities are reviewed regularly to help ensure that our priorities continue to align with our goals;

The fact that we do not make any political contributions in the United States from corporate funds, including contributions to so-called Section 527 entities or independent expenditure political action committees (Super PACs);

The fact that, as required by law, all political contributions accepted or made by our federal political action committee, which is voluntarily funded by employees and makes contributions on a bipartisan basis, are reported to the Federal Election Commission (and are publicly available at: https://www.fec.gov/data/ committee/C00350744/?tab=summary). We do not contribute corporate funds to our political action committee; and

Examples of the types of trade associations and other industry groups in which we participate (such as Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Council of Institutional Investors and American Bankers Association), as well as information on the instructions provided to these groups to limit how our funds can be used.

Specifically, we instruct trade and industry groups to not use our funds for any election-related activity at the federal, state or local level. This includes contributions and expenditures (including independent expenditures) in support of or in opposition to any candidate for any office, ballot initiative campaign, political party, committee or political action committee.

We already disclose payments used for lobbying and have enhanced our transparency in this regard.

»

We provide transparent access to the quarterly disclosure we make with respect to all U.S. federal lobbying costs (paid directly and through trade associations) and the issues to which our lobbying efforts relate pursuant to the Lobbying Disclosure Act. These filings are publicly available at: https://www.senate.gov/legislative/Public_Disclosure/LDA_reports.htm), and we provide this link for ease of access in our Policy Statement and also added directly on our firm’s website at www.gs.com/corpgov.

While our policy advocacy efforts are focused primarily at the national level, we also make such disclosures at the state or local level to the extent required to do so under applicable lobbying laws.

»

For context on the extent of our lobbying efforts, for each of 2022 and 2023, our federal, state and local lobbying payments, as well as all trade and business association membership payments (whether or not attributable to lobbying), represented less than 0.25% of net earnings.

»

As set forth in our Policy Statement, we publicly disclose in the reports we file under the Lobbying Disclosure Act expenditures relating to our active grassroots lobbying efforts to inform our employees, shareholders, vendors/suppliers or the small business community that comprises our 10,000 Small Businesses Voices program with respect to legislation or regulation that may impact their interests.

Wedo not get involved with model legislation efforts (and are not even be made awaremembers of an actionany trade association for such purpose).

We already have robust oversight mechanisms including:

»

Our Board, including through our Public Responsibilities Committee, is informed of, and provides guidance (as needed) on, our various advocacy efforts;

»

Our Policy Statement is reviewed by written consent, depriving themour Public Responsibilities Committee;

»

A comprehensive report on our trade association memberships, including membership fees and dues paid in excess of their rights and potentially causing confusion across$30,000, is reviewed annually by our diverse shareholder base.Public Responsibilities Committee. This report also includes information about our lobbying expenditures;

 

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS

81


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

»

Our Executive Vice President and staff in our OGRA, Legal and Compliance functions review and approve trade association memberships to ensure that they are consistent with our public policy objectives. Examples of our trade association memberships include Securities Industry Financial Markets Association, Bank Policy Institute, Financial Services Forum, Association for Financial Markets in Europe and the American Investment Council as well as other similar industry groups; and

 

»

OGRA coordinates on an ongoing basis with our business unit leadership and our Legal and Compliance functions to identify priorities, and it vets our public policy priorities and related advocacy efforts with senior management.

Item 6. Shareholder Proposal Regarding aOutcome Report on the EffectsEfforts Regarding Protected Classes of the Use of Mandatory ArbitrationEmployees

The Nathan Cummings Foundation, 475 Tenth Ave, 14th120 Wall Street, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10018,10005, beneficial owner of 290 sharesat least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal. The proponent has advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 

 PROPONENT’S STATEMENT Proponent’s Statement

RESOLVED:

Resolved:Shareholders request the Board of Directors oversee the preparation of an annual public report describing and quantifying the effectiveness and outcomes of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman Sachs”) ask the Board of Directors’s (Goldman Sachs) efforts to oversee the preparation of a public report on the impact of the use of mandatory arbitration on Goldman Sachs’s employees and workplace culture. The report should evaluate the impact of Goldman Sachs’s current use of arbitration on the prevalence ofprevent harassment and discrimination inagainst its workplace and on employees’ abilityprotected classes of employees. In its discretion, the Board may wish to seek redress. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost and omit proprietary and personal information.

WHEREAS:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that it is unlawful “to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because ofconsider including disclosures such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.”1 Nevertheless, 48 percent of African Americans and 36 percent of Hispanics have experienced race-based workplace discrimination.2 More than half of senior-level women say that they have been sexually harassed during their careers, with African American women facing an increased relative risk of sexual harassment in the workplace.3

A workplace that tolerates harassment invites legal, brand, financial and human capital risk. Companies may experience reduced morale, lost productivity, absenteeism and challenges in attracting and retaining talent. Unexpected leadership changes following allegations of harassment or discrimination put shareholder value at risk.

In contrast, research by McKinsey & Company found that companies with high levels of ethnic and cultural diversity are 33 percent more likely to outperform in profitability while those in the top quartile for gender diversity are 27 percent more likely to have superior value creation.4 A study by the Wall Street Journal found that over the five-year period ended June 28, 2019, the 20 most diverse companies in the S&P 500 had an average annual stock return that was almost six percent higher than the 20 least-diverse companies.5

Goldman Sachs requires its employees to agree to arbitrate employment-related claims. Mandatory arbitration limits employees’ remedies for wrongdoing, keeps misconduct secret and prevents employees from learning about shared concerns.6

Arbitration clauses face a changing regulatory landscape. Attorneys general from every state voiced support for ending forced arbitration of sexual harassment claims in 2018. In 2019, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill banning mandatory arbitration. California banned the use of arbitration agreements as a condition of employment, Washington state invalidated contracts requiring arbitration of sexual harassment claims and the New York Supreme Court refused to compel arbitration in a harassment lawsuit. Continuing to rely on arbitration clauses for protections, when these may be removed retroactively, creates a long-tail risk for our company. Investors’ concerns about arbitration’s potential to allow harassment and discrimination to go unseen are pertinent to Goldman Sachs, where thousands of women have alleged gender bias.as:

 

1

https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm

2

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-64-percent-americans-say-racism-remains-majorproblemn877536

3

https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-metoo-has-to-do-with-the-workplace-gender-gap-1540267680; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/gwao.12394

4

https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/organization/our%20insights/delivering%20through%20diversity/ delivering-through-diversity_full-report.ashx

5

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-business-case-for-more-diversity-11572091200

6

https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/systemic/review/the total number and aggregate dollar amount of disputes settled by the company related to abuse, harassment, or discrimination in the previous three years;

 

82 

the total number of pending harassment or discrimination complaints the company is seeking to resolve through internal processes, arbitration, or litigation;

 GOLDMAN SACHS

the retention rates of employees who raise harassment or discrimination concerns, relative to total workforce retention;

   |  

the aggregate dollar amount associated with the enforcement of arbitration clauses;

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

the number of enforceable contracts for current or past employees which include concealment clauses, such as non-disclosure agreements or arbitration requirements, that restrict discussions of harassment or discrimination; and

 

the aggregate dollar amount associated with such agreements containing concealment clauses.

This report should not include the names of accusers or details of their settlements without their consent. It should be prepared at a reasonable cost and omit any information that is proprietary, privileged, or violative of contractual obligations.

Supporting Statement

In 2021, after receiving majority support for a shareholder resolution requesting they do so, Goldman released a report reviewing its mandatory arbitration requirement for employee harassment or discrimination claims. In light of that review, the Board decided that “employees who assert a claim of sexual harassment in an arbitration will have the option to waive confidentiality as to the arbitration decision.”1 The firm did not release other protected classes from this confidentiality obligation.

Investor concerns related to Goldman’s treatment of its employees by race, ethnicity, and other protected class remained unaddressed. Black individuals comprise 13.6 percent of the United States’ population2 but only 3.4 percent of Goldman’s executive and management teams.3 This representation percentage has remained static over time, only increasing by 0.31 percent since 20204, the first year for which this data was available.

82

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

Given the company’s ongoing use of non-disclosure agreements and mandatory arbitration, which conceal from external audiences internal culture challenges, the extent to which race-based harassment and discrimination exists within Goldman is unknown.

There have been several high-profile derivative suits settled, including at Twentieth Century Fox, Wynn Resorts, and Alphabet, alleging boards breached their duties by failing to protect employees from discrimination and harassment, injuring the companies and their shareholders.

Civil rights violations within the workplace can result in substantial costs to companies, including fines and penalties, legal costs, costs related to absenteeism, reduced productivity, challenges recruiting, and distraction of leadership. A company’s failure to properly manage its workforce can have significant ramifications, jeopardizing relationships with customers and other partners.

A public report such as the one requested would assist shareholders in assessing whether the Company is improving its workforce management.

 

1

https://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents/report-on-review-of-arbitration- program.pdf

2

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222

3

https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-commitments/sustainability/2022-people-strategy-report/multimedia/report.pdf

4

https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-commitments/sustainability/sustainable-finance/documents/reports/2020-sustainability-report.pdf?source=website

 DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONDirectors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

We share the proponent’s views relating to workplace harassment and discrimination. As our Chairman and CEO recently reinforced, in no uncertain terms, thereThere is no place at Goldman Sachs for discrimination or harassment against any individual or group in any form. A cornerstone of our culture is our commitment to providing Providing employees a safe and inclusive workplace for all employees. These values are embedded inthat is free of discrimination and regularly reinforced at, every stepharassment is among the firm’s highest priorities as part of our people’s careers, from onboarding“people first” commitment.

The use of arbitration or confidentiality agreements to trainingassist in managing our broad and performance, development, compensation and promotion processes. Further, our policies and practices were recentlydiverse global workforce does not result in – nor does it imply the existence of – harassment or discrimination at Goldman Sachs. While the proponent’s supporting statement references settlements at other public companies, those matters do not involve Goldman Sachs. More broadly, the use of these types of agreements is periodically reviewed and enhanced in the context of the “Me Too” movement.

Our arbitration program, which provides mutual benefits toby the firm, andincluding as described below.

We provide significant transparency about our people is in compliance withstrategy, such as our efforts to engage the best talent across broad and diverse backgrounds and experiences and further embed our long-standing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion across all relevant rules and regulations. We do not believe that there is any limitation onaspects of our employees’ ability to seek redress of any claim,talent strategy, including employment-related claims. To this end, in lightthrough our annual People Strategy Report (available at www.gs.com). As a result of our “zero tolerance” approach to harassment and discrimination, our existing transparency, our robust firmwide controls designed to prevent and address employee misconduct, including our numerous escalation channels and our ongoing commitments to promote diversityposting culture, and inclusion,the other factors and considerations described below, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interestinterests of our firm or our shareholders.

Discrimination, harassment or mistreatment in any form at Goldman Sachs is unacceptable and is not tolerated. This “zero  tolerance” policy applies on and off premises, at work-related events and outside of work.

»  These values are embedded in, and regularly reinforced at, every step of our people’s careers, from onboarding to training and performance management, development, compensation and promotion processes, and are supported by a robust system of firmwide controls designed to encourage reporting and prevent and address employee misconduct if it occurs.

  For example, we maintain an explicit Equal Employment Opportunity policy that employees are required to review at the time of hire and on an annual basis and require that all employees complete mandatory training and education (e.g., Recognize, Respond, Respect: Sexual Harassment Awareness) on these critical matters.

  Employees are required to escalate any potential discrimination and harassment concerns they observe. The firm has established a multi-channel internal and external escalation process (which provides for the

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

83


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

ability to make anonymous reports) for concerns of discrimination, harassment or other misconduct to be reported. Regardless of the manner of escalation, all matters are carefully documented, reviewed and investigated, and the firm strictly prohibits any retaliation for reporting concerns. When misconduct is found, discipline, including termination where appropriate, is imposed in accordance with the firm’s disciplinary framework. The firm also requires regular reporting on harassment, discrimination and other conduct matters to senior leadership as well as the Board of Directors.

  Our Firmwide Conduct Committee, with senior partner-level membership, is responsible for overseeing the firm’s conduct risk management program.

»  Our policies and practices are reviewed on an ongoing basis and have been regularly enhanced over time.

Additional Context on Proposal Submission. As noted in the proponent’s supporting statement, a shareholder proposal submitted by the proponent relating to our arbitration practices was voted on at our 2021 annual meeting. The proposal received approximately 49% support under the voting standards established in the firm’s By-Laws and publicly disclosed each year in our proxy statement. The Board viewed this level of support as significant, and in consideration of this result as well as the broader shareholder feedback that the Board received in conjunction with its engagement on this issue, the Board proactively determined to undertake a comprehensive review to assess the firm’s arbitration program and in December 2021, our Board issued a report, which is available at www.gs.com/corpgov.

»  As a result of this review, our Board directed management to institute a number of enhancements for the purpose of further increasing transparency and accountability, including:

  Regular reporting to the Board on sexual harassment matters;

  Regular periodic assessments of the firm’s arbitration program; and

  Waiving confidentiality of arbitration decisions on sexual harassment claims at the option of the employee.

»  Each of these enhancements have since been implemented, and our Board expects to direct another comprehensive review of the firm’s arbitration program later this year and will issue another report following completion of this new review.

Item 7. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Environmental Justice Impact Assessment

The Sierra Club Foundation, 2101 Webster Street, Suite 2150, Oakland, California 94612, together with a co-filer, Harrington Investments, Inc., each beneficial owners of at least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, are the proponents of the following shareholder proposal. The proponents have advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

Proponents’ Statement

Whereas: Environmental justice examines disparities in how people are exposed to environmental benefits and harms, which can have material implications for investors.

The United Nations has recognized that all people have a right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment.1 Fossil fuel development poses substantial risks to this and other human rights, and has been linked to significantly elevated rates of cancers, and air, soil, and water contamination for nearby residents.2 These outcomes disproportionately affect children, workers, and people who are Black, Indigenous, have low income, or live in the Global South.3 Meanwhile, a disproportionate portion of the 17 million Americans exposed to the negative consequences of fossil fuel production are Black.4 Since 2016, Goldman Sachs has provided over $143 billion in financing to fossil fuel companies.5

Goldman Sachs has also developed a framework to “put climate transition and inclusive growth at the forefront of” its work with clients.6 However, this transition carries several workforce 7 and environmental justice risks. Research has found that economic and workforce benefits of the energy transition accrue unequally along lines of race and ethnicity, regardless of income or education.8 Most minerals required for electric vehicle, wind turbine, and battery production are concentrated in the Global South, where local people bear environmental harms associated with minerals extraction, and where climate change threatens production collapse.9 Resultant civic unrest, loss of social

84

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

license, legislative or regulatory actions, and systemic risk of global failure of a transition can lead to stranded assets and reputational harm.

These environmental justice risks are not effectively addressed or managed in Goldman Sachs’ policies and reporting. Rigorous assessment and disclosure of these risks would enhance the bank’s risk management framework, improve its reputation, and advance its stated goals.

In recent years, Goldman Sachs has faced regulatory action and public scrutiny regarding its sustainability practices and disclosures. In 2022, the bank’s asset management subsidiary incurred a $4 million penalty to settle SEC charges for sustainability-related policies and procedures failures.10 The bank has committed to help reduce racial disparities,11 to “protect, preserve and promote human rights around the world,”12 and shared its view that “companies’ management of environmental and related social risks and opportunities may affect long-term corporate performance.” By implementing this proposal, the bank can advance its commitments and deliver value to shareholders.

Resolved: Shareholders request that the Goldman Sachs Board of Directors conduct a rigorous assessment of material risks and opportunities related to the environmental justice impacts of its energy and power sector financing and underwriting and disclose the results, at reasonable expense and omitting proprietary and privileged information.

Supporting statement: At the Board and management’s discretion, Proponents suggest that “material risks and opportunities” encompass both enterprise and systemic considerations, and that outcomes and recommendations from the assessment be integrated in a revised version of the bank’s Environmental Policy Framework.

1

https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/07/1123482

2

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6344296/

3

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629623001640

4

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-022-00434-9

5

https://www.ran.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/BOCC_2023_vF.pdf

6

https://www.goldmansachs.com/media-relations/press-releases/2021/announcement-04-mar-2021.html

7

https://www.nber.org/papers/w31539

8

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/scc.2022.0112; https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-powers-benefits-dont-shine-equally-on-everyone/

9

https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/2023_Transition_Minerals_Tracker_JX5pGvf.pdf; https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/ffd2a83b-8c30-4e9d-980a-52b6d9a86fdc/TheRoleofCriticalMineralsinCleanEnergyTransitions.pdf

10

 https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-209

11

 https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-commitments/diversity-and-inclusion/racial-equity/

12

 https://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents/human-rights-statement.pdf

13

 https://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/environmental-stewardship/epf-pdf.pdf

Directors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Across the broad spectrum of our businesses, we work with our clients to help navigate considerations around environmental and social impacts as well as community health and safety. Our goal is to help ensure that our people, capital and ideas are used to help find innovative and effective, market-based solutions to help address climate change, ecosystem degradation and other critical environmental issues, with a steadfast focus on driving long-term success for our clients and communities to create long-term, durable value for our shareholders.

We have in place frameworks and policies to identify and mitigate climate- and sustainability-related risks to our firm, our clients and our communities, and we already provide extensive public disclosure related thereto. This includes our Environmental Policy Framework, Sustainability Reports, TCFD reports and a dedicated portion of our website (www.gs.com/sustainability).

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

85


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Furthermore, we have launched a number of initiatives over the past two decades targeting inclusive growth and the climate transition, including One Million Black Women and the Climate Innovation and Development Fund, a $25 million fund that supports sustainable low-carbon economic development in South and Southeast Asia and catalyzed approximately $500 million in private-sector and government investments in climate solutions to help accelerate the transition to net zero emissions. However, no one company can build a sustainable economy on its own. Advancing the climate transition will require thoughtful public policy that balances energy affordability and security with social outcomes. As a result, we believe that adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

 

 

  

We believe disputes betweenapproach the management of environmental and social risks with the same care and discipline as any other business risk, and we undertake a robust review of the environmental and social practices of our employeesclients and the firm are best resolved in arbitration, regardless of who the employee is or what claim they are asserting. Arbitration provides important benefits to both employers and employees and is in no way used to cover up “bad behavior.”potential clients when making our business selection decisions.

 

 

 »

Our arbitration provisions expressly carve out reports to, and charges filed with, government agencies, including the SEC, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and state agencies.

 

 »

We encourage employeesWhen we identify a potentially significant environmental or social issue, we address the issue by working with the client to come forward to report misconduct throughdevelop appropriate safeguards and sustainable practices. By facilitating the adoption of more sustainable practices, we can better serve the long-term interests of our robust, multi-channel internalcommunities, our clients and external complaint process.

 »

We maintain a disciplinary framework approved by our prudential regulatorsthe environment in which they operate, while helping to ensure that misconduct, including harassment and discrimination, is investigated and addressed.

 »

Many of the firm’s employees (including investment bankers, traders and private wealth advisors) are required to arbitrate any claims with the firm under FINRA rules. Our arbitration program, which is in compliance with all relevant rules and regulations, applies these rules consistently across theprudent risk management for our firm.

 

 

 » 

Arbitration provides a number of mutual benefitsWe will not hesitate to forgo any assignment where such productive engagement is not feasible or where the firm andtransaction involves potentially material environmental impacts, significant social issues or unacceptable risks that directly conflict with our people, including:policies and/or business risks assessments.

 

 

 »

Quicker resolutionFor instance, in 2022, the firm reviewed more than 1,700 transactions for environmental and social risks. We identified and managed environmental, health and safety risks in several potential transactions and portfolio companies — and in some cases, decided to forgo participation due to the high levels of disputes: The arbitration process is more efficient and streamlined than litigation in court; parties have their disputes resolved much more quickly in arbitration than in court, where appeals and delays relating to discovery and motion practice can result in multi-year litigation.risk that could not be mitigated or that did not align with our policies or commitments.

 

 

  »

Lower costs for both parties: Because ofIn addition to our firmwide review process, we equip teams in sensitive sectors with sector-specific due diligence guidelines and training to evaluate new business opportunities more effectively. This includes background on current environmental and social issues and sensitivities in the speed of resolution, it typically costs lesssector, as well as potential diligence questions to arbitrate than to litigate for all parties involved.discuss with a company.

 

 

 »

No limitationWe currently have fourteen guidelines across key sectors, which include Oil & Gas, Transportation, Water and Power Generation, among others. These sector guidelines are available on rights or remedies: Arbitrators are required to follow the same substantive laws that exist in court proceedings,our website as part of our Environmental Policy Framework and are permitted to award the same remedies available in court, including compensatory damages, punitive damagesperiodically reviewed and attorneys’ fees.updated based on emerging best practices, regulatory changes and engagement with stakeholders.

 

 

  »

Flexibility: Arbitration offers flexibilityWe have also developed cross-sector guidelines that apply to tailor proceedings to parties’ needsall our businesses. These guidelines help keep our teams up-to-date on the environmental and preferences. In addition,social issues that can affect our clients and the parties jointly select the arbitrator, whereascommunities in court the judge is assigned.which they operate. For example, as further detailed in our Environmental Policy Framework:

 

 

 » 

Indigenous Peoples:We recognize that the identities and cultures of indigenous peoples are inextricably linked to the lands on which they live and the natural resources on which they depend. For transactions where the use of proceeds may have robust firmwide controls designedthe potential to encourage reportingdirectly impact indigenous peoples, we expect our clients to demonstrate alignment with the objectives and preventrequirements of IFC Performance Standard 7 on Indigenous Peoples, including free, prior and address employee misconduct. Consistent with our Business Principles and Core Values, we strive to maintain the highest standards of conduct at all times.informed consent.

 

 

 »

Ongoing FocusStakeholder Engagement and Resettlement: For certain transactions where there could be material effects on Employee Conductlocal communities, we expect our clients to demonstrate an appropriate stakeholder engagement process. In cases where there is large-scale resettlement, we will closely evaluate the stakeholder engagement process and, if appropriate, work with the company to improve aspects such as compensation measures and/or community engagement.

 

 

Arbitration cannot be considered in a vacuum, and must be considered in the context of our firm culture, including our “zero tolerance” approach to discrimination and harassment. We strive to ensure the highest standards of conduct at all times, consistent with our Business Principles and Core Values.

 

86

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS83


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

 

 »

Critical Natural Habitats and UNESCO World Heritage Sites: We will not finance any projects or initiate loans where the specified use of proceeds would significantly convert or degrade a critical natural habitat. We also recognize the significance of cultural and natural heritage and will not knowingly finance extractive projects, commercial logging or other environmentally sensitive projects in prescribed UNESCO World Heritage sites. Furthermore, we will not finance projects that contravene any relevant international environmental agreement that has been enacted into the law of, or otherwise has the force of law in, the country in which the project is located.

We emphasizehave also undertaken, and will continue, a rigorous process to help ensure full analysis and vetting of information to comply beginning in 2025 with new disclosure requirements pursuant to the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which may ultimately incorporate aspects of the proponent’s requested assessment.

For more information on our sustainability efforts, see Spotlight on Sustainability.

Item 8. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report Disclosure of Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio

The New York City Comptroller, Municipal Building, One Centre Street, 8th Floor North, New York, New York 10007, on behalf of The New York City Employees’ Retirement System, The New York City Teachers’ Retirement System, and the New York City Police Pension Fund, each a beneficial owner of at least $25,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least one year, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal. The proponent has advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 Proponent’s Statement

Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio

Resolved

Shareholders request that Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Goldman”) disclose annually its Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio (“Ratio”), defined as its total financing through equity and debt underwriting, and project finance, in low-carbon energy supply relative to that in fossil-fuel energy supply. The disclosure, prepared at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, shall describe Goldman’s methodology, including what it classifies as “low carbon” or “fossil fuel.”

Supporting Statement

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) has advised that greenhouse gas emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. According to the International Energy Agency (“IEA”), this requires rapid transition away from fossil fuels and a tripling in global annual clean energy investment by 2030.1

Banks aligning their activities with their own climate goals are better prepared to manage the risks, including legal, reputational and financial risks, associated with the global energy transition. Furthermore, they can capitalize on profitable opportunities in clean energy and position themselves as leaders in a rapidly changing market. Since 2022, banks have reportedly earned more in lending and underwriting fees from clean energy projects than from oil, gas, and coal companies.2

Goldman has committed to aligning its financing activities with a net zero 2050 pathway and deploying $750 billion across its financing, investment and advisory activities by 2030 to help clients accelerate the climate transition and advance inclusive growth.”3

While these commitments may appear significant, investors need more information to assess Goldman’s relative financing of fossil fuels, which totaled approximately $143 billion since 2016, ranking it one of fossil fuels’ largest financers.4

According to BloombergNEF’s recent report, Financing the Transition: Energy Supply Investment and Bank Financing Activity (“BloombergNEF Report”),5 the pace at which low-carbon energy supply is scaled up will dictate the rate

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

87


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

at which fossil fuels are phased down. Synthesizing the seven most frequently referenced 1.5C – aligned pathways (IEA; Network for Greening the Financial System; IPCC), it concluded that, to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, the Ratio must reach a minimum of 4:1 by 2030, rise to 6:1 in the 2030s and 10:1 thereafter.

Clean-energy-to-fossil-fuel financing ratios have emerged as a key metric for assessing progress in financing the clean energy transition. The IEA tracks one,6 and they have been recognized by the leading bank climate alliances in which Goldman participates, including the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero and the Net Zero Banking Alliance, which advised that comparable indicators for “reporting requirements could include …a transition finance ratio.”7

At management’s discretion, we recommend Goldman:

Set timebound Ratio targets aligned with its net zero commitment.

Consult BloombergNEF Report when setting Ratio targets and defining “low carbon” and “fossil fuel” financing.

Work to establish standardized industrywide methodologies.

Include lending in its ratio if methodologically sound.

We urge shareholders to vote FOR the proposal.

1

https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050

2

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artcles/2023-10-18/green-fees-overtake-fossil-fuels-for-second-straight-year

3

Goldman Sachs Update on Our 2030 Sustainable Finance Commitment; report.pdf (goldmansachs.com)

4

https://www.bankingonclimatechaos.org/#sector-panel

5

https://assets.bbhub.io/professional/sites/24/BNEF-Bank-Financing-Report-Summary-2023.pdf

6

https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2023/overview-and-key-findings

7

https://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/NZBA-Transition-Finance-Guide.pdf

Directors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

We believe the greatest contribution that we as a financial institution can make on climate issues is to help our clients achieve their sustainability goals. To this end, over the past two decades we have made a number of commitments commensurate with our role in the global economy to help address the impacts of climate change and accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Clean energy financing is incorporated into our strategic $750 billion sustainable financing, investing and advisory activity target. In addition, we expect that the regulatory standards related to climate risk and the climate transition will continue to evolve across jurisdictions, particularly in the coming years, which will necessitate further consideration of these issues and a variety of new disclosures. In light of this – including that we will be publishing a “Green Asset Ratio” later this year to comply with the European Banking Authority’s new disclosure requirements – we believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

We expect that we all have a shared responsibilitythe regulatory standards related to exercise sound judgment, mitigateclimate risk and escalate concerns,the climate transition will continue to evolve across jurisdictions. For instance, as a regulated financial institution with significant operations in the European Union (EU), we will be disclosing a significant amount of new sustainability and our Board holds senior management accountable for embodying an appropriate “toneclimate-related data over the next year at the top” and maintaining and communicating a culture that emphasizes our values.firmwide level.

 

 

 »

As partBeginning this year, we are required to disclose a Green Asset Ratio, which has been established by European regulatory authorities as a key performance indicator for measuring the proportion of our ongoing commitmentEU Taxonomy-aligned on-balance-sheet exposure in relation to dialogue, education and formal training, we offer a broad range of programs focused on our business standards and conduct, and have established select committees focused on conduct.total assets.

 

 

 »

For example,We have also undertaken, and will continue, a rigorous process to help ensure full analysis and vetting of information to comply with new disclosure requirements beginning in 2019,2025 pursuant to the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, which may ultimately incorporate metrics related to the proponent’s requested “clean-energy-to-fossil-fuel financing ratio”,
but
we launched “A Culturecannot prudently commit to the disclosure of Respect,” an annual mandatory training program for all employees globally focused on respectnew climate metrics related to our financing activities in the workplace, our collective responsibility to challenge unacceptable behavior and the rolethis time of leaders and managers in promoting a respectful environment.significant regulatory developments.

88

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Furthermore, we have already set financing portfolio carbon intensity targets that cover the relevant sectors (power and energy) where the achievement of said targets is in large part predicated on increasing low carbon technology financing on a relative
basis in support of clients that are developing these projects and technologies.

 

 

In addition, our Firmwide Conduct Committee,Ultimately, we believe that calculating and disclosing the proponent’s requested “clean-energy-to-fossil-fuel financing ratio” – a version of which is already available through other sources, as the proponent notes – will be of limited long-term
incremental value. The proponent’s requested ratio may not align
with senior partner-level membership, is responsiblethese anticipated regulatory developments in terms of calculation methodology or otherwise, which in turn could create confusion among investors and other stakeholders and become overly burdensome and unnecessary to calculate if we are required to publish the proponent’s requested ratio alongside new regulatory disclosures.

For more information on our sustainability efforts, see Spotlight on Sustainability.

Item 9. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a GSAM Proxy Voting Review

The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), through the Board of Pensions of the Presbyterian Church U.S.A., 100 Witherspoon Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202, together with a co-filer, Portico Benefit Services, each beneficial owner of at least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, are the proponents of the following shareholder proposal. The proponents have advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

Proponents’ Statement

Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) is a respected global financial services leader providing multiple investment options for clients addressing environmental, social and governance (ESG) topics.

GSAM understands the materiality of climate risk and its negative impact on companies and the economy, however our voting record on climate-related proposals has dropped dramatically putting us far behind many other investment firms. According to Share Action’s 2022 ranking of the top 68 managers1 voting record on 252 shareholder proposals, GSAM ranked 59th of 68 asset managers assessed, supporting only 35% of overall proposals, and only 56% of environmental resolutions. And in 2023 GSAM votes declined further on climate and racial justice resolutions, for example voting for only 4 climate resolutions out of 65 (according to NPX filings of S&P 500 companies provided by Diligent).

This proxy voting record seems inconsistent with GSAM’s membership in several investing initiatives:

The Principles for definingResponsible Investment, a global investor network representing more than $120 trillion in assets urges investors to vote on ESG issues and implementing the firm’s conduct risk program, particularly the relationship between conduct and culture.“prioritize addressing systemic sustainability issues”2.

 

  »

Escalation ChannelsClimate Action 100+, an investor initiative urging the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitters to reduce emissions consistent with the Paris Agreement, flags votes for its members; Goldman lagged peers, voting for only 3 of 20 flagged proposals3.

When voting GSAM looks primarily at near-term risk created for a specific company. Such an approach is shortsighted and fails to acknowledge a multitude of physical and transition-related risks.

In addition, proxy voting that appears to ignore the full scope of climate risks creates reputational and business risk for the company, especially with global clients committed to ESG and concerned about the broader economic impact of climate change.

Similarly, we believe diversity issues are of material importance to companies and investors. For years Goldman Sachs has affirmed its commitment to diversity. But the proxy voting record on diversity and inclusion issues did not reflect GSAM’s stated positions on diversity, another concerning misalignment.

We further believe it is GSAM’s fiduciary responsibility to consider the impacts of climate and diversity risks on both portfolio companies and portfolios as a whole and vote accordingly. Thus, we request this special review.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

89


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Resolved: Shareowners request that the Board of Directors initiate a review of both Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s 2023 proxy voting record and proxy voting policies related to diversity and climate change, prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information.

Supporting statement: Proponents suggest the review include the following among other topics:

Any misalignment of the company’s policy and voting record with the goals of the Paris Agreement, industry initiatives of which Goldman Sachs is part and its own stated policies.

 

 

As partA comparison with the voting record of our Business Integrity Program, we maintain a multi-channel internalother major investment firms and external (including external counsel) complaint process that encourages employees to raise concerns without reprisal.mutual funds

 

 

RegardlessRecommendations for strengthening voting guidelines on climate-related issues.

1

https://shareaction.org/reports/voting-matters-2022.

2

https://www.unpri.org/download?ac=13269

3

https://www.climateaction100.org/approach/proxy-season/

Directors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Goldman Sachs is committed to sustainability, including climate transition and inclusive growth, as well as advancing diversity, equity and inclusion, and we have a myriad of policies, practices and disclosures on an enterprise-wide basis in support of these commitments. However, it is important to note that this proposal attempts to link the responsibilities of our Board to the separate voting practices that Goldman Sachs Asset Management (GSAM) exercises on behalf of its clients. As further discussed below, GSAM owes fiduciary duties to its clients that are separate and distinct from the fiduciary duties our Board owes to our shareholders. We believe that this proposal conflates the Board’s oversight responsibilities with GSAM’s fiduciary obligations to its clients.

GSAM is a registered investment adviser that owes fiduciary duties to its clients, which requires that GSAM act in the best interests of its clients. As a fiduciary, GSAM, within its public markets investment business, is committed to promoting and exercising effective stewardship among the companies represented in the portfolios GSAM manages on behalf of its clients. GSAM exercises its shareholder rights via proxy voting, engages with company management and participates in various conferences and industry forums with a focus on promoting long-term shareholder value for its clients. GSAM provides public reporting and disclosures on its website (www.gsam.com) regarding its stewardship approach, including through an annual Stewardship Report, which contains information on the development of GSAM’s proxy voting policy and voting outcomes.

As a result, we believe that the adoption of this proposal impedes GSAM’s fiduciary responsibilities, is unnecessary and is not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

Exercising client shareholder rights via proxy voting is an important element of the manner of escalation, allpublic equity portfolio management service GSAM provides to its advisory clients that have authorized GSAM to address such matters are carefully reviewed and investigated internally and/ or externally, as appropriate, with the highest discretion, and the firm strictly prohibits any retaliation for reporting potential employee misconduct.on their behalf.

 

 »

“Me Too” Movement. In 2018,GSAM has fiduciary responsibilities under applicable law and is ultimately responsible for voting shares in portfolio companies in the contextbest interests of its advisory clients, which may or may not have the “Me Too” movement we reviewed and strengthenedsame interests as our policies and procedures, including by:shareholders.

 

 »

Expanding our sexual harassment policy statement;To assist GSAM in exercising this critical responsibility for public equities, GSAM has developed a customized Global Proxy Voting Policy (the GSAM Voting Policy, available on GSAM’s website at (www.gsam.com)). The GSAM Voting Policy includes customized voting guidelines developed by GSAM’s public portfolio management teams and Global Stewardship Team that embody the positions and factors GSAM generally considers important in casting proxy votes.

90

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

»

GSAM also established the Asset Management Public Markets Business Proxy Voting Council (the Council) to oversee
GSAM’s proxy voting responsibilities. The Council is comprised of stakeholders from the Global Stewardship Team, public equity investment teams, divisional management, Legal and Compliance and is responsible for bringing key stakeholders together annually to review and recommend potential changes to the GSAM Voting Policy and, on an ad hoc basis, discuss any potential changes to the voting process and convene on voting topics that may arise during the year.

 

 

Implementing more comprehensive external reporting mechanisms for employees,GSAM recognizes the effect environmental, social and governance factors can have on investment performance, and it provides public disclosure, both on its website and through its filings with the SEC, regarding its stewardship approach, including the optiondevelopment of reporting to female professionals;its voting policy and voting outcomes.

 

 

Enhancing our sexual harassment investigation protocol, including by establishing guiding principles, confidentiality and support considerations and clear best practices.

»
 

With respect to company proxies voted in accordance with the GSAM Voting Policy, GSAM discloses voting results on its website on a quarterly basis.

 

84» 

With respect to GSAM-managed U.S. registered mutual funds, GSAM also discloses voting results in a filing with the SEC and on its website on an annual basis.

» GOLDMAN SACHS

GSAM publishes an annual Stewardship Report on its website that outlines the efforts of the Global Stewardship Team,
which focuses on proxy voting and proactive, outcomes-based engagement initiatives to promote best practices and drive positive change.

»   |  

GSAM can provide clients with portfolio-specific proxy voting and engagement reporting on a quarterly, semi-annual or
annual basis, upon request. GSAM has the ability to automate and customize these reports and welcomes the opportunity to discuss the content and frequency of these reports with its clients subject to their needs.

» PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

In certain cases, clients also have the ability to conduct their own voting or develop customized voting policies specific to
their investment needs or goals.

 

As a result of the fiduciary duties GSAM owes to its clients, we believe that GSAM is best suited to determine the manner in which it votes proxies and that continued adherence to its disclosed voting and investment policies best serves the interests of its advisory clients and, therefore, our shareholders.


ITEMS 5-8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Item 7.10. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Conversion to a Report on Financial Statement Assumptions Regarding Climate Change

The National Center for Public Benefit Corporation

Harrington Investments, Inc., 1001 2nd Street,Policy Research, 2005 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Suite 325, Napa, California, 94559,700, Washington, D.C. 20036, beneficial owner of 100 sharesat least $2,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least three years, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal. The proponent has advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 

 PROPONENT’S STATEMENTProponent’s Statement

Our company’s ChairmanFINANCIAL STATEMENT ASSUMPTIONS AND CLIMATE CHANGE

WHEREAS: Many policymakers, investors and Executive Officer,companies have converged on goals including the need to limit global temperature increase to 1.5° C and to reach net zero global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050.

The International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Net Zero 2050 Roadmap (NZE) offers a normative, not scientific, energy sector path for net zero GHG emissions. The IEA urges no investment in August 2019, signednew fossil supply projects to achieve net zero: “As a “Statementshare of total energy supply, [fossil fuels] fall from 80% in 2020 to just over 20% in 2050.”1

In line with such assumptions, the Company has a goal to achieve net zero carbon emissions in its operations and supply chain by 2030,2 and has announced that it would “target $750 billion in financing, investing, and advisory activity to nine areas focused on these two priorities….”3 As of March 2021, the PurposeCompany had already reached “$156 billion of [its] total, including $93 billion dedicated to climate transition.”4 The Company has also made clear its commitment to the Paris Agreement and has “align[ed] [its] financing activities with a Corporation,net zero by 2050 pathway. committing our

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

91


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

These investment decisions presume the normative IEA NZE is possible and is based on true assumptions, but it is unclear what, if any, analysis Goldman Sachs has done to protect company assets should NZE prove unsound.

A 2023 study by the Energy Policy Research Foundation (EPRF) found that net zero advocates have misconstrued the IEA’s position on new oil and gas investment, and that the IEA has made questionable assumptions and milestones for NZE about government policies, energy and carbon prices, behavioral changes, economic growth, and technology maturity.5

The EPRF study found, “Oil and gas play irreplaceable roles in modern civilization that are not reproducible with low- carbon alternatives. The attempt to serve all stakeholders, including shareholders as stakeholders; and

Goldmansubstitute them with inferior, less efficient, energy sources will have paid over $15.9 billion dollarsenormous micro- and macroeconomic consequences and profound geopolitical implications.”6

NZE advocates speak in penalties for investmentterms of fossil fuels as stranded assets, but no consideration has been given to whether the true stranded assets might be the assets spent on expensive renewable energy options based on faulty assumptions. Should the EPRF’s study prove true, our Company stands to lose its renewable energy investments, plus the costs of reverting back to reliable energy sources. Additionally, it appears that most countries are not really going to outlaw reliable and lending abuses since 2000, includingaffordable energy, further making current net-zero stranded-asset theory non-sensical.7

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the recent $2.9 billion settlement to resolveCompany’s Board seek an audited report assessing how applying the 1Malaysia Development Berhad bribery scandal;

Our company has received nearly $950 billion dollars in Federal loans, guarantees and bailout assistance since 1997, entailing a social debt to taxpayers;

Shareholders last year filed a resolution with our company requesting that our board as fiduciaries review the Statement and publish recommendations regarding appropriate implementationfindings of the statement, however, our board opposedEnergy Policy Research Foundation and similar studies would affect the resolutionassumptions, costs,

estimates, and took no action;valuations underlying its financial statements, including those related to long-term commodity and carbon prices, remaining asset lives, future asset retirement obligations, capital expenditures and impairments.

The COVID-19 pandemic arrived priorBoard should obtain and ensure publication of the report by February 2025, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information.

1

https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/deebef5d-0c34-4539-9d0c-10b13d840027/NetZeroby2050-ARoadmapfortheGlobalEnergySector_CORR/pdf

2

https://www.goldmansachs.com/our-commitments/sustainability/sustainable-finance/our-operational-impact/

3

https://www.goldmansachs.com/media-relations/press-releases/2021/announcement-04-mar-2021.html

4

https://www.goldmansachs.com/media-relations/press-releases/2021/announcement-04-mar-2021.html

5

https://assets.realclear.com/files/2023/06/2205_a_critical_assessment_of_the_ieas_net_zero_scenario_esg_and_the_cessation_of_investment_in_new_ oil_and_gas_fields.pdf

6

https://assets.realclear.com/files/2023/06/2205_a_critical_assessment_of_the_ieas_net_zero_scenario_esg_and_the_cessation_of_investment_in_new_ oil_and_gas_fields.pdf

7

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/resistance-green-policies-around-europe-2023-08-10/; https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/19/china/china-xi-carbon-climate-kerry-intl-hnk/index.html

https://energy.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/renewable/indias-ambitious-2070-zero-emission-target-needs-10-trillion-investment/96512902;

Directors’ Recommendation

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

We are committed to supporting our 2020 shareholders’ annual meeting, makingclients with their climate transition strategies. We have long recognized the scale and complexity of the global climate transition, and we have been transparent about the challenges – for example, with respect to data – that have impacted our company’s commitment to stakeholders even more timelyclimate-related reporting. To this end, we have also developed a strategic framework for addressing the risks posed by climate change on our businesses and urgent foroperations, which is further discussed below and in our company to implement;2023 TCFD report.

The U.S. economy has been torn asunder and millions of Americans have lost their jobs and it may take many years for it to recover fully;

At the 2020 annual meeting, the proponent asked management whether it will reduce or eliminate dividends, stock buybacks and executive bonuses; expand financial assistance to communities mostAs a result, in need; and delineate how our company will treat alllight of our constituents as stakeholders, focusing on generating long-term shareholder value;

In responsecurrent disclosures and client-centric approach to managing climate-related risk and opportunities, we believe that the pandemic, our companyadoption of this proposal is unnecessary and its employees made generous global financial contributions to those in the greatest need, but there now exists the opportunity to convert to a Public Benefit Corporation pursuant to Delaware law to institutionalize a long-term commitment to all stakeholders consistent with our CEO’s pledge on behalf of Goldman Sachs; and

By amending our corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation to become a Public Benefit Corporation, Goldman Sachs would be structured to operatenot in the best interests of allour firm or our shareholders.

Climate-related risk and considerations are part of our broad risk-oversight and governance structure, including across our Board, senior management, and other business and functional groups. We are focused on managing a broad spectrum of financial and nonfinancial risk across our business, including climate-related risks.

We have developed a strategic framework for addressing the risks posed by climate change on our businesses and operations. These risks are incorporated into our firmwide risk taxonomy, which recognizes that climate-related risks may materialize through other risk categories (e.g., Credit and Market Risk, Liquidity and Funding Risk and Operational Risk).

92

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

»

We categorize climate risk into physical risk and transition risk. Physical risk is the risk that asset values may change as a result of changes in the climate, while transition risk is the risk that asset values may change because of changes in climate policies or changes in the underlying economy as it decarbonizes. We have developed methodologies to assess risks, which serve as fundamental elements for quantifying and integrating climate risk into relevant risk management processes across the firm.

»

In addition, we study a variety of climate-change related scenarios to further inform our risk management processes and support our clients’ climate-related objectives.

While our firm is focused on managing climate-related risk, we also aim to capture climate-related opportunities. Our approach to these opportunities, which are subject to similar business selection, due diligence and risk-return analysis as other commercial opportunities, is aligned with the foundational levers of our Sustainable Finance Strategy, including our work with clients and how we manage our firm.

»

Working with Clients: Our sustainability strategy is centered on how we can help our clients achieve their sustainability objectives. We have developed and continue to refine our firmwide One Goldman Sachs commercial model that leverages the full depth and breadth of our franchise, with the goal of bringing the best of Goldman Sachs and our sustainable finance capabilities to our clients.

»

Managing Our Firm: We promote an inclusive workforce, providing our people with the tools, resources and support they need to serve our clients. Our people actively protect the value of our firm, taking care to manage our own global footprint. By extending our commitments and tending to our supply chain, we strive to lead through action to advance sustainable business outcomes over the long term.

For more information on our sustainability efforts, see Spotlight on Sustainability.

Item 11. Shareholder Proposal Regarding Pay Equity Reporting

Mercy Rome, care of those materially affected by its conduct, which would include multiple stakeholders, including shareholders. The StateNewground Social Investment, 111 Queen Anne Ave. N, #500, Seattle, Washington 98109, together with co-filers Eric and Emily Johnson and the Robert H. and Elizabeth Fergus Foundation, each a beneficial owner of Delaware recently adopted new amendments that makes the adoptionat least $2,000 in market value of the new structure even more attractivecompany’s Common Stock for at least three years, are the proponents of the following shareholder proposal. The proponents have advised us that a representative will present the proposal and accessiblerelated supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

Proponent’s Statement

RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (“Company”, “Goldman Sachs”, or “Goldman”) report annually on unadjusted median and reduces certain board member fiduciary liabilitiesadjusted pay gaps across race and gender globally, and include associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks – including risks associated with recruiting and retaining diverse key talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, and omit proprietary information, litigation strategy, and legal compliance information.

Ideally, annual reporting would integrate base, bonus, and equity compensation broken out by country, where appropriate, and further differentiate between gender and racial/minority/ethnicity groupings.

Racial/gender pay gaps are the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Goldman Sachs has faced substantial scrutiny in recent years for breaches of stakeholder interests; be it therefore

Resolved, that shareholders request the Board approve an amendmentgender pay discrimination, which culminated in a $215 million class-action settlement in May 2023.1 Ongoing pay inequities – which persist across both race and gender at Goldman – pose substantial risks to the company’s Restated CertificateCompany. For instance, Black workers’ median annual earnings represent just 77% of Incorporation to become a Public Benefit Corporation pursuant to Delaware lawwhite wages, while the median income for women working full-time is only 84% that of men. Considering race, Black women earn 76% and to submit the proposed amendment to shareholders for approval. Such a change would enable the company to operate in a responsible and sustainable manner that balances the stockholders’ pecuniary interests, and the best interests of those stakeholders affected by the corporation’s conduct.

Supporting Statement: The proponent recommends that the Board, in its discretion, consider stating the public purpose in the amended certificate that reflects a forward looking vision regarding Goldman Sachs’ unique ability to respond appropriately for all global stakeholders drawing upon lessons learned from the deadly pandemic.Latina women just 63%.2

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS85

93


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

At the current trajectory, White women will not reach pay equity until 2059 – three decades from now; Black women not until 2130 – a century from now; and Latina women not until 2224 – two full centuries from now.3

Citigroup estimates that had minority and gender wage gaps been closed 20 years ago, it would have contributed $12 trillion additional dollars to national income.

Studies link diversity in leadership and managing pay equity to superior stock performance as well as higher return on equity.4

Women and minorities clearly face structural bias regarding job opportunity and pay. At Goldman, underrepresented minorities represent 47.0% of the workforce but only 26.7% of executives. Women represent 42.9% of the workforce but only 25.1% of executives.

Best practice pay equity reporting consists of two parts:

 

1.

Statisticallyadjusted gaps – which assess whether minorities and non-minorities (both men and women) are paid equally for similar roles.

2.

Unadjusted median pay gaps – which assess equal opportunity for high paying roles.

Currently, Goldman reports neither adjusted nor unadjusted quantitative pay gaps. In contrast, roughly 50% of the nation’s top 100 companies report adjusted gaps, and an increasing number also disclose unadjusted gaps.5

Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way to measure pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and the International Labor Organization. The United Kingdom and Ireland legally mandate disclosure of median gender pay gaps.6

THEREFORE: Because gender and equity pay gaps are inherently unfair, because they have been shown to harm company performance, and because disparity continues to be a serious issue that plagues Goldman Sachs, please vote FOR this commonsense reporting proposal.

~ ~ ~

1

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/09/business/dealbook/goldman-sachs-discrimination-lawsuit.html

2

https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/cps-pinc/pinc-05.html—par_textimage_24

3

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scoreca rd+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf

4

Ibid.

5

https://diversiq.com/which-sp-500-companies-disclose-gender-pay-equity-data/

6

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scoreca rd+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf

 DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONDirectors’ Recommendation

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

We have long believed thatshare the proponents’ focus on pay equity. We recognize there is a company should benefit alldesire among certain stakeholders for publication of its stakeholders, including its employees, clients, communities, shareholders, vendors and suppliers, and this approach is embedded in all that we do. Our ability to successfully execute on our purpose — advancing sustainable economic growth and financial opportunitymore data regarding pay — and drive long-term shareholder valuewe have already committed to providing additional information. We believe the fundamental underlying issue for our firm and many corporations is integrally relatedthe representation of women and diverse professionals both in magnitude and levels of seniority. We remain committed to how wellcompensating our employees fairly and equitably and to fostering gender and racial/ethnic diversity and inclusion in our leadership ranks and broader workforce. To this end, we servehave policies and procedures in place with respect to our clientshiring, promotion and customers, manage our people andcompensation practices to support our broader stakeholders, including the communities in which we live and work.these commitments. This includes ensuring compensation decisions are subject to multiple levels of review.

We are proudalso highly focused on providing transparency and accountability to have been a signatoryour investors and other stakeholders. For example, we continue to the Business Roundtable’s Statementregularly report on the Purpose of a Corporation in 2019, which was a reflection offirm’s progress towards our long-standing principles and our governance and management framework.

In light of our ongoing focus on advancing the interests of all of our stakeholders,aspirational diversity goals, as well as various considerations relating toour annual EEO-1 demographic data. Furthermore, in connection with our 2023 annual meeting commitment, we have published information regarding our gender and race pay gaps on our website at www.gs.com/corpgov.

After taking into account our existing policies and procedures, as well as the practicality and appropriatenesspublication of converting to a public benefit corporation, particularly for a financial services firm,pay equity statement, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and not in the best interests of our firm or our shareholders.

 

94

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ITEMS 4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

Our compensation policies and procedures are designed to compensate employees without regard to gender, race, ethnicity or other protected categories. It is the firm’s foundational documents already expressly providepractice to annually review employee compensation prior to its finalization. More specifically, our Legal and Human Resource functions conduct a robust compensation analysis, the purpose of which is to help ensure the firm continues to pay employees comparable compensation for the consideration of stakeholder interests in taking any corporate action – and have done so since our IPO.similar work.

 

  »

Since our initial public offering, our Certificate of Incorporation has explicitly providedWe believe that reporting median pay gaps on an unadjusted basis, as requested in the proposal, does not provide information
that is accurate or useful, as it does not take into account factors such as an employee’s role, tenure, location or impact. These factors, among others, are necessary to consider when evaluating whether employees are comparably compensated
for the consideration of stakeholder interests — together with the interests of our shareholders — in connection with the taking of any corporate action. This includes our current and retired employees, our clients and customers and our contributions to our communities, among other considerations.similar work.

 

  »

This clearly demonstrates that inAs part of our current corporate formcontinued commitment to enhanced transparency and accountability, we are permitted to —have published additional information regarding our gender and do — appropriately consider stakeholder interests in order to carry outrace pay gaps on our purpose and drive shareholder value.website at www.gs.com/corpgov.

 

  

Converting to a public benefit corporation could create unnecessary costThis pay equity statement is the next step on the firm’s journey of enhanced transparency and uncertainty, while providing shareholders and other stakeholders with limited, if any, benefit.accountability regarding our workforce.

 

 »

OperationalSince 2021, we have published our People Strategy Report annually (available at www.gs.com), which provides tangible indicators of our progress on our people-related goals, including expanded EEO-1 disclosure and Market Uncertainty. Toprogress on our knowledge, only a handful of U.S. publicly traded corporations are,aspirational diversity goals. We will continue to publish information regarding our gender and race pay gaps in our People Strategy Report or have newly converted to be, public benefit corporations, and no major global financial institutions are public benefit corporations. As a result, there could be operational and market uncertainty, which could impact our ability to attract investors, should we even receive the necessary support from shareholders to undertake such a conversion. For example:comparable publication on an annual basis going forward.

 

 

There is no case law in Delaware that provides guidance regarding the balancing of obligations of directors of public benefit corporations when the interests of shareholders and other stakeholders or the public benefit diverge. Given this, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified directors for the public benefit corporation.

 

There could be market uncertainty given the difficulty in assessing the impact of such a conversion on our short-term and long-term stock price, market capitalization and overall operational and financial performance.

There may be a destabilizing effect on our international operations, as the feasibility and impact of converting to a public benefit corporation would need to be reviewed in each of the jurisdictions where the firm currently operates.

 »

Regulatory Uncertainty and Oversight. As a participant in the global financial services industry, we are subject to extensive regulation and supervision worldwide, which regulation and supervision take into account the interests of constituencies other than shareholders in their regulatory oversight functions. In the U.S. alone, for our firm this includes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the SEC, the FDIC, the New York State Department of Financial Services, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission. We must comply with the rules and regulations of each of these authorities around the world in order to continue to do business as a financial institution, and the views of such authorities and our ability to comply with their rules and regulations could impact our ability to convert to a public benefit corporation and, following conversion, our ability to take certain actions needed to achieve our public benefit purpose.

86GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
For more information on our compensation philosophy generally, see Compensation Matters. For more information on our racial and gender equity initiatives, see www.gs.com/racialequity and www.gs.com/whenwomenlead.


ITEMS 5-8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 »

Costs and Administrative Burden of Implementation. The costs and administrative burden of converting to a public benefit corporation could be significant. This may include, without limitation:

Legal fees and other expenses in connection with the conversion to and managing the firm as a public benefit corporation post-conversion, as well as distraction to the Board and management from executing their existing fiduciary duties and advancing our purpose;

Legal fees and other expenses in connection with soliciting shareholder approval of the conversion to a public benefit corporation (which approval is not assured), including filing materials with the SEC;

Costs and expenses in connection with preparation of additional required reporting; and

The possibility for shareholder litigation relating to the conversion or how our directors balance shareholder and public benefit interests, which could in turn create significant legal and other expenses for the firm.

We have a clear track record of successfully delivering on our purpose and supporting our stakeholders to drive long-term returns for our shareholders. Our shareholders agree — as evidenced by the fact that over 90% of votes present or represented by proxy at our 2020 Annual Meeting voted against a similar proposal at that meeting.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS87


ITEMS 5-8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

Item 8.12. Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Racial Equity AuditDirector Election Resignation Bylaw

The Service Employees International UnionNew York City Carpenters Pension Plans Master Trust, 1800 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite 301, Washington D.C. 20036,Fund, 395 Hudson Street, 9th Floor, New York, New York 10014, beneficial owner of 9,787 sharesat least $25,000 in market value of the company’s Common Stock for at least one year, is the proponent of the following shareholder proposal. The proponent has advised us that a representative will present the proposal and related supporting statement at our Annual Meeting.

 

 PROPONENT’S STATEMENTProponent’s Statement

RESOLVED that

Director Election Resignation Bylaw Proposal:

Resolved: That the shareholders of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (“Goldman”Company”) urgehereby request that the board of directors take the necessary action to adopt a director election resignation bylaw that requires each director nominee to submit an irrevocable conditional resignation to the Company to be effective upon the director’s failure to receive the required shareholder majority vote support in an uncontested election. The proposed resignation bylaw shall require the Board to accept a tendered resignation absent the finding of Directorsa compelling reason or reasons to overseenot accept the resignation. Further, if the Board does not accept a racial equity audit analyzing Goldman’s impacts on nonwhite stakeholderstendered resignation and communities of color. Input from civil rights organizations, employees, and customersthe director remains as a “holdover” director, the resignation bylaw shall stipulate that should be considered in determining the specific mattersa “holdover” director fail to be analyzed. Are-elected at the next annual election of directors, that director’s new tendered resignation will be automatically effective 30 days after the certification of the election vote. The Board shall report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting confidential and proprietary information, should be publicly disclosed on Goldman’s website.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

High-profile police killings of black people—most recently George Floyd—have galvanized the movementreasons for racial justice. That movement, togetherits actions to accept or reject a tendered resignation in a Form 8-K filing with the disproportionate impacts ofU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Supporting Statement: The Proposal requests that the COVID-19 pandemic, have focused the attention of media, the public and policy makers on systemic racism, racialized violence and inequities in employment, health care, and the criminal justice system.

Goldman touts its $10 million Fund for Racial Equity, which will “support organizations addressing racial injustice,” and the $17 million it “deployed”Board establish a director resignation bylaw to “organizations supporting [COVID-19] relief efforts in communities of color.”1 We urge Goldman to implement its commitment to racial justice by assessing its impacts on nonwhite stakeholders and communities of color.

Although Goldmanenhance director accountability. The Company has set diversity goals for its professional workforce, it faces challenges with respect to inclusion. A viral June 2020 email from a black managing director stated: “[W]hile our firm expresses a commitment to equality and social justice up top, [junior colleagues] don’t necessarily see commitment and support from their direct managers.”2

Goldman underwrites municipal bonds whose proceeds pay police brutality settlements. For example, Goldman was lead underwriter for a 2017 Chicago offering that allocated $225 million for settlements and judgments. One report characterized these bonds as “a transfer of wealth from over-policed communities of color to Wall Street and wealthy investors.”3

Goldman’s philanthropy fund has donated to the Los Angeles and New York City police foundations4 and the company reportedly sponsors the Salt Lake City police foundation.5 Goldman Sachs Asset Management co-chaired the New York City police foundation’s 2019 annual gala.6 Police foundations buy equipment for police departments, including surveillance technology that has been used to target communities of color and nonviolent protestors.

Although Goldman does not disclose all of its trade associations, it lists membership in the Securities Industry Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”)established in its “Statement on Policy Engagementbylaws a majority vote standard for use in an uncontested director election, an election in which the number of nominees equal the number of open board seats. Under applicable state corporate law, a director’s term extends until his or her successor is elected and Political Participation.”7 SIFMA lobbied most frequently inqualified, or until he or she resigns or is removed from office. Therefore, an incumbent director who fails to receive the current Congress onrequired vote for election under a majority vote standard continues to serve as a “holdover” director until the Wall Street Tax Actnext meeting of 2019, which would tax financial transactions.8 Supporters argue thatshareholders. A Company governance policy currently addresses the revenue raised through the tax could fund measurescontinued status of an incumbent director who fails to be re-elected by requiring such as student loan forgiveness and the Green New Deal,9 which would mitigate impacts of systemic racism.10

We urge Goldmandirector to assess its behavior through a racial equity lens to identify how it contributes to systemic racism, including areas of misalignment between Goldman’s stated values and the impacts of its actions, and could begin to help dismantle it.tender his or her resignation for Board consideration.

 

1

https://www.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/fund-for-racial-equity/index.html  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

2

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-goldman-sachs-race/goldman-sachs-executives-email-making-plea-for-racial-equality-goes-viral-at- firm-idUSKBN23C086

3

http://nathancummings.org/wp-content/uploads/PoliceBrutalityBonds-Jun2018-1.pdf, at 7.

4

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/311774905/201922279349300402/IRS990ScheduleI

5

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/18/new-racial-justice-target-defund-police-foundations-417423

6

https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b1m0xjc8wmn3mf/Color-of-Change-Calls-on-Larry-Fink-to-Stop-Supporting-NYC-Police-Foundation

7

https://www.goldmansachs.com/investor-relations/corporate-governance/corporate-governance-documents/political-statement.pdf

8

https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs//summary?id=D000000229

9

E.g., https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/463361-a-wall-street-tax-can-help-pay-for-bold-policy-solutions; https://www.cfo.com/tax/2019/05/bernie-sanders-introduces-plans-for-wall-street-speculation-tax/

10

See https://www.marketwatch.com/story/you-have-a-degree-but-who-do-you-know-why-student-debt-is-a-racial-justice-issue-2020-06-15; https://www.cjr.org/covering_climate_now/green-new-deal-climate-justice.php

88 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

95


ITEMS 5-8.4-12. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

 

 

 

The new director resignation bylaw will set a more demanding standard of review for addressing director resignations then that contained in the Company’s resignation governance policy. The resignation bylaw will require the reviewing directors to articulate a compelling reason or reasons for not accepting a tendered resignation and allowing an un-elected director to continue to serve as a “holdover” director. Importantly, if a director’s resignation is not accepted and he or she continues as a “holdover” director but again fails to be elected at the next annual meeting of shareholders, that director’s new tendered resignation will be automatically effective 30 days following the election vote certification. While providing the Board latitude to accept or not accept the initial resignation of an incumbent director that fails to receive majority vote support, the amended bylaw will establish the shareholder vote as the final word when a continuing “holdover” director is not re-elected. The Proposal’s enhancement of the director resignation process will establish shareholder voting in director elections as a more consequential governance right.

 

 DIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATIONDirectors’ Recommendation

 

OUR BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

We shareOur directors take very seriously their fiduciary obligation to act in the proponent’s focus on advancing racial equity. The recent senseless actsbest interests of racism and violence against Black people serve as a deeply upsetting reminder for all of us that significant work in this area remains. Enhancing racial equity, including by driving inclusive growth, is not only the right thing to do, it is core to our purpose and how we do business, and we are committed to promoting diversity, equity and inclusion in all that we do both internally and externally.

Over the past year, we have further strengthened our established racial equity-related initiatives and taken new actions to encourage open dialogue, assess our shortcomings and enhance our diversity and inclusion efforts to create lasting change both at our firm and within our communities. In lightshareholders. Director accountability is a critical element of this. Importantly, we already have in our ongoing commitmentBy-Laws a majority voting standard for uncontested elections that includes a director resignation policy.

As a result, taking into account our current By-Laws, our robust director nomination process and corporate governance best practices, as well as the fact that our shareholders have not expressed any significant concerns regarding our director resignation policy to these important issues,date, we believe that the adoption of this proposal is unnecessary and therefore not in the best interestinterests of our firm or our shareholders.

 

 

  

Bringing diverse people, perspectivesPursuant to our existing By-Laws, a director that does not receive majority support must immediately tender his or her resignation to the Board. The Board, excluding the impacted director, will promptly determine, through a process managed by our Governance Committee, which is comprised of independent directors, whether to accept the resignation. Our By-Laws provide that the Board must accept the resignation unless a significant reason exists for the director to remain on the Board. Furthermore, in the event the Board determines to reject a director’s tendered resignation, this determination and abilities to Goldman Sachs is an imperative for our organizationthe Board’s rationale must be disclosed in order to best serve our stakeholders, and we regularly engagea Form 8-K filed with our Board on this issue.the SEC.

 

  »

We previously set clear, quantifiable aspirational diversity goals aroundOur governance structure establishes strong protections of shareholder rights and promotes director accountability. For example, in addition to our entry-level hiring,majority voting bylaw, we have annual election of all directors, no poison pill, a shareholder right to call special meetings, a shareholder right of proxy access, no supermajority vote requirements in our governing documents, a commitment to independent board leadership, individual director evaluations and our recent progress is encouraging, with our most diverse campus analyst class ever joining the firm last summer.a robust re-nomination process.

 

  »

Additionally, in 2020, we announced two new aspirational goals to enhance the diverse representation of our vice president population and significantly increase our hiring of Black analysts from historically Black colleges and universities, while maintaining our existing programs focused on other diverse populations.

 »

We are equally committed to inclusion and career development initiatives to promote the advancement of our diverse populations and to increase the representation of diverse communities at all levels across the firm; for example, we made progress in increasing the diversity of our most recent partner and managing director promotions.

 »

We have emphasized our commitment to enhanced transparency and accountability as part of our broader firmwide strategy, and we will continue to apply this to our progress on our diversity and inclusion goals as well. In response to stakeholder feedback, we have committed to expanding our EEO-1 disclosure as part of our upcoming Sustainability Report, and also expect to continue to share greater data on our progress towards our aspirational goals going forward.

 

We have long invested capital and resourcesAs such, we do not believe amending our By-Laws in minority-owned businesses, including throughthe unnecessarily prescriptive manner set forth in the proposal will provide any additional value to our 10,000 Small Businesses program, Launch with GS, our Urban Investment Group and our sustainable finance efforts.shareholders.

 »

The Urban Investment Group, our domestic multi-asset class investing and lending business, deploys over $1 billion annually to close the opportunity gap for underserved places and people through real estate projects, social enterprises and lending facilities for small businesses. Over 80% of the team’s investing is in minority communities.

 »

As part of our $750 billion commitment to sustainable finance, we support underserved populations by leveraging our capabilities to improve access and affordability. Inclusive growth supports communities by drawing on innovative finance and partnerships to mitigate unequal access and affordability among underserved populations across four key themes, including accessible and innovative healthcare, financial inclusion, accessible and affordable education and communities.

 »

In response to the COVID-19 crisis, we have committed over $1 billion to small businesses by deploying capital to Community Development Financial Institutions and other mission-driven lenders, and partnering with the National Urban League and the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce to ensure that both capital and information reach minority-owned businesses. We have also redoubled our commitment to small businesses through an additional $250 million to fund the next generation of our 10,000 Small Businesses program.

For more information about our Board, including our director nomination processes, see Corporate Governance.

 

96

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS89


ITEMS 5-8. SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALSCERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

We have supplemented our commercial efforts with additional philanthropic activity to support diverse communities where most effective.

 »

Building upon more than $200 million of grants in minority communities and to minority-owned businesses over the past two decades, in 2020 we created the Goldman Sachs Fund for Racial Equity to support the vital work of leading nonprofits that are addressing racial injustice, structural inequity and economic disparity, which has committed $10 million from GS Gives in addition to matching employee contributions to recipient organizations.

 »

Beyond just making immediate monetary donations, we believe it is also critically important to work with these organizations over the long term to further four key themes of advancing economic progress, legal and criminal justice reform, fueling social change and fostering educational opportunities.

 »

We also established the Goldman Sachs COVID-19 Relief Fund, which has contributed over $40 million to support relief efforts around the world, with significant funds designated toward supporting communities of color.

We have engaged in deeper conversations within our organization and within our communities about how we can support our Black and other minority colleagues, clients, customers and communities, including how we can become better listeners and better allies, and the concrete steps we will take to embed inclusion into everything we do.

 »

Our Chairman and CEO has called on all of our diversity committees and affiliation networks to assist the firm and leadership in accelerating its journey in attracting and developing a workforce that is as diverse in its composition, backgrounds and experiences as it is rich in differing perspectives and insights, and has reemphasized the firm’s dedication to doing the hard work necessary to continue to make meaningful and sustainable progress.

 »

We believe in the importance of encouraging difficult conversations on race and how to be an active ally. To this end, our people have shared their insights on a variety of topics, including their own experiences with racism and discrimination; how to contribute to the fight towards social justice and racial equality; inequality, racial injustice and other issues impacting underserved communities around the country; and in particular how to best support the Black community and bring the Black community and its allies together moving forward.

 »

One recent example is our reverse mentoring program aimed at broadening the understanding of the Black experience and providing a space to practice and refine inclusive behaviors, which involves pairing senior Black talent with non-Black senior leadership to deepen the understanding of current events, the historical impact of racism and the lived Black experience.

For more information see www.gs.com/racialequity.

90GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS POLICY

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

On the recommendation of our independent directors, our Board has in place various policies that provide guidelines for the review of certain relationships and transactions involving our directors and executive officers.

Related Person Transactions Policy

Our Board has a written Related Person Transactions Policy regarding the review and approval of transactions between us and “related persons” (directors, executive officers, immediate family members of a director or executive officer, or known 5% shareholders).

Under this policy, transactions that exceed $120,000 in which a related person has, may have or may be deemed to have a direct or indirect material interest are submitted to ourthe Designated Reviewers (the Chairs of the Governance, Committee Chair, our Audit Committee Chairand Risk Committees) or our full Governance Committee for review and approval, as applicable. Certain transactions, including employment relationships, ordinary course banking, brokerage, investment, lending and other services, payment of certain regulatory filing fees and certain other ordinary course non-preferential transactions, are consideredhave been determined by the Governance Committee to be preapproved transactions, and thus do not require specific review and approval under the policy (although these transactions must be reported to our Governance Committee and may still be submitted for review and approval if deemed appropriate).

In reviewing and determining whether to approve a related person transaction, the following factors, among others, are considered:

 

Whether the transaction is in the interests of us and our shareholders;

 

Whether the transaction would impair the independence of an independent director;

 

 

Whether the transaction presents a conflict of interest, taking into account the size of the transaction, the financial position of the director or executive officer, the nature of the director’s or executive officer’s interest in the transaction, and the ongoing nature of the transaction;transaction and any other relevant factors;

 

 

Whether the transaction is fair and reasonable to us and on substantially the same terms as would apply to comparable third parties;

 

 

The business reasons for the transaction;

 

 

Any reputational issues; and

 

 

Whether the transaction is material, taking into account the significance of the transaction to our investors.

All of the transactions and relationships reported under —Certain Relationships and Transactions were determined, under the mechanisms of the Related Person Transactions Policy, to be in the best interests of our firm and our shareholders.

In addition to our policies on director independence and related person transactions, we also maintain a policy with respect to outside director involvement with financial firms, such as private equity firms or hedge funds. Under this policy, in determining whether to approve any current or proposed affiliation of a non-employee director with a financial firm, our Board will consider, among other things, the legal, reputational, operational and business issues presented, and the nature, feasibility and scope of any restrictions, procedures or other steps that would be necessary or appropriate to ameliorate any perceived or potential future conflicts or other issues.

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS91

97


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

 

 

 

Certain Relationships and Transactions

 

Brokerage and Banking Services

 BROKERAGE AND BANKING SERVICES

 

Some of our directors and executive officers (and persons or entities affiliated with them) have brokerage and/or discretionary accounts at our broker-dealer affiliates and may utilize other ordinary course banking or lending products (such as credit cards) offered by GS Bank. Certain family office entities affiliated with directors may from time to time invest in certificates or other derivative or structured products issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA.and its affiliates on substantially the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated clients. Extensions of credit by Goldman SachsGS Bank USA, whichthat do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability and do not present other unfavorable features have been and may be made to certain of our directors and executive officers (and persons or entities affiliated with them) in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons unrelated to our firm, and in each case in compliance with relevant laws and regulations.

 

Firm-Managed Funds and Other Investments

 FIRM-MANAGED FUNDS AND OTHER INVESTMENTS

 

We have established private investment funds (Employee Funds) to permit our employees (and in certain cases, retired employees) to participate in our private equity, hedge fund and other similar activities by investing in or alongside funds and investments that we manage or sponsor for independent investors and/or for our firm. We believe the opportunity to make such investments helps to promote teamwork and collaboration across the firm and provides alignment with the firm’s strategy to grow the alternatives business. Investment decisions for the Employee Funds are made by the investment teams or committees that are fiduciaries for such funds, and no executive officers are members of such investment teams or committees.

The Employee Funds generally maintain diversified investment portfolios, and these investment opportunities do not affect the incentives of our executive officers under our compensation program. Many of our employees, their spouses, related charitable foundations or entities they own or control have invested in these Employee Funds. In some cases, we have limited participation to our PMDs, including our executive officers, or limited the amount of participation, and in some cases participation may be limited to individuals eligible to invest pursuant to applicable law.

Certain of the Employee Funds provide applicable investors with an interest in the overrides we receive for managing the funds for independent investors (overrides),(Overrides); the level of Override for which applicable investors may be eligible may vary based on certain criteria. Employee Funds generally do not require our current or retired PMDs and other current or retired employees to pay management fees and do not deduct overridesOverrides from fund distributions. Similarly, certain other investments may be made available to our PMDs, retired PMDs andand/or other current employees on a fee-free or reduced fee basis.

Distributions and redemptions exceeding $120,000 from Employee Funds made to our 20202023 executive officers (or persons or certain entities affiliated with them) and Mr. Viniar (with respect to investments made when he was an employee) during 2020,2023, consisting of profits and other income and return of amounts initially invested (excluding overrides generally available only to PMDs,Overrides, which are discussed below), were approximately, in the aggregate, as follows: Mr. Solomon—$13.1Solomon – $6.5 million; Mr. Waldron—$2.3Waldron – $1.7 million; Mr. Scherr—$2.2Coleman – $1.9 million; Ms. Ruemmler – $300,000; Mr. Rogers—$3.6Berlinski – $351,000; John F.W. Rogers (Executive Vice President) – $2.3 million; Elizabeth M. Hammack (Global Treasurer)—$616,000; Laurence Stein (Chief Administrative Officer)—$1.4 million;and Brian J. Lee (Chief Risk Officer)—$803,000; Sheara J. Fredman (Chief Accounting Officer)—$188,000; and Mr. Viniar—$3.9 million. - $600,000.

Distributions of overrides generally available only to PMDs (and retired PMDs) madeOverrides distributed to our 20202023 executive officers (or persons or entities affiliated with them) and Mr. Viniar (with respect to investments made when he was an employee) during 20202023 were approximately, in the aggregate, as follows: Mr. Solomon—$493,000;Solomon – $332,000; Mr. Waldron—$139,000;Waldron – $209,000; Mr. Scherr—$94,000;Coleman – $42,000; Ms. Ruemmler – $60,000; Mr. Rogers—$104,000; Ms. Hammack—$28,000;Berlinski – $30,000; Mr. Stein—$49,000;Rogers – $175,000; Ericka Leslie (Chief Administrative Officer during 2023) – $50,000; Mr. Lee—$56,000; Ms. Fredman—$13,000;Lee – $86,000; and Mr. Viniar—$411,000.Sheara Fredman (Chief Accounting Officer) – $31,000.

Subject to applicable laws, in addition, certain of our directors and executive officers may from time to time invest their personal funds in other funds or investments that we have established and that we manage or sponsor. Except as described above, these other investments are made on substantially the same terms and conditions as other similarly-situated investors in these funds or investments who are neither directors nor employees. In certain of these

98

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

funds, including certain Employee Funds, our directors and executive officers may own in the aggregate more than 10% of the interests in these funds.

Affiliates of Goldman Sachs generally bear overhead and administrative expenses for, and may provide certain other services free of charge to, Employee Funds.

 

92GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

    TRANSACTIONS WITH DIRECTOR- AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER-AFFILIATED ENTITIES

Transactions with Director- and Executive Officer-Affiliated Entities

 

We take very seriously any actual or perceived conflicts of interest, and we critically evaluate all potential transactions and relationships that may involve directors or executive officers or entities affiliated with them.

Mr. Mittal is the Executive Chairman and former CEO of ArcelorMittal S.A. and beneficially owns (directly and indirectly) approximately 37%40% of the outstanding common shares of ArcelorMittal. Goldman Sachs provides ordinary course financial advisory, lending, investment banking, trading (such as acting as a commodities derivative counter-partycounterparty from time to time) and other financial services to ArcelorMittal and its affiliates, including as described below.

Goldman Sachs participates in a $5.5 billion five-year revolving credit facility for ArcelorMittal, which facility was extended during 2020.ArcelorMittal. Under this $5.5 billion facility, Goldman Sachs has agreed to lend to ArcelorMittal up to $170 million at an interest rate of LiborSOFR + 55720 basis points (which rate may vary depending on ArcelorMittal’s credit ratings). Goldman Sachs currently has no loan outstanding under this facility.

Goldman Sachs also participated in a $4.8 billion acquisition bridge facility, pursuant to which the firm had agreed to lend to an acquisition joint venture up to approximately $252 million (repayment of which was guaranteed by ArcelorMittal) at an interest rate of Libor + 50 basis points (which rate would increase depending on the bridge facility’s time to maturity). This facility was repaid in full as of March 2020.

Goldman Sachs also participates in a $212.5 million credit facility for an entity in which ArcelorMittal is an approximately 25% shareholder. Under the facility, Goldman Sachs has agreed to lend up to approximately $22.5 million at an interest rate of LiborSOFR + 450 basis points.points (which rate may vary based on a credit spread adjustment). This credit facility is currently partially drawn, resulting in an approximately $19.4 million loan from Goldman Sachs currently has no loan outstanding under this facility.

In September 2020, it was announced thataddition, from March 2023 to February 2024, Goldman Sachs acted as financial advisor and provided certain financing to its third-party client, who in December 2020 acquired substantially all of the operations of a subsidiary of ArcelorMittal in a $3.3 billion transaction. Goldman Sachs had previously participated in a $1 billion five-year asset-backed revolving credit facility for this subsidiary of ArcelorMittal. Under such facility, the firm had agreed to lend up to $6.1 million at an interest rate of Libor + 125 to 175 basis points (varying depending on a fixed charge coverage ratio). Goldman Sachs did not make any loan under this facility during 2020, and,riskless principal in connection with the acquisition, this facility is no longer outstanding.

In May 2020, Goldman Sachs participatedapproximately $290 million of on-exchange divestments by ArcelorMittal of its shareholding in an entity in which it was a $3 billion 364-day syndicated term loan for ArcelorMittal. Under the term loan, Goldman Sachs agreed to lend to ArcelorMittal up to $230 million at an interest rate of Libor + 167 basis points. The undrawn term loan facility was partially canceled in May 2020 in connection with the proceeds of a $2 billion combined public offering of ordinary shares and mandatory convertible notes, and the remaining commitment of $76.8 million was canceled in July of 2020.minority shareholder.

Each of these transactions was conducted, on, and all of these services were provided, on an arm’s-length basis.

Mr. Ogunlesi is the Chairman and Managing PartnerChief Executive Officer of Global Infrastructure Partners LLC (together with its affiliates, GIP). In connection with his role at GIP, Mr. Ogunlesi is entitled to less than 5% of the total profit of the fundfunds that participated in the following transactions, and he also has a direct or indirect interest in such fundfunds amounting to less than 0.02% of each such fund. During 2020, Goldman Sachs acted as financial advisor to a third-party client that acquired a GIP fund’s stake in a portfolio company in an approximately 550 million transaction resulting from a competitive bidding process.

In 2021,May 2023, Goldman Sachs acted as an underwriter in an approximately $145$300 million public common stock offering for a company in which a fund managed by GIP was a selling stockholder andshareholder. Such fund received approximately $70$145 million of the proceeds of the offering. In addition, in August 2023, Goldman Sachs purchased for resale in an SEC-registered trade approximately $288 million of stock in such company from the fund managed by GIP as selling shareholder. Goldman Sachs’ relationship with this company pre-dates GIP’s investment therein. In March 2024, Goldman Sachs also acted as an underwriter in an approximately $3 billion public debt offering for BlackRock Inc., the proceeds of which are intended to fund a portion of BlackRock’s acquisition of GIP.

This transactionEach of these transactions was conducted, on, and all of these services were provided, on an arm’s-length basis.

During 2020,2023, Goldman Sachs maintainedcontinued its consulting relationship with athe company for which the spouse of Mr. Rogers serves as CEO and foundingmanaging partner; the service agreement provides for annual fees of approximately $1 million to providefor the provision of advice and insights in support of the firm’s business strategy in China. This consulting relationship was entered into on an arm’s-length basis.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS93


CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS—CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

 

    FAMILY MEMBER EMPLOYMENT

5% Shareholders

 

A child of Mr. Scherr was employed by the firm as a non-executive employee during 2020 and received compensation (consisting of base salary and incentive compensation) for his most recent annual performance period of less than $200,000. The amount of compensation was determined in accordance with our standard compensation practices applicable to similarly-situated employees.

    5% SHAREHOLDERS

 

For information on transactions involving Goldman Sachs, on the one hand, and BlackRock, Inc., State Street Corporation or The Vanguard Group, on the other, see footnotes (a), (b) and (c) under Beneficial Ownership — Ownership—Beneficial Owners of More Thanthan Five Percent.

 

94

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

99


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP—BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

 

 

Beneficial Ownership

Beneficial Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table contains certain information, as of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024 regarding beneficial ownership of Common Stock by each director, nominee and NEO, as well as by all directors, nominees, NEOs and other executive officers as a group as of such date. The table below contains information regarding ownership not only of our Common Stock, but also of vested RSUs where applicable. It does not include PSUs.PSUs, unvested RSUs or SVC Awards.

 

 
NAME  Name 

NUMBER OF SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK
     BENEFICIALLY  OWNED

Number of Shares of Common  
Stock Beneficially Owned
(a)(b)

David Solomon(c)

 

128,169

 141,752

John Waldron(c)

 

90,631

  94,927

Stephen Scherr  Denis Coleman(c)

 

97,786

  47,754

John Rogers  Kathryn Ruemmler(c)

 

154,384

  6,501

Karen Seymour  Philip Berlinski(c)

 

34,101

  27,884

Michele Burns

 

23,461

  26,397

Drew Faust  Mark Flaherty

 

4,464

  17,361

Mark Flaherty  Kimberley Harris

 

14,427

  2,600

Ellen Kullman  Kevin Johnson

 

9,398

  1,590

Lakshmi Mittal  Ellen Kullman

 

49,114

  13,057

Adebayo Ogunlesi  Lakshmi Mittal

 

25,856

  52,922

Peter Oppenheimer  Thomas Montag(c)

 

20,803

 207,179

Jan Tighe  Adebayo Ogunlesi

 

3,795

  29,883

Jessica Uhl  Peter Oppenheimer

 

0

  25,114

  Jan Tighe

   7,161

  Jessica Uhl

  2,738

David Viniar(c)

 

1,013,237

 974,109

Mark Winkelman

105,824

All directors, nominees, NEOs and other executive officers as a group (20 persons)(d)

 

1,964,468

 1,855,956

 

(a)

For purposes of this table and the Beneficial Owners of More than Five Percent table below, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of Common Stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of determination. In light of the nature of vested RSUs, we have also included in this table shares of Common Stock underlying vested RSUs. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of Common Stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days (as well as the shares of Common Stock underlying vested RSUs) are deemed to be outstanding but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

 

100

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS95


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP—BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

 

 

The shares of Common Stock underlying vested RSUs included in the table above are as follows:

 

  Name

  RSUs

 
NAME

  David Solomon(c)

            RSUS            
0 

David Solomon  John Waldron(c)

 

0

 

John Waldron  Denis Coleman(c)

 

0

14,069 

Stephen Scherr  Kathryn Ruemmler(c)

 

0

 

John Rogers  Philip Berlinski(c)

 

33,421

2,481 

Karen Seymour(c)  Michele Burns

 

24,902

26,397 

Michele Burns  Mark Flaherty

 

23,461

16,346 

Drew Faust  Kimberley Harris

 

4,464

2,600 

Mark Flaherty  Kevin Johnson

 

13,410

1,590 

Ellen Kullman

 

9,398

13,057 

Lakshmi Mittal

 

34,114

37,922 

Adebayo Ogunlesi  Thomas Montag(c)

 

23,856

463 

Peter Oppenheimer  Adebayo Ogunlesi

 

18,803

27,883 

Jan Tighe  Peter Oppenheimer

 

3,795

23,114 

Jessica Uhl  Jan Tighe

 

0

7,161 

David Viniar(d)  Jessica Uhl

 

18,769

2,738 

Mark Winkelman  David Viniar(c)

 

15,824

21,705 

All directors, nominees, NEOs and other executive officers as a group (20 persons)(e)(d)

 

326,446

197,526

 

(b)

Except as discussed in footnotes (c) and (d) below, all of our directors, nominees, NEOs and other executive officers have sole voting power and sole dispositive power over all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by them. No individual director, nominee, NEO or other executive officer beneficially owned in excess of 1% of the outstanding Common Stock as of March 1, 2021.February 26, 2024. The group consisting of all directors, nominees, NEOs and other executive officers as of March 1, 2021February 26, 2024 beneficially owned approximately 0.57% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock (0.48%(0.51% not including vested RSUs)RSUs as of such date.date).

 

(c)

Excludes any shares of Common Stock subject to our Shareholders’ Agreement that are owned by other parties to our Shareholders’ Agreement. As of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024, each of Messrs. Solomon Waldron and ScherrWaldron was a party to our Shareholders’ Agreement and a member of our Shareholders’ Committee; however, each disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock subject to our Shareholders’ Agreement other than those specified above for each NEO individually. See For a discussion of our Shareholders’ Agreement, see Frequently Asked Questions —HowQuestions—How is voting affected by shareholders who participate in certain Goldman Sachs Partner Compensation plans? for a discussion of our Shareholders’ Agreement.

 

Includes shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by our NEOs indirectly through certain estate planning vehicles of our NEOs for which voting power and dispositive power is shared, through family trusts, the sole beneficiaries of which are immediate family members of our NEOs, and through private charitable foundations of which our NEOs are trustees, as follows: Mr. Solomon—20,670Solomon – 17,242 shares, Mr. Coleman – 4,118 shares and Mr. Rogers—21,471Berlinski – 6,995 shares; similarly, with respect to Mr. Viniar—332,043Viniar – 323,979 shares and Mr. Montag – 55,466 shares. Each NEO or Mr.Messrs. Viniar and Montag, as applicable, shares voting power and dispositive power over these shares and disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in family trusts and private charitable foundations.

 

(d)

All RSUs held by Mr. Viniar were received as compensation for his service as a non-employee director.

(e)

Includes an aggregate of 123,186 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by these individuals indirectly through certain estate planning vehicles for which voting power and dispositive power is shared, an aggregate of 146,142210,062 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by family trusts, the sole beneficiaries of which are immediate family members of these individuals and an aggregate of 138,609142,300 shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the private charitable foundations of which certain of these individuals are trustees. Each of these individuals shares voting power and dispositive power over these shares and disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held in family trusts and private charitable foundations.

 

Each current executive officer is a party to our Shareholders’ Agreement and disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock subject to our Shareholders’ Agreement that are owned by other parties to our Shareholders’ Agreement.

SeeCompensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Policies and Practices for a discussion of our executive stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements.

 

96

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

101


BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP—BENEFICIAL OWNERS OF MORE THAN FIVE PERCENTOWNERSHIP

 

 

 

Beneficial Owners of More Thanthan Five Percent

Based on filings made under Section 13(d) and Section 13(g) of the Exchange Act, as of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024 the only persons known by us to be beneficial owners of more than 5% of Common Stock were as follows:

 

  
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner 

NUMBER OF SHARES
OF COMMON STOCK
    BENEFICIALLY  OWNED    
  Number of Shares

  of Common Stock

  Beneficially Owned (#)

 

 

PERCENT
    OF CLASS    
Percent
of Class (%)

  BlackRock, Inc.

  50 Hudson Yards

  New York, NY 10001

   

BlackRock, Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, New York 10022

21,081,14423,010,145(a) 6.15 7.09

  

State Street Corporation

State Street Financial Center

One Lincoln  1 Congress Street, Suite 1

Boston, Massachusetts 02111

02114

 19,857,799  19,616,360(b) 5.79 6.04

  

The Vanguard Group

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

 25,649,314  28,546,582(c) 7.48 8.80

 

(a)

This information has been derived from the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013, Amendment No. 1 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 4, 2014, Amendment No. 2 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 9, 2015, Amendment No. 3 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, Amendment No. 4 to such filing filed with the SEC on January 24, 2017, Amendment No. 5 to such filing filed with the SEC on January 25, 2018, Amendment No. 6 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 4, 2019, Amendment No. 7 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020, and Amendment No. 8 to such filing filed with the SEC on January 29, 2021, Amendment No. 9 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 1, 2022, Amendment No. 10 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 7, 2023 and Amendment No. 11 to such filing filed with the SEC on January 26, 2024 by BlackRock, Inc. and certain subsidiaries. We and our affiliates engage in ordinary course trading, brokerage, asset management or other transactions or arrangements with, and provide ordinary course investment banking, lending or other financial services to, BlackRock, Inc. and its affiliates, related entities and clients. These transactions are negotiated on arm’s-length bases and contain customary terms and conditions. Affiliates of BlackRock, Inc. are investment managers for certain investment options under our 401(k) Plan and certain GS Pension Plan assets. BlackRock’s affiliates’ engagement is unrelated to BlackRock’s Common Stock ownership. In addition, their fees resulted from arm’s-length negotiations, and we believe they are reasonable in amount and reflect market terms and conditions.

 

(b)

This information has been derived from the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021, Amendment No. 1 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 14, 2022, Amendment No. 2 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 6, 2023 and Amendment No. 3 to such filing filed with the SEC on January 30, 2024 by State Street Corporation and certain subsidiaries. We and our affiliates provide ordinary course financial advisory, lending, investment banking and other financial services to, and engage in ordinary course trading, brokerage, asset management (including, but not limited to, State Street’s role as fund administrator, custodian or lender for certain of our funds) or other transactions or arrangements with State Street Corporation and its affiliates, related entities and clients. These transactions are negotiated on arm’s-length bases and contain customary terms and conditions. State Street Global Advisors is an investment manager for certain investment options under our 401(k) Plan and previously certain assets in the GS Pension Plan. State Street Global Advisors’ engagements are unrelated to State Street’s Common Stock ownership. Their fees resulted from arm’s-length negotiations, and we believe they are reasonable in amount and reflect market terms and conditions.

 

(c)

This information has been derived from the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016, Amendment No. 1 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 13, 2017, Amendment No. 2 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 9, 2018, Amendment No. 3 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, Amendment No. 4 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 12, 2020, and Amendment No. 5 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021, Amendment No. 6 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 9, 2022, Amendment No. 7 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023 and Amendment No. 8 to such filing filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024 by The Vanguard Group and certain subsidiaries. We and our affiliates engage in ordinary course trading, asset management, arrangements relating to the placement of the firm’s investment funds or other transactions or arrangements with, and may from time to time provide other ordinary course lending or other financial services to, The Vanguard Group and its affiliates, related entities and clients. These transactions are negotiated on arm’s-length bases and contain customary terms and conditions. The Vanguard Group is an investment manager to mutual funds that are investment options in our 401(k) Plan and certain tax qualified plans for employees of certain of our affiliates, including The 401(k) Savings Plan and the GreenSky Trade Credit LLC 401(k) Plan. The selection of the Vanguard mutual funds as investment options for each plan is unrelated to Vanguard’s Common Stock ownership. In the case of The 401(k) Savings Plan and the GreenSky Trade Credit LLC 401(k) Plan, a third-party investment manager who is not affiliated with GS is responsible for fund selection and selected the Vanguard mutual fund.funds. We believe that the fees paid to The Vanguard Group through the Vanguard mutual fundfunds are the same as the fees that are paid by the other holders of the same share classclasses of that fund.those funds.

 

102

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS97


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

Additional Information

How to Contact Us

Across our shareholder base there is a wide variety of viewpoints about matters affecting our firm. We meet and speak with our shareholders and other stakeholders throughout the year. Board-level engagement is led by our Lead Director and may include other directors as appropriate. Any interested party may contact us through the following channels:

 

OUR DIRECTORS

INVESTOR RELATIONS

BUSINESS INTEGRITY PROGRAM

 

OUR DIRECTORS

INVESTOR RELATIONS

BUSINESS INTEGRITY PROGRAM

Communicate with our directors,
including our Lead Director, Committee
Chairs or Independent Directors
as a group

 

Mail correspondence to:

John F.W.F. W. Rogers

Secretary to the Board of Directors

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

200 West Street

New York, NY 10282

 

Reach out to our Investor

Relations team
at any time

 

Email:

gs-investor-relations@gs.com

 

Phone:

(+1) 212-902-0300

 

You may contact us, or any member
of our Board upon request, in each case
in a confidential or anonymous manner,
through the firm’s reporting hotline
under our Policy on Reporting of Concerns
Regarding Accounting and Other Matters

 

Phone:

(+1) 866-520-4056

 

Policy is available on our website at www.gs.com/business-integrity-program

www.gs.com/business-integrity-program

 

Corporate Governance and Other Materials Available on our Website

On our website (www.gs.com/shareholders) under the heading “Corporate Governance,” you can find, among other things, our:

 

 

Restated Certificate of Incorporation

 

 

Amended and Restated By-Laws

 

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

 

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

 

 

Policy Regarding Director Independence Determinations

 

 

Charters of our Audit, Compensation, Governance, Public Responsibilities and Risk Committees

 

 

Compensation Principles

 

 

Statement on Policy Engagement and Political Participation and access to our disclosures of Federal Lobbying Costs

 

 

Information about our Business Integrity Program, including our Policy on Reporting of Concerns Regarding Accounting and Other Matters

 

 

Sustainability ReportReporting (including Sustainability, People Strategy, pay equity information, SASB and TCFD reporting) and Environmental Policy Framework

 

Audit Report: Goldman Sachs’ Efforts To Advance Equity and Opportunity for Underserved Communities

 

Report on VestingReview of Equity-Based Awards Due to Voluntary Resignation to Enter Government ServiceArbitration Program

 

 

Statement on Human Rights and Statement on Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking

 

 

Business Principles and Core Values

Business Standards Committee Report and Business Standards Committee: Impact Report

You can also findReferences to our October 22, 2020 statements relatingwebsite or other links to 1MDB government and regulatory settlementsour publications or other information are provided for the convenience of our shareholders. None of the information or data included on our website (www.gs.com) under Media Relations. Information on our websitewebsites or accessible at these links is not,incorporated into, and will not be deemed to be a part of, this Proxy Statement or incorporated into any of our other filings with the SEC.

 

98

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

103


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of our Compensation Committee is or has been an officer or employee of Goldman Sachs. No member of our Compensation Committee or our Board is, or has beenwas in 20202023, an executive officer of another entity at which one of our executive officers serves, or hasserved in 2020 served2023, on either the board of directors or the compensation committee. For information about related person transactions involving members of our Compensation Committee, seeCertain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of ownership of, and transactions in, our equity securities with the SEC. Our directors and executive officers are also required to furnish us with copies of all such Section 16(a) reports if not filed by the firm on their behalf. The reports are published on our website at www.gs.com/shareholders.

Based on a review of the copies of these reports, and on written representations from our reporting persons, we believe that all such reports that were required to be filed under Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors and executive officersduring 2023 were complied with during 2020.timely filed.

Incorporation by Reference

Only the following sections of this Proxy Statement shall be deemed incorporated by reference into our 20202023 Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 thereof: Corporate Governance—Item 1. Election of Directors—Our Directors; Corporate Governance—Item 1. Election of Directors—Independence of Directors; Corporate Governance—Structure of our Board and Governance Practices—Our Board Committees—Audit; Compensation Matters—Compensation Discussion and Analysis; Compensation Matters—Executive Compensation; Compensation Matters—Compensation Committee Report; Compensation Matters—Pay Ratio Disclosure; Compensation Matters—Non-EmployeeDirector Compensation Program; CompensationAudit Matters—Item 3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021); Audit Matters—Item 4. Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021;2024; Certain Relationships and Related Transactions; Beneficial Ownership; Additional Information—Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation; Additional Information—Section 16(a) Reports; Frequently Asked Questions—How do I obtain more information about Goldman Sachs? and Frequently Asked Questions—How can I submit nominees (such as through proxy access) or shareholder proposals in accordance with our By-Laws?

To the extent that this Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by Goldman Sachs under either the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, the sections of this Proxy Statement entitled “Compensation Committee Report” and “Report of our Audit Committee” (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) will not be deemed incorporated into any such filing, unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.

Other Business

As of the date hereof, there are no other matters that our Board intends to present, or has reason to believe others will present, at our Annual Meeting. If other matters come before our Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment with respect to such matters.

 

104

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS99


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

 

 

 

Frequently Asked Questions

What are some common terms and acronyms used in this Proxy Statement?

 

ANNUAL MEETINGAnnual Meeting

 Goldman Sachs Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 29, 202124, 2024

Assessment Framework

 Compensation Committee Assessment Framework used to provide greater definition to and transparency regarding the key factors considered by the Committee to assess firm performance in the context of compensation decisions for our NEOs and Management Committee

BVPS

 Book Value Per Common Share

BY-LAWSBy-Laws

 Amended and Restated By-Laws

CD&A

 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CET1

 Common equity tier one capital

CLO

 Chief Legal Officer

COMMON STOCKCommon Stock

 Common shares of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.

CRO

 Chief Risk Officer

EPS

 Diluted Earnings Per Common Share

ESG

 Environmental, social and governance

EVP

Executive Vice President

EXCHANGE ACTExchange Act

 U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

EXECUTIVE

LEADERSHIP TEAM, ELTExecutive Leadership Team

 Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), our Chief Operating Officer (COO) and our Chief Financial Officer (CFO)

FW COOK

Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc.

GOLDMAN SACHS, OUR

FIRM, WE, US,Goldman Sachs, our firm,
we, us,
GS AND OUR
and our

 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries

GOVERNANCE COMMITTEEGovernance Committee

 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

GS GIVESGives

 Goldman Sachs Gives

HCM

 Human Capital Management

IR

 Investor Relations

NEO

 Named Executive Officer. For 2020,2023, our NEOs are: David Solomon, John Waldron, Stephen Scherr, John RogersDenis Coleman, Kathryn Ruemmler and Karen SeymourPhilip Berlinski

NYSE

 New York Stock Exchange

PEERSPeers

 Our Peers consist of our Core U.S. Peers (Bank of America Corporation (BAC), Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Morgan Stanley (MS)), our Additional U.S. Peers (TheThe Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (BK), and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)) and our European Peers (Barclays PLC (BARC), Credit Suisse Group AG (CS), Deutsche Bank AG (DB) and UBS Group AG (UBS))

PMD

 Participating Managing Director

PROXY STATEMENTProxy Statement

 Goldman Sachs Proxy Statement filed with the SEC in connection with the 20212024 Annual Meeting

PSU

 Performance-based RSU

PWCPwC

 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

ROE

 Return on Average Common Shareholders’ Equity

ROTE

 Return on Average Tangible Common Shareholders’ Equity

RSU

 Restricted stock unit

SAY ON PAY VOTESay on Pay Vote

 Our annual advisory vote to approve NEO compensation

SEC

 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

SHARES AT RISKShares at Risk

 Shares (after(generally after applicable tax withholding) that are subject to five-yeartransfer restrictions, calculated based on the grant date, which generally prohibit the sale, transfer, hedging or pledging of underlying Shares at Risk, even if the NEO leaves our firm (subject to limited exceptions)

SVC Awards

 Shareholder Value Creation Awards

TSR

 Total Shareholder Return, including dividends reinvested without payment of any commission

 

100

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

105


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

 

 

 

When and where is our Annual Meeting?

We will be holding our Annual Meeting virtually, on Thursday,Wednesday, April 29, 2021,24, 2024, at 8:30 a.m., New YorkSalt Lake City time, viaat our office at 222 South Main Street, 14th Floor, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101. Upon arrival, please follow signage for security and entry into the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021.

In light of ongoing considerations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the safety of all of our people, including our shareholders, and taking into account applicable federal, state and local guidance, we have determined that the 2021 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the Internet, with no physical in-personmeeting.

Shareholders will be able to attend, vote and submit questions for our Annual Meeting from any location via the Internet. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting by one of the methods described in these proxy materials. Information about our Annual Meeting can also be found at www.gs.com/ proxymaterials. If you are not able to attend our meeting live, a replay will be available for 30 days at www. virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021.

How can I attend our Annual Meeting?

Shareholders as of the record date mayand/or their authorized representatives are permitted to attend vote and submit questionsour Annual Meeting in person by following the procedures in our Proxy Statement. Our Annual Meeting is held in an accessible facility; assisted listening devices will be available upon request.

Will our Annual Meeting be webcast?

Our Annual Meeting will be available through an audio-only webcast, which will be accessible to the public at www.gs.com/proxymaterials. Anyone can listen to the Annual Meeting by logging in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021. To log in, shareholders (or their authorized representatives) will needthrough the control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction form or Notice. Only one shareholder per control number can access the meeting.

If you are not a shareholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest,webcast, but you will not be able to participate. We recommend that you log-in early to be sure you can accessparticipate in the meeting. You may log in at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/ GS2021 15 minutes in advance of the meeting start. Note, if the meeting does not begin playing we recommend refreshing your browser. If you have technical difficulties accessing the meeting, please contact the technical support number that will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021.

Can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?

Shareholders as of our record date who attend and participate in our virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021 will have an opportunity to submit questions live via the Internet during a designated portion of the meeting. These shareholders may also submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com. In both cases, shareholders must have available their control number provided on their proxy card, voting instruction

form or Notice, and must provide their name (see more information in “How will questions be handled at the Annual Meeting?”). We are committed to activeengagement with our shareholders. If at any time you would like to speak with us, please contact our Investor Relations team at gs-investor-relations@gs.com.

How will questions be handled at the Annual Meeting?

During the meeting we will answer as many questions that comply with our rules of conduct and are submitted online by shareholders as time permits. We will endeavor to answer questions using the text submitted by our shareholders, however, in all cases we reserve the right to edit inappropriate language, or to exclude questions that are not pertinent to meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions and provide a single response to avoid repetition.

Consistent with our rules of conduct for physical meetings, and for the benefit of all shareholders to know who is asking a question, when logging in or submitting a question for the Annual Meeting (whether in advance of or at the meeting), you will be required to include your name and organization (if applicable). Questions submitted anonymously will not be recognized at the meeting. Shareholders may be limited to three questions each to allow us the opportunity to answer other questions received. If applicable, please also indicate whether your question relates to a specific proposal being presented.

How will proposals be presented at the Annual Meeting?

Our Chairman and CEO will chair our Annual Meeting and will present the Election of Directors and other management proposals as described herein. Each of the proponents of the shareholder proposals described herein (or their designated representative) will be provided the opportunity to present their proposal at the meeting, either live or through a prerecorded message.

What is included in our proxy materials?

Our proxy materials, which are available on our website atwww.gs.com/proxymaterials, include:

 

  Our Notice of 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

 

  Our Proxy Statement; and

 

  Our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders.

If you received printed versions of these materials by mail (rather than through electronic delivery), these materials also included a proxy card or voting instruction form.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS101


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How are we distributing our proxy materials?

To expedite delivery, reduce our costs and decrease the environmental impact of our proxy materials, we used “Notice and Access” in accordance with an SEC rule that permits us to provide proxy materials to our shareholders over the Internet. By March 19, 2021,15, 2024, we sent a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to certain of our shareholders containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials online. If you received a Notice, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy via the Internet. If you received a Notice and would like to receive a copy of our proxy materials, follow the instructions contained in the Notice to request a copy electronically or in paper form on a one-timeone-

time or ongoing basis. Shareholders who do not receive the Notice will continue to receive either a paper or electronic copy of our Proxy Statement and 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders, which will be sent on or about March 23, 2021.19, 2024.

How do I ask a question at our Annual Meeting?

Shareholders as of our record date who attend the Annual Meeting in person will be able to ask questions during the designated portion of our Annual Meeting, in accordance with our Rules of Conduct. Shareholders may be limited to three questions each to allow us the opportunity to answer other questions at the meeting.

How will proposals be presented at the Annual Meeting?

Our Chairman and CEO will chair our Annual Meeting and will present the Election of Directors and other management proposals as described herein. Each of the proponents of the shareholder proposals described herein (or their designated representative) will be provided with the opportunity to present their proposal in person at the meeting.

What do I need to bring to attend the Annual Meeting?

Photo Identification. Anyone wishing to gain admission to our Annual Meeting must provide a form of government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport.

Proof of Ownership

Shareholders of Record: No additional document regarding proof of ownership is required.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: You or your representative must bring an account statement, voting instruction form or legal proxy as proof of your ownership of shares as of the close of business on February 26, 2024.

Additional Documentation for an Authorized Representative. Any shareholder representative (for example, of an entity that is a shareholder) must also present satisfactory documentation evidencing their authority with respect to the shares.

We reserve the right to limit the number of representatives for any shareholder who may attend the meeting.

Failure to follow any of these procedures may delay your entry into or prevent you from being admitted to our Annual Meeting. Please contact us via shareholderproposals@gs.com at least five business days in advance of our Annual Meeting if you would like

106

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

to confirm you have proper documentation or if you have other questions about attending our Annual Meeting.

Who can vote at our Annual Meeting?

You can vote your shares of Common Stock at our Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder at the close of business on March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024, the record date for our Annual Meeting.

As of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024, there were 342,900,077324,527,112 shares of Common Stock outstanding, each of which entitles the holder to one vote for each matter to be voted on at our Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Shareholder of Record.Record. If your shares of Common Stock are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered a “shareholder of record” of those shares. You may contact our transfer agent (by regular mail or phone) at:

Computershare

P.O. Box 50500043078

Louisville, KY 40233-5000Providence, RI 02940-3078

U.S. and Canada: 1-800-419-2595

International: 1-201-680-6541

www.computershare.com

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name.Name. If your shares are held in an account at a bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name. In that case, you will have received these proxy materials from the bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization holding your account and, as a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your bank, brokerage firm or similar organization as to how to vote the shares held in your account.

How do I vote?

To be valid, your vote by Internet, telephone or mail must be received by the deadline specified on the proxy card or voting information form, as applicable. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we urge you to vote and submit your proxy in advance of the meeting.

 

 

If You are a Shareholder of RecordIf You are a Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name
 
IF YOU ARE A SHAREHOLDER OF RECORD

IF YOU ARE A BENEFICIAL OWNER OF SHARES

HELD IN STREET NAME

By Internet(a)


(24 hours a day)

 www.proxyvote.com www.proxyvote.com
 

By Telephone(a)

(24 hours a day)

 1-800-690-6903 1-800-454-8683
 

By Mail

 

Return a properly executed and dated proxy card in the pre-paid envelope we have provided

 Return a properly executed and dated voting instruction form by mail, depending upon the method(s) your bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization makes available
 

At our Annual

Meeting(a)

 

Shareholders who attend the virtualInstructions on attending our Annual Meeting should follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021 to vote during the meetingin person can be found above

 Shareholders who attendTo do so, you will need to bring a valid “legal proxy.” You can obtain a legal proxy by contacting your account representative at the virtualbank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization through which you hold your shares. Additional instructions on attending our Annual Meeting should follow the instructions at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021 to vote during the meetingin person can be found above

 

(a)

Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. We have been advised that the Internet and telephone voting procedures that have been made available to you are consistent with applicable legal requirements. Shareholders voting by Internet or telephone should understand that, while we and Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (Broadridge) do not charge any fees for voting by Internet or telephone, there may still be costs, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies, for which you are responsible.

 

102

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

107


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

 

 

 

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You can revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at our Annual Meeting, subject to the voting deadlines that are described on the proxy card or voting instruction form, as applicable.

You can revoke your vote:

 

  By voting again by Internet or by telephone (only your last Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the meeting will be counted);

 

  By signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date;

 

  By obtaining a “legal proxy” from your account representative at the bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization through which you hold shares; or

 

  By attending and voting at our Annual Meeting.

You may also revoke your proxy by giving written notice of revocation to John F.W. Rogers, Secretary to the Board of Directors, at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, which must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 28, 2021.23, 2024. If you intend to revoke your proxy by providing such written notice, we advise that you also send a copy via email toBeverly.OToole@gs.com shareholderproposals@gs.com. Please ensure to confirm receipt of your revocation.

If your shares are held in street name, we also recommend that you contact your broker, bank or other nominee for instructions on how to change or revoke your vote.

Can I confirm that my vote was cast in accordance with my instructions?

Shareholder of Record.Record. Our shareholders have the opportunity to confirm that their vote was cast in accordance with their instructions. Vote confirmation is consistent with our commitment to sound corporate governance practices and a key means to increase transparency. Vote confirmation is available 24 hours after your vote is received beginning on April 14, 2021,9, 2024, with the final vote tabulation available through June 29, 2021.24, 2024. You may confirm your vote whether it was cast by proxy card, electronically or telephonically. To obtain vote confirmation, log ontowww.proxyvote.com using the control number we have provided to you and receive confirmation on how your vote was cast.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. Name.

If your shares are held in an account at a bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization, the ability to confirm your vote may be affected by the rules

and procedures of your bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar

organization and the confirmation will not confirm whether your bank, broker or brokerother entity allocated the correct number of shares to you.

How can I obtain an additional proxy card?

Shareholders of record can contact our Investor Relations team at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, 29th Floor, New York, New York 10282, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone: 1-212-902-0300, email: gs-investor-relations@gs.com.

If you hold your shares of Common Stock in street name, contact your account representative at the bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization through which you hold your shares.

How will my shares be voted if I do not vote in person at the Annual Meeting?

The proxy holders (that is, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card) will vote your shares of Common Stock in accordance with your instructions at the Annual Meeting (including any adjournments or postponements thereof).

How will my shares be voted if I do not give specific voting instructions?

Shareholders of Record. If you indicate that you wish to vote as recommended by our Board or if you sign, date and return a proxy card but do not give specific voting instructions, then the proxy holders will vote your shares in the manner recommended by our Board on all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and the proxy holders may determine in their discretion regarding any other matters properly presented for a vote at our Annual Meeting. Although our Board does not anticipate that any of the director nominees will be unable to stand for election as a director nominee at our Annual Meeting, if this occurs, proxies will be voted in favor of such other person or persons as may be recommended by our Governance Committee and designated by our Board.

Beneficial Owners of Shares Held in Street Name. Name. If your bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not receive specific voting instructions from you, how your shares may be voted will depend on the type of proposal.

 

  

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm. For the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, NYSE rules provide that brokers (other than brokers that are affiliated with Goldman Sachs) that have not received voting instructions

108

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

from their customers 10ten days before the meeting date may vote their customers’ shares in the brokers’ discretion on the

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS103


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

ratification of our independent registered public accounting firm. This is known as broker-discretionary voting.

 

 » If your broker is Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC or another affiliate of ours, NYSE policy specifies that, in the absence of your specific voting instructions, your shares of Common Stock may only be voted in the same proportion as other shares are voted with respect to the proposal.

 

 » For shares of Common Stock held in retail accounts at Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC for which specific voting instructions are not received, we will vote such shares in proportion to the voted shares of Common Stock in retail accounts at Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC.

 

  All other matters.matters. All other proposals are “non-discretionary“non-discretionary matters” under NYSE rules, which means your bank, brokerage firm, broker-dealer or other similar organization may not vote your shares without voting instructions from you. Therefore, you must give your broker instructions in order for your vote to be counted.

Participants in our 401(k) Plan.Plan. If you sign and return the voting instruction form but otherwise leave it blank or if you do not otherwise provide voting instructions to the 401(k) Plan trustee by mail, Internet or telephone, your shares will be voted in the same proportion as the shares held under the 401(k) Plan for which instructions are received, unless otherwise required by law.

What is a Broker Non-Vote?

A “broker non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for the meeting with respect to the ratification of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm but does not vote on non-discretionary matters because you did not provide voting instructions on these matters.

What is the quorum requirement for our Annual Meeting?

A quorum is required to transact business at our Annual Meeting. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock as of March 1, 2021,February 26, 2024, present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote, will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes are treated as present for quorum purposes.

If I abstain, what happens to my vote?

If you choose to abstain from voting on the Election of Directors, your abstention will have no effect, as the required vote is calculated through the following calculation: votes FOR divided by the sum of votes FOR plus votes AGAINST.

If you choose to abstain from voting on any other matter at our Annual Meeting, your abstention will be counted as a vote AGAINST the proposal, as the required vote is calculated through the following calculation: votes FOR divided by the sum of votes FOR plus votes AGAINST plus votes ABSTAINING.

What vote is required for adoption or approval of each matter to be voted on?

PROPOSALVOTE REQUIREDDIRECTORS’ RECOMMENDATION
Election of DirectorsMajority of the votes cast FOR or AGAINST (for each director nominee)

FOR all nominees

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the election of our director nominees

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
(Say on Pay)
Majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy

FOR the resolution approving the Executive Compensation of our NEOs

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the resolution

Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)Majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy

FOR the resolution approving The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the resolution

Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021Majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy

FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the ratification of the appointment

Shareholder ProposalsMajority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy (for each shareholder proposal)

AGAINST each shareholder proposal

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted AGAINST each shareholder proposal

104GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What are my choices for casting my vote on each matter to be voted on?

PROPOSALVOTING OPTIONSEFFECT OF ABSTENTIONSBROKER
DISCRETIONARY
VOTING ALLOWED?
EFFECT OF
BROKER
NON-VOTES
Election of DirectorsFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN (for each director nominee)No effect - not counted as a “vote cast”NoNo effect

Advisory Vote to Approve

Executive Compensation

(Say on Pay)

FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposalNoNo effect
Approval of The
Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)
FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposalNoNo effect
Ratification of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2021FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAINTreated as a vote AGAINST the proposalYesNot applicable
Shareholder ProposalsFOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN (for each shareholder proposal)Treated as a vote AGAINST the proposalNoNo effect

Who counts the votes cast at our Annual Meeting?

Representatives of Broadridge will tabulate the votes cast at our Annual Meeting, and American Election Services, LLC will act as the independent inspector of election.

How is voting affected by shareholders who participate in certain Goldman Sachs Partner Compensation plans?

Employees of Goldman Sachs who participate in the PCP are “covered persons” under our Shareholders’ Agreement. Our Shareholders’ Agreement governs, among other things, the voting of shares of Common Stock owned by each covered person directly or jointly with a spouse (but excluding shares acquired under our 401(k) Plan). Shares of Common Stock subject to our Shareholders’ Agreement are called “voting shares.”

Our Shareholders’ Agreement requires that before any of our shareholders vote, a separate, preliminary vote is held by the persons covered by our Shareholders’ Agreement. In the election of directors, all voting shares will be voted in favor of the election of the director nominees receiving the highest numbers of votes cast by the covered persons in the preliminary vote. For all other matters, all voting shares will be voted in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the covered persons in the preliminary vote.

If you are a party to our Shareholders’ Agreement, you previously gave an irrevocable proxy to our Shareholders’ Committee to vote your voting shares at

our Annual Meeting in accordance with the preliminary vote and to vote on any other matters that may come before our Annual Meeting as the proxy holder sees fit in a manner that is not inconsistent with the preliminary vote and that does not frustrate the intent of the preliminary vote.

As of March 1, 2021, 8,610,503February 26, 2024, 7,971,568 shares of Common Stock were beneficially owned by the parties to the Shareholders’ Agreement. Each person who is a party to our Shareholders’ Agreement disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares subject to the agreement that are owned by any other party. As of March 1, 2021, 7,926,261February 26, 2024, 7,322,017 of the outstanding shares of Common Stock that were held by parties to our Shareholders’ Agreement were subject to the voting provisions of our Shareholders’ Agreement (representing approximately 2.31%2.26% of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting). The preliminary vote with respect to the voting shares will be concluded on or about April 16, 2021.12, 2024.

Other than this Shareholders’ Agreement (which covers our Chairman and CEO, who is also a director), there are no voting agreements by or among any of our directors.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

109


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Where can I find the voting results of our Annual Meeting?

We expect to announce the preliminary voting results at our Annual Meeting. The final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form 8-K that will be posted on our website.

What vote is required for adoption or approval of each matter to be voted on?

Proposal

Vote Required

Directors’ Recommendation

Election of Directors

Majority of the votes cast FOR or AGAINST (for each director nominee)

FOR all nominees

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the election of our director nominees

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
(Say on Pay)

Majority of the shares present in person or represented

by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter

FOR the resolution approving the Executive Compensation of our NEOs

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the resolution

Ratification of PwC as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024

Majority of the shares present in person or represented

by proxy and entitled to vote on the matter

FOR the ratification of the appointment of PwC

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted FOR the ratification of the appointment

Shareholder Proposals

Majority of the shares present in person or represented

by proxy (for each shareholder proposal) and entitled to vote on the matter

AGAINST each shareholder proposal

Unless a contrary choice is specified, proxies solicited by our Board will be voted AGAINST each shareholder proposal

What are my choices for casting my vote on each matter to be voted on?

ProposalVoting OptionsEffect of AbstentionsBroker
Discretionary
Voting Allowed?
Effect of Broker
Non-Votes

Election of Directors

FOR, AGAINST

or ABSTAIN (for each director nominee)

No effect - not counted as
a “vote cast”

No

No effect

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
(Say on Pay)

FOR, AGAINST
or ABSTAIN

Treated as a vote AGAINST
the proposal

No

No effect

Ratification of PwC as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2024

FOR, AGAINST
or ABSTAIN

Treated as a vote AGAINST
the proposal

Yes

Not applicable

Shareholder Proposals

FOR, AGAINST

or ABSTAIN (for each shareholder proposal)

Treated as a vote AGAINST
the proposal

No

No effect

How do I inspect the list of shareholders of record?

A list of the shareholders of record as of February 26, 2024 will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our headquarters at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, from April 15, 2024 to April 23, 2024.

What is a Broker Non-Vote?

A “broker non-vote” occurs when your broker submits a proxy for the meeting with respect to the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm but does not vote on non-discretionary matters because you did not provide voting instructions on these matters.

 

 

110

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS105


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

 

 

 

If I abstain, what happens to my vote?

If you choose to abstain from voting on the Election of Directors, your abstention will have no effect, as the required vote is calculated through the following calculation: votes FOR divided by the sum of votes FOR plus votes AGAINST. If you choose to abstain from voting on any other matter at our Annual Meeting, your abstention will be counted as a vote AGAINST the proposal, as the required vote is calculated through the following calculation: votes FOR divided by the sum of votes FOR plus votes AGAINST plus votes ABSTAINING.

When will Goldman Sachs next hold an advisory vote on the frequency of Say on Pay votes?

The next advisory vote on the frequency of Say on Pay votes will be held no later than our 20232029 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

How do I obtain more information about Goldman Sachs?

A copy of our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders accompanies this Proxy Statement. You also may obtain, free of charge, a copy of that document, our 20202023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Director Independence Policy and the charters for our Audit, Compensation, Governance, Public Responsibilities and Risk Committees by writing to: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, 29th Floor, New York, New York 10282, Attn: Investor Relations; email:gs-investor-relations@gs.com gs-investor- relations@gs.com.

These documents, as well as other information about Goldman Sachs, are also available on our website atwww.gs.com/ www. gs.com/shareholders.

How do I inspect the list of shareholders of record?

A list of the shareholders of record as of March 1, 2021 will be available for inspection during ordinary business hours at our headquarters at 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, from April 19, 2021 to April 28, 2021, as well as at our Annual Meeting.

How do I sign up for electronic delivery of proxy materials?

This Proxy Statement and our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available on our website at:www.gs.com/ www. gs.com/proxymaterials. If you would like to help reduce our costs of printing and mailing future materials, you can agree to access these documents in the future over the Internet rather than receiving printed copies in the mail. For your convenience,You may do so when you may find links to sign up for electronic delivery for both shareholders of recordvote through www.proxyvote. com or at www.investordelivery.com and beneficial owners who hold shares in street name at www.gs.com/electronicdelivery.by following the instructions.

Once you sign up, you will continue to receive proxy materials electronically until you revoke this preference.

Who pays the expenses of this proxy solicitation?

Our proxy materials are being used by our Board in connection with the solicitation of proxies for our Annual Meeting. We pay the expenses of the preparation of proxy materials and the solicitation of proxies for our Annual Meeting. In addition to the

solicitation of proxies by mail, certain of our directors, officers or employees may solicit proxies telephonically, electronically or by other means of communication. Our directors, officers and employees will receive no additional compensation for any such solicitation. We have also hired Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Avenue,333 Ludlow Street, 5th Floor, South Tower, Stamford, Connecticut 06902, to assist in the solicitation and distribution of proxies, for which they will receive a fee of $25,000, as well as reimbursement for certain out-of-pocket costs and expenses. We will reimburse brokers, including Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC and other similar institutions, for costs incurred by them in mailing proxy materials to beneficial owners.

What is “householding”?

In accordance with a notice sent to certain street name shareholders of Common Stock who share a single address, shareholders at a single address will receive only one copy of this Proxy Statement and our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders unless we have previously received contrary instructions. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce our printing and postage costs. We currently do not “household” for shareholders of record.

If your household received a single set of proxy materials, but you would prefer to receive a separate copy of this Proxy Statement or our 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders, you may contact us at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, 29th Floor, New York, New York 10282, Attn: Investor Relations, telephone: 1-212-902-0300, email: gs-investor-relations@gs.comgs-investor- relations@gs.com, and we will deliver those documents to you promptly upon receiving the request.

You may request or discontinue householding in the future by contacting the broker, bank or similar institution through which you hold your shares. You may also change your householding preferences through the Broadridge Householding Election system at 1-866-540-7095 using the control number we have provided to you.

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

111


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How can I recommend a director candidate to our Governance Committee?

Our Governance Committee welcomes candidates recommended by shareholders and will consider these candidates in the same manner as other candidates.

Shareholders who wish to recommend director candidates for consideration by our Governance Committee may do so by submitting in writing such candidates’ names to John F.W. Rogers, Secretary to the Board of Directors, at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282.

106GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How can I submit a Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposal at the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders?

Shareholders who, in accordance with the SEC’s Rule 14a-8, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed by us in connection with our 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit their proposals to John F.W. Rogers, Secretary to the Board of Directors, via email atshareholderproposals@gs.com or by mail at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282. Proposals must be received on or before Friday, November 19, 2021.15, 2024. Please ensure that receipt of your proposal is confirmed. As the rules of the SEC make clear, however, simply submitting a proposal does not guarantee its inclusion.

How can I submit nominees (such as through proxy access) or shareholder proposals in accordance with our By-Laws?

Shareholders who wish to submit a “proxy access” nomination for inclusion in our proxy statement in connection with our 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders may do so by submitting in writing a Nomination Notice, in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by our By-Laws, to John F.W. Rogers, Secretary to the Board of Directors, via email atshareholderproposals@gs.com or by mail at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, no earlier than October 20, 202116, 2024 and no later than November 19, 2021.15, 2024. Please ensure that receipt of your submission is confirmed.

In accordance with our By-Laws, for other matters (including director nominees not proposed pursuant to proxy access) not included in our proxy materials to be properly brought before the 20222025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, a shareholder’s notice of the matter that the shareholder wishes to present must be delivered to John F.W. Rogers, Secretary to the Board of Directors,

in compliance with the procedures and along with the other information required by our By-Laws, via email atshareholderproposals@gs.com or by mail at The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 200 West Street, New York, New York 10282, not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the 20212024 Annual Meeting. As a result, any notice given by or on behalf of a shareholder pursuant to these provisions of our By-Laws (and not pursuant to the SEC’s Rule 14a-8) must be received no earlier than December 30, 202125, 2024 and no later than January 29, 2022.24, 2025. Please ensure that receipt of your submission is confirmed.

Shareholders providing notice to the company under the SEC’s Rule 14a-19 who intend to solicit proxies in support of nominees submitted under our advance notice By-Laws for the 2025 Annual Meeting must comply with this deadline, the requirements of our By-Laws and the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b).

 

 

112

 

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHS107


ANNEX A: CALCULATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES AND OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

Annex A: Calculation of Non-GAAP Measures and Other Information

Reconciliation of average common shareholders’ equity to average tangible common shareholders’ equity

ROE is calculated by dividing net earnings applicable to common shareholders by average monthly common shareholders’ equity. ROTE is calculated by dividing net earnings applicable to common shareholders by average monthly tangible common shareholders’ equity (tangible common shareholders’ equity is calculated as total shareholders’ equity less preferred stock, goodwill and identifiable intangible assets). Management believes that ROTE is meaningful because it measures the performance of businesses consistently, whether they were acquired or developed internally, and that tangible common shareholders’ equity is meaningful because it is a measure that the firm and investors use to assess capital adequacy. ROTE and tangible common shareholders’ equity are non-GAAP measures and may not be comparable to similar non-GAAP measures used by other companies.

The table below presents a reconciliation of average common shareholders’ equity to average tangible common shareholders’ equity:

 

   Unaudited ($ in Millions)Average for the Year
Ended December 31, 2023
 
UNAUDITED ($ IN MILLIONS)    AVERAGE FOR THE YEAR ENDED    
DECEMBER 31, 2020
Total shareholders’ equity   91,779116,699           
Preferred stock   (11,203)(10,895)           
Common shareholders’ equity   80,576105,804           
Goodwill   (4,238)(6,147)           
Identifiable intangible assets   (617)(1,736)           
Tangible common shareholders’ equity   75,72197,921           

Impact of Selected Items and FDIC Special Assessment Fee

   $ in Millions, Except Per Share AmountsFor the Year Ended
December 31, 2023     
   Pre-tax earnings:

   AWM historical principal investments

$(2,076)          

   GreenSky

(1,227)          

   Marcus loans portfolio

233          

   Personal Financial Management (PFM)

276          

   General Motors (GM) Card

(65)          

   FDIC special assessment fee

(529)          
   Total impact to pre-tax earnings$(3,388)          
   Impact to net earnings$(2,781)          
   Impact to EPS$(8.04)          
   Impact to ROE(2.6)pp          

Includes selected items that the firm has sold or is selling related to the firm’s narrowing of its ambitions in consumer-related activities and related to Asset & Wealth Management, including its transition to a less capital intensive business. Pre-tax earnings for 2023 for each selected item include the operating results of the item and additionally, (i) for the Marcus loans portfolio, a net mark-down of $367 million in net revenues and a reserve reduction of $442 million in provision for credit losses related to the sale of substantially all of the portfolio, (ii) for GreenSky, a mark-

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | GOLDMAN SACHSGoldman Sachs  

A-1


ANNEX A: CALCULATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES AND OTHER INFORMATION

down of $200 million in net revenues and a reserve reduction of $637 million in provision for credit losses (both related to the pending sale of the GreenSky point-of-sale loan portfolio), a write-down of intangibles of $506 million and an impairment of goodwill of $504 million related to Consumer platforms, (iii) for PFM, a gain of $349 million related to the sale of the business, and (iv) for GM Card, a reserve reduction of $160 million in provision for credit losses related to the transfer of the GM Card portfolio to held for sale. Historical principal investments include consolidated investment entities and other legacy investments the firm intends to exit over the medium term (medium term refers to a three to five year time horizon from year-end 2022).

In 4Q23, the firm recognized a pre-tax expense of $529 million for the expected aggregate special assessments to be collected by the FDIC to recover the losses to the deposit insurance fund resulting from the receiverships of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.

Net earnings reflects the effective income tax rate for the respective segment of each selected item and the allocation of the FDIC special assessment fee, adjusted for a write-off of deferred tax assets related to GreenSky.

A-2

  Goldman Sachs | Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders  


ANNEX B: ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

 

 

Annex B: Additional Details on Director Independence

Set forth below is detailed information regarding certain categories of transactions reviewed and considered by our Governance Committee and our Board in making independence determinations, which our Board has determined are immaterial under our Director Independence Policy.

 

   
  Category

CATEGORY

(Revenues,  (Revenues, payments or donations
  by our firm
must not exceed the
  greater of $1 million or 2%
of the
  entity’s consolidated gross revenues)

  revenues (CGR))

 

POSITIONPosition

DURING 2020During 2023

 

DIRECTOR

Director
 

PERCENT OF 2020Percent of 2023 CGR

Ordinary Course Business

Transactions (last 3 years)

Between Goldman Sachs and an entity with which a director or his or hertheir immediate family member is or was affiliated as specified

 Executive Officer

(for-profit
entity)
 

  Harris

  Mittal and his family member(s)

    Ogunlesi  Montag

   Uhl  Ogunlesi

 Aggregate 20202023 revenues to us from, or payments by us to, any such entity, if any, in each case did not exceed 0.1%0.20% of such other entity’s 20202023 consolidated gross revenues

 

 Employee
(for  (for
profit entity)
 None N/A

 

 Officer/Employee

(not-for-profit


entity)
 

   FaustNone

 Aggregate 2020 revenues to us from, or payments by us to, any such entity, if any, in each case did not exceed 0.1% of such other entity’s 2020 consolidated gross revenuesN/A

Charitable Donations (during 2020)2023)

Made in the ordinary course by

Goldman Sachs (including our

matching gift program), The Goldman

Sachs Foundation or the donor

advised funds under GS Gives program

 Officer/
Employee/

Trustee/

Board
Member

(not-for-profit


entity)

 Generally all independent directors and certain of their family members Aggregate 20202023 donations by us to such organization, if any, in each case did not exceed $640,000$425,000 or did not exceed 0.6%0.70% of thesuch other organization’s 20202023 consolidated gross revenues

Client Relationships(last (last 3 years)

Director or his or her immediate family

member is a client on substantially

the same terms as other similarly situated clients (for example, brokerage accounts and investment in funds managed or sponsored by us in those accounts)

 N/A 

  Burns and her family member(s)

  Harris and her family member(s)

  Kullman and her family member(s)

  Mittal and his family member(s)

  Montag and his family member(s)

  Ogunlesi and his family member(s)

  Oppenheimer and his family member(s)

  Tighe and her family member(s)

   Winkelman  Viniar and his family member(s)

 Aggregate 20202023 revenues to us from each of these accounts did not exceed 0.01% of our 20202023 consolidated gross revenues

 

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

 

B-1

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021


DIRECTIONS TO OUR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  |  GOLDMAN SACHSB-1


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

 

 

 

Directions to our 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Annex C: The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)Located at our office at:

ARTICLE I222 South Main Street

GENERAL14th Floor

1.1     PurposeSalt Lake City, Utah 84101

The purpose of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021) is to: (i) attract, retain and motivate officers, directors, employees (including prospective employees), consultants and others who may perform servicesPlease follow signage for the Firm (as hereinafter defined), to compensate them for their contributions to the long-term growth and profits of the Firm and to encourage them to acquire a proprietary interestAnnual Meeting in the success of the Firm, (ii) align the interests of officers, directors, employees, consultantsbuilding lobby for security and others who may perform services for the Firm with those of shareholders of GS Inc., (iii) assist the Firm in ensuring that its compensation program does not provide incentives to take imprudent risks and (iv) comply with regulatory requirements.entry.

The Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Directors of GS Inc. (the “Board”) on April 30, 1999 as The Goldman Sachs 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1999 SIP”) and was amended and restated as The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “2003 SIP”) by the Board on January 16, 2003, subject to the approval by the shareholders of GS Inc., which approval was obtained on April 1, 2003. The 2003 SIP was further amended and restated, effective as of December 31, 2008, and subsequently amended as of December 20, 2012. The 2003 SIP was amended and restated as The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2013) (the “2013 SIP”) by the Board on March 19, 2013, subject to the approval by the shareholders of GS Inc., which approval was obtained on May 23, 2013. The 2013 SIP was amended and restated as The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2015) (the “2015 SIP”) by the Board on March 6, 2015, subject to the approval by the shareholders of GS Inc., which approval was obtained on May 21, 2015. The 2015 SIP was amended and restated as The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2018) (the “2018 SIP”) by the Board on February 22, 2018, subject to the approval by the shareholders of GS Inc., which approval was obtained on May 2, 2018. The 2018 SIP was further amended and restated, effective as of January 15, 2019.

The Plan was amended and restated as The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021) by the Board on February 26, 2021, subject to the approval by the shareholders of GS Inc.

The amendments made to the 2018 SIP shall affect only Awards granted on or after the Effective Date (as hereinafter defined). Awards granted prior to the Effective Date shall be governed by the terms of the 2018 SIP (as in effect prior to the Effective Date), the 2015 SIP (as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2018 SIP), 2013 SIP (as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2015 SIP), the 2003 SIP (as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2013 SIP) or the 1999 SIP (as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2003 SIP), as applicable, and the applicable Award Agreements. The terms of this Plan are not intended to affect the interpretation of the terms of the 2018 SIP, 2015 SIP, the 2013 SIP, the 2003 SIP or the 1999 SIP, as applicable, as they existed prior to the Effective Date.

1.2     Definitions of Certain Terms

Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, the terms listed below shall have the following meanings for purposes of the Plan and any Award Agreement.

1.2.1    “AAA” means the American Arbitration Association.

1.2.2    “Account” means any brokerage account, custody account or similar account, as approved or required by GS Inc. from time to time, into which shares of Common Stock, cash or other property in respect of an Award are delivered.

1.2.3    “Award” means an award made pursuant to the Plan.Public Transport

 

C-1 

TRAX stop located at: Gallivan Plaza, Main Street at 275 South, Salt Lake City

Driving Directions

From SLC International Airport

 GOLDMAN SACHS

Head west on North Terminal Drive

   |  

Continue straight and make slight right onto Terminal Drive

 PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Continue straight on Terminal Drive


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

 

Take I-80 East ramp on the left to City Center/Ogden/Provo

 

Keep left at fork, follow signs for I-80 East and merge onto I-80 East

 

Take exit 121 for 600 South

 

Merge onto 600 South

1.2.4    “Award Agreement” means the written document or documents by which each Award

Turn left onto West Temple

Turn right onto 200 South

Parking is evidenced, including any related Award Statement and signature card.

1.2.5    “Award Statement” means a written statement that reflects certain Award terms.

1.2.6    “Board” means the Board of Directors of GS Inc.

1.2.7    “Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which banking institutions in New York City are authorized or obligated by Federal law or executive order to be closed.

1.2.8    “Cause” means (a) the Grantee’s conviction, whether following trial or by plea of guilty or nolo contendere (or similar plea), in a criminal proceeding (i) on a misdemeanor charge involving fraud, false statements or misleading omissions, wrongful taking, embezzlement, bribery, forgery, counterfeiting or extortion, or (ii) on a felony charge, or (iii) on an equivalent charge to those in clauses (i) and (ii) in jurisdictions which do not use those designations, (b) the Grantee’s engaging in any conduct which constitutes an employment disqualification under applicable law (including statutory disqualification as defined under the Exchange Act), (c) the Grantee’s willful failure to perform the Grantee’s duties to the Firm, (d) the Grantee’s violation of any securities or commodities laws, any rules or regulations issued pursuant to such laws, or the rules and regulations of any securities or commodities exchange or association of which the Firm is a member, (e) the Grantee’s violation of any Firm policy concerning hedging or pledging or confidential or proprietary information, or the Grantee’s material violation of any other Firm policy as in effect from time to time, (f) the Grantee’s engaging in any act or making any statement which impairs, impugns, denigrates, disparages or negatively reflects upon the name, reputation or business interests of the Firm or (g) the Grantee’s engaging in any conduct detrimental to the Firm. The determination as to whether Cause has occurred shall be made by the Committee in its sole discretion and, in such case, the Committee also may, but shall not be required to, specify the date such Cause occurred (including by determining that a prior termination of Employment was for Cause). Any rights the Firm may have hereunder and in any Award Agreement in respect of the events giving rise to Cause shall be in addition to the rights the Firm may have under any other agreement with a Grantee or at law or in equity.

1.2.9    “Certificate” means a stock certificate (or other appropriate document or evidence of ownership) representing shares of Common Stock.

1.2.10    “Change in Control” means the consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving GS Inc. (a “Reorganization”) or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of GS Inc.’s assets to an entity that is not an affiliate of GS Inc. (a “Sale”), that in each case requires the approval of GS Inc.’s shareholders under the law of GS Inc.’s jurisdiction of organization, whether for such Reorganization or Sale (or the issuance of securities of GS Inc. in such Reorganization or Sale), unless immediately following such Reorganization or Sale, either: (a) at least 50% of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of (i) the entity resulting from such Reorganization, or the entity which has acquired all or substantially all of the assets of GS Inc. in a Sale (in either case, the “Surviving Entity”), or (ii) if applicable, the ultimate parent entity that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, as such Rule is in effect on the date of the adoption of the 1999 SIP) of 50% or more of the total voting power (in respect of the election of directors, or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Surviving Entity (the “Parent Entity”) is represented by GS Inc.’s securities (the “GS Inc. Securities”) that were outstanding immediately prior to such Reorganization or Sale (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such GS Inc. Securities were converted pursuant to such Reorganization or Sale) or (b) at least 50% of the members of the board of directors (or similar officials in the case of an entity other than a corporation) of the Parent Entity (or, if there is no Parent Entity, the Surviving Entity) following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale were,available at the time of the Board’s approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Reorganization or Sale, individuals (the “Incumbent Directors”) who either (i) were members of the Board on the Effective Date or (ii) became directors subsequent to the Effective DateABM Parking Garage (on 200 South between West Temple and whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of GS Inc.’s proxy statement in which such persons are named as nominees for director).

1.2.11    “Client” means any client or prospective client of the Firm to whom the Grantee provided services, or for whom the Grantee transacted business, or whose identity became known to the Grantee in connection with the Grantee’s relationship with or employment by the Firm.Main Street near Hotel Monaco)

 

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  Proxy Statement for the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders | Goldman Sachs  

   |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-2

C-1


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

1.2.12    “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and the applicable rulings and regulations thereunder.

1.2.13    “Committee” means the committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan pursuant to Section 1.3, and which, to the extent the Board determines it is appropriate for Awards under the Plan to qualify for the exemption available under Rule 16b-3(d)(1) or Rule 16b-3(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, shall be a committee or subcommittee of the Board composed of two or more members, each of whom is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the Committee shall be the Compensation Committee of the Board.

1.2.14    “Common Stock” means common stock of GS Inc., par value $0.01 per share.

1.2.15    “Competitive Enterprise” means an existing or planned business enterprise that (a) engages, or may reasonably be expected to engage, in any activity; (b) owns or controls, or may reasonably be expected to own or control, a significant interest in any entity that engages in any activity or (c) is, or may reasonably be expected to be, owned by, or a significant interest in which is, or may reasonably be expected to be, owned or controlled by, any entity that engages in any activity that, in any case, competes or will compete anywhere with any activity in which the Firm is engaged. The activities covered by this definition include, without limitation: financial services such as investment banking; public or private finance; lending; financial advisory services; private investing for anyone other than the Grantee and members of the Grantee’s family (including for the avoidance of doubt, any type of proprietary investing or trading); private wealth management; private banking; consumer or commercial cash management; consumer, digital or commercial banking; merchant banking; asset, portfolio or hedge fund management; insurance or reinsurance underwriting or brokerage; property management; or securities, futures, commodities, energy, derivatives, currency or digital asset brokerage, sales, lending, custody, clearance, settlement or trading.

1.2.16    “Conflicted Employment” means the Grantee’s employment at any U.S. Federal, state or local government, any non-U.S. government, any supranational or international organization, any self-regulatory organization, or any agency or instrumentality of any such government or organization, or any other employer determined by the Committee, if, as a result of such employment, the Grantee’s continued holding of any Outstanding Award or Shares at Risk would result in an actual or perceived conflict of interest.

1.2.17    “Date of Grant” means the date specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as the date of grant of the Award.

1.2.18    “Delivery Date” means each date specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as a delivery date, provided, unless the Committee determines otherwise, such date is during a Window Period or, if such date is not during a Window Period, the first trading day of the first Window Period beginning after such date.

1.2.19    “Dividend Equivalent Right” means a dividend equivalent right granted under the Plan, which represents an unfunded and unsecured promise to pay to the Grantee amounts equal to all or any portion of the regular cash dividends that would be paid on shares of Common Stock covered by an Award if such shares had been delivered pursuant to an Award.

1.2.20    “Effective Date” means the date this Plan is approved by the shareholders of GS Inc. pursuant to Section 3.15 hereof.

1.2.21    “Employment” means the Grantee’s performance of services for the Firm, as determined by the Committee. The terms “employ” and “employed” shall have their correlative meanings. The Committee in its sole discretion may determine (a) whether and when a Grantee’s leave of absence results in a termination of Employment (for this purpose, unless the Committee determines otherwise, a Grantee shall be treated as terminating Employment with the Firm upon the occurrence of an Extended Absence), (b) whether and when a change in a Grantee’s association with the Firm results in a termination of Employment and (c) the impact, if any, of any such leave of absence or change in association on Awards theretofore made. Unless expressly provided otherwise, any references in the Plan or any Award Agreement to a Grantee’s Employment being terminated shall include both voluntary and involuntary terminations.

C-3GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

1.2.22    “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and the applicable rules and regulations thereunder.

1.2.23    “Exercise Price” means (i) in the case of Options, the price specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as the price-per-share of Common Stock at which such share can be purchased pursuant to the Option or (ii) in the case of SARs, the price specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as the reference price-per-share of Common Stock used to calculate the amount payable to the Grantee.

1.2.24    “Expiration Date” means the date specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as the final expiration date of the Award.

1.2.25��   “Extended Absence” means the Grantee’s inability to perform for six (6) continuous months, due to illness, injury or pregnancy-related complications, substantially all the essential duties of the Grantee’s occupation, as determined by the Committee.

1.2.26    “Fair Market Value” means, with respect to a share of Common Stock on any day, the fair market value as determined in accordance with a valuation methodology approved by the Committee.

1.2.27    “FINRA” means the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

1.2.28    “Firm” means GS Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

1.2.29    “Good Reason” means, in connection with a termination of employment by a Grantee following a Change in Control, (a) as determined by the Committee, a materially adverse alteration in the Grantee’s position or in the nature or status of the Grantee’s responsibilities from those in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control or (b) the Firm’s requiring the Grantee’s principal place of Employment to be located more than seventy-five (75) miles from the location where the Grantee is principally Employed at the time of the Change in Control (except for required travel on the Firm’s business to an extent substantially consistent with the Grantee’s customary business travel obligations in the ordinary course of business prior to the Change in Control).

1.2.30    “Grantee” means a person who receives an Award.

1.2.31    “GS Inc.” means The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and any successor thereto.

1.2.32    “Incentive Stock Option” means an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that is intended to qualify for special Federal income tax treatment pursuant to Sections 421 and 422 of the Code, as now constituted or subsequently amended, or pursuant to a successor provision of the Code, and which is so designated in the applicable Option Award Agreement.

1.2.33    “Initial Exercise Date” means, with respect to an Option or an SAR, the date specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as the initial date on which such Award may be exercised, provided, unless the Committee determines otherwise, such date is during a Window Period or, if such date is not during a Window Period, the first trading day of the first Window Period beginning after such date.

1.2.34    “1999 SIP” means The Goldman Sachs 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2003 SIP.

1.2.35    “New York Stock Exchange” means the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. and any successor exchange or trading market that is the principal trading market for the Common Stock.

1.2.36    “Non-Employee Director” means a member of the Board who is not an officer or employee of the Firm.

1.2.37    “Nonqualified Stock Option” means an option to purchase shares of Common Stock that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

1.2.38    “Option” means an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Stock Option or both, as the context requires.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-4


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

1.2.39    “Outstanding” means any Award to the extent it has not been forfeited, canceled, terminated, exercised or with respect to which the shares of Common Stock underlying the Award have not been previously delivered or other payments made.

1.2.40    “Plan” means The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021), as described herein and as hereafter amended from time to time.

1.2.41    “RSU” means a restricted stock unit granted under the Plan, which represents an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver shares of Common Stock in accordance with the terms of the RSU Award Agreement.

1.2.42    “RSU Shares” means shares of Common Stock that underlie an RSU.

1.2.43    “Restricted Share” means a share of Common Stock delivered under the Plan that is subject to Transfer Restrictions, forfeiture provisions and/or other terms and conditions specified herein and in the Restricted Share Award Agreement or other applicable Award Agreement. All references to Restricted Shares include “Shares at Risk.”

1.2.44    “Retirement” means termination of the Grantee’s Employment (other than for Cause) on or after the Date of Grant at a time when (i) (A) the sum of the Grantee’s age plus years of service with the Firm (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) equals or exceeds 60 and (B) the Grantee has completed at least 10 years of service with the Firm (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion) or, if earlier, (ii) (A) the Grantee has attained age 50 and (B) the Grantee has completed at least five years of service with the Firm (as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion).

1.2.45    “SAR” means a stock appreciation right granted under the Plan, which represents an unfunded and unsecured promise to deliver shares of Common Stock, cash or other property equal in value to the excess of the Fair Market Value per share of Common Stock over the Exercise Price per share of the SAR, subject to the terms of the SAR Award Agreement.

1.2.46    “Section 409A” means Section 409A of the Code, including any amendments or successor provisions to that Section and any regulations and other administrative guidance thereunder, in each case as they, from time to time, may be amended or interpreted through further administrative guidance.

1.2.47    “Shares at Risk” means Restricted Shares that are designated as “Shares at Risk” in the applicable Award Agreement.

1.2.48    “SIP Administrator” means each person designated by the Committee as a “SIP Administrator” with the authority to perform day-to-day administrative functions for the Plan.

1.2.49    “SIP Committee” means the persons who have been delegated certain authority under the Plan by the Committee.

1.2.50    “Solicit” means any direct or indirect communication of any kind whatsoever, regardless of by whom initiated, inviting, advising, suggesting, encouraging or requesting any person or entity, in any manner, to take or refrain from taking any action.

1.2.51    “Transfer Restrictions” means restrictions that prohibit the sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, hypothecation, fractionalization, hedge or other disposal of (including through the use of any cash-settled instrument), whether voluntarily or involuntarily by the Grantee, of an Award or any shares of Common Stock, cash or other property delivered in respect of an Award.

1.2.52    “Transferability Date” means the date Transfer Restrictions on a Restricted Share will be released. Within 30 Business Days after the applicable Transferability Date, GS Inc. shall take, or shall cause to be taken, such steps as may be necessary to remove Transfer Restrictions.

1.2.53    “2003 SIP” means The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2013 SIP.

C-5GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

1.2.54    “2013 SIP” means The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2013), as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2015 SIP.

1.2.55    “2015 SIP” means The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2015), as in effect prior to the effective date of the 2018 SIP.

1.2.56    “2018 SIP” means The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2018), as in effect prior to the Effective Date.

1.2.57    “Vested” means, with respect to an Award, the portion of the Award that is not subject to a condition that the Grantee remain actively employed by the Firm in order for the Award to remain Outstanding. The fact that an Award becomes Vested shall not mean or otherwise indicate that the Grantee has an unconditional or nonforfeitable right to such Award, and such Award shall remain subject to such terms, conditions and forfeiture provisions as may be provided for in the Plan or in the Award Agreement.

1.2.58    “Vesting Date” means each date specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement as a date on which part or all of an Award becomes Vested.

1.2.59    “Window Period” means a period designated by the Firm during which all employees of the Firm are permitted to purchase or sell shares of Common Stock (provided that, if the Grantee is a member of a designated group of employees who are subject to different restrictions, the Window Period may be a period designated by the Firm during which an employee of the Firm in such designated group is permitted to purchase or sell shares of Common Stock).

1.3     Administration

1.3.1    Subject to Sections 1.3.3 and 1.3.4, the Plan shall be administered by the Committee.

1.3.2    The Committee shall have complete control over the administration of the Plan and shall have the authority in its sole discretion to (a) exercise all of the powers granted to it under the Plan, (b) construe, interpret and implement the Plan and all Award Agreements, (c) prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to the Plan, including rules governing its own operations, (d) make all determinations necessary or advisable in administering the Plan, (e) correct any defect, supply any omission and reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan, (f) amend the Plan to reflect changes in applicable law (whether or not the rights of the Grantee of any Award are adversely affected, unless otherwise provided in such Grantee’s Award Agreement), (g) grant Awards and determine who shall receive Awards, when such Awards shall be granted and the terms of such Awards, including setting forth provisions with regard to termination of Employment, such as termination of Employment for Cause or due to death, Conflicted Employment, Extended Absence or Retirement, (h) unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, amend any outstanding Award Agreement in any respect, whether or not the rights of the Grantee of such Award are adversely affected, including, without limitation, to (1) accelerate the time or times at which the Award becomes Vested, unrestricted or may be exercised (and, in connection with such acceleration, the Committee may provide that any shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to such Award shall be Restricted Shares, which are subject to vesting, transfer, forfeiture or repayment provisions similar to those in the Grantee’s underlying Award), (2) accelerate the time or times at which shares of Common Stock are delivered under the Award (and, without limitation on the Committee’s rights, in connection with such acceleration, the Committee may provide that any shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to such Award shall be Restricted Shares, which are subject to vesting, transfer, forfeiture or repayment provisions similar to those in the Grantee’s underlying Award), (3) waive or amend any goals, restrictions or conditions set forth in such Award Agreement, or impose new goals, restrictions and conditions or (4) reflect a change in the Grantee’s circumstances (e.g., a change to part-time employment status or a change in position, duties or responsibilities) and (i) determine at any time whether, to what extent and under what circumstances and method or methods (1) Awards may be (A) settled in cash, shares of Common Stock, other securities, other Awards or other property (in which event, the Committee may specify what other effects such settlement will have on the Grantee’s Award, including the effect on any repayment provisions under the Plan or Award Agreement), (B) exercised (including a “cashless” exercise) or (C) canceled, forfeited or suspended, (2) shares of Common Stock, other securities, other Awards or other property and other amounts payable with respect to an Award may be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Grantee thereof or of the Committee and (3) Awards may be settled by GS Inc., any of its subsidiaries or affiliates or any of its or their designees.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-6


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

1.3.3    Actions of the Committee may be taken by the vote of a majority of its members present at a meeting (which may be held telephonically). Any action may be taken by a written instrument signed by a majority of the Committee members, and action so taken shall be fully as effective as if it had been taken by a vote at a meeting. The determination of the Committee on all matters relating to the Plan or any Award Agreement shall be final, binding and conclusive. The Committee may allocate among its members and delegate to any person who is not a member of the Committee or to any administrative group within the Firm, including the SIP Committee, the SIP Administrators or any of them, any of its powers, responsibilities or duties. In delegating its authority, the Committee shall consider the extent to which any delegation may cause Awards to fail to meet the requirements of Rule 16(b)-3(d)(1) or Rule 16(b)-3(e) under the Exchange Act.

1.3.4    Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Board may, in its sole discretion, at any time and from time to time, grant Awards or administer the Plan. In any such case, the Board shall have all of the authority and responsibility granted to the Committee herein.

1.3.5    No Liability. No member of the Board or the Committee or any employee of the Firm (each such person, a “Covered Person”) shall have any liability to any person (including any Grantee) for any action taken or omitted to be taken or any determination made in good faith with respect to the Plan or any Award. Each Covered Person shall be indemnified and held harmless by GS Inc. against and from (a) any loss, cost, liability or expense (including attorneys’ fees) that may be imposed upon or incurred by such Covered Person in connection with or resulting from any action, suit or proceeding to which such Covered Person may be a party or in which such Covered Person may be involved by reason of any action taken or omitted to be taken under the Plan or any Award Agreement and (b) any and all amounts paid by such Covered Person, with GS Inc.’s approval, in settlement thereof, or paid by such Covered Person in satisfaction of any judgment in any such action, suit or proceeding against such Covered Person, provided that GS Inc. shall have the right, at its own expense, to assume and defend any such action, suit or proceeding and, once GS Inc. gives notice of its intent to assume the defense, GS Inc. shall have sole control over such defense with counsel of GS Inc.’s choice. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be available to a Covered Person to the extent that a court of competent jurisdiction in a final judgment or other final adjudication, in either case not subject to further appeal, determines that the acts or omissions of such Covered Person giving rise to the indemnification claim resulted from such Covered Person’s bad faith, fraud or willful criminal act or omission. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights of indemnification to which Covered Persons may be entitled under GS Inc.’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as may be amended from time to time, or Amended and Restated Bylaws, as may be amended from time to time, as a matter of law, or otherwise, or any other power that GS Inc. may have to indemnify such persons or hold them harmless.

1.4     Persons Eligible for Awards

Awards under the Plan may be made to such current, former (solely with respect to their final year of service) and prospective officers, directors, employees, consultants and other individuals who may perform services for the Firm, as the Committee may select.

1.5     Types of Awards Under Plan

Awards may be made under the Plan in the form of (a) Options, (b) SARs, (c) Restricted Shares, (d) RSUs, (e) Dividend Equivalent Rights and (f) other equity-based or equity-related Awards that the Committee determines are consistent with the purpose of the Plan and the interests of the Firm. No Incentive Stock Option (other than an Incentive Stock Option that may be assumed or issued by GS Inc. in connection with a transaction to which Section 424(a) of the Code applies) may be granted to a person who is not eligible to receive an Incentive Stock Option under the Code.

1.6     Shares Available for Awards

1.6.1    Total Shares Available. Subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 1.6.2, the total number of shares of Common Stock which may be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan on or after the Effective Date shall not exceed twenty million (20,000,000) shares, plus the number of shares available for awards under the 2018 SIP as of the Effective Date. Each Option, SAR, Restricted Share, RSU or similar Award or share of Common Stock underlying an Award shall count as one share of Common Stock. No further Awards shall be granted

C-7GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

pursuant to the 2018 SIP. If, on or after the Effective Date, any Award or any outstanding award granted under the 2018, 2015 or 2013 SIP (“2018, 2015 or 2013 SIP Award”) is forfeited or otherwise terminates or is canceled without the delivery of shares of Common Stock, shares of Common Stock are surrendered or withheld from any Award or 2018, 2015 or 2013 SIP Award to satisfy any obligation of the Grantee (including Federal, state or foreign taxes) or shares of Common Stock owned by a Grantee are tendered to pay the exercise price of any Award, then the shares covered by such forfeited, terminated or canceled Award or 2018, 2015 or 2013 SIP Award or which are equal to the number of shares surrendered, withheld or tendered shall again become available to be delivered pursuant to Awards granted under this Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to adjustment as provided in Section 1.6.2, no more than twenty-four million (24,000,000) shares of Common Stock that can be delivered under the Plan shall be deliverable pursuant to the exercise of Incentive Stock Options. Any shares of Common Stock (a) delivered by GS Inc., (b) with respect to which Awards are made hereunder and (c) with respect to which the Firm becomes obligated to make Awards, in each case through the assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by an acquired entity, shall not count against the shares of Common Stock available to be delivered pursuant to Awards under this Plan. Shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to Awards may be authorized but unissued Common Stock or authorized and issued Common Stock held in GS Inc.’s treasury or otherwise acquired for the purposes of the Plan.

1.6.2    Adjustments. The Committee shall adjust the number of shares of Common Stock authorized pursuant to Section 1.6.1 and shall adjust (including, without limitation, by payment of cash) the terms of any Outstanding Awards (including, without limitation, the number of shares of Common Stock covered by each Outstanding Award, the type of property to which the Award relates and the exercise or strike price of any Award), in such manner as it deems appropriate to prevent the enlargement or dilution of rights, for any increase or decrease in the number of issued shares of Common Stock (or issuance of shares of stock other than shares of Common Stock) resulting from a recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, spinoff, splitup, combination, reclassification or exchange of shares of Common Stock, merger, consolidation, rights offering, separation, reorganization or any other change in corporate structure or event the Committee determines in its sole discretion affects the capitalization of GS Inc.; provided, however, that no such adjustment shall be required if the Committee determines that such action would cause an award to fail to satisfy the conditions of an applicable exception from the requirements of Section 409A or otherwise would subject a Grantee to an additional tax imposed under Section 409A in respect of an Outstanding Award. After any adjustment made pursuant to this Section 1.6.2, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each Outstanding Award shall be rounded up or down to the nearest whole number as determined by the Committee.

1.6.3    Except as provided in this Section 1.6 or under the terms of any applicable Award Agreement, there shall be no limit on the number or the value of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to Awards to any individual under the Plan.

1.6.4    There shall be no limit on the amount of cash, securities (other than shares of Common Stock as provided in Section 1.6.1, as adjusted by Section  1.6.2) or other property that may be delivered pursuant to any Award.

1.7     Non-Employee Director Compensation

Each Non-Employee Director may receive total annual compensation in a fixed amount equal to (a) in the case of a Non-Employee Director who does not serve as a chair of a committee appointed by the Board, $450,000 and (b) in the case of a Non-Employee Director who serves as a chair of a committee appointed by the Board, $475,000. Any fixed amount of total annual compensation described in this Section 1.7 may be payable in the form of cash and/or an Award that shall have such terms and conditions as the Board may from time to time specify. Notwithstanding any other provision herein, including, without limitation, Sections 2.3.1, 2.4.1, 2.5.1, 2.6.1 and 2.7 (providing the Committee the authority to grant Awards), the amount of total annual compensation paid to each Non-Employee Director shall be governed solely by this Section 1.7.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-8


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

ARTICLE II

AWARDS UNDER THE PLAN

2.1     Agreements Evidencing Awards

Each Award granted under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement, which shall contain such provisions and conditions as the Committee deems appropriate (and which may incorporate by reference some or all of the provisions of the Plan). The Committee may grant Awards in tandem with or in substitution for any other Award or Awards granted under this Plan or any award granted under any other plan of the Firm. By accepting an Award pursuant to the Plan, a Grantee thereby agrees that the Award shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement.

2.2     No Rights as a Shareholder

No Grantee (or other person having rights pursuant to an Award) shall have any of the rights of a shareholder of GS Inc. with respect to shares of Common Stock subject to an Award until the delivery of such shares. Except as otherwise provided in Section 1.6.2, no adjustments shall be made for dividends or distributions on (whether ordinary or extraordinary, and whether in cash, Common Stock, other securities or other property), or other events relating to, shares of Common Stock subject to an Award for which the record date is prior to the date such shares are delivered.

2.3     Options

2.3.1    Grant. Subject to the individual limit described in Section 1.6.1, the Committee may grant Awards of Options in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine (and may include a grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights under Section 2.8 in connection with such Option grants); provided, however, that (i) the Exercise Price for any Option may not be less than the lesser of (A) the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Date of Grant for such Option and (B) the average of the high and low sale prices of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Date of Grant for such Option and (ii) the Expiration Date in respect of an Option may not be later than the tenth anniversary of the Date of Grant. Except as provided for in Section 1.6.2, the Exercise Price for any Outstanding Option may not be reduced after the Date of Grant.

2.3.2    Exercise. Options that are not Vested or that are not Outstanding may not be exercised. Outstanding Vested Options may be exercised in accordance with procedures established by the Committee (but, subject to the applicable Award Agreement, may not be exercised earlier than the Initial Exercise Date). The Committee may from time to time prescribe periods during which Outstanding Vested Options shall not be exercisable.

2.3.3    Payment of Exercise Price. Any acceptance by the Committee of a Grantee’s written notice of exercise of a Vested Option shall be conditioned upon payment for the shares of Common Stock being purchased. Such payment may be made in cash or by such other methods as the Committee may from time to time prescribe.

2.3.4    Delivery of Shares. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, and except as provided in Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.11 and 3.17.1, and subject to Section 3.2, upon receipt of payment of the full Exercise Price (or upon satisfaction of procedures adopted by the Committee in connection with a “cashless” exercise method adopted by it) for shares of Common Stock subject to an Outstanding Vested Option, delivery of such shares of Common Stock shall be effected by book-entry credit to the Grantee’s Account. The Grantee shall be the beneficial owner and record holder of such shares of Common Stock properly credited to the Account. No delivery of such shares of Common Stock shall be made to a Grantee unless the Grantee has timely returned all required documentation specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement or as otherwise required by the Committee or the SIP Administrator.

2.3.5    Repayment if Conditions Not Met. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the Plan and a Grantee’s Option Award Agreement in respect of exercised Options were not satisfied, then the Grantee shall be obligated immediately upon demand therefor, as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion, to

C-9GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

either: (i) return to the Firm such number of shares of Common Stock that were delivered in excess of the Exercise Price paid therefor or (ii) pay the Firm an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value (determined at the time of exercise) of the shares of Common Stock that were delivered in respect of such exercised Options over the Exercise Price paid therefor, in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock, cash or other property applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such shares.

2.4     SARs

2.4.1    Grant. Subject to the individual limit described in Section 1.6.1, the Committee may grant Awards of SARs in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine (and may include a grant of Dividend Equivalent Rights under Section 2.8 in connection with such SAR grants); provided, however, that (i) the Exercise Price for any SAR may not be less than the lesser of (A) the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Date of Grant for such SAR and (B) the average of the high and low sale prices of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the Date of Grant for such SAR and (ii) the Expiration Date in respect of an SAR may not be later than the tenth anniversary of the Date of Grant. Except as provided for in Section 1.6.2, the Exercise Price for any SAR may not be reduced after the Date of Grant.

2.4.2    Exercise. SARs that are not Vested or that are not Outstanding may not be exercised. Outstanding Vested SARs may be exercised in accordance with procedures established by the Committee (but, subject to the applicable Award Agreement, may not be exercised earlier than the Initial Exercise Date). The Committee may from time to time prescribe periods during which Outstanding Vested SARs shall not be exercisable.

2.4.3    Delivery of Shares. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, and except as provided in Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.11 and 3.17.1, and subject to Section 3.2, upon exercise of an Outstanding Vested SAR for which payment will be made partly or entirely in shares of Common Stock, delivery of shares of Common Stock (and cash in respect of fractional shares), with a Fair Market Value (on the exercise date) equal to (i) the excess of (a) the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock (on the exercise date) over (b) the Exercise Price of such SAR multiplied by (ii) the number of SARs exercised, shall be effected by book-entry credit to the Grantee’s Account. The Grantee shall be the beneficial owner and record holder of such shares of Common Stock properly credited to the Account on such date of delivery. No delivery of such shares of Common Stock shall be made to a Grantee unless the Grantee has timely returned all required documentation specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement or as otherwise required by the Committee or the SIP Administrator.

2.4.4    Repayment if Conditions Not Met. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the Plan and a Grantee’s SAR Award Agreement in respect of exercised SARs were not satisfied, then the Grantee shall be obligated immediately upon demand therefor, as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion, to either: (i) return to the Firm such number of shares of Common Stock that were delivered in excess of the Exercise Price paid therefor or (ii) pay the Firm an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value (determined at the time of exercise) of the shares of Common Stock subject to the exercised SARs over the Exercise Price therefor, in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock, cash or other property applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such SARs.

2.5     Restricted Shares

2.5.1    Grant. The Committee may grant or offer for sale Awards of Restricted Shares in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. Upon the issuance of such shares in the name of the Grantee, the Grantee shall have the rights of a shareholder with respect to the Restricted Shares and shall become the record holder of such shares, subject to the provisions of the Plan and any restrictions and conditions as the Committee may include in the applicable Award Agreement. In the event that a Certificate is issued in respect of Restricted Shares, such Certificate may be registered in the name of the Grantee but, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, shall be held by a custodian (which may be GS Inc. or one of its affiliates) until the time the restrictions lapse.

2.5.2    Condition to Grant. Any grant or offer for sale of Awards of Restricted Shares is subject to the Grantee’s irrevocable grant of full power and authority to GS Inc. to register in GS Inc.’s name, or that of any

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-10


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

designee, any and all Restricted Shares that have been or may be delivered to the Grantee, and the Grantee’s irrevocable authorization of GS Inc., or its designee, to sell, assign or transfer such shares to GS Inc. or such other persons as it may determine in the event of a forfeiture of such shares pursuant to any Award Agreement.

2.5.3    Repayment if Conditions Not Met. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the Plan and a Grantee’s Restricted Share Award Agreement (or other Award Agreement which provides for delivery of Restricted Shares) in respect of Restricted Shares which have become Vested (or for which Transfer Restrictions have been released) were not satisfied, then the Grantee shall be obligated immediately upon demand therefor, as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion, to either: (i) return to the Firm such number of Restricted Shares for which such terms and conditions were not satisfied or (ii) pay an amount equal to the Fair Market Value (determined at the time such shares became Vested, or at the time Transfer Restrictions were released, as applicable) of such Restricted Shares, in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock, cash or other property applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such Restricted Shares.

2.6     RSUs

2.6.1    Grant. The Committee may grant Awards of RSUs in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee may determine. A Grantee of an RSU has only the rights of a general unsecured creditor of GS Inc. until delivery of shares of Common Stock, cash or other securities or property is made as specified in the applicable Award Agreement.

2.6.2    Delivery of Shares. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, and except as provided in Sections 3.3, 3.4, 3.11 and 3.17.3, and subject to Section 3.2, on each Delivery Date the number or percentage of RSU Shares specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement with respect to the Grantee’s then Outstanding Vested RSUs (which amount may be rounded to avoid fractional RSU Shares) shall be delivered. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, or as otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, delivery of RSU Shares shall be effected by book-entry credit to the Grantee’s Account. The Grantee shall be the beneficial owner and record holder of any RSU Shares properly credited to the Grantee’s Account. No delivery of shares of Common Stock underlying a Grantee’s RSUs shall be made unless the Grantee has timely returned all required documentation specified in the Grantee’s Award Agreement or as otherwise determined by the Committee or the SIP Administrator.

2.6.3    Repayment if Conditions Not Met. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the Plan and a Grantee’s RSU Award Agreement in respect of the delivery of shares underlying such RSUs were not satisfied, then the Grantee shall be obligated immediately upon demand therefor, as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion, to either: (i) return to the Firm such number of the shares of Common Stock delivered in respect of such RSUs for which such terms and conditions were not satisfied or (ii) pay the Firm an amount equal to the Fair Market Value (determined at the time of delivery) of the shares of Common Stock delivered with respect to such Delivery Date, in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock, cash or other property applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such shares of Common Stock.

2.7     Other Stock-Based Awards

The Committee may grant other types of equity-based or equity-related Awards (including the grant or offer for sale of unrestricted shares of Common Stock) in such amounts and subject to such terms and conditions as the Committee shall determine. Such Awards may entail the transfer of actual shares of Common Stock to Plan participants, or payment in cash or otherwise of amounts based on the value of shares of Common Stock, and may include, without limitation, Awards designed to comply with or take advantage of the applicable local laws of jurisdictions other than the United States.

2.8     Dividend Equivalent Rights

2.8.1    Grant. The Committee may grant, either alone or in connection with any other Award, a Dividend Equivalent Right.

2.8.2    Payment. The Committee shall determine whether payments in connection with a Dividend Equivalent Right shall be made in cash, in shares of Common Stock or in another form, whether they shall be

C-11GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

conditioned upon the exercise of any Award to which they relate, the time or times at which they shall be made and such other terms and conditions as the Committee shall deem appropriate. No payments will be made in respect of any Dividend Equivalent Right at a time when any performance-based goals that apply to the Dividend Equivalent Right or Award that is granted in connection with a Dividend Equivalent Right have not been satisfied (as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion).

2.8.3    Repayment if Conditions Not Met. If the Committee determines that all terms and conditions of the Plan and a Grantee’s Award Agreement in respect of which a Dividend Equivalent Right was granted were not satisfied (including the terms and conditions of any other Award that was granted in connection with the Dividend Equivalent Right), then the Grantee shall be obligated to pay the Firm immediately upon demand therefor, any payments in connection with such Dividend Equivalent Right (and, if such payments in respect of the Dividend Equivalent Right were made in a form other than cash, as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion, either return to the Firm the property paid in respect of such Dividend Equivalent Right or an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of such payment determined at the time of payment), without reduction for any amount applied to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations in respect of such payments.

ARTICLE III

MISCELLANEOUS

3.1     Amendment of the Plan or Award Agreement

3.1.1    Unless otherwise provided in the Plan or in an Award Agreement, the Board may from time to time suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the Plan in any respect whatsoever, including in any manner that adversely affects the rights, duties or obligations of any Grantee of an Award.

3.1.2    Unless otherwise determined by the Board, shareholder approval of any suspension, discontinuance, revision or amendment shall be obtained only to the extent necessary to comply with any applicable law, rule or regulation; provided, however, (i) if and to the extent the Board determines it is appropriate for the Plan to comply with the provisions of Section 422 of the Code, no amendment that would require shareholder approval under Section 422 of the Code shall be effective without the approval of the shareholders of GS Inc. and (ii) no amendment to increase any Non-Employee Director’s total annual compensation above the amounts described in Section 1.7 shall be effective without the approval of the shareholders of GS Inc.

3.2     Tax Withholding

3.2.1    As a condition to the delivery of any shares of Common Stock, other property or cash pursuant to any Award or the lifting or lapse of restrictions on any Award, or in connection with any other event that gives rise to a Federal or other governmental tax withholding obligation on the part of the Firm relating to an Award (including, without limitation, FICA tax), (a) the Firm may deduct or withhold (or cause to be deducted or withheld) from any payment or distribution to the Grantee, whether or not pursuant to the Plan, (b) the Committee shall be entitled to require that the Grantee remit cash to the Firm (through payroll deduction or otherwise) or (c) the Firm may enter into any other suitable arrangements to withhold, in each case in an amount sufficient in the opinion of the Firm to satisfy such withholding obligation.

3.2.2    If the event giving rise to the withholding obligation involves a transfer of shares of Common Stock, then, at the discretion of the Committee, the Grantee may satisfy the withholding obligation described under Section 3.2.1 by electing to have GS Inc. withhold shares of Common Stock (which withholding, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, will be at a rate not in excess of the statutory maximum rate) or by tendering previously owned shares of Common Stock, in each case having a Fair Market Value equal to the amount of tax to be withheld (or by any other mechanism as may be required or appropriate to conform with local tax and other rules). For this purpose, Fair Market Value shall be determined as of the date on which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined, which may, as determined by the Committee, be the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the trading day immediately prior to the date shares of Common Stock (or cash or other property) are delivered in respect of RSUs (and GS Inc. may cause any fractional share amount to be settled in cash).

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-12


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

3.3     Required Consents and Legends

3.3.1    If the Committee shall at any time determine that any consent (as hereinafter defined) is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the granting of any Award, the delivery of shares of Common Stock or the delivery of any cash, securities or other property under the Plan, or the taking of any other action thereunder (each such action being hereinafter referred to as a “plan action”), then such plan action shall not be taken, in whole or in part, unless and until such consent shall have been effected or obtained to the full satisfaction of the Committee. The Committee may direct that any Certificate evidencing shares delivered pursuant to the Plan shall bear a legend setting forth such restrictions on transferability as the Committee may determine to be necessary or desirable, and may advise the transfer agent to place a stop order against any legended shares.

3.3.2    By accepting an Award, each Grantee shall have expressly provided consent to the items described in Section 3.3.3(d) hereof.

3.3.3    The term “consent” as used herein with respect to any plan action includes (a) any and all listings, registrations or qualifications in respect thereof upon any securities exchange or under any Federal, state or local law, or law, rule or regulation of a jurisdiction outside the United States, (b) any and all written agreements and representations by the Grantee with respect to the disposition of shares, or with respect to any other matter, which the Committee may deem necessary or desirable to comply with the terms of any such listing, registration or qualification or to obtain an exemption from the requirement that any such listing, qualification or registration be made, (c) any and all other consents, clearances and approvals in respect of a plan action by any governmental or other regulatory body or any stock exchange or self-regulatory agency, (d) any and all consents by the Grantee to (i) the Firm’s supplying to any third party recordkeeper of the Plan such personal information as the Committee deems advisable to administer the Plan, (ii) the Firm’s deducting amounts from the Grantee’s wages, or another arrangement satisfactory to the Committee, to reimburse the Firm for advances made on the Grantee’s behalf to satisfy certain withholding and other tax obligations in connection with an Award and (iii) the Firm’s imposing sales and transfer procedures and restrictions and hedging restrictions on shares of Common Stock delivered under the Plan and (e) any and all consents or authorizations required to comply with, or required to be obtained under, applicable local law or otherwise required by the Committee. Nothing herein shall require GS Inc. to list, register or qualify the shares of Common Stock on any securities exchange.

3.4     Right of Offset

The Firm shall have the right to offset against its obligation to (i) deliver shares of Common Stock (or other property or cash), (ii) release restrictions and/or other terms and conditions in respect of Restricted Shares or (iii) pay dividends or payments under Dividend Equivalent Rights (granted alone or in connection with any Award), in each case, under the Plan or any Award Agreement any outstanding amounts (including, without limitation, travel and entertainment or advance account balances, loans, repayment obligations under any Awards, or amounts repayable to the Firm pursuant to tax equalization, housing, automobile or other employee programs) the Grantee then owes to the Firm and any amounts the Committee otherwise deems appropriate pursuant to any tax equalization policy or agreement.

3.5     Nonassignability

3.5.1    Except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in the applicable Award Agreement and Sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 below, no Award (or any rights and obligations thereunder) granted to any person under the Plan may be sold, exchanged, transferred, assigned, pledged, hypothecated, fractionalized, hedged or otherwise disposed of (including through the use of any cash-settled instrument), whether voluntarily or involuntarily, other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and all such Awards (and any rights thereunder) shall be exercisable during the life of the Grantee only by the Grantee or the Grantee’s legal representative. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Committee may permit, under such terms and conditions that it deems appropriate in its sole discretion, a Grantee to transfer any Award to any person or entity that the Committee so determines. Any sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, hypothecation, fractionalization, hedge or other disposition in violation of the provisions of this Section 3.5 shall be void. All of the terms and conditions of this Plan and the Award Agreements shall be binding upon any permitted successors and assigns.

3.5.2    The Committee may adopt procedures pursuant to which some or all Grantees of RSUs or Restricted Shares may transfer some or all of their RSUs or Restricted Shares, in each case, which shall continue

C-13GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

to be subject to the same terms and conditions on such Award, through a gift for no consideration to any immediate family member (as determined pursuant to the procedures) or a trust in which the recipient and/or the recipient’s immediate family members in the aggregate have 100% (or such lesser amount as determined by the Committee from time to time) of the beneficial interest (as determined pursuant to the procedures).

3.5.3    The Committee may adopt procedures pursuant to which a Grantee may be permitted to specifically bequeath some or all of the Grantee’s Outstanding RSUs under the Grantee’s will to an organization described in Sections 501(c)(3) and 2055(a) of the Code (or such other similar charitable organization as may be approved by the Committee).

3.6     Requirement of Consent and Notification of Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code or Similar Provision

No election under Section 83(b) of the Code (to include in gross income in the year of transfer the amounts specified in Code Section 83(b)) or under a similar provision of the law of a jurisdiction outside the United States may be made unless expressly permitted by the terms of the Award Agreement or by action of the Committee in writing prior to the making of such election. If a Grantee of an Award, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Common Stock under the Plan or otherwise, is expressly permitted under the terms of the Award Agreement or by such Committee action to make any such election and the Grantee makes the election, the Grantee shall notify the Committee of such election within ten (10) days of filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service or other governmental authority, in addition to any filing and notification required pursuant to regulations issued under Code Section 83(b) or other applicable provision.

3.7     Requirement of Notification Upon Disqualifying Disposition Under Section 421(b) of the Code

If any Grantee shall make any disposition of shares of Common Stock delivered pursuant to the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option under the circumstances described in Section 421(b) of the Code (relating to certain disqualifying dispositions), such Grantee shall notify GS Inc. of such disposition within ten (10) days thereof.

3.8     Change in Control

3.8.1    The Committee may provide in any Award Agreement for provisions relating to a Change in Control, including, without limitation, the acceleration of the vesting, delivery or exercisability of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of goals with respect to, any Outstanding Awards and Shares at Risk; provided, however, that, in addition to any conditions provided for in the Award Agreement, any acceleration of the vesting, delivery or exercisability of, or the lapse of restrictions or deemed satisfaction of goals with respect to, any Outstanding Awards and Shares at Risk in connection with a Change in Control may occur only if (i) the Change in Control occurs and (ii) the Grantee’s Employment is terminated by the Firm without Cause or by the Grantee for Good Reason within 18 months following such Change in Control.

3.8.2    Unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement and except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in the event of a merger, consolidation, mandatory share exchange or other similar business combination of GS Inc. with or into any other entity (“successor entity”) or any transaction in which another person or entity acquires all of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of GS Inc., or all or substantially all of the assets of GS Inc., Outstanding Awards and Shares at Risk may be assumed or a substantially equivalent Award may be substituted by such successor entity or a parent or subsidiary of such successor entity, and such an assumption or substitution shall not be deemed to violate this Plan or any provision of any Award Agreement.

3.9     Other Conditions to Awards

Unless the Committee determines otherwise, the Grantee’s rights in respect of all of his or her Outstanding Awards and Shares at Risk (whether or not Vested) shall immediately terminate, such Awards shall cease to be Outstanding and such Shares at Risk shall be cancelled if: (a) the Grantee attempts to have any dispute under the Plan or his or her Award Agreement resolved in any manner that is not provided for by Section 3.17 and the Award Agreement, (b) the Grantee in any manner, directly or indirectly, (1) Solicits any Client to transact business with a Competitive Enterprise or to reduce or refrain from doing any business with the Firm or (2) interferes with or damages (or attempts to interfere with or damage) any relationship between the Firm and any Client or (3) Solicits any person who is an employee of the Firm to resign from the Firm or to apply for or accept

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-14


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

employment (or any other association) with any person or entity other than the Firm, (c) the Grantee fails to certify to GS Inc., in accordance with procedures established by the Committee, that the Grantee has complied, or the Committee determines that the Grantee in fact has failed to comply, with all the terms and conditions of the Plan or Award Agreement, (d) any event constituting Cause occurs with respect to the Grantee, (e) the Committee determines that the Grantee failed to meet, in any respect, any obligation the Grantee may have under any agreement between the Grantee and the Firm, or any agreement entered into in connection with the Grantee’s Employment with the Firm or the Grantee’s Award, (f) as a result of any action brought by the Grantee, it is determined that any of the terms or conditions for delivery of shares of Common Stock (or cash or other property) in respect of an Award are invalid or (g) the Grantee’s Employment terminates for any reason or the Grantee is otherwise no longer actively Employed with the Firm and an entity to which the Grantee provide services grants the Grantee cash, equity or other property (whether vested or unvested) to replace, substitute for or otherwise in respect of any Award. By exercising any Option or SAR or by accepting delivery of shares of Common Stock (including, for the avoidance of doubt, in the case of Restricted Shares, accepting Restricted Shares for which Transfer Restrictions are released), payment in respect of Dividend Equivalent Rights or any other payment under this Plan, the Grantee shall be deemed to have represented and certified at such time that the Grantee has complied with all the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Award Agreement.

3.10   Right of Discharge Reserved

Neither the grant of an Award nor any provision in the Plan or in any Award Agreement shall confer upon any Grantee the right to continued Employment by the Firm or affect any right that the Firm may have to terminate or alter the terms and conditions of the Grantee’s Employment.

3.11   Nature and Form of Payments

3.11.1    Any and all grants of Awards and deliveries of shares of Common Stock, cash or other property under the Plan shall be in consideration of services performed or to be performed for the Firm by the Grantee. Awards under the Plan may, in the sole discretion of the Committee, be made in substitution in whole or in part for cash or other compensation otherwise payable to an Employee. Without limitation on Section 1.3 hereof, unless otherwise specifically provided in an Award Agreement or by applicable law, the Committee shall be permitted with respect to any or all Awards to exercise all of the rights described in Sections 1.3.2(h) and 1.3.2(i). Deliveries of shares of Common Stock may be rounded to avoid fractional shares. In addition, the Firm may pay cash in lieu of fractional shares.

3.11.2    All grants of Awards and deliveries of shares of Common Stock, cash or other property under the Plan shall constitute a special discretionary incentive payment to the Grantee and shall not be required to be taken into account in computing the amount of salary or compensation of the Grantee for the purpose of determining any contributions to or any benefits under any pension, retirement, profit-sharing, bonus, life insurance, severance or other benefit plan of the Firm or under any agreement with the Grantee, unless the Firm specifically provides otherwise.

3.12   Non-Uniform Determinations

None of Committee’s determinations under the Plan and Award Agreements need to be uniform and any such determinations may be made by it selectively among persons who receive, or are eligible to receive, Awards under the Plan (whether or not such persons are similarly situated). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall be entitled, among other things, to make non-uniform and selective determinations under Award Agreements, and to enter into non-uniform and selective Award Agreements, as to (a) the persons to receive Awards, (b) the terms and provisions of Awards, (c) whether a Grantee’s Employment has been terminated for purposes of the Plan and (d) any adjustments to be made to Awards pursuant to Section 1.6.2 or otherwise.

3.13   Other Payments or Awards

Nothing contained in the Plan shall be deemed in any way to limit or restrict the Firm from making any award or payment to any person under any other plan, arrangement or understanding, whether now existing or hereafter in effect.

C-15GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

3.14   Plan Headings; References to Laws, Rules or Regulations

The headings in this Plan are for the purpose of convenience only, and are not intended to define or limit the construction of the provisions hereof.

Any reference in this Plan to any law, rule or regulation shall be deemed to include any amendments, revisions or successor provisions to such law, rule or regulation.

3.15   Date of Adoption and Term of Plan; Shareholder Approval Required

The adoption of the Plan as amended and restated on February 26, 2021 was expressly conditioned on the approval of the shareholders of GS Inc. in accordance with Section 422 of the Code, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange and other applicable law.

Unless sooner terminated by the Board, the Plan shall terminate on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders of GS Inc. that occurs in 2025. The Board reserves the right to terminate the Plan at any time. All Awards made under the Plan prior to the termination of the Plan shall remain in effect until such Awards have been satisfied or terminated in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreements.

3.16   Governing Law

ALLRIGHTSANDOBLIGATIONSUNDERTHE PLANANDEACH AWARD AGREEMENTSHALLBEGOVERNEDBYANDCONSTRUEDINACCORDANCEWITHTHELAWSOFTHE STATEOF NEW YORK,WITHOUTREGARDTOPRINCIPLESOFCONFLICTOFLAWS.

3.17   Arbitration

3.17.1    Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, it shall be a condition of each Award that any dispute, controversy or claim between the Firm and a Grantee, arising out of or relating to or concerning the Plan or applicable Award Agreement, shall be finally settled by arbitration in New York City before, and in accordance with the rules then obtaining of, FINRA, or, if FINRA declines to arbitrate the matter in New York City (or if the matter otherwise is not arbitrable by it), the AAA in accordance with the commercial arbitration rules of the AAA. Prior to arbitration, all claims maintained by the Grantee must first be submitted to the Committee in accordance with any claims procedures as may be determined by the Committee. Any arbitration decision and/or award will be final and binding upon the parties and may be entered as a judgment in any appropriate court. Nothing herein shall be construed as an agreement by either the Firm or Grantee to arbitrate claims on a collective or class basis. In addition, by accepting an Award, Grantee agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, no arbitrator shall have the authority to consider class or collective claims, to order consolidation or to join different claimants or grant relief other than on an individual basis to the individual claimant involved. Notwithstanding any applicable forum rules to the contrary, to the extent there is a question of enforceability of this Agreement arising from a challenge to the arbitrator’s jurisdiction or to the arbitrability of a claim, such question shall be decided by a court and not an arbitrator.

3.17.2    Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, it shall be a condition of each Award that the Firm and the Grantee irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of any state or Federal court located in the City of New York over any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to or concerning the Plan or the Award that is not otherwise arbitrated or resolved according to Section 3.17.1. This includes any suit, action or proceeding to compel arbitration or to enforce an arbitration award. By accepting an Award, the Grantee acknowledges that the forum designated by this Section 3.17.2 has a reasonable relation to the Plan, any applicable Award and to the Grantee’s relationship with the Firm. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall preclude the Firm from bringing any suit, action or proceeding in any other court for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Section 3.17 or otherwise.

3.17.3    Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, the agreement by the Grantee and the Firm as to forum is independent of the law that may be applied in the suit, action or proceeding and the Grantee and the Firm agree to such forum even if the forum may under applicable law choose to apply non-forum

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-16


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

law. By accepting an Award, (a) the Grantee waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any objection which the Grantee may have to personal jurisdiction or to the laying of venue of any such suit, action or proceeding in any court referred to in Section 3.17.2, (b) the Grantee undertakes not to commence any action arising out of or relating to or concerning any Award in any forum other than a forum described in Section 3.17 and (c) the Grantee agrees that, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, a final and non-appealable judgment in any such suit, action or proceeding in any such court shall be conclusive and binding upon the Grantee and the Firm.

3.17.4    Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, by accepting an Award, the Grantee irrevocably appoints each General Counsel of GS Inc., or any person whom any General Counsel of GS Inc. designates, as his or her agent for service of process in connection with any suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to or concerning this Plan or any Award which is not arbitrated pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.17.1, who shall promptly advise the Grantee of any such service of process.

3.17.5    Unless otherwise specified in an applicable Award Agreement, by accepting an Award, the Grantee agrees to keep confidential the existence of, and any information concerning, a dispute, controversy or claim described in this Section 3.17, except that the Grantee may disclose information concerning such dispute, controversy or claim to the arbitrator or court that is considering such dispute, controversy or claim or to his or her legal counsel (provided that such counsel agrees not to disclose any such information other than as necessary to the prosecution or defense of the dispute, controversy or claim).

3.17.6    By accepting an Award, Grantee agrees to arbitrate all claims as described in this Section 3.17, in accordance with the arbitration procedure set forth in this Section 3.17, provided that nothing herein shall limit any right or obligation under applicable law or Firm policy to provide information the Grantee reasonably believes to be true to the appropriate governmental authority, including a judicial, regulatory, administrative, or governmental authority; report possible violations of law or regulation, or make other disclosures that are protected under any applicable law or regulation; or preclude a Grantee from filing a charge with or participating in any investigation or proceeding conducted by a governmental authority. For the avoidance of doubt, governmental authority includes Federal, state and local government agencies such as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and any state or local human rights agency (e.g., the New York State Division of Human Rights, the New York City Commission on Human Rights, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing), as well as law enforcement.

3.17.7    The Federal Arbitration Act governs interpretation and enforcement of all arbitration provisions under the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, and all arbitration proceedings thereunder.

3.17.8    Nothing in this Section 3.17 creates a substantive right to bring a claim under U.S., Federal, state or local employment laws.

3.18   Severability; Entire Agreement

If any of the provisions of this Plan or any Award Agreement is finally held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable (whether in whole or in part), such provision shall be deemed modified to the extent, but only to the extent, of such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability and the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby; provided that, if any of such provisions is finally held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable because it exceeds the maximum scope determined to be acceptable to permit such provision to be enforceable, such provision shall be deemed to be modified to the minimum extent necessary to modify such scope in order to make such provision enforceable hereunder. By accepting an Award, the Grantee acknowledges that the Plan and any Award Agreements contain the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersede all prior agreements, promises, covenants, arrangements, communications, representations and warranties between them, whether written or oral with respect to the subject matter thereof.

3.19   Waiver of Claims

By accepting an Award, the Grantee recognizes and agrees that prior to being selected by the Committee to receive an Award he or she has no right to any benefits under such Award. Accordingly, in consideration of the Grantee’s receipt of any Award, he or she expressly waives any right to contest the amount of any Award, the terms of any Award Agreement, any determination, action or omission hereunder or under any Award Agreement

C-17GOLDMAN SACHS  |  PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


ANNEX C: THE GOLDMAN SACHS AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (2021)

by the Committee, the SIP Administrator, GS Inc. or the Board or any amendment to the Plan or any Award Agreement (other than an amendment to this Plan or an Award Agreement to which his or her consent is expressly required by the express terms of an Award Agreement), and the Grantee expressly waives any claim related in any way to any Award including any claim based upon any promissory estoppel or other theory in connection with any Award and the Grantee’s employment with the Firm.

3.20   No Third Party Beneficiaries

Except as expressly provided in an Award Agreement, neither the Plan nor any Award Agreement shall confer on any person other than the Firm and the Grantee of the Award any rights or remedies thereunder; provided that the exculpation and indemnification provisions of Section 1.3.5 shall inure to the benefit of a Covered Person’s estate, beneficiaries and legatees.

3.21   Certain Limitations on Transactions Involving Common Stock; Fees and Commissions

3.21.1    Each Grantee shall be subject to, and acceptance of an Award shall constitute an agreement to be subject to, the Firm’s policies in effect from time to time concerning trading in Common Stock, hedging or pledging and confidential or proprietary information. In addition, with respect to any shares of Common Stock delivered to any Grantee in respect of an Award, sales of such Common Stock shall be effected in accordance such rules and procedures as may be adopted from time to time with respect to sales of such shares of Common Stock (which may include, without limitation, restrictions relating to the timing of sale requests, the manner in which sales are executed, pricing method, consolidation or aggregation of orders and volume limits determined by the Firm).

3.21.2    Each Grantee may be required to pay any brokerage costs or other fees or expenses associated with any Award, including, without limitation, in connection with the sale of any shares of Common Stock delivered in respect of any Award or the exercise of an Option or SAR.

3.22   Deliveries

3.22.1    Deliveries of shares of Common Stock, cash or other property under the Plan shall be made to the Grantee reasonably promptly after the Delivery Date or any other date such delivery is called for, but in no case more than thirty (30) Business Days after such date.

3.22.2    In the discretion of the Committee, delivery of shares of Common Stock (including Restricted Shares) or the payment of cash or other property may be made initially into an escrow account meeting such terms and conditions as are determined by the Firm and may be held in that escrow account until such time as the Committee has received such documentation as it may have requested or until the Committee has determined that any other conditions or restrictions on delivery of shares of Common Stock, cash or other property required by this Award Agreement have been satisfied. The Firm may establish and maintain an escrow account on such terms and conditions (which may include, without limitation, the Grantee’s (or the Grantee’s estate or beneficiary) executing any documents related to, and the Grantee (or the Grantee’s estate or beneficiary) paying for any costs associated with, such account) as the Firm may deem necessary or appropriate. Any such escrow arrangement shall, unless otherwise determined by the Firm, provide that (A) the escrow agent shall have the exclusive authority to vote such shares of Common Stock while held in escrow and (B) dividends paid on such shares of Common Stock held in escrow may be accumulated and shall be paid as determined by the Firm in its sole discretion.

3.23   Successors and Assigns of GS Inc.

The terms of this Plan shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of GS Inc. and its successors and assigns.

PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  |  GOLDMAN SACHSC-18


 

 

LOGO

Mix paper from responsible sources FSC www.fsc.org FSC C132107

This proxy is printed using vegetable-based inks on chlorine free paper that contains recycled content, is FSC® certified and made with 10% post-consumer waste.elemental chlorine-free paper.

 

 


 

FSC www.fsc.org MIX Paper from responsible sources FSC® C132107   LOGO

   THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

   200 WEST STREET

   NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10282

   LOGO


THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING FOR HOLDERS

AS OF 2/26/24 TO BE HELD ON 4/24/24

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions (i) for shares held through our 401(k) plan, up until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 21, 2024 and (ii) for all other shares, up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 23, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to complete an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions (i) for shares held through our 401(k) plan, up until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 21, 2024 and (ii) for all other shares, up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 23, 2024. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. We recommend you mail your proxy at your earliest convenience and in any event by April 16, 2024 to ensure timely receipt.

If you vote by Internet or by telephone, please do NOT mail back the proxy card below.

    LOGO

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

200 WEST STREET

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10282

LOGO

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING FOR HOLDERS

AS OF 3/1/21 TO BE HELD ON 4/29/21

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.comor scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions (i) for shares held through our 401(k) plan, up until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2021 and (ii) for all other shares, up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 28, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to complete an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GS2021

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions (i) for shares held through our 401(k) plan, up until 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2021 and (ii) for all other shares, up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 28, 2021. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. We recommend you mail your proxy at your earliest convenience and in any event by April 22, 2021 to ensure timely receipt.

If you vote by Internet or by telephone, please do NOT mail back the proxy card below.

 

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

V30019-Z87020-Z87019-P06294    KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS  

D31059-Z79179-Z79180-P49953                  KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — 

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.                        

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

 THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

 

Matters to be voted on:

 

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposal 1:

 For Against Abstain
 1. Election of DirectorsLOGO    
1a.   

        Matters to be voted on:

Michele Burns
  
 
1b.  Mark Flaherty   
1c.  Kimberley Harris   
1d.  Kevin Johnson   
1e.  Ellen Kullman  
1f.Lakshmi Mittal
1g.Thomas Montag
1h.Peter Oppenheimer
1i.David Solomon
1j.Jan Tighe
1k.David Viniar

 The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR

            proposal 1:

ForAgainstAbstain

proposals 2

1.and 3:

 

For

Election of DirectorsLOGO

 

ê

Against
 

Abstain

 2. 
  1a.    M. Michele Burns    ☐
  1b.    Drew G. Faust    ☐
  1c.     Mark A. Flaherty    ☐
  1d.    Ellen J. Kullman    ☐
  1e.    Lakshmi N. Mittal    ☐
  1f.    Adebayo O. Ogunlesi    ☐
  1g.    Peter Oppenheimer    ☐
  1h.    David M. Solomon    ☐
  1i.    Jan E. Tighe    ☐
  1j.    Jessica R. Uhl    ☐
  1k.    David A. Viniar    ☐
  1l.     Mark O. Winkelman    ☐

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR

proposals 2-4:

ForAgainstAbstain
ê
2.Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)   

3. Approval of The Goldman Sachs Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (2021)

For

LOGO

 Against     ☐Abstain

3.

  
4.

Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm for 20212024

 

 

 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST proposals 5-8:4-12: 

For

 

Against

LOGO

 Abstain
4.  ê
5.Shareholder Proposal Regarding Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consenta Policy for an Independent Chair   
6.5.  Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Transparency In Lobbying Report

6.

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Outcome Report on Efforts Regarding
Protected Classes of Employees

7.

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Environmental Justice Impact Assessment

8.

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Disclosure of Clean Energy Supply Financing Ratio

9.

Shareholder Proposal Regarding a GSAM Proxy Voting Review

10.

Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Report on the Effects of the Use of Mandatory ArbitrationFinancial Statement Assumptions Regarding Climate Change

   
7.11.  

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Conversion to a Public Benefit CorporationPay Equity Reporting

   
8.12.  

Shareholder Proposal Regarding a Racial Equity AuditDirector Election Resignation Bylaw

   
 

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

  
   
 

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

 

Date

  

Signature (Joint Owners)

 

Date

 


 

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.The Notice and Proxy Statement and the 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at: www.proxyvote.com

 

 

 

— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — 

D31060-Z79179-Z79180-P49953 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

V30020-Z87020-Z87019-P06294    

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING: APRIL 29, 202124, 2024

This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors

The undersigned hereby appoints David M. Solomon and Adebayo O. Ogunlesi,David Viniar, and each of them, as proxies, each with full power of substitution, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote for, and on behalf of, the undersigned as designated on the reverse side at the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 29, 202124, 2024 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Other than with respect to shares held through The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan, the undersigned hereby further authorizes such proxies to vote in their discretion upon such other matters as may properly come before such Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. Receipt of the Notice of the 20212024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Proxy Statement in connection with such meeting and the 20202023 Annual Report to Shareholders is hereby acknowledged.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed by you.If you sign and return (or submit electronically) this proxy but do not give any direction, this proxy will be voted “FOR” Proposals (1), (2), and (3) and (4), “AGAINST” Proposals (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (10), (11) and (8)(12) and in the discretion of the proxies upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Unless otherwise specified, in order for your vote to be submitted by proxy, you must (i) properly complete the Internet or telephone voting instructions or (ii) properly complete and return this proxy in order that, in either case, your vote is received no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 28, 2021.23, 2024.

Parties to the Goldman Sachs Shareholders’ Agreement should refer to the e-mail notice that accompanied the proxy card for information regarding the authorization granted by the proxy card.

Special instructions with respect to shares held through The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan. This proxy also provides voting instructions for shares held by The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Trustee of the Goldman Sachs Stock Fund under The Goldman Sachs 401(k) Plan, and authorizes and directs the Trustee to vote in person or by proxy all shares credited to the undersigned’s account as of the March 1, 2021February 26, 2024 record date. You must indicate how the shares allocated to yourthe account are to be voted by the Trustee by Internet or telephone or by completing and returning this form no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2021.21, 2024. If you (i) sign and return (or submit electronically) this form but do not give any direction or (ii) fail to sign and return (or submit electronically) this form or vote by Internet or telephone, the shares allocated to yourthe account will be voted in the same proportion as the shares held under the Plan for which instructions are received, unless otherwise required by law.

Submitting your proxy via the Internet or by telephone or mail will not affect your right to vote should you decide to attend and vote at the Annual Meeting.